Slashdot Mirror


A Small But Growing Group Of Silicon Valley Heretics Are Disconnecting Themselves From the Internet (theguardian.com)

The Guardian reports: Decades after he stayed up all night coding a prototype of what was then called an "awesome" button, Rosenstein belongs to a small but growing band of Silicon Valley heretics who complain about the rise of the so-called "attention economy": an internet shaped around the demands of an advertising economy. These refuseniks are rarely founders or chief executives, who have little incentive to deviate from the mantra that their companies are making the world a better place. Instead, they tend to have worked a rung or two down the corporate ladder: designers, engineers and product managers who, like Rosenstein, several years ago put in place the building blocks of a digital world from which they are now trying to disentangle themselves. "It is very common," Rosenstein says, "for humans to develop things with the best of intentions and for them to have unintended, negative consequences." Rosenstein, who also helped create Gchat during a stint at Google, and now leads a San Francisco-based company that improves office productivity, appears most concerned about the psychological effects on people who, research shows, touch, swipe or tap their phone 2,617 times a day. There is growing concern that as well as addicting users, technology is contributing toward so-called "continuous partial attention", severely limiting people's ability to focus, and possibly lowering IQ. One recent study showed that the mere presence of smartphones damages cognitive capacity -- even when the device is turned off. "Everyone is distracted," Rosenstein says. "All of the time."

142 comments

  1. time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by turning off the phone, and stop wasting time on /.

    1. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, fuck Internet now stupid

    2. Re:time to increase brain power by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      Dude....you can't read slashdot on a phone.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re: time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A distracting message about everyone being distracted.

      Sent from my iPhone.

    4. Re:time to increase brain power by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Try. You won't be missing much.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:time to increase brain power by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

      I find it easier to just turn off everything on the weekends, go get stuff done (be it fun, necessary, whatever), and just enjoy being alive. The phone stays in my pocket unless I need to make a call (or get one - and notifications are turned off for anything that doesn't involve me putting the thing against my ear and responding with "hello?")

      You should try it sometime. It's pretty fun. So far this year, I've managed to get a garden going, build a greenhouse, partially build a new home office (waiting on the shell to arrive soon), watch the salmon run up the river near my home, read a ton of cool books, meet cool people at various events, go do stuff, go see stuff...

      The point here is not to brag - the point is that there is a balance that's needed. There's idle time to fart around with your phone, and there's idle time where you need to rebuild your sense of soul and presence in this world.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re: time to increase brain power by CarterMeyers · · Score: 1

      It's even better that you used "/." instead of "slashdot"... that was just great :)

    7. Re: time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do shit, and still have your phone. The difference between this pontificating and "The Devil" is lack of an imaginary bad man.

    8. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet used to be transactional. Sit down, dial up, do what you wanted to do, hang up. That was a better time.

    9. Re:time to increase brain power by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Internet on my phone is the matrix. With beautiful tasty steak.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    10. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you consider this for a second?:)

      What if 5, 6 billion plus people can't think this way anymore? They don't even get you idea. At all.

    11. Re:time to increase brain power by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Nice theory, and if it works for you I'm happy for you for it. But personally, if I had the willpower to turn the internet off for a day and leave it off, I'd have the willpower to just leave it on and not use it. I expect I'm far form the only one.

    12. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice theory, and if it works for you I'm happy for you for it. But personally, if I had the willpower to turn the internet off for a day and leave it off

      as someone old enough to remember life before the internet I read stuff like this and it becomes clear that y'all have been irretrievably brain-washed. it is as if you have been transformed at a molecular level into some sort of non-human

    13. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1. Weekends are for living.

    14. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha granpa go shit in diapers haha

    15. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, until you get married, eh? Eh!

      Thankfully I will never marry.

    16. Re:time to increase brain power by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      In the near future, the only things on the Internet will be Things.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    17. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with that attitude you won't, no...

