Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Create World's First 'Molecular Robot' Capable of Building Molecules (scienmag.com)

New submitter re385 shares a report from Science Magazine: Scientists at The University of Manchester have created the world's first "molecular robot" that is capable of performing basic tasks including building other molecules. The tiny robots, which are a millionth of a millimeter in size, can be programmed to move and build molecular cargo, using a tiny robotic arm. Each individual robot is capable of manipulating a single molecule and is made up of just 150 carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen atoms. To put that size into context, a billion billion of these robots piled on top of each other would still only be the same size as a single grain of salt. The robots operate by carrying out chemical reactions in special solutions which can then be controlled and programmed by scientists to perform the basic tasks. In the future such robots could be used for medical purposes, advanced manufacturing processes and even building molecular factories and assembly lines. The research will be published in Nature on Thursday 21st September. "All matter is made up of atoms and these are the basic building blocks that form molecules," explains Professor David Leigh, who led the research at University's School of Chemistry. "Our robot is literally a molecular robot constructed of atoms just like you can build a very simple robot out of Lego bricks. The robot then responds to a series of simple commands that are programmed with chemical inputs by a scientist. It is similar to the way robots are used on a car assembly line. Those robots pick up a panel and position it so that it can be riveted in the correct way to build the bodywork of a car. So, just like the robot in the factory, our molecular version can be programmed to position and rivet components in different ways to build different products, just on a much smaller scale at a molecular level."

17 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. First Gray Goo! by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 4, Funny

    World turned into "Gray Goo" in 3....2.....1

    1. Re:First Gray Goo! by null+etc. · · Score: 3, Informative

      3....2.....1

      Actually, the age of the universe is 10^18 seconds. A grain of sand contains 10^20 atoms. If a nanobot created one atom per second, it would take 100 times the age of the universe to construct a simple grain of sand.

  2. Bob by Romancer · · Score: 2

    We will build. We will become more, and many.

    Bobiverse begins.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  3. So, can they build themselves? by msevior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If so we will finally have self-replicating robots and all that they entail...

    1. Re:So, can they build themselves? by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Interesting

      May not need to.

      Given the size of the robots in question, and the means by which they are programmed/operated, it would make sense to create artificial gene sequences to use the cellular machinery inside a living cell already to manufacture, and control these molecular robots, as they would be very useful chaperons to enzymes and other proteins. (both are "huge" by comparison, if the statement given in the article is accurate.)

      Since they are controlled via submersion in different chemical solutions, the insides of a complex (by this I mean, having real organelles) single celled organism sounds like the ideal place to use and operate these, since the organisms already create vacuoles containing various solutions for a variety of purposes.

      Adding them to a cell's toolkit in this way would be a radical advancement in what can be done in petri dishes or glassware. Arbitrary modifications of existing in-vivo protein and enzyme interactions would open a lot of doors.

    2. Re:So, can they build themselves? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Given the size of the robots in question, and the means by which they are programmed/operated, it would make sense to create artificial gene sequences to use the cellular machinery inside a living cell already to manufacture, and control these molecular robots, as they would be very useful chaperons to enzymes and other proteins.

      DNA does not permit you to specify the position of molecules. Not all ends are achievable with DNA. That's why humans can (theoretically/occasionally) out-optimize nature. No matter how many times nature "tries" to accomplish certain ends with DNA, they will always remain impossible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:So, can they build themselves? by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      The idea is to use the cellular machinery to create a "soup" of precursor molecules inside some larger structure, with appropriate sized orifices, then deliver the reactants in small quantities using ion channel driven pumps, so that the microbots are manufactured through self-assembly. The cell just does some heavy lifting of taking "Large organic food molecules", turning them into more simplistic reactants, and then providing the more controlled environment for assembly.

      After that, it may drag them around with a small RNA tag or something to move them to the desired vacuoles.

      The DNA side basically just says "Hey, fill this bubble of cell membrane with this aqueous mixture" through the expression of enzymes and proteins.

  4. Re:star trek by michelcolman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, this reminds me more of the video game "SpaceChem". It's almost as if these researchers went "hey, here's a crazy idea, let's make one of those waldos for real".

    (If you don't know the game, it's really worth checking out, one of the best puzzle games ever invented and I don't say that lightly).

  5. Re:Galaxies like grains of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or alternatively, as UK defines "billion" according to the long scale, the grain of salt is 10^-9 x 10^12 x 10^12 = 10^15 m in diameter.

    It's a long time since that definition of "billion" was in common use here in the UK.

  6. Re:Galaxies like grains of salt by michelcolman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it's a pile, not a stack, they don't have to be exactly on top of each other. One bot is 10^-27 m^3. A billion billion of those would be 10^-9 m^3 which is 1 mm^3. That's a big grain of salt, but not quite as far off.

  7. Re: star trek by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

    I bet it will still have copyright and drm :(

  8. Details by Suki+I · · Score: 2

    How much molecular acid did they use?

  9. Re:One nanonometer... I don't think so. by Poingggg · · Score: 2

    One mm = 10^-3m. 10^-6 x 10^-3m = 10^-9m = 1nm = one nanometer. I have no idea what a nanonometer should be, but it's hard to take you seriously with that gaffe :-).

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?
  10. HOLY CRAP NANITES ARE REAL!!!! by sabbede · · Score: 2

    This is huge! Yet so incredibly small...

  11. Re:star trek by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and capacitance is variable.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  12. Re:Galaxies like grains of salt by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Yeah, the regular table salt I have right here is pretty much all ~1mm^3.

    (tastes)

    Oh wait, that's sugar.

    ("tastes" some more...)

    Hum... sugar.... <Homer>Aaaaarrrrglllllll...</Homer>

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  13. Re:Not a robot by tomhath · · Score: 2

    Yea, this sounds more like a catalyst than a robot.