Slashdot Mirror


Unselfish People Are More Likely to Wind Up With Depression (vice.com)

People with depression are more likely to feel bad in response to perceived inequality, according to a study published this week in Nature Human Behaviour. From a report: Simply, in experiments where participants were tasked with playing a game with a strong element of unfairness, those participants with higher levels of brain activity in depression-linked brain regions -- as recorded via fMRI scans -- were more likely to later demonstrate signs of clinical depression. This is a new test of an old idea, one that's been demonstrated in previous research. People with depression commonly demonstrate increased concern for others, or for the perspectives of others. More precisely, prosocial attitudes predict depression, which is in contrast to individualist attitudes. Individualist here basically just means selfish, or relatively selfish. The researchers behind the current study hypothesized that they would be able to observe these tendencies at the level of actual brain activity. Fortunately, there are some tried and true methods of testing prosocial behavior. One of these takes the form of what's known as an ultimatum game. The general idea is that participants are offered rewards that are to be shared among a group. Each offer differs in how much the participant gets in relation to the rest of the group, with prosocial participants more likely refuse larger personal rewards in favor of larger rewards going to everybody else. Individualists take the offer that best benefits them, while prosocial people are more concerned with other people in the group.

1 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Re:flawed goals, premises, everything here by tomhath · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's even simpler than that. Choose between 100 divided equally among four people, or 50 but you get 30 of that. Bernie and Jesus would say take the larger reward and spread it around equally; a Republican would take the 30 and tell the others to screw themselves; a Democrat would want to take 40 of the 50 as tax and tell the group how they should spend the other 10.