Slashdot Mirror


This Guy Is Digitizing the VHS History of Video Games (vice.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: UK-based gaming journalist and blogger Chris Scullion is on a mission to preserve his collection -- and maybe your collection, too -- of these old video game VHS tapes. In the 80s and 90s, video game companies and trade magazines made these tapes to accompany popular titles or new issues with bonus material or promotional footage, giving a glimpse into how marketing for games was done in the industry's early days. Scullion has 18 tapes to upload so far, and plans to provide accompanying commentary as well as the raw video as they go up on his YouTube channel. Scullion's first upload is a promotional tape for Super Mario All-Stars, given away by Nintendo UK in 1993. It's hosted by Craig Charles, who played Lister in the British sci-fi sitcom Red Dwarf. Digitizing his collection keeps that sweet nostalgia content safe from degradation of the magnetic tape, which starts to go downhill within 10 to 25 years. He's capturing them in HD using a 1080p upscaler, at a full 50fps frame rate by converting to HDMI before grabbing -- a higher frame rate than many standard commercial digitizing devices that capture at 30fps -- so that no frames are missed. Some of the tapes he's planning to digitize have already been converted and uploaded to YouTube by other people, he says, but most are either poor quality or captured with less-advanced grabbing devices.

87 comments

  1. Slashdot! News no one cares about. by MikeDataLink · · Score: 0, Troll

    Everyday I come to this site, and everyday I think we'll talk about some exciting tech news. But all that's here is news about some dude recording video tapes in his basement and people being mad about beta software not working.

    It's almost as if the editors aren't actually nerds.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    1. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I would think that nerdship (nerdom? nerdity?) would positively correlate with positive opinion of other people preserving vanishing historical accounts for future historians.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everyday I come to this site

      Well there's your problem.

    3. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not if it's PAL! God damn, PAL video sucks huge donkey balls. You gotta give the British credit for adopting the metric system, but a 50Hz refresh rate? Blind idiots.

    4. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The editors are low paid millennials who despise Trump and vote down comments that question their ability to moderate. That's literally all we know about them.

    5. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      It's almost as if the editors aren't actually nerds.

      Are you kidding? This is one of the nerdiest posts I've seen on Slashdot in a while. I'm re-reading the passage from TFA below, and I cannot imagine how it could be much nerdier.

      "Scullion's first upload is a promotional tape for Super Mario All-Stars, given away by Nintendo UK in 1993. It's hosted by Craig Charles, who played Lister in the British sci-fi sitcom Red Dwarf. Digitizing his collection keeps that sweet nostalgia content safe from degradation of the magnetic tape, which starts to go downhill within 10 to 25 years. He's capturing them in HD using a 1080p upscaler, at a full 50fps frame rate by converting to HDMI before grabbing "

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think because, as nerds, we've all actually... DONE IT.

      I have. i transferred several old VHS tapes of various shows and such that aren't produced anymore as well as some old recordings I made way back when on my parent's VCR. I had the actual original airing of the first Borg contact on ST:TNG. Ironically, i decided to digitzie it not because it was ST:TNG (I can get blu-rays for that) or the first airing but because of the commercials!
      Before that I digitized my old Laserdisc copies of Space Ace and Dragon's Lair.
      I had a buncha old CD's from NextGen that I tossed though but those were all windows based and probably wouldn't have worked anymore.
      I also scanned all my grandfather's slides using an actual film/slide scanner. (Something I thought would be a few months' of weekends that stretched into 4 years)

    7. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slow news day, SJW Friday story in 3... 2.. 1...

    8. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      >I think because, as nerds, we've all actually... DONE IT.

      So long ago, too. I've actually forgotten what my setup was, though I doubt it was archival quality (not that you can tell with VHS's sub-broadcast quality to start with). I probably just had a coax connection to a capture card and manually trimmed the raw file before leaving it to encode over the next few days.

      It was the kind of thing I did once, to preserve a family video, and then after the experience vowed was not worth the effort and I'd rather pay a conversion service in future.

    9. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost as if you have nothing better to do than comment about how uninterested you are in stories which don't interest you, in the comment sections of those very stories.

