Slashdot Mirror


Internet Is Having a Midlife Crisis (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The rise of cyber-bullying and monopolistic business practices has damaged trust in the internet, pioneering entrepreneur Baroness Lane-Fox has told the BBC. The Lastminute.com founder also called for a "shared set of principles" to make the web happier and safer. She said the internet had done much good over the last 30 years. But she said too many people had missed out on the benefits and it was time to "take a step back". "The web has become embedded in our lives over the last three decades but I think it's reached an inflexion point, or a sort of midlife crisis," she told Radio 4's Today programme. Baroness Lane-Fox co-founded travel booking site Lastminute.com in 1998 before going on to sell the firm for 577m pound seven years later. She described the early days of the internet as being "full of energy and excitement," and akin to the "wild West". "There was this feeling that suddenly, with this access to this new technology, you could start a business from anywhere," she said. However, she said that while technology had become a hugely important sector of the UK economy, it had not fulfilled its early potential.

13 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. If one wants to recapture that Wild West energy... by forkfail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... I cannot think of a better way than imposing more regulation.

    And if she thought that the 'net was a "nice" place in its early days, well, I suspect that she missed huge swaths of usenet...

    With this said, she is right. The character of the 'net has changed. But her own response seems to be very midlife in and of itself: let's try to recapture a childhood that cannot be returned to.

    --
    Check your premises.
  2. The Internet has been replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is now the surveillance and propaganda arm of the government, and the surveillance and psyops arm of corporate America

    You've lost

  3. Who is having the crisis? by Jahoda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, she's 44. And, when I hear someone start talking about how things "just aren't the way they used to be" in that context, I think maybe it's she and not the internet who is having the mid-life crisis.

    1. Re:Who is having the crisis? by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think she is complaining it's not possible to create an Internet startup like she used to be able to do so, because there's always someone out there who is already doing something in the Amazon marketplace or elsewhere. Railway tickets? Done. Airplane tickets? Done. Car hire? Done. Alternative to taxis? Done. Retro merchandise? Done. Discount fashion show throwaway items? Done. Second hand books? Done. Antiques? Done.

      It's like academic research. What was once a hot research field topic, becomes one of a hundred books on that subject a decade later.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  4. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Lastminute.com founder also called for a "shared set of principles" to make the web happier and safer.

    Umm. Ok. Now compare to:

    She described the early days of the internet as being "full of energy and excitement," and akin to the "wild West".

    You can't have a vibrant, safe, wild-west. IMO, it's your "shared set of principles" that killed the Internet (or at least made it a lot, less interesting).

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To add: what's more, the internet was a lot more interesting when people didn't even want to trust it.

      The internet started sucking when it became big business, when it became "serious," when it was somehow important to trust it.

  5. The problem is not the Internet by William+Baric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Cyber-bullying" affecting "young people's self-esteem" is not a problem. The problem is that young people from Western countries are now unable to cope with "bad" words which might hurt their precious little feelings. It's not "the Internet is having a midlife crisis", it's "Western civilization is crumbling".

    1. Re:The problem is not the Internet by mjr167 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because this is what they are teaching in schools. My 2nd grader was told by her teacher that "words hurt forever". I found this out while calming her down after her friend calling her 'mean' reduced her to tears.

      There is no "sticks and stones..." anymore. Now it's "words hurt more than hitting" and "words are unforgivable".

    2. Re:The problem is not the Internet by imidan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess this goes along with the madness that is college students' belief that disagreement is innately hurtful and may even extend to the level of hate speech or threats. Young people seem to be taught that conflict is necessarily aggressive and wrong, and if someone else's opinions conflict with theirs, then those people are also aggressive and wrong (and their own side is blameless and innocent). And, apparently having lost the capacity for friendly competition, all that's left is ugly, go-for-the-jugular, all-out destruction of the other side. We see the same thing in our government, where compromise is now a craven weakness.

  6. once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The rise of cyber-bullying and monopolistic business practices has damaged trust in the internet

    Internet culture died around 1993..

    Since then, it has been stamped into the dirt by idiots who have begged for and bought with their own money: more surveillance, less freedom, more censorship, less end user control over their own devices, and a wholesale transfer of that control to megacorps. They've constantly favored Facebook and other data-broker intrusions into "private" communication, putting a few for-profit companies into gatekeeper roles over ever increasing swaths of the internet. They've punished open standards and open protocols, replacing them with closed, central control ones. They've removed the ability of people to defend themselves against that "cyber-bulling" by requiring more and more be tied to real world identities, which enables the bullies and denies the victims a key form of self defense.

    No... the internet died long before this "Baroness Lane-Fox" probably ever heard of it. She's part of the problem, not part of the solution.

    1. Re:once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not insightful and I'll tell you why..

      I was around for the rise of AOL and its spill-over on to Usenet.

      Usenet wasn't a bastion of hope and free ideas. It had all the petty bickering that any forum online has today. All it had going for it was that its pettiness was confined to the super-nerds and university kids who actually had access. The seeds of what the internet was to become were sewn far before AOLers ever came to town.

      The internet was made by people and is used by people and because of that it has all the problems that people have.

      The idea of the Eternal September is a one-sided load of crock.. If anything the spread of forums on the web was caused by heavy handed moderators who were intent on keeping their early Usenet echo-chambers exclusive to themselves and their cronies.

      There's the early internet in how I remember it. Good luck ever seeing that on the Wiki echo chamber..

  7. Weird article by Sumus+Semper+Una · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Things that have contributed to eroding my trust of the Internet to some degree:

    Proliferation of fake news (by which I mean ideological propaganda specifically designed to look like news but with incitement as its goal rather than information)
    Government (pick whichever one you want) sponsored spying
    Dodgy business practices by large, well-known, IT-focused companies
    Data breaches and other hacks
    Viruses
    Spam
    Advertisers trying to disguise their ads as if they were a natural part of the parent page
    Advertising by looking at metadata

    Things that have definitely not contributed to eroding my trust of the internet:

    Cyber bullying

  8. Re:Leftists utterly hate free expression. by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since when is disagreeing with someone the same thing as hating free speech?

    Free speech gave the original poster the right to say whatever they wanted, and they exercised that right. It does not guarantee them some kind of "safe space" where they can be free of criticism or counterargument of whatever they choose to say.

    The reason free speech was guaranteed by the Founders was in order to allow reasoned debate and criticism, particularly of the government, without fear of retribution by that government. But if people as individuals aren't allowed to disagree with each other then you don't have a debate, you just have a bunch of sheep compelled to follow whoever speaks first.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank