Slashdot Mirror


Apple Suffers 'Major iPhone X Leak'

Details of new iPhones and other forthcoming Apple devices have been revealed via an apparent leak. From a report: Two news sites were given access to an as-yet-unreleased version of the iOS operating system. The code refers to an iPhone X in addition to two new iPhone 8 handsets. It also details facial recognition tech that acts both as an ID system and maps users' expressions onto emojis. One tech writer said it was the biggest leak of its kind to hit the firm. [...] "As best I've been able to ascertain, these builds were available to download by anyone, but they were obscured by long, unguessable URLs [web addresses]," wrote John Gruber, a blogger known for his coverage of Apple. "Someone within Apple leaked the list of URLs to 9to5Mac and MacRumors. I'm nearly certain this wasn't a mistake, but rather a deliberate malicious act by a rogue Apple employee." Neither Mr Gruber nor the two Apple-related news sites have disclosed their sources. However, the BBC has independently confirmed that an anonymous source provided the publications with links to iOS 11's golden master (GM) code that downloaded the software from Apple's own computer servers. It's a big blow to Apple, which uses surprise as a key element at its events. The leak could take some wind out of its sails as it looks to wow consumers. In 2012, Tim Cook had said the company was planning to "double down on secrecy." At the quarterly earnings call, he blamed the leaks about the upcoming iPhone models as one of the reasons that slowed down the sales of current generation iPhone models. However, an analysis published over the weekend found that Apple itself has been the source of several of these leaks in the years since. Earlier this year, the company held a meeting to boast about its internal progress to curb leaks. The hour-long recording of the meeting ironically got leaked. Nearly all details, except the final press renders of the new iPhone models, have leaked. In a subsequent post, Gruber wrote: The BBC doesn't say definitively that the leak was sent by an Apple employee, but I can state with nearly 100 percent certainty that it was. I also think there's a good chance Apple is going to figure out who it was. [...] That person should be ashamed of themselves, and should be very worried when their phone next rings. Moments ago, 9to5Mac reported about a new tvOS firmware leak, which appeared "to be out in the wild today" that details the upcoming features of the next generation Apple TV streaming device.

17 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Oh Please! by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Leaks" about Apple products are just hyped up press releases.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Oh Please! by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure, Apple "leaks" stuff all the time, as most large organizations do, but those mostly follow the same few patterns that you see at all large organizations:
      - They use "leaks" to clear out details that they'd rather not have sharing a news cycle with their big announcements
      - They use "leaks" to prepare the media and the public for a shock it won't like (e.g. higher prices, no headphone jack, etc.)
      - They use "leaks" to get people excited about products by hinting at features

      What the "leaks" NEVER do is spoil events by stealing thunder from their keynote addresses, which is exactly what happened here when you look into exactly how much got out. In fact, this one gets even worse, since it...
      ...spoils nearly all of the major news for their annual iPhone launch
      ...spoils the first event at the brand new location they spent billions of dollars building
      ...spoils the event that coincides with the 10th anniversary of the iPhone
      ...spoiled details about an updated Apple TV that wasn't on most radars
      ...spoiled everything just two days before the event, utterly deflating it

      So yes, Apple "leaks" things, but as a company that directly or indirectly employs hundreds of thousands of employees, they occasionally actually leak things too, and this DEFINITELY falls into that latter case.

    2. Re:Oh Please! by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...or maybe the leak drives focus AWAY from a CEO who is not as good at showmanship as the previous CEO. Honestly, It's only 1 day before the scheduled announcement. It's not enough time to allow any competitor to develop a competing product. After Tuesday, who cares if there was a leak? Everyone will know about the new products and features anyway.

    3. Re:Oh Please! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Informative

      The iPhone 8 is literally an uglier iPhone 7 that will be easier to break due to the glass back.

      And even that is not new at all. The iPhone 4 already had an easy-to-break glass back.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Oh Please! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      ...or maybe the leak drives focus AWAY from a CEO who is not as good at showmanship as the previous CEO.

      Just because Steve Jobs really knew how to present things in a keynote with showmanship and Tim Cook sounds as exciting on stage as a monotonic teacher... eh... never mind.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:Oh Please! by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      It's not about the competition. It's about controlling the narrative. If you control the narrative, you get to be the one who starts off in control of setting expectations and reactions, which can have a massive impact on how your products are perceived by the public.

      Consider, for instance, how differently the release of information about specs can go. Apple's iPhones aren't known for having the best specs, but they generally seem to punch above their weight, which is to say that despite their specs frequently being worse on paper, user benchmarks and real-world usage suggest iPhones are generally able to get more performance out of lesser hardware.

      Now image a few scenarios, one where they control the news, and some others where they don't:

      A) Apple announces the new device, but doesn't mention most of the specs, instead merely presenting some pretty graphs that show a massive year-over-year gain in terms of performance, battery life, and the other metrics that users care about. The headline news will be that "great" just became "even better!". If anyone tries to air concerns about the specs, their voice will be drowned by mainstream coverage of headline features. If anyone has questions about the device's performance, they'll be shown the pretty graphs. The actual specs won't come out until the phones are in people's hands. At that point the tech sites will do their usual comparisons against the competition, but any concerns about unflattering comparisons will be rendered moot by the benchmarks and firsthand accounts that will also be coming out at that time. Apple maximizes the number of people who believe their phone to perform well with great battery life, resulting in great unit sales.