    18. Re:time to increase brain power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've taken it a bit farther. I don't own a cell phone on purpose as I don't need to be that connected or available to everyone. I don't do social media either. If you want to talk to me call me on my land line or come over to my house and visit face to face just like when people knew how to converse with each other. After all does anyone really need to know what everyone else is doing at any given moment.

    19. Re:time to increase brain power by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      You must be grafting on weekends then... because me... i barely get enough rest to be ready for the next week, never mind starting a bloody greenhouse lol.

      Wish I was you.

  2. Frankenstein's monster by thegreatbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes you have to take responsibility for your actions, regardless of the original intent, even if your efforts are futile.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    1. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intent is to make money. That's always the intent. None of these people are working for free.

    2. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original intent was a paycheck...original intent succeeded.

    3. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now he needs a paycheck larger than everyone else's, so he needs to start what amounts to a new religion.

    4. Re:Frankenstein's monster by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I don't recall the angry mob of villagers taking responsibility for their actions against the innocent Frankenstein's "monster" ("creation" is the preferred nomenclature, dude).

    5. Re:Frankenstein's monster by thegreatbob · · Score: 1

      True, true. Sadly, I have not read much of the classics in the last 10-15 years :( I should probably set about fixing that :)

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    6. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Stop blabbering.

    7. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now I've become The Social Network, the destroyer of concentration, IQ and mental health."

    8. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The villagers were angry because the monster was a superhuman-strong serial killer dead-set on revenge against his creator for creating him. It's an AI allegory from before electricity.

      Read the book.

    9. Re:Frankenstein's monster by mmdurrant · · Score: 1

      Not sure if your comment is tongue-in-cheek or not... it was 17 years ago when I read it for the first time, but recollection tells me the only villagers who interacted with Frankenstein's creation ran away in terror.

      --
      I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
    10. Re:Frankenstein's monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which brings us full circle: The villagers are running away.

    11. Re:Frankenstein's monster by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

      Waaat? Read? Wuzzat?

      --
      PlaynBass
  3. But... by computational+super · · Score: 4, Insightful

    technology is contributing toward so-called "continuous partial attention", severely limiting people's ability to focus

    Of course, the noisy, crowded, attention-impossible "collaborative" open office trend is just fine.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I'm guessing the Internet-cord-cutters are not working most of their time in a "collaborative open office".

    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I see what you're trying to say but people are capable of holding a conversation in a noisy environment (bars, restaurants, etc) however with a smartphone they choose not to, which is where the irritation stems from. I've watched my 67 year old father become this kind of annoying person over the last 6 years, every notification merits a glance - no matter the conversation. So many people do this it has become a reflex action. I catch myself doing it. Its becoming harder and harder to resist the urge for "notification gratification".

      It's hard to turn notifications off and put the phone away, but people gotta start making the effort.

    3. Re:But... by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Did you just put an equal sign between a bar chit-chat and actual work?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:But... by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      I get depressed when I haven't had a notification for a while.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re:But... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Of course, the noisy, crowded, attention-impossible "collaborative" open office trend is just fine.

      Where I work, these "open orifices" tend drive folks to work from home whenever possible . . . achieving just the opposite of "collaboration". Folks who used to put in unpaid overtime in the office just don't do it any more. And some folks who have to be in the office camp out in the halls in chairs. If you are a programmer trying to concentrate, a chair in the hall is better than sitting next to a sales person blabbing on the phone all day.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:But... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      to be fair though, sitting anywhere near the sales/marketing team is pretty much in violation of not only OSHA, as well as a grey area in the eyes of the Geneva Convention.

    7. Re:But... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      The fact that this happens isn't new. Only the frequency. I would get really pissed when the phone rang cause then the person I talked to would stand up and walk to the land line to answer it "cause it might be important".

      The telephone set the stage where it was acceptable to rudely cut a conversation off and walk away. Modern notifications are just an extension.

    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the opposite. I get annoyed when I get a notification - as in "This had better be good".

