Slashdot Mirror


Beijing Startup Offers Engineers $1M Salary Plus Options in Battle For Talent (financialpost.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Financial Post report: Beijing ByteDance Technology is the brainchild of entrepreneur Zhang Yiming. The company is best known for a mobile app called Jinri Toutiao, or Today's Headlines, which aggregates news and videos from hundreds of media outlets. In five years, the app has become one of the most popular news services anywhere, with 120 million daily users. Toutiao is on pace to pull in about US$2.5 billion in revenue this year, largely from advertising. It was just valued at more than US$20 billion, according to a person familiar with the matter, roughly the same as Elon Musk's SpaceX. In China, the Beijing company is controversial because of its recruiting. ByteDance hires top performers from such giants as Baidu and Tencent Holdings, sometimes raising salaries 50 per cent and tossing in stock options. "Our philosophy is to pay the top of the market to get the best," says the slight 34-year-old in an interview at the company's headquarters, his first with foreign media. "The company that wants to achieve the most, you need the best talent." Top performers can make US$1 million in salary and bonus a year, plus options, according to people familiar with its hiring. Total compensation can exceed US$3 million.

119 comments

  1. $50,000 by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I already make $50,000 working IT in Silicon Valley. Why would I want to move to Beijing?

    1. Re:$50,000 by penandpaper · · Score: 0

      The lovely sunsets!

    2. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I already make $50,000 working IT in Silicon Valley. Why would I want to move to Beijing?

      Your post explains why you are making $50,000 in silicon valley.

    3. Re: $50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you make more than that if you live in silicon valley. If not, you should move.

    4. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sunrises should be colourful too.

      E.C.P.

    5. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a week since you started your new job that pays $150K+. Did you get fired, creimer?

    6. Re:$50,000 by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      Doesn't California have like the 3rd highest cost of living for US and silicon valley being the highest part in the state. $50k would be an Ok wage for the mid-west where the median household income is around $45-55k depending on which state and housing is cheap.

    7. Re:$50,000 by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      This deserves more than merely saying it, but... WHOOSH!

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    8. Re: $50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cremier got a 150k+ job? Good for him! He gets trolled all the time and doesn't handle it well, but deep down I think he's an alright guy.

    9. Re: $50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cremier got a 150k+ job? Good for him! He gets trolled all the time and doesn't handle it well, but deep down I think he's an alright guy.

      110010001000 got a new job (or so he claimed). He keeps posting this stupid $50K in Silicon Valley meme to provoke creimer. With a half-dozen ACs pretending to be creimer and another half-dozen ACs copying-and-pasting comments to creimer, no one can keep track of what the real creimer is doing.

    10. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand that the parent post was intended as irony, right?

      On the internet, irony is very hard to detect.

    11. Re: $50,000 by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      no one can keep track of what the real creimer is doing

      Which is a pity, because you'd like totally want to.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're at a poverty level for the area; $150,000 is basically middle class out there.

      CAP === 'oddest'

    13. Re: $50,000 by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Professor Aspberger, is that you?

    14. Re: $50,000 by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Aspberger? No autism.

      While your at you can also rule out zoloft, prozac, and paxil.

    15. Re: $50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creamer is eating, instead of working out lol...

    16. Re: $50,000 by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I got a new job? When was this?

    17. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emoticons are for that... obviously :P
      Also a punctuation symbol

    18. Re:$50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as the Great Firewall is in operation, Beijing can fuck right off. They don't have enough money to pay me to live in an Orwellian hellhole. (And yes, this is a lesson that the UK might pay heed to as well.)

    19. Re: $50,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't show up for work at all this week...YOURE FIRED!!!

  2. Always wondered... by w3woody · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's well known that the productivity difference between someone just starting in software development and someone who is proficient in the art of development can be as much as a factor of 20. (Source: Mythical Man Month, and personal experience.) Yet somehow the difference in compensation (unless you win the lottery in some startup IPO) is more like a factor of 2.

    This, unlike all other industries, where the difference in compensation correlates with the difference in productivity.

    I hope this starts a trend. And I hope the trend also correlates with a trend towards weeding out unproductive--but politically connected--developers who seem to be managerial favorites but couldn't code their way out of a wet paper bag.

    But I doubt it.

    1. Re:Always wondered... by pez · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My experience is that at the low end of that 20:1 ratio is the dead weight that should never be in the programming profession. Those are the people you should really fire. A more reasonable number between an average contributor and a top contributor is 2:1 or 3:1... and you sometimes see that big a gap in pay.

    2. Re:Always wondered... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      couldn't code their way out of a wet paper bag.
      To be fair, if I was in a wet paper bag I am not sure anything I code would help me out either. I would probably stop coding to get out of the bag and dry off before coding again. Obviously, I am not a rock-star programmer if I can't even code myself out of a wet paper bag!

    3. Re:Always wondered... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could use the pen in your username to poke a hole in the wet paper bag.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Always wondered... by w3woody · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've seen much bigger productivity gaps between the best developers and average guys who have maybe 1 to 3 years of experience under their belt. I'm talking about folks who have mastered their art over the corse of a couple of decades and who could (for example) design and build a new programming language and a basic compiler proof of concept in a month.

      I understand that there are a lot of folks out there who are down on the idea of "superstar programmers" and who believe the idea that anyone mastering the art of development is somehow detrimental. But in my experience the ones who are the loudest to complain about substantial productivity differences are ones who have risen to "Senior Developer" status but who still engage in "voodoo stick" programming.

    5. Re:Always wondered... by p4nther2004 · · Score: 1

      I understand that there are a lot of folks out there who are down on the idea of "superstar programmers" and who believe the idea that anyone mastering the art of development is somehow detrimental.

      It's worth remembering (and cited in MMM), that the 20-to-1 gap isn't present solely in programming. Rate-Busters have existing for years.

    6. Re:Always wondered... by w3woody · · Score: 2

      As an aside, the "dead weight" you refer to, I've also encountered. And I would suggest some of them have negative productivity--meaning your team would have been farther ahead had you never hired them in the first place. (Which means you're paying money to slow your team down.)

    7. Re:Always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my experience, the major difference between the most productive devs and the least productive devs isn't what they do. It is what they don't do. Experienced guys know where all the blind alleys are, where all the unneeded flexibility should be trimmed, and where all the bad requirements are that can be negotiated away.

      Been in the business for 20 years. I spend a lot more time making other developers productive than I do actually coding myself. By applying my experience to all of their work streams rather than just my own, I make the entire project run much much smoother.

      The trick is finding enough time to actually code myself to keep those skills up to date.

    8. Re:Always wondered... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      It's well known that the productivity difference between someone just starting in software development and someone who is proficient in the art of development can be as much as a factor of 20.

      Oh, it gets worse than that. You can have folks who actually have negative productivity.

      They build super ingenious bugs that require your best developers to find and fix. Thus, stealing their time from developing, and reducing the overall productivity of the entire project.

      Also, these days, a salary of a million dollars is laughable: I want one million billion dollars!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    9. Re:Always wondered... by w3woody · · Score: 2

      If their productivity is negative 1 and they're paid $60k/year, and your productivity is 10x average, then doesn't that imply being paid negative $600k/year? :-P

    10. Re:Always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your off topic.

      He is talking about engineers not code monkeys.

    11. Re:Always wondered... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The problem with superstar programmers is they are hard to count on: they are difficult to recruit, offer no guarantees on retention, and can have friction with other superstars. From a productivity standpoint though... it is great working with them!

      In my field we used to call them Renaissance Engineers-- great cross-discipline knowledge and capable of wearing many hats in the organization. Specific to my field, you are likely limited to under 100 new graduates per year that fit into this category, and it seems to be dropping-- although we don't have the resources for recruiting that our competitors do.

    12. Re:Always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, I've been the 1 and I've been the 20, and that's on the same project. The first month working on some (to me) totally alien project, using a framework and language I don't know? Nothing useful achieved as far as code written. The last month crunching to get a product out the door that I now understand better than anyone else, using a framework and language I've learned inside and out: more useful work than the rest of the 12 mo project put together.

      The frustrating thing about being a good developer is that it's always when you're doing your best work that the project ends, because you've completed it to the satisfaction of the PHB/customer/whatever. If they're competent, that's cause it's done, but you have a head full of ideas for v1.1. If they're incompetent, you were at 90% done, and they've shipped a lemon to save a few weeks of dev time.

    13. Re:Always wondered... by gnick · · Score: 1

      I hired on as "dead weight". At best. By education, I have an MSEE but had only limited, self-taught, 20-year old programming experience. After parting with my EE job about a year ago, I hired on as my new company's sole "Programmer". (I was shotgunning my resume out and lucked into a great position that I was radically unqualified for - Must've been my irresistible charm.) I don't think that a 20:1 productivity ratio between my predecessor-at-retirement and first-day-gnick is an exaggeration. Not at all. Declaring negative productivity might have been fair. I've closed that gap quite a bit since hiring on, but it'll take a long time before I'm at his level. I'd be shocked if he made twice what they pay me, although there's no question he was worth it compared to what they've gotten from me.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    14. Re:Always wondered... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A more reasonable number between an average contributor and a top contributor is 2:1 or 3:1...

      You're only considering half[1] of the range, but even then I think your performance ratio is low.

      [1] Yeah, I know what mean, median, mode & skew are.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Always wondered... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Your off topic.

      Check on the bottom. I lost one so it could be mine.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Always wondered... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I would if I could use quote tags properly. :(

      This wet paper bag will be the death of me!

    17. Re:Always wondered... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Not in the field of programming, but we're currently trying to dig out of the hole that one of those negative productivity workers dug, about 3 months after firing him.

    18. Re:Always wondered... by jbengt · · Score: 2

      Actually pay rises as the square root of productivity, so we're in imaginary territory here.

    19. Re:Always wondered... by swb · · Score: 1

      The corollary to the superstar programmer is that more productive engineers are allowed to take bigger risks in code deployment,allowing them to skip some rote development that a "less productive" engineer may be required to go through.

      When it works out, the more productive engineer is allowed to continue risk taking and becomes more productive.

    20. Re: Always wondered... by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with superstar programmers is they are hard to count on: they are difficult to recruit, offer no guarantees on retention, and can have friction with other superstars.

      So you're saying they're still people.

    21. Re: Always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's quote was that?

    22. Re:Always wondered... by w3woody · · Score: 1

      Personally I have never had any problems with someone who is there and wants to learn and improve. Personally I like people who want to grow and develop as a programmer; hell, I was once a programmer who needed to grow and develop myself, a quarter century ago.

      The ones who piss me off, however, are the ones who completely fuck up the code base--and do so while arrogantly proclaiming their way is the right way, and who refuse to learn because they have nothing to learn from someone older (and thus, somehow dumber) than they are.

    23. Re: Always wondered... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it is easier to build a business around easily replaceable people.

    24. Re: Always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waterbagging. It's waterboarding and teabagging combined.

    25. Re:Always wondered... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "They build super ingenious bugs that require your best developers to find and fix."

      But we are in DevOps land right now! and full stack development too!

      This means that devs get more responsibilities at arch and ops... I just went out of one and a half month of work rethinking and refactoring a piece of functionality already deployed on production, which should have taken me two-three days to build a new -and that took a half a dozen people team about two weeks to develop first time. Now it works, will work in the future and will be able to adapt for the times coming.

      They are basically nice guys, mind you, young, enthusiast and not that dumb so they, more or less, know how to do it, but they lack the ability to know what to do and why, and that shows on their designs.

      Of course, for mid management, it is me the one quickly becoming the old curmudgeon that doesn't adapt and is not a nice team-player.

