Slashdot Mirror


Laser Light Forges Graphene Into the Third Dimension (newatlas.com)

Big Hairy Ian quotes New Atlas: The wonder material graphene gets many of its handy quirks from the fact that it exists in two dimensions, as a sheet of carbon only one atom thick. But to actually make use of it in practical applications, it usually needs to be converted into a 3D form. Now, researchers have developed a new and relatively simple way to do just that, using lasers to 'forge' a three-dimensional pyramid out of graphene...

By focusing a laser onto a fine point on a 2D graphene lattice, the graphene at that spot is irradiated and bulges outwards. A variety of three-dimensional shapes can be made by writing patterns with the laser spot, with the height of the shape controlled by adjusting the irradiation dose at each particular point. The team illustrated that technique by deforming a sheet of graphene into a 3D pyramid, standing 60 nm high. That sounds pretty tiny, but it's 200 times taller than the graphene sheet itself.

"The beauty of the technique is that it's fast and easy to use," says one of the researchers. "It doesn't require any additional chemicals or processing."

36 comments

  1. AHHHH!!!! Flatland won't be flat anymore!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this a violation of the prime directive? You would be forcing carbon atoms who know of 2D space into the foreign world of THREEE DIMENSIONS (shuns... shuns... shuns..)!!!!!!

  2. Atoms are 3D by ls671 · · Score: 2

    The wonder material graphene gets many of its handy quirks from the fact that it exists in two dimensions, as a sheet of carbon only one atom thick.

    Atoms are 3 dimensional, so no!

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:Atoms are 3D by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      The wonder material graphene gets many of its handy quirks from the fact that it exists in two dimensions, as a sheet of carbon only one atom thick.

      Atoms are 3 dimensional, so no!

      Well, it does exist in 2 dimensions, also in 3.

    2. Re:Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but no one is gonna care until it’s in 4d.

    3. Re:Atoms are 3D by ls671 · · Score: 2

      They must be really special atoms since protons are 3D with a Charge radius of 0.8751(61) fm

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      2 dimensional atoms made with 3D protons, this gets interesting!

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    4. Re:Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphene is a molecule, nice pedant fail.

    5. Re:Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because molecules are made of something other than atoms? LOL...

    6. Re:Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphene is a molecule, nice pedant fail.

      Molecules contain atoms you fool... anti-pedant fail.

    7. Re: Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of examples of constrained mechanical systems, both macroscopic and microscopic. That the parts are three dimensional doesn't change that the system can have fewer dimensions that matter in a given situation.

      If you want actual interesting instead of snarl, read up on topological insulators and similar system that heavily make use of geometry and topology of 2d surfaces (even though they have 3d pieces in a 3d world).

      Also the charge radius in most situations is just a useful, back of envelope approximation for something without definitive shape that can change depending on local fields.

    8. Re:Atoms are 3D by NEDHead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just give it time...

    9. Re: Atoms are 3D by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Yep! There are a lot of examples where we use E = 0.5 * m * v * v to calculate kinetic energy. This doesn't make it true just because we use that formula or model if you prefer. It only constitute a good enough approximation for some cases.

      Einstein has shown that the above model introduce a big error margin at very high speed and he came up with a much more precise formula that applies to all cases. Silly scientists that take their approximation model for realty and even debate it, that's funny! ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    10. Re:Atoms are 3D by mikael · · Score: 1
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. 8/10 troll, brah.

    12. Re:Atoms are 3D by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      My thought too - but given enough time it will.

      A graphene calabi yau room would be quite interesting - at least it would beat the boring donut universe theory.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    13. Re: Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps you should go back to school, just because some science uses maths and models that rely on items being 2D to create estimates doesn't make those objects actually 2D, it is simply how we do the maths to provide close approximations.

    14. Re: Atoms are 3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein has shown that the above model introduce a big error margin at very high speed and he came up with a much more precise formula that applies to all cases.

      Really? Got any proof for that?

      I would say it applies to more cases and save the all statement until we figured everything out.

    15. Re:Atoms are 3D by TheInternet01 · · Score: 1

      Single layer sheet of atoms is about as close to two dimensional as we can perceive.

      --
      Uplink Hosting - Web/email at an affordable price with high performance - https://uplinkhosting.ca/link.php?id=3
    16. Re:Atoms are 3D by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Yep! and Chuck Norris is about as close to infinite power as we can perceive. Therefore, Chuck Norris is virtually infinite power.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    17. Re:Atoms are 3D by leretard · · Score: 0

      Atoms are 3 dimensional

      then what are the dimensions ascribed to them by quantum mechanical theory

  3. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did light bounce a solid?

    1. Re:Question by hord · · Score: 2

      Yes. The energy of a photon can interact with matter in multiple ways. One way is that its energy is absorbed by an atom via momentum.

  4. not a pyramid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was a real pyramid I suppose it would be very difficult to handle. Those would be some deadly sharp edges...

  5. nonsense on so many levels by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    I am a graphene researcher. Actually, I'm a commercial scientist working on graphene products. It's been... educational watching certain parts of my field fail to pay attention to the actual commercialization of graphene that's been going on around them for the last several years. If you look around with just a little effort, you can find real graphene enabled products (as in graphene plays an important role more than just marketing) for purchase right now.

    Graphene doesn't "need" a 3D structure. For success, any new material needs good business cases, good product development, and good investment. We don't need more press releases about the "wonder material." This is a distraction.

    1. Re:nonsense on so many levels by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can you please provide examples? The truth is, graphene was touted to be the wonder material of the future and, ten years later, it seems to remain the wonder material of the future. Examples that it is the wonder material of today would be most welcome.

    2. Re:nonsense on so many levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously - Goldsmith had the least informative informative post I've ever seen. Zero examples or substance, but it sort of seems like the poster knows their stuff? I guess ?

    3. Re:nonsense on so many levels by slashrio · · Score: 1

      30 years ago I acquired a pot of graphene grease.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    4. Re:nonsense on so many levels by Whibla · · Score: 1

      This company makes graphene for use in carbon fibres and plastics, although as far as I can tell it's still fairly early days and hence small scale. The parent company also makes graphene impregnated inks for printable electronic circuitry amongst other things.

      I think there's still stumbling blocks to making vast amounts of the stuff, and the companies linked above hold patents on some current manufacturing processes, which might be delaying further wide scale development.

      I think it's fair to say that working with stuff at essentially the atomic level is tricky, but we're getting there. Manufacturing techniques are (by my reading anyway) proving to be the main stumbling block. If this becomes a 'solved' problem the sky's the limit (well space's the limit at that point...).

    5. Re:nonsense on so many levels by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      It's not a "wonder material." It's a new material, and it's got some interesting properties. The hype is really a problem. As I said, just a little looking finds some products, here's one.

    6. Re:nonsense on so many levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difficulty is mass production. It is a material of the future. Large scale production remains the blocker.

  6. Space Manufacturing? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Given: a lump of coal
    Problem: make a sail
    Problem: make a cover
    Turn On Laser...

  7. WTF? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    since when the fuck did Atoms become 2D items?

    1. Re:WTF? by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      It is a shorthand for all of the atoms residing in the same plane. It's a completely reasonable way to phrase it.

  8. sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake me up when they finally make the graphene sword we've all been waiting for.

  9. Old Technology New Again by TexasDiaz · · Score: 1

    Wait, isn't this how my DVD-R burner works? Are they REALLY saying that they just re-invented the DVD-R/CD-R technology for Graphene? If so, give those guys a cookie.