      I have a smartphone, but don't get notifications every day. The few I get, are usually the girlfriend sending a message. Sometimes the calendar app. No social media - because I don't use any of those. And I turn off sound completely while at work.

      I don't consider myself a "cord-cutter". I merely don't jump on bandwagons - such as facebook or other social media. Email is enough - and email doesn't "notify" as I don't keep email sw running. I start it when I want to check.

    9. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The horror. If I ever get forced to sit with a blabber, there are only two possible outcomes:
      1. I refuse to work when I can't concentrate - and play games or surf instead. Not sustainable
      2. I go for prompt revenge - and disrupt the blabber's work as much as he disrupt mine. As in - if he disturbs me by blabbing into his phone, I disturb him by unplugging said phone. Every time. Not sustainable either, of course.

      And yes - I currently work in a landscape against my will. But we all agreed to take phone conversations to another room - so it kind of works.

    10. Re:But... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's hard to turn notifications off and put the phone away, but people gotta start making the effort.

      Advantages of being old, contrarian, and largely self-employed - I never turned notifications on in the first place. Unless it's a (fairly rare) phone call or an (even rarer) text message, I don't receive notifications. I collect and check email when I want to - none of that 'push' shit to put my attention under someone else's control. I don't do social media; but even if I did, I wouldn't receive notifications very often, because both data and WiFi are turned off until I explicitly require them to look something up or to check mail. I can see that it may be difficult to 'unplug' - but it sure as hell was easy to not plug in in the first place.

      This often gets framed as a technological issue, but it's really a sociological and psychological one. People need to re-learn that their true self-worth isn't contingent on being available and attentive to everyone and his dog on a 24/7 basis. They also need to learn that somebody else's unavailability is simply that - it isn't rejection.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    11. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Facebook account. I have never used it on a mobile device, and on the desktop it is the only thing the Edge browser is used for.

    12. Re:But... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "I find it hard to turn notifications off and put the phone away, but people gotta start making the effort.

      Fixed it for you. Don't project.

    13. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Facebook account which I log into once in a while to keep it "active", but never use it. Moreover, I otherwise have Facebook and all it's little track and snitch domains deadsunk in my hosts file. 'And I do not own a smart phone ('suppose a heresy to some in this day and age?).

    14. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't missing much. I stopped social networking in order to protect my own privacy and now I just shake my head at people getting notifications from their brother's dentists cousin or some stupid bullshit. I realize that I'm far from invisible, but making it "harder" to track is nearly as good. Criminals and governments generally pick the low hanging fruit.

    15. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently work in a landscape against my will.

      Ah, work release from prison, or just traditional slavery?

    16. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on a conference call with a guy in one of those collaborative spaces - and I can clearly hear the woman next to him talking on her call - so much so that it was making it hard to hear what he was saying. I told him point blank to tell that lady to lower her voice: we don't care about her project/problems etc... I think he may have had his phone on speaker-phone because I didn't hear her anymore after that.

      Why, if you are in in enclosed environment with a lot of people with little 1/4 height cubes do you think it is brilliant to let everyone within 100 meters to know what you're saying? It boggles the mind.

    17. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work is off limits at the bar - because your ego inflated self-important loud call is harshing my buzz man.

    18. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol well put...yet sadly accurate. Talk about overinflated blow hards, liars, and thieves.

    19. Re:But... by nnull · · Score: 1

      It's because there are so many people that demand that you respond to them. Instant gratification. Some of my clients have people that will send me an email that I'm not responding to them in a "timely" fashion just because I read my messages an hour later. They will even start calling me if I don't respond to them in the next 5-15 minutes and if I don't answer they get even more angry. They try to paint me as the problem. This nonsense just eats away at my time or my peoples time and serves little purpose.

      These people are honestly sick. I simply choose to ignore them now. My phone broke all week this week and I couldn't have been happier. I didn't lose clients and people still coming to me.