      Attention whore much?

    10. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      This seems like legit news for nerds. Most of the posts do. I see a post about cyber attacks, a post about Amazon's suggestions algorithm going awry, this post, the obligatory FOSS post (this time pertaining to patents), Apple's latest portable touchscreen Next cube isn't selling, and so on. Maybe the problem is that you're just not excited by the news anymore. It seems to be a pretty good cross section of news for nerds and stuff that would matter to nerds.

    11. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day I come to this site, and everyday I think we'll talk about some exciting tech news. ...

      FTFY.
      "Everyday" is an adjective, for example: "Bad grammar is an everyday occurrence."
      "Every day" is what you meant to say.

    12. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had A New Hope, Empire & Jedi on DVD(+RW) 4 years before they were released on DVD. Not digital, but also not "special".

    13. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      It did have higher resolution than NTSC and much better color, too. The reason why it was 50Hz is that their electrical grid was 50Hz and back in the old days, the TV's would use the AC frequency as a sync timer. Since the US has 60Hz AC, NTSC used 60 Hz as their "clock".

    14. Re:Slashdot! News no one cares about. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      So long ago, too. I've actually forgotten what my setup was, though I doubt it was archival quality

      Last time I did a VHS-to-DVD conversion, I plugged a VCR into a Hauppauge WinTV PVR150 (or was it a PVR250?) and set its MPEG-2 compressor to the highest available framerate. Since I was also looking to convert from PAL to NTSC (for which I had borrowed a multisystem VCR), I slowed the video down from 25 fps to 24000/1001 fps and scaled the video from 720x576 to 720x480 before reencoding for final output.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  2. Probably short-lived... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo's DMCA Takedown in 3... 2... 1...

    1. Re:Probably short-lived... by sh00z · · Score: 2

      Nintendo's DMCA Takedown in 3... 2... 1...

      Nice try if they think they have a claim. That "D" stands for Digital, remember? Nintendo only ever released hte material in analog format. There may be other copyright grounds upon which to base takedown notices, but DMCA won't be one of them.

    2. Re:Probably short-lived... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, this looks like a HUGE copyright infringement. Tapes commercially made, and some lowlife decides to upload them to YouTube. No different than a movie.

      Even if he had permission, YouTube don't care. There are plenty of stories of people that have obtained permission to use a segment of something and they are banned.

    3. Re:Probably short-lived... by omnichad · · Score: 2

      DMCA, section 1201k :

      Effective 18 months after the date of the enactment of this chapter, no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide or otherwise traffic in any—
      (i) VHS formatanalog video cassette recorder unless such recorder conforms to the automatic gain control copy control technology ...
      (B) Effective on the date of the enactment of this chapter, no person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide or otherwise traffic in—
      (i) any VHS formatanalog video cassette recorder or any 8mm format analog video cassette recorder if the design of the model of such recorder has been modified after such date of enactment so that a model of recorder that previously conformed to the automatic gain control copy control technology no longer conforms to such technology; or
      (ii) any VHS formatanalog video cassette recorder, or any 8mm format analog video cassette recorder that is not an 8mm analog video cassette camcorder, if the design of the model of such recorder has been modified after such date of enactment so that a model of recorder that previously conformed to the four-line colorstripe copy control technology no longer conforms to such technology.
      Manufacturers that have not previously manufactured or sold a VHS formatanalog video cassette recorder, or an 8mm format analog cassette recorder, shall be required to conform to the four-line colorstripe copy control technology in the initial model of any such recorder manufactured after the date of the enactment of this chapter, and thereafter to continue conforming to the four-line colorstripe copy control technology. For purposes of this subparagraph, an analog video cassette recorder “conforms to” the four-line colorstripe copy control technology if it records a signal that, when played back by the playback function of that recorder in the normal viewing mode, exhibits, on a reference display device, a display containing distracting visible lines through portions of the viewable picture

      Of course, these tapes were promotional and probably not copy-protected and they were transferred and converted in the UK, where the DMCA would have no bearing.

  3. What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
    I do wish there were links and information to the tech he's using for the VHS digital transfers.

