Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Problem, Really, is This Thing Called 'Disruption' (wired.com)

Posted by msmash on from the the-fault-in-our-stars dept.

New submitter mirandakatz writes: The word "disruption" is everywhere in tech -- and it's getting founders in trouble. Just look at what happened with Bodega last week: Had the startup not professed to be disrupting the mom-and-pop shops on every corner, it might not have landed itself in such hot water. At Backchannel, veteran Silicon Valley communications whiz Karen Wickre makes the case against "disruption," pointing out that many of today's biggest companies got their starts without claiming to completely upend an existing industry. She writes: "What if Sergey and Larry had touted Google, in 1998, as 'an unprecedented platform for disrupting global advertising?' Do you think Jeff Bezos claimed that Amazon.com was upending global retail? Netflix? Within a few months of its 1997 launch, it did not foresee the actual paradigm shift of media streaming."

6 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Well, duh by bhcompy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I'm going to put a bunch of people out of business and create a new way to do business in this vertical" is not a way to endear yourself to people in this day and age. Walmart, Amazon, Google, etc didn't get to where they are by telling people they're going to rape and pillage entire industries. They got their by hiding that fact until their momentum couldn't be stopped.

    1. Re:Well, duh by bobbutts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find the advantage of Amazon to be convenience and selection. Price is a secondary concern. I want it now, but driving for 15 mins each way and messing around in a store doesn't qualify as "now".

    2. Re:Well, duh by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People love the idea of disruption when it rapes and pillages monopolistic industries that deserve to be disrupted. Yellow Cabs, yes. Corner convenience stores, not so much.

    3. Re:Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      instant gratification in a brick and mortar store does not include the fact that they don't carry my size in clothes or enough of a selection of the items that I am looking for. For example, I cannot get the programming books that I am looking for in a Barnes and Noble. They cannot keep up with the changes in the industry.

    4. Re:Well, duh by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anything that I spend my own money on, I want disrupted as much as possible. The more I go to convenience stores, the more I'd like 'em disrupted.

      Just don't touch the industries where my paychecks come from.

      And don't point out that everything is related so that if you disrupt my convenience store you'll eventually, however indirectly, end up disrupting my paychecks. Shh. I don't wanna hear it.

      Adapting to change is for other people!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  2. Real disruption is done secretly by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's how Netflix took down Blockbuster. They kept their huge profits secret till they went public. By that time it was too late for Blockbuster video rental store (Yes, they really did have a store that rented movies.)

    Now, everyone tries to brag in order to get money. It's self defeating. If you are truly a disruptive technology, you should be working your ass to keep that secret. Claim you expect to get 20% of the market, not 80%.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com