    26. Re:Always wondered... by gnick · · Score: 1

      The guy I replaced is quite a bit older than I am (35 yrs I'm guessing?) Those are years of experience, not deterioration. He wrote most of the 340,000 lines of C++ I inherited and, from what I can tell, still keeps it all in his head. Here I am a month into the job excited that I'm learning what the call stack is and how a debug assertion error works. After a year I've come a long way, but fully recognize how far there is to go.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    27. Re:Always wondered... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The problem with superstar programmers is they are hard to count on

      They are also hard to detect. How do you know someone is a "superstar" before you hire them? Many people interview well, and are even good at writing toy programs on a whiteboard. Yet they turn out to be mediocre programmers when doing real work on a bloated installed base.

      If you ask a team of programmers who is the "superstar" on their team, I doubt if they would all give the same answer. The team's manager might give yet another answer.

    28. Re:Always wondered... by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      My experience is that at the low end of that 20:1 ratio is the dead weight that should never be in the programming profession. Those are the people you should really fire. A more reasonable number between an average contributor and a top contributor is 2:1 or 3:1... and you sometimes see that big a gap in pay.

      Counting this dead weight, which is everywhere, the ratio is actually worse.

      I worked with one man that accomplished exactly nothing in seven months. So that's infinity:1.

      Worse than that is broken work that becomes more expensive to correct than it took to write. Now we're into negative territory.

      I see negative ratios all the time. People coding, who could have been used far better if they were made to sit in a corner and not allowed near a computer at all.

    29. Re: Always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it is easier to build a business around easily replaceable people.

      If you make your business around the idea that people are replaceable, people will pay in kind and replace you at the first chance. If you show no loyalty to them, why should they show it to you? Even Henry Ford realized that paying his people a bit more made economic sense for him...

  3. Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked stoc by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked stock also we can you right before it vests and you get 0

  4. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Given the enormous cratering in purchasing power of the US dollar over the past decade, this is more in line with where salaries for good tech people should be. And minimum wage should be $75/hour.

    Tech companies are raping us.

  5. roughly the same as Elon Musk's SpaceX by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that the new standard of company valuation measurement? Or do /. editors have an Elon Musk mention quota to meet every freaking day?

    1. Re:roughly the same as Elon Musk's SpaceX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest a car analogy: That's as much as 125 Hyundai Elantras.

    2. Re:roughly the same as Elon Musk's SpaceX by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I just happened to notice your comment here and I need to ask you:

      Do you have an Elon Musk mention quote to meet every freaking day? Because yours is the first mention of Musk I see on this thread. Do you collect a 'first post' bonus in addition to meeting your quote requirement?

    3. Re:roughly the same as Elon Musk's SpaceX by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Do you have an Elon Musk mention quote to meet every freaking day? Because yours is the first mention of Musk I see on this thread.

      No, but I did read the summary. Did you?

  6. I thought salaries were very low... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in developing countries ???

    1. Re:I thought salaries were very low... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The salaries in Beijing and some of the coastal cities in China are as high or higher than in the West. Beijing has higher salaries than the Bay Area and Shanghai has higher salaries than Germany I think. The problem is the salaries are highly asymmetric across the country. I don't mean just 2:1 or 3:1 but much more than that.

    2. Re:I thought salaries were very low... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      This also means you can get a housekeeper for peanuts.

  7. I always wonder how they define 'best' by computational+super · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whenever I read about tech companies trying to attract "top talent", I'm reminded of a guy that I used to work with. Actually sat right next to - we worked together in one of those "collaborative" open office nightmares. This guy seemed to know everything. Every time somebody had a problem they couldn't figure out, they brought it to him. He taught me how to read Oracle explain plans, how to use Excel pivot tables, and how to write Emacs macros. Well, since I sat right next to him, we ended up getting to know each other pretty well over the course of a year - turns out this guy was a legitimate genius. He taught himself to program in elementary school, started college when he was 12, had a master's degree in CS, had published a couple of books about cryptography... he even spoke like four languages. I finally got around to asking him, "no offense but... why on Earth do you work HERE?" He seemed surprised by the question - turned out he had been out of work for a year before landing this (relatively unglamorous) job working on insurance software. He listed some of the places he had interviewed and been rejected for - all "brand name" places, all places that insist that they're trying to attract "top talent". Now, he was an older guy (mid 40's I think) and personality-wise a little bit like Milton from "Office Space", but it didn't take much time talking with him to know that he was exactly the type of "tech guy" you'd want in any position, but he had major trouble finding any work at all. The kicker? They downsized him after about a year... but they still kept me. No idea why.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welll then.. I think I'm going to set the building on fire after that story.. - milton.