    I have some old VHS tapes I'd really like to digitize, but don't know where to start, and I'd really have no problem spending the $$ to get the right stuff to do it right like it sounds like this guy is doing.....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by RadioD00d · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keeping in mind that VHS resolution is 480p AT BEST, and you're not going to improve it unless you do lots of filtering (I'm sure there are companies which will do that for you, but I can't afford that kind of service). I have a VHS player / DVD recorder that is relatively simple to operate. I have managed to transfer most of my VHS stuff (personal videos, weddings, parties, like that) to DVD, from which I can rip MP4s with ease. I'm sure there are easier/more efficient/better quality ways, but these videos were shot by drunks at parties - how much better is it gonna get? AND - the price is right.

    2. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.amazon.com/Coverter-Capture-Digital-Converter-support/dp/B06X42H9VZ

    3. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do wish there were links and information to the tech he's using for the VHS digital transfers.

      I have some old VHS tapes I'd really like to digitize, but don't know where to start, and I'd really have no problem spending the $$ to get the right stuff to do it right like it sounds like this guy is doing.....

      You're kidding, right?
      Why not just Bing it?
      Probably a VHS VCR and a video capture card....Maybe a Grex thrown in the loop, like I do.. You're more likely to find a VCR/DVD combo.
      Oh, and there are these services that do it for you (for a few extra $$)

    4. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a FireWire S-VHS/MiniDV Tape deck. This can output the analog VHS tape through the firewire (IEEE-1394, mostly the mini 4-pin connector) to a computer. This allows you to hook it up to Mac, PC, Linux, and the DV driver is built into the OS pretty much. I can import into quicktime, Adobe, Windows Media, any program in Linux/etc..

      Try a JVC HR-DVS2U or HD-DVS1U. They do both VHS, S-VHS, MiniDV and don't care about macrovision. Plus it works with the RCA/S-Video input ports and sends it out via DV Protocol. I use these in my business and have two of them. They are about $200-$500, but they never have looked better. And it works on Commercial VHS as well!

    5. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I transferred my family's VHS and Hi-8 video using a Canopus ADVC-300 that we picked up for cheap at a yard sale. That does time base correction to compensate for stretched tape, and handles the analog-to-digital conversion using the DV codec. Granted, DV is 4:1:1 chroma subsampling with JPEG-like compression, fixed 25mbit, so it's far from lossless, but it has fewer block artifacts than your typical MPEG-2 capture to DVD.
      I kept it at 480i rather than upscaling, then encoded to MP4 for viewing while keeping a copy of the DV AVI on an external hard drive.

    6. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by darkshadow · · Score: 1

      I just digitized a Banjo-Kazooie promo video with Jon Lovitz. I used Diamond Multimedia USB 2.0 Video Capture Device, about $40 on Amazon.

      --
      -Darkshadow (There was a thing called Heaven; but all the same they used to drink enormous quantities of alcohol.)
    7. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maximum VHS resolution for NTSC is 480 lines, for PAL/SECAM it's 525 lines, but typically it's far less due to blanking.

    8. Re:What transfer Tech is he using? Details? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      There are, or were, VHS players that burn straight to DVD. You might find them on eBay or even Amazon. Otherwise, there are numerous VHS to digital converters for about $30 on Amazon. Your best avenue of making good conversions would probably be spent trying to research and get the best VHS player however. Also, converting to 1080p or the like is probably a fool's game. As others have mentioned, VHS is more like 480 and unless running some weird digital clean up which would probably run fine on 480, the increase in resolution just means a larger poorly imaged conversion.

  4. Transfer tech? by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    Curious about capture method(s) I have a D-VHS deck which among other things... will output analog VHS to firewire.... I would be interested in seeing a delta on this capture versus D-VHS to FW... still.. very cool.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
    1. Re:Transfer tech? by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Considering he's using an HDMI upscaler just to get the framerate right, I'm not so sure it's a perfect setup. Though it might be a cheap trick that works well, I don't understand the advantage over capturing 480i video at 50Hz. Upscaling is really only going to help force Youtube to allocate a decent amount of bandwidth, but that can be done with a software scaler in post-processing.

