Slashdot Mirror


Typing By Brain Arrives: No Surgery Necessary (wired.com)

mirandakatz writes: 2017 has been a coming-out year of sorts for the brain-machine interface. But the main barrier to adoption is the potentially invasive nature of a BMI: Not many people are going to want to get surgery to have a chip implanted in their brains. A New York company may have found a solution to that. It's created a BMI that works just by an armband -- and it works now, not in some far-off future.
Steven Levy describes a recent demo by the CEO of CTRL-Labs: After [typing] a few lines of text, he pushes the keyboard away... He resumes typing. Only this time he is typing on...nothing. Just the flat tabletop. Yet the result is the same: The words he taps out appear on the monitor... The text on the screen is being generated not by his fingertips, but rather by the signals his brain is sending to his fingers. The armband is intercepting those signals, interpreting them correctly, and relaying the output to the computer, just as a keyboard would have...

CTRL-Labs, which comes with both tech bona fides and an all-star neuroscience advisory board, bypasses the incredibly complicated tangle of connections inside the cranium and dispenses with the necessity of breaking the skin or the skull to insert a chip -- the Big Ask of BMI. Instead, the company is concentrating on the rich set of signals controlling movement that travel through the spinal column, which is the nervous system's low-hanging fruit. Reardon and his colleagues at CTRL-Labs are using these signals as a powerful API between all of our machines and the brain itself.

10 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Misleading title by Ken_g6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's not typing by brain. That's typing by muscles. It won't work for paralyzed people like Stephen Hawking.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    1. Re:Misleading title by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not typing by brain. That's typing by muscles. It won't work for paralyzed people like Stephen Hawking.

      Why not? I would think that even if my hand was paralyzed or amputated I could imagine typing and the brain would send the signals, it just wouldn't arrive at the muscles. I suppose if you've been that way since birth it might be different, but I'm not so certain. I mean even if it's not working you'd think the brain is still wired to try. Don't some advanced prosthetics work like that, they're not just mechanical but they actually read the nerve impulses to recognize what you're trying to do. If you could pair this up with a VR/AR headset maybe you could learn to use virtual hands.

      The downside is of course that there's no physical truth to compare to, but if I could see the computer's interpretation of it we could work on that, like this is me counting on my fingers one-two-three-four-five, this is me bending my index finger forward, this is me curling my index finger, this is me bending it sideways, this me doing V for victory, a fist, giving you the finger, the horns, the Spock greeting, the okay sign etc. and then I could virtually type on a virtual keyboard. It could go a helluva lot faster than eye tracking.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Misleading title by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Why not? I would think that even if my hand was paralyzed or amputated I could imagine typing and the brain would send the signals, it just wouldn't arrive at the muscles

      I can 'imagine typing' and that's not the same thing as 'typing'. Can you really 'type' without a hand to type with? Maybe yes? Maybe no. I don't know. I know there are cases where you are injured and you *are* trying to move your hand it it doesn't move, and those cases this should work, but after you've been injured for a while (years) can you still even send the signals to move your hand or whatever, or do you forget how?

      I can also say that I need a keyboard to type on. I need the feedback. The home key ridges, the guides the physical buttons make. The feedback from the keys. Typing, for me at least, is not a one way stream from brain to fingers, it is a two way stream where feedback from my finger tips results in constant tiny positional corrections, ensuring that i can maintain speed and accuracy.

    3. Re:Misleading title by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Paralysis is usually due to the signals not getting to the muscles for some reason, like a broken wire. Obviously if that is the case then putting the sensor on the muscle isn't going to work, you need to attach it at the brain end. Unfortunately the brain is rather complex and has a large amount of I/O, so it's much harder to do it that way.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Even Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only this time he is typing on...nothing. Just the flat tabletop.

    Since the tabletop does not give, he gets carpal tunnel syndrome even faster!

  3. Re:But the main barrier ... by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    The main barrier is that nobody has found a way to connect electronic circuits to neural tissue in a sustainable way. The body rejects that shit sooner or later.

    Couldn't be bothered to do your research before posting?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  4. What could go wrong.... by rholtzjr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, while this may be pretty handy in some cases, but I am hoping people are taking into account that IF it is brain activity that simulates a keyboard based on what your thinking..... Get where this is going. No more thinking about last night with your wife, no more cubicle walks ups that will interrupt your thought process, and holy cow, do we need to reference the micro-managing boss scenario? I see benefits and the opposite with technology like this. I just hope someone does think about this.

    It would be kind of bad if a co-worker drops by and "Yea, I would tap that" shows up on your screen.

  5. Poor timing by hattable · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just bought Mavis Beacon :(

    --
    OMG facts!
  6. Solving a non-problem. by Ihlosi · · Score: 2
    What they're doing is probably an EMG and not really new.

    And it doesn't help most of the people who would need a 'typing by brain' interface - because the reason they need it is usually that the signals their brain is trying to send don't get anywhere near their muscles because parts of the brain or the spinal cord are not working as they should.

    1. Re:Solving a non-problem. by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 2


      YET despite not alleviating the difficulties of every possible disability it is still helping and much better than some.

      I can imagine there is a numerically large enough part of the worldwide population that can benefit from this.

      It's very much like curing one specific rare type of cancer. It still solved a serious issue and it is progress.

      Not that I wish it on anyone but imagine if you have a disability that prevents you from using your fingers/hands but your forearms are fine. -will you say it's a "non-problem"??

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.