    2. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People generally hire other people they like. If they are actually productive its a plus. I've noticed in jobs and in life your pay grade is dependant upon how much people like you. Management probably thought he was weird so out he goes.

    3. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think there's a general perception in tech over the last ten years that "top talent" = "under 30". Age discrimination is prolific, to say the best. I'm already 36. I fully expect to return to a low-paying retail or service job by the time I'm 50.

    4. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The kicker? They downsized him after about a year... but they still kept me. No idea why.

      The main issue is that the management had no idea what they're doing. You can't attract and maintain talent if you have no idea what it looks like to begin with. The second factor is that in absence of an ability to recognize talent, people fall back on other methods and poor Milton here probably wasn't overly personal or the type to make friends with the weasels in middle management.

    5. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Genuine "top talent" people tend to have a low tolerance for taking bullshit from their bosses. They're seen as rebellious and hard to control. Nobody really wants to take a risk of having to corral some savant who sees through their bosses' walls of bullcrap and talks back all the time.

      When companies say "top talent" what they really mean is that they want a genius-on-paper-only who won't ever talk back ... the people who -- when it doesn't directly involve work -- don't really ever seem to have anything interesting to say....

    6. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Wow. He knew how to use Excel pivot tables AND how to write Emacs macros? Truly a genius.

    7. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this (relatively unglamorous) job working on insurance software.
      .
      .
      .
      They downsized him after about a year... but they still kept me. No idea why.

      I think the first statement has a lot to do with the last statement. Insurance industry? Old dinosaur industries think developers are commodities. That's the way corporate america thinks of things. They probably laid him off either because he was new, or because he wasn't schmoozy enough. The managers obviously didn't care, or possibly even recognize he had value above other people.

      The next lesson you should learn is that you should leave the company you're at. They obviously don't recognize talent. Why would you be any different?

    8. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Old dinosaur industries think developers are commodities

      Not sure I believe the young mammal industries are much different.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    9. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow. He knew how to use Excel pivot tables AND how to write Emacs macros? Truly a genius.

      Now now ... play nice or no sweets for you ...

      You left out "how to read Oracle explain plans", BTW.

      The point clearly is, the guy could do pretty much anything. Very broad areas of experience and expertise. The comment provided samples, not a resume ;)

    10. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Was he an aging hacker who wrote viruses when he was 11 years old but couldn't find work anywhere as an adult? Wonder why?

      Tech companies don't hire tech talent. Tech companies don't pay top salaries. Tech companies run fake news stories to try to scam their competitors into wasting money paying top salaries, to run their competitors out of business. Top tech talent ends up permanently unemployed, slowly starving to death while they work on hobby projects in their basements. Top tech talent spams the tech companies with resumes and wonders why there aren't any tech jobs in the tech industry.

    11. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Management is terrified about people who know too much. They are worried that if they leave they'll be up shit creek so they get rid of them which some how makes sense...

    12. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so true! I've never been a team player because I helped others work out problems. Turned out that I went over the manager's head so I wasn't a team player. I was gone in the first round of cuts. They people that stayed on were the ones that had their heads down and did the minimum to survive... I guess that's the top talent, not to be noticed.

    13. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hire these people often, so your company must be discriminating in some way and it is probably due to his personality. Many manager have a hard time managing introverts or "strange" smart people. Also, many managers have a hard time keeping these people challenged or that the manager wants to be the smartest in the room. For me and my team, we are all strange so it works. So if this guy is out there, post his name and I will talk to him.