    2. Re:Transfer tech? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And....he's in the UK, so that's why I said and meant exactly what I said. What are you getting at?

    3. Re:Transfer tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And....he's in the UK, so that's why I said and meant exactly what I said. What are you getting at?

      You need to take a correspondence course in how electrical systems work. Find a comic book for a listing in back.

    4. Re:Transfer tech? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Because 50 Hz SD video ought to be captured at 576i, not 480i like you said. Capturing 50 Hz SD video at 480i would result in loss of resolution.

    5. Re:Transfer tech? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Which has nothing to do with why he was going on about the refresh rate that I already got correct. Either is well beside the point that upscaling to 1080i is completely unnecessary during capture.

    6. Re:Transfer tech? by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's using the upscaler to get the framerate right, he's using it to convert 480i (576i?) to 1080i(p?). I have no idea why he insists on up-scaling the video to a resolution that's not an exact multiple of 480/576 - afterall, if you put the video at the source-resolution on Youtube, the viewers can choose whether or not to view it at fullscreen (whose resolution varies according to which monitor is displaying it) or in a window at it's original resolution, and the upscaling will be done at the receiving end. If someone has a 720p monitor, they will end up watching a down-scaled version of an up-scaled video.

      Also, about the framerate, IIRC, standard PAL VHS tapes record video at 25Hz instead of 50fps, and in doing so, somehow merge two 50Hz interlaced frames into one 25Hz non-interlaced frame. If he was digitizing directly from broadcast television or some other video-source that runs at 50Hz interlaced, I can understand why he'd want a 50Hz video, but from VHS, I'd only recommend 25Hz.

      Maybe his video-grabber setup only accepts HDMI input, and he's got a device for converting analogue video (eg. composite video) into a digital HDMI signal, but for some reason, his device insists on upscaling everything to 1080p. I myself have a SCART-to-HDMI device which I use to display the output of some of my old computers on a monitor that takes HDMI input, but unfortunately, it only seems to work properly at 60Hz even though it claims to be able to cope with 50Hz (thankfully, my old computers can also be told to output 60Hz instead of 50Hz).

    7. Re:Transfer tech? by omnichad · · Score: 2

      IIRC, standard PAL VHS tapes record video at 25Hz instead of 50fps, and in doing so, somehow merge two 50Hz interlaced frames into one 25Hz non-interlaced frame.

      For movies, 24fps film is generally sped up to 25fps during the telecine process. While they could use basic frame doubling to get 50Hz out of it, it would be better to cram in extra vertical resolution from the film on the alternate field. I don't know which is standard.

      Either way, that wouldn't apply for video/broadcast content or content generated by an actual SNES (which some of this is).

      If someone has a 720p monitor, they will end up watching a down-scaled version of an up-scaled video..... but for some reason, his device insists on upscaling everything to 1080p.

      He already said that he did this to get 50 fps (which doesn't make a lot of sense, because plenty of analog capture equipment can capture fields). And you can even see on Youtube that he gets a 1080p50 output in the end. Just saying 1080p typically means 1080p30. 1080p50 would be similar to 1080i50 but with some extra interpolation to fill in the rest of the resolution. Which is just a much bigger leap when VHS doesn't even carry a full 576 lines (or at least it's pretty lossy, noisewise).

      This crazy amount of interpolation doesn't do much for video quality, but Youtube allocates way more bandwidth to high resolution video. If he did 576p50 or 576i, it would look far worse after Youtube compressed it - even if you viewed it at full-screen.

    8. Re:Transfer tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so dumb creimer!

      Anyway, don't forget to put that video as well on your useless iPad:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      As well, this picture:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

    9. Re:Transfer tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information about land whales, Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

      Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://ibb.co/gVad65

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      -Nancy Guerrero

    10. Re:Transfer tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAl/SECAM is 525 line resolution (the other 50 lines are blanking/data).

    11. Re:Transfer tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does the electrical system have to do with the video system, and who the hell uses correspondence courses in 2017, Chris?

  5. Dude this is about BETA TAPES! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    You can't get more nerdy than that!