      -- or --

      B) The specs leak in the months before the official announcement. Tech sites do their usual deep dive on the specs, but without any performance charts, firsthand accounts, or benchmarks to go by, all they'll report are the by-the-numbers comparisons that are likely to be unflattering for Apple. With blood in the water and nothing coming out of Apple to the contrary, mainstream sites will start reporting on the growing concern over the performance of upcoming models. The longer it goes without an answer from Apple, the more news cycles these concerns will be stretched across, thus reaching more people. By the time the iPhone is actually announced, everyone from your grandparents to your sister's cousin's roommate will have heard that the new iPhones perform poorly and have worse battery life. The pretty graphs, real-world usage, and benchmarks all showing otherwise will eventually assuage most concerns, but not before some damage will have been done. People that would have bought the new iPhone now won't.

      -- or --

      C) The specs leak just a few days before the announcement. While not as bad for Apple as (B), this one results in less enthusiastic reporting about the headline features as the surprise has already been spoiled. Additionally, nearly every report will be damped by a perfunctory mention of the leaks. The new iPhones will sell fine, but the overall reaction will be less enthusiastic than it would have been otherwise.

    6. Re:Oh Please! by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Yup, I believe it was nVidia that spoiled the surprise, and Jobs yanked their cards entirely from all Macs. Apple seems to have softened a bit since then. I've seen other CEOs announce things before Apple on a handful of occasions without Apple dropping them entirely, but Apple does seem to take punitive measures still.

      For instance, you'll see estimates suggesting that the mix of supplies for a particular part will be 80-20 from companies A and B. When A then says something before Apple is ready, you'll hear a few weeks later that the mix ended up being closer to 50-50 between companies A and B, rather than the 80-20 that was originally thought.

      I'm guessing Apple either bakes it into their contracts or else has enough wiggle room in their contracts that they can punish their suppliers in those sorts of ways.

  2. Apple? Surprise? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You could have surprised me. Every release they "leak" the details the morning of the presentation. This just happened a day early

  3. Re:Like it matters when Cook is presenting by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tim Cook does virtually none of the presenting—most of what he does is the feel-good stuff, financials and introducing other people, so I'm not sure what you're complaining about. He's taking on the stuff that nobody could make particularly interesting anyway.

  4. RTFS much? by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know it's too much to ask people to RTFA, but you can at least read the summary.

    This wasn't a features leak -- this was a leak of the entire iOS 11 Golden Master source code. Apparently for all current Apple products at that. Sure, some people have used the leak to divine what new features are in iOS 11 -- but the real damage is that the entire source for iOS 11 GM is now out there in the wild.

    That certainly isn't something that happens prior to every presentation.

    Yaz

    1. Re:RTFS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yoz, apparently it was too much for you to read as well ... it's the master build not the source code. Yuuggge difference.

    2. Re:RTFS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      A GM build != source code. We will see the GM build dropped or slated to drop tomorrow. iOS source, code, on the other hand is kept secret, and if there were a leak of that, there would be witch hunts.

    3. Re:RTFS much? by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

      No, it's bad reporting on the BBC's part:

      However, the BBC has independently confirmed that an anonymous source provided the publications with links to iOS 11's golden master (GM) code that downloaded the software from Apple's own computer servers.

      Having looked into things further you are correct that the leak was of compiled binary data -- which isn't code. The BBC article says that it was links to iOS 11 GM code that was leaked, hence my error.

      Yaz

  5. Re:Subject by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

    I don't think that second reason is particularly relevant. Apple is still taking away 90% of the industry's profits (or have they dropped to the high 80% range?), and often end up supply constrained at the beginning of the cycle. Apple understands the market really well, and they're selling about as many phones of that price as the market can bear.

    Your design comment is probably the strongest—even though the design was a bit different, it wasn't enough. The internals of the 7 are a huge upgrade, but people want it to look different and be noticeably better at everything. Apple and most other high-end phone manufacturers are running into the issue of their phones just legitimately being so powerful it's hard to say that the additional power they're throwing in has *too* much of an affect on day-to-day use. Sure, you and I can talk about geekbench scores and their multi-core design, but if it isn't making the phone visibly better, it's hard for an average consumer to decide to get the new phone if their current one isn't broken—which is effectively your first point. I can bet there are some people that did defer the upgrade for this year's phone, just as the 6 pulled upgrades forward by a year, but it's hard to believe it's the dominating factor.

    (I heard recently—on Gruber's show—about a survey that asked people when they upgrade their phones. The most common answer was apparently 'when my old one breaks'.)

  6. Re:Let Craig Federighi do the whole presentation. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and he apparently has time to post comments here on Slashdot!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  7. Re:deliberate malicious act by a rogue by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    That was a clear case of copyright infringement.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  8. I'm confused by hattable · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did slashdot just link to an article posted on slashdot itself as a story?

    --
    OMG facts!