    14. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Guy who could write Emacs macros bothered to learn about pivot tables in excel. That shows how broad his interests are.

      I can write Emacs macros and do Gauss elimination with partial pivoting. But pivot tables in Excel? It must be something so dumb I would not bother to what it is.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    15. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Tech companies run fake news stories to try to scam their competitors into wasting money

      And lobby congress to increase the (low-wage, slave-wage) H1B visa cap.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    16. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by quietwalker · · Score: 1

      Something people overlook is that there's a world of difference between having talent, and having people around you recognize your talent.

      This is especially the case with IT and software development. To quote "The Story of Mel":

      I have often felt that programming is an art form,
      whose real value can only be appreciated
      by another versed in the same arcane art;
      there are lovely gems and brilliant coups
      hidden from human view and admiration, sometimes forever,
      by the very nature of the process.

      Just like in your example, it seems like you recognized it, but no one else did. So how are your higher ups going to know his value?

      As I pointed out in another post oh-so-long ago, communication is a force multiplier for pretty much whatever company position you occupy. If you (or your manager) isn't advertising you and promoting your successes to those higher up, you're gonna be first on the chopping block. 80% of the time, the guy who does nothing but talks a great game is the only visible one to the folks making the decisions.

      In a company, talent isn't important. You need to be perceived as having talent that makes the company a profit, and whether or not that perception matches reality isn't really important.

    17. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC asking for someone's name? Nice try, you fucking asshole. You don't have a team, you don't have a company, and you don't hire anyone. You are a fucking liar. Fuck. You.

    18. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When downsizing occurs I always assumed talent had nothing to do with the decision. It was the higher payed guys that were let go. You're underpaid.

    19. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Well, _I_ thought so. Who are you, the one that fired him?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    20. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way back when "The Story of Mel" was written, antisocial introverted talent could land backroom jobs running IT for companies. That's just not possible anymore.

      There's another story from the same era called "Know your System Administrator (A field guide)" which describes "The MANIAC" as "Usually an aging cracker who discovered that neither the Mossad nor Cuba are willing to pay a living wage for computer espionage. Fell into system administration; occasionally approaches major competitors with indesp schemes." The Maniac is consistently described as having no social skills, and at one point, "Screams at users until they go away."

      Times have changed in the social media era, and introverts are shit out of luck. Companies only hire social socializing socialites, never maniac Mel.

    21. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Chronically.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    22. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Hiring in technology is 80% personality and 20% skill. Sad but true.
      It's the job of management to help disparate personalities all get along together, but tbh management these days is just a stick to make sure people are working.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by jbengt · · Score: 1

      When downsizing occurs I always assumed talent had nothing to do with the decision. It was the higher payed guys that were let go

      Pretty much true.
      During the last recession, the first group of people laid off from the company I worked at were mostly people you would imagine should be the first to go. During the last round of lay-offs, which included me, one of the vice presidents quipped to me that the only people left were partners and inexperienced kids, and no one who really could do the work.

    24. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they hire "Socializing maniac Mel." Social graphs are just as hackable as moving bits around. They key is sending relevant social signal (aka branding) at the appropriate time long-enough to reap the shekels and run back to the cave. Having demonstrable skills trumps needing to play social games considerably.

    25. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      No idea why.

      Clearly you didn't remind HR of Milton from Office Space.

      It's good to be a gangster...

    26. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socializing maniac is covered under "Compound System Administrators" with the "Maniacal Idiot" who "Napalms the CPU."

    27. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure that's what happens when you have budget cuts and layoffs for 16 years straight and somehow blame everything on 9/11 just because. Keep telling yourself the economy sucks right now but it's gonna get much better real soon. Vote Trump. #MAGA

    28. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Symkowski has people skills!!!

    29. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I fired him once I found out he didn't know how to write VB macros.

    30. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by stanjo74 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All organizations I've worked at want "top talent", but they don't know what to do with top-talent or don't have the environment for top-talent to perform disproportionately well. So, the top-talent are only slightly more productive than average, but they are fickle (don't take BS from management/business, no loyalty), not very likable (straight shooters, try to change the organization), or outright a liability (don't fall for PC agenda, diversity programs, social skills not honed).
      In the context of medium to large organizations, it's best to hire "above-average" rather than "top" talent.