    1. Re:Dude this is about BETA TAPES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL my mom, recording her soap operas on an original betamax deck, was a nerd. who woulda thunk it.

    2. Re:Dude this is about BETA TAPES! by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah - you know who made me mp3s from mix tapes?!

      YOUR MOM!

  6. My Life in Gaming by Luthair · · Score: 2

    The My Life in Gaming guys and some others in NA have already done this to some extent, can find things on Youtube.

  7. NEWSFLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some guy is ripping old VHS tapes!!

  8. This is awesome by CustomBuild · · Score: 1

    As the years go by, I am amazed by how much history is overlooked. For example, I thought that I was an uber Star Wars nerd, until I realized that I had never heard of the Holiday special. Despite being cheesy, it was our first introduction to Bobba Fett.

    1. Re:This is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They made 2 Ewok movies as well. 1 released in theatres in Europe, both on TV in US.
      I haven't seen them since they originally aired but do remember "Starcruiser crash!"

      Enjoy watching them (if its possible to enjoy them)

  9. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If video games qualified as art I might care.

  10. This is god's work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so pleased to see that creimer gets downvoted almost right away. Praise jesus!

    1. Re:This is god's work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so pleased to see that creimer gets downvoted almost right away. Praise jesus!

      No, no, no. Creimer is being very clever by letting his karma sink to "terrible" and being allowed to post twice a day at -1. Meanwhile, his wanker trolls will hump leg on those comments, draw everyone's attention and send traffic to his websites. Ka-ching, Baby Jesus!

  11. Video puts me to sleep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re: Video puts me to sleep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer affiliate spam is obvious. Mod down.

    2. Re: Video puts me to sleep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer affiliate spam is obvious. Mod down.

      Who the fuck is Creimer?

  12. Um, okay... by Solandri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    collection keeps that sweet nostalgia content safe from degradation of the magnetic tape, which starts to go downhill within 10 to 25 years. He's capturing them in HD using a 1080p upscaler, at a full 50fps frame rate by converting to HDMI before grabbing -- a higher frame rate than many standard commercial digitizing devices that capture at 30fps -- so that no frames are missed.

    Why?

    VHS only has about 333x480 (NTSC) or 335x576 (PAL) resolution in luminosity, much lower color resolution. There is no point capturing it at higher resolution - you're just wasting storage space with duplicated or made-up pixels.

    The framerate thing I can sorta understand - both NTSC and PAL were interlaced. So for example, the actual resolution of NTSC VHS was 333x240 @ 60 fps interlaced, which when deinterlaced (the alternate lines of video interpolated) created 333x480 frames @ 60 fps. While modern computer video formats do support interlacing, I've noticed annoying artifacts when they're converted badly (you'll see horizontal lines during quick panning or quick horizontal movement). So I can understand.capturing at 333x480 @ 60 fps when it only contains 333x240 @ 60 fps of information.

    Maybe if he had access to the original Betacam tapes I could understand capturing in HD. Those had 720x480 or 720x576 resolution with 10-bit 4:2:2 chroma compression. But if your source media is plain VHS...

    1. Re:Um, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the reason...

      Let's say that they recorded the VHS at VHS resolution ... is h.264 a lossy format that changes pixels even at high bit-rates?

      (hint: yes, it is)

      And does any source video with very sharp edges (think low resolution 8-bit art, or cartoons with solid blocks of colour) become slightly blurry with h.264 even at high bit-rates?

      (hint: yes it does)

      VHS as a format won't last for 100 years, and many (most?) VHS tapes are decaying already causing visual degradation. In a decade or two those tapes may be unplayable. Any backup they make may become the primary source for this video.

      So you can question whether pixel shifting matters, whether fuzzy edges matter, and even whether this video source matters (I don't care about these VHS videos), but it's clear that lossy high resolution video are better at capturing low-resolution pixels.

      There is an upper resolution limit of course... just like how when they transfer 15mm film to digital there aren't many benefits above 2k, but for 35mm film there aren't many benefits above 4k, because in both situations they're not recording much more than film grain at that resolution.

