Slashdot Mirror


Democrats Ask FEC To Create New Rules To Keep Foreign Influence Off Social Media Ads (thehill.com)

Cristina Marcos reports via The Hill: Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday asked the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to establish new guidelines for online advertising platforms that would prevent foreign spending to influence U.S. elections. The move comes after Facebook provided information to Congress and special counsel Robert Mueller, who is leading the FBI's investigation into Russia's election interference, about Russian ad purchases during the 2016 campaign.

"The recent revelations that foreign nationals with suspected ties to the Russian government sought to influence the 2016 election through social media advertisements are deeply concerning and demand a response," 20 House and Senate Democrats wrote in the letter. "We are fast approaching the 2018 election cycle. As such, it is imperative the Federal Election Commission begin this effort in earnest," they wrote. CNN, which first reported on the Democrats' letter, cited Facebook sources saying they expect Congress may try to require disclaimers on online political ads in the future, similar to political television ads. The Democratic lawmakers suggested that any FEC guidance address how foreign actors can use corporate or nonprofit designations to avoid disclosing political spending; what advertisement platforms can do to prevent foreign campaign activity; and possible changes to disclosure standards for political advertisements.

17 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Too bad.... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They don't also wan't to keep that influence out of our ballot boxes... and Across our Borders.

    1. Re:Too bad.... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're happy to invite in any immigrant who they think will vote Democrat. But heaven forbid a Russian conservative buy an ad.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Too bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Democrats don't seem to have a problem with the millions of dollars Hillary Clinton took from foreign governments.

    3. Re: Too bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just as they have no problem with the 'hate speech' or violence from their own supporters.

    4. Re:Too bad.... by skids · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they are overspending on this thread. There's like 5 putin rogonosets to every one actual slashdotter who even bothered to open the thread.

    5. Re: Too bad.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You still don't get why Trump won. The sheer level of insufferable arrogance from upper-middle class liberals that dominate internet discussion is a massive reason why. A huge part of why nationalism (whether it's Trump or Brexit or populist parties Swedish Democrats in Sweden, Front Nationale in France, and others throughout Europe) is seeing such a surge in support is in opposition to the CONSTANT liberal circlejerking in the media and refusal to even consider that the working class isn't a bunch of idiotic, evil racists, but bases its vote on real world experiences that they go through and rational self interest.

      They are sick and tired of sneering upper middle class liberals scaremongering about anybody who isn't part of the political establishment and being called racists for wanting to maintain a national sovereignty and set of values.People are sick and tired of ad hominems being the dominant form of discourse from the left whenever issues relating to protecting our national borders and culture come up. They are sick and tired of their acquaintances screaming on Facebook UNFRIEND ME IF YOU SUPPORT TRUMP YOU RACIST BIGOT.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re: Too bad.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Trump won because of the standard populist tactic of telling people that they are being attacked, and offering simplistic solutions. Mexicans are stealing your jobs, so I'll build a wall to keep Mexicans out. Liberals and the political elite are corrupt and make you feel uncomfortable, so I'll throw her in jail and repeal everything Obama ever did.

      On top of that, Trump went full post-truth. He didn't even try to really hide the fact that he was lying, he just went with the idea that all politicians lie so you might as well stop worrying about it and vote for the one whose promises you like the sound of.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re: Too bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trump won because of the standard populist tactic of telling people that they are being attacked, and offering simplistic solutions.

      You mean lack of complex solutions like "tax the rich more"?

      As for the tactic of telling people they are being attacked....women, minorities, LGBT?

    8. Re: Too bad.... by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree with you that hubris plays a big role, it's also bigger than that.

      It's the blatant dishonesty combined with the hubris. The left basically says we are going to lie to you because we don't trust you to make the "correct" decision if you are fully informed. To wit, in Germany, they claim importing over a million Syrian refugees is vital to the economy, despite the fact that most of them are illiterate in their own language (much less German), and the vast majority are simply unemployable and so will be huge net drains on the economy. So the economic argument is bullshit, but clearly they are serving some other purpose which the left is not being honest about. Same thing with the Affordable Care Act. Remember how it was going to lower prices for most Americans? Remember how it was going to increase access to care? Compare the promises with the actual outcome. The left is pathologically unable to tell the truth about their agenda or their tactics, because the vast majority of people would recoil in horror if they were honest. So they cloak it in terms like fairness, affordable, economic vitality, humanitarianism, etc, while the real goal is enervating the populace and taking ever more control over everyone's lives.

    9. Re: Too bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was clear since June of 2016 that the news media were trying to elect Hillary President all by themselves while trying to bury Trump in fake news. Rather than speak with college kids that don't bother going to the polls I spent my time speaking with senior citizens. They all saw the circus going on with the news and decided they were going to vote for Trump just to spite the bullshit taking place. I personally voted for Trump to get rid of ObamaCare which penalizes people that cannot afford healthcare with a tax penalty that they can't afford either. If this country wants universal healthcare it needs to be single payer heathcare, not "tax the middle class" healthcare. Even Michael Moore, Liberal cock-sucker that he is, knew that Trump was going to be elected but no one paid attention.

    10. Re: Too bad.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, this is a parody, right? I said shitting all over people and ridiculously exaggerating what they say was the problem, and you post a comment doing exactly that?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  2. Hahaha by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  3. And foreign owned corporations? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And how much influence do foreign owned corporations exert in the US election cycle through their unlimited and unaccountable spending on party political advertising and campaigning. Then there's the issue of such corporations' influence over law-making through lobbying. Fake news and hacking political parties email accounts are the least of the US's worries in this respect.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    1. Re:And foreign owned corporations? by Luthair · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suggest listening to Planet Money's Rough Translation in Ukraine if you think that fake news isn't an issue.

  4. Re:Dems are behind the curve again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And yet George Soros has done it for the past 12 years. But that's ok because the money is laundered through the political committees.

    Let's not even get into the Clinton foundation that essentially took international bribes for US policy in all but name.

    And, I can't help but point out, once again you're just spewing DNC talking points. It's illegal for foreign nationals to advertise for political candidates. It is NOT illegal for foreign nationals to advertise for issues. Otherwise CAIR and the ADL leaders would have to be thrown in prison.

    Facebook advertised for the Russians - WHAT advertising remains to be revealed.

    Damn that pesky first amendment that you now loathe so much.

    And Hillary would've gotten away with it too if it weren't for those pesky Russians.

  5. Re:Dems are behind the curve again by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Foreign election interference has gone both ways, on several axes. The USA has certainly intervened in many foreign elections, as they have in ours, since the founding of the USA. Public statements of concern about or support for one candidate or another have been traditional, at many levels of public and private announcement. So has foreign support of election monitoring, to help ensure a fair election, both by the US and on several occasions of USA elections.

  6. PopeRatzo is peak stupidity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here we have Clinton, who asked the Ukraine for dirt on Trump during the election.
    Clinton who lied under oath 7 times provably, and had her husband interfere with an investigation.
    Clinton took on the order of $150 million in bribes from Russia while running the state department.
    Clinton who literally rigged a national primary for the DNC to win it because she couldn't beat Sanders.

    And you complain about Republicans and elections? You are quite possibly the dumbest person on /. these days, and that is including creimer. Don't worry, you are so stupid you will still blindly vote DNC straight down the ticket no matter how corrupt they are or how badly they treat the middle class, because a rock has more common sense than you.

    Liberals have hit peak stupidity. They support people who literally rig elections while complaining about a couple Facebook ads that "might" have been bought by Russia. They ignore actual election fraud, support those who commit it, and then complain about freedom of speech. Yes, we have hit peak stupidity with PopeRatzo.