    31. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is another related failure mode. It's the same "cutting through the bullshit" and unwillingness to do inefficient, illogical, or immoral things sans the generalized talent.

      I am certainly not "top talent" but have a strong, formal background in logic and critical thinking very far beyond what typical CS people have (second philosophy major with a hard focus on ethics and logic). I'd like to go for a PhD in logician theory but top schools are expensive. That focus combined with a desire to truly help people gets me and people like me in trouble. Even pointing out when your boss wants one thing but says to do another in the most nice, roundabout, couched way possible ruffles feathers. In employment its either go along with the nonsense or else.

    32. Re:I always wonder how they define 'best' by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      In a company, talent isn't important. You need to be perceived as having talent that makes the company a profit, and whether or not that perception matches reality isn't really important.

      The rest of what you wrote about communication is spot on, but this conclusion in a bit too cynical, in my opinion.

      Talent is important, otherwise there's nothing to advertise. There's only so much that you can do to mediocre work to make it appear great to higher-ups, and most managers will still prefer to advertise the work that's the most easiest to advertise.

      Talent + communication = success. Communication alone will get you further than talent alone, but neither can compete when you have both.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    33. Re: I always wonder how they define 'best' by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Truth is, software companies don't give a flying fuck about attracting or retaining talented employees. As evidence, look at the worthless office space where they require people to work. Low floor, no view, open plan, cubicles, children's toys, junk food buffets. The space reeks of contempt for those who must work in it.

      Remember - talk is cheap, but good real estate is really fucking expensive.

  8. Re:Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. also we can you right before it vests...

    You accidentally the whole stock option.

  9. Maybe because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you have a yearning need to contract lung cancer?

  10. I have a site just like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But google censors the shit out of it.

    Only in China can you have a site like this which is not censored and the traffic totally killed by evil google.

    fuck google

  11. Have Mercy!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been Humpin' on your mom all day!!!

  12. stock options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose these offers are for only Chinese citizens. As far as I know unless the company is listed a WFOE or is publicly listed outside of China, can a foreigner own a share of a domestic company.

    1. Re: stock options? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, international companies are by law required to have lower salaries so that the domestic companies can soak up the talent.

    2. Re: stock options? by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      I did a half a year stint in Shanghai on a shared PM/Developer position.

      CNY 25000 a month, crazy good food every day

      The thing with China is that Alibaba and Tencent hoover pretty much ALL worthy talent, and everybody else is left with scraps.

      Imagine Google and Necrosoft hiring 7 out of 10 of new CS graduates in USA.

  13. Meanwhile... ageism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I'm bitter about my own choices (I am) and it is my own damn fault but... stuck at a transportation company in their IT department and HR believes we only have to compete with other transportation companies when it comes to wages and benefits.

    I am constantly seeing DBA's and other highly skilled professionals come, get trained, stay 6-12 months, and then leave for better paid/less BS work places.

    This guy has the right idea, pay more, but I can bet all his top performers are less than 32 in age.

    I wish people would recognize talent where it is regardless of age... but we don't live in that fantasy land.

  14. Re:Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked s by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    This time - and it's probably a fluke - Joe_Dragon is right. Can is a transitive verb. As in "We've got a bumper pea harvest, I think I'll can some". And it's short for shitcan, which means to dismiss or dispose of something or someone.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Pay roll costs are probably the same by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    If you compare the total compensation this company will be in line with many American companies.

    The big difference is, in America almost all the compensation will be taken up by the PHBs in C$O titles and very little will be given to the developers and front line managers. In addition they developers will be called code monkeys by the C$Os derisively when they are having their three martini lunches in the corporate suite.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  16. Would you like some more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...bubble tea with your tech bubble?