    2. Re:Um, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. x264 has a lossless mode.
      2. Upscaling introduces distortion.
      3. High resolution captures almost guarantee that whatever settings he is using to compress the video, it is far more distorted than if he used the same bitrate in native resolution.
      4. He is uploading his rips on YouTube, which ruins the quality even further.

      Therefore there is no valid reason at all to capture in 1080p. Here is the actual reason: he is a "gamer", and upscaling boxes are popular in the Western retro game scene for people who want to play games on HDTVs. Presumably, he does not understand a thing about how video works and is blindly reapplying the same methods that he uses to play his video games.

    3. Re:Um, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably his upscaler is taking each 335x288 field (it says UK, so it is probably PAL) and scaling it up to 1080 vertical and using the 50Hz field rate as a rate for the resulting frames. I agree, this somewhat profligate. Why do it? because everything nowadays is optimized to process 1080p video. So it is easier to just squeeze the compression rate down and it won't really matter. A lot of times the scaling on the output end is really bad, so there is a good argument for doing the upscaling with a scaler that you know is good.

    4. Re:Um, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he does not even know that good VHS-Recorders have Analogue-Anti-Noise-measures builtin whereas cheap digitizers don't.

    5. Re:Um, okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A digital library is nice, but if you want preservation, he should be making 1:1 analog copies.

      A digital copy will technically be different from the analog version.

  13. A technical correction by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    PAL is 50 FIELDS per second, not frames.

    There are 50 vertical fields per second interleaved with each other. Each field consists of every other line, so each field is half the vertical resolution of the full signal.
    There are 576 vertical scan lines in the signal, so each field is 288 lines.

    The human eye is fooled into seeing a full 50 frames per second due to the high field rate.

    By converting to 50 FRAMES per second, he is interpolating each field into a full frame signal.

    So in this case, each field is being doubled to a frame, and then being scaled again by 2.25 times to arrive at 1080. So you're taking an extremely low resolution frame and up-ressing it. He would be better off leaving it at 480-50P and uploading it like that. Less data to encode and compress. As is, you're taking 288 lines and scaling up to 1080 lines. Upscaling has its limits as far as how much it can improve the signal.

    The actual spatial resolution of a VHS tape is about 200 lines anyway. (the amount of detail you can perceive inside that higher resolution signal)

    Also, hopefully he is correcting the D1 aspect ratio to 1:1 (square). It looks like he did in the video I watched.

    VHS was the absolute worst of the worst in terms of signal quality, but it was there first and it won over Beta. Sony got their revenge later with Blu Ray. /former broadcast engineer

    1. Re:A technical correction by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      He would be better off leaving it at 480-50P

      I don't think YouTube does 50p at 480. You have to go to 720p at minimum.

      So in this case, each field is being doubled to a frame

      It looks like whatever he used has done something a bit more sophisticated than simply doubling lines.

      If he's really serious about archiving, he should capture as 576i and save it losslessly, or at a high bitrate, then he can work from that to make his outputs. It sounds like he just captured an upscale from some box or other though. I'm not convinced it's done a perfect job. There seem to be some odd

      The actual spatial resolution of a VHS tape is about 200 lines anyway. (the amount of detail you can perceive inside that higher resolution signal)

      Not vertically it isn't. You can get your full 576 (interlaced) discrete lines. Horizontally I think it was usually quoted as being equivalent to around 400 pixels or so.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  14. Truely a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like his posts but he's going to ruin his life by drawing so much attention to his cringy internet footprint.
    Has he ever commented on this? It's almost sad except he's doing it to himself.

    1. Re:Truely a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like his posts but he's going to ruin his life by drawing so much attention to his cringy internet footprint.
      Has he ever commented on this? It's almost sad except he's doing it to himself.

      https://www.cdreimer.com/slashdot.html

      https://www.kickingthebitbucket.com/tag/slashdot/

    2. Re:Truely a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to update my hosts file... Jesus, what a narcissist.

    3. Re:Truely a genius! by ILoveFatCashews · · Score: 0

      Jesus, what a narcissist.

      The "Son of God" claim was always a bit of a stretch.

