Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Teams is Replacing Skype for Business To Put More Pressure on Slack (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Microsoft Teams isn't even a year old, but it's about to replace Skype for Business. At Microsoft's Ignite conference in Orlando, Florida today, the software giant is revealing that it plans to kill off Skype for Business in favor of Microsoft Teams. Skype for Business took over from Lync, Microsoft's previous business chat app, back in 2015. Microsoft's original Teams launch made it look obvious that Skype for Business would eventually disappear, given the fact that Teams integrates most of Skype's functionality already. Microsoft says it has been building a new Skype infrastructure that has been "evolving rapidly," and it will serve as the enterprise-grade service for voice, video, and meetings in Microsoft Teams. A new Skype for Business server will be available in the second half of 2018 for customers not ready to move to Teams, but Microsoft is pushing Office 365 users will to move over to Teams as the key communications client instead of relying on Skype for Business.

4 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. This is the exact opposite of what they should do. by Lordpidey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Replacing a fully functional product that a company probably spent a lot of money hiring people to implement and integrate with the company network with another product just seems moronic.

    If I were a buisness that used Skype, I'd be pissed off and probably change to Slack, rather than change to Microsoft Teams.

    --
    Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
  2. Re:This is the exact opposite of what they should by spiritgreywolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using Teams for a little bit at two of my clients - and I have to say Microsoft REALLY needs to improve the efficiency of Teams before they go fully replacing Skype. As soon as I run the fat-client app whether on Windows or Mac, it's a resource suck as bad as anything I have seen. It's like a really sad, slow version of Google Wave.

    --
    Never have a philosophy which supports a lack of courage
  3. Re:This is the exact opposite of what they should by Junta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would say they should have named it 'Lync' again. Skype for business has been the most confusing thing to talk about, because it has *zero* to do with Skype, except in the minds of MS marketing people.

    As a result you can't just say 'Skype' because people won't do the right thing, you always had to say 'Skype for Business' which is a misleading mouthful.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  4. Has it been two years already? by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time for a chat client name change!
    * Messenger
    * Communicator
    * Lync
    * Skype for Business (as opposed to "Skype for Pleasure"?)
    ... and those are just the ones that are still in my Applications folder! I think there were a couple besides those as well. And those are just corporate clients -- I'm not even talking about MSN Messenger, Windows Live Messenger, etc etc etc. And some were for both, before there was a big division between corporate and regular IM clients. ("MSN Messenger" came with Office X for Mac.)

    Oh yeah, NetMeeting -- anyone else remember that?

    And I'm sure I'm still forgetting one or two more.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.