  17. I've only met 3 programmers worth 1 million a year by FeelGood314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And all three are exploited, making 100k-150K salaries. The best developer I ever met started at what is now a very large and well know company as a high school student. 20 years later the company has 5000 engineers. If it was a choice between him and 200 random engineers at the company, management wouldn't even debate it, everyone knows he's the smartest person they ever met. The frustrating part is in all three cases management knows they have people that are worth over a million a year and that these people are responsible for a significant part of the companies profit but they still treat these people worse than their average employee.

  18. It makes sense by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    You can make an argument that football players, CEOs and bond traders are underpaid rather than overpaid because their salary seems a lot compared to minimum wage but if you look at at as a percentage of what they make for the people who pay them they're getting screwed.

    For a startup with a few people you can make the case for IT people getting paid a tonne of cash, provided they can meet brutally tough performance goals.

    Of course it's harder to justify this sort of thing for the average computer janitor when you can get someone in on a H1B to do it for a lot less.

    Of course if you're a computer janitor you should support legislation like this

    http://www.livemint.com/Politi...

    Washington: A legislation has been introduced in the US House of Representatives which among other things calls for more than doubling the minimum salary of H-1B visa holders to $130,000, making it difficult for firms to use the programme to replace American employees with foreign workers, including from India.

    The High-Skilled Integrity and Fairness Act of 2017 introduced by California Congressman Zoe Lofgren prioritises market based allocation of visas to those companies willing to pay 200% of a wage calculated by survey, eliminates the category of lowest pay, and raises the salary level at which H1B dependent employer are exempt from non displacement and recruitment attestation requirements to greater than $130,000. This is more than double of the current H1B minimum wage of $60,000 which was established in 1989 and since then has remained unchanged.

    It's probably fair to say this is effectively raising the de facto minimum wage for IT work.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re:It makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably fair to say this is effectively raising the de facto minimum wage for IT work.

      Or, raising the de facto minimum skill level for IT work where companies will decide to outsource to a foreign country...

  19. Re:Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or it means your planning on canning them for long term storage.

    Your example was poor but you are correct nonetheless.

  20. Re: Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Can is a transitive verb.

    Why do they like Thanksgiving so much in Arkansas? They can pumpkin.

  21. Re:I've only met 3 programmers worth 1 million a y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you live in a very remote area and can't leave it for a personnal reason ( family, in love with the cold mountains of alaska, whatever ) , IT jobs are easier to find than a 7/11 store in thailand . So if these people stay, they are happy with the way things are. Not everyone is running after more and more money. Maybe they like their job, maybe they like their colleagues, maybe they just don't care because their life isn't defined by what they do between 9 to 5 monday to friday . And I understand that management increase the wage of the unhappy ones first, or keep the money for them altogether.

  22. Re: Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked by angelmarauder · · Score: 1

    You lold me

  23. Re:I've only met 3 programmers worth 1 million a y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's typical for senior and principal SW engineers to make 300k+ a year at Facebook, Google, Amazon and Microsoft. It's normal to hit these levels when people are in their 30's. This is not rock star pay, but typical pay at these companies.

    So if your rock star acquaintance is that talented and only making 100k-150k/year, it's because he/she has other major constraints. Refuses to move, can't work with others, crippling social anxiety, etc. Blaming this on "management" is short sighted because this person could leave their job. Good engineers are in very high demand in the US.

  24. Re:I've only met 3 programmers worth 1 million a y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember, the people in the IT department at any company are seen as a cost center. Unless you are programming in a company that produces software you are seen as a liability not an asset.

  25. Re:Chinese Overtime and most of pay is in locked s by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I guess your mom was reading it out to you and censored the "short for shitcan" bit because it's not suitable language for a five-year-old.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. Bill Gates says by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    $640k is enough for anyone.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  27. Re: GUESS WHO'S PAYING FOR IT! by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Trump, Trump, Trump, Trumpity Trump Trump TRUMP!!!!1!!

  28. Re: I've only met 3 programmers worth 1 million a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dream on, broham. FB & GOOG hire and promote mostly based on nepotism. Just like every other company controlled by the Stanford VC cabal.