    4. Re:Truely a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No creimer, the GP is right!

      We all know that you don't even care about your siblings nor about your girlfriend:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      All you care about is yourself:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      And your chair, of course:
      http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    5. Re:Truely a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough! I WAS his girlfriend and he sure doesn't and never cared about me!

      I you see him, give him this message:

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many time do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    6. Re:Truely a genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wanna see a bit of a stretch? The seam of your pants!

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Been done and better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. FireWire MiniDV/S-VHS Tape decks work great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a FireWire S-VHS/MiniDV Tape deck. This can output the analog VHS tape through the firewire (IEEE-1394, mostly the mini 4-pin connector) to a computer. This allows you to hook it up to Mac, PC, Linux, and the DV driver is built into the OS pretty much. I can import into quicktime, Adobe, Windows Media, any program in Linux/etc..

    Try a JVC HR-DVS2U or HD-DVS1U. They do both VHS, S-VHS, MiniDV and don't care about macrovision. Plus it works with the RCA/S-Video input ports and sends it out via DV Protocol. I use these in my business and have two of them. They are about $200-$500, but they never have looked better. And it works on Commercial VHS as well!

  19. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Byte magazine? Here is something better, there is 2 more than in a byte as a bonus just for you. Just like bits and yourself, they only have two possible states, bragging and broken:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    https://school.discoveryeducat...

  20. It's not an example to follow by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Well that guy is an idiot as he upscales the stuff to 1080p which is completely pointless and only provides degradation of quality.

    The smart thing to do is to use a propper framegrabber which does no deinterlacing. Firewire ones are good and their 25 MBps codec is practically lossless, yet gets down the data to a decent size. Also they both capture audio and video in perfect sync.

    Then, and only then, you de-interlace in software to get the 50 or 60 fps. ffmpeg or avconv can do that easily.

    For (S-)VHS or other colour under formats, you should use an S-Video cable, for component formats you should use component framegrabbers.

    So to summarize:
    1. Get a decent VCR (some Panasonic or JVC S-VHS should be good enough for VHS) If you are digitizing many tapes, it might be good to to have several ones, as they are typically worn out in different way and some tapes may play getter on some VCRs than others.
    2. Get a decent framegrabber (anything Firewire should be good, but others may be, too, it having both video and audio inputs is a good sign)
    3. Deinterlace to 50 or 60 fps (depending on the video standard) in software afterwards.

  21. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    peppridge farms remembers

  22. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should upvote just any comment? Or just useful ones? How was your post useful or relevant?

    I guess it sucks that people finally woke up to your bullshit, huh?

  23. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you are you disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

    You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

    Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

    How many time do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

    The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

    You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

    When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

    Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

    Bonus:
    Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

    The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

    So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

    Signed:
    The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

  24. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wrote your famous comment scraping Python script that only takes five weeks to add 10000 numbers. You should understand how the mod system works here, bubble butt.

  25. Video Game B-Roll by nowsharing · · Score: 1

    Video Game B-Roll by My Life in Gaming have been doing this for over a year and have almost 50 full promo videos on YouTube, in HD, with no commentary: https://www.youtube.com/user/V...

  26. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information about land whales, Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    -Nancy Guerrero

  27. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, actually, I don't remember that. And you don't either, except in that imaginary world where you gain weight on 1500 calories a day, have a healthy diet of power bars, vanilla lattes, and cottage cheese, and make lots of money as an Amazon Associate.

    Don't like it? Complain to management. Bitching about it here in the comments doesn't change anything.

    (Where have I heard that before...?)

    Moderation has always had a tendency to punish users who are obnoxious, controversial, or otherwise unlikable. And guess what? You fit the bill, so now the moderation system has taken notice of you, and is punishing you for being unlikable, obnoxious, and constantly off-topic. You can take to your multiple sock puppets and complain about it, or you can learn your lesson, eat a little humble pie, and shut the fuck up unless you have something useful to add to the grown-ups' conversation. Note that off-topic wool-gathering and affiliate link spamming does not count as "something useful."

  28. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you sound bitter, sweet tits

  29. Re:Byte Magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like it? Complain to management. Bitching about it here in the comments doesn't change anything.