    20. Re:But... by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I don't have a particular problem with open, collaborative offices, as long as they are not complete barns, and as long as there is some space apart for when you do need to use Skype or whatever for work, someone, or discuss things with or have a particular need for peace and quiet for a couple of hours. However, some offices are not laid out in a way that is particularly pleasant, and a better understanding of how to make a shared office a more enjoyable space would be welcome. Where I work now the groups of desks in a single area are relatively modest (around 15) and there is a breakout room for around four to five people with a table, chairs, sofa, and a video conferencing suite. And I will probably move my espresso machine in there.

    21. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It depends on the time of day. When I am on the clock work takes priority. When I am off the clock my private life takes priority.

      Regardless of the work/personal privatization, the personal conversation in front of me takes priority over a remote notification sent to my device, including incoming calls.

      That means I will happily ignore an incoming call to continue a conversation in person.

    22. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. For work I check email and messages before lunch and at the end of the day. Clients get used to it, they just st need to be trained in that standard procedure.

    23. Re:But... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      This often gets framed as a technological issue, but it's really a sociological and psychological one. People need to re-learn that their true self-worth isn't contingent on being available and attentive to everyone and his dog on a 24/7 basis. They also need to learn that somebody else's unavailability is simply that - it isn't rejection.

      For me, the only way somebody can remotely interrupt my train of thought is a phone call, and those have existed for over a century. But today there are less intrusive ways to convey a message, so phone calls feel relatively much worse. Personally, I feel phone calls are psychologically jarring because you need to engage with the person quite deeply, without getting all the clues of presence. I prefer either asynchronous messaging or actual presence. Then there's the interruption aspect, where the caller assumes their chatter is more important than whatever you are doing.

      Now, if people want all this in their async web data, I guess it's their choice. I've found it's possible to use things like FB for coordinating collaborative projects, without spending your entire life there.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    24. Re:But... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      In retrospect I should have been more detailed in my answer.

      What I meant was: a bar conversation doesn't usually require a quiet environment to take place, because it doesn't take large amounts of brain power. Work, on the other hand, does.
      There's a reason you can't develop code in a bar (other than the availability of alcohol). It's the need to focus and not be interrupted.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  4. Continuous Partial Attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    technology is contributing toward so-called "continuous partial attention", severely limiting people's ability to focus, and possibly lowering IQ.

    It's just anecdotal, but I experience not only these symptoms but also increased symptoms of seasonal allergies (year-round) and irritability pretty much in direct proportion to how much I feel like I'm suffering from "continuous partial attention" thought patterns. Disconnecting from the internet usually isn't enough, I try to find an escape from as much of ordinary life's routines as possible to mitigate the effects.

  5. The New Luddites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their history will likely follow the same course. They could always live among the Amish.

    1. Re:The New Luddites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on Slashdot could a former Facebook engineer be called a luddite for bailing on social media.

      Last time I checked there was more to technology than sending pictures of your dinner to friends.

  6. web vs social networks? by tomxor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this more a problem with social networks? I know browsing the web more generally can be addictive for some, but I feel like there is a distinction.

    I don't do the normal social network, no facebook, no twitter etc, I went down that road for a very short time and found the overall effect fairly negative and attention graby many years before it became news. I don't find my life very distracted as a non-social networker, I don't have a smart phone, and the closest I get to distracted is emails or pull requests on GitHub (which are periodic, not continuous).

    Does anyone have examples of "highly distracted" experiences outside of social networking on the web?

    1. Re:web vs social networks? by tomxor · · Score: 3, Informative

      You claim to be a non-social networker, and yet you use GitHub the social network for social coders. You're a real piece of work, liar.

      Ouch, that's like calling someone who uses mouthwash an alcoholic. GitHub's is not a true social network, it has messaging to facilitate issues and PRs and at the most "staring" projects, facebook on the other hand is messaging and following and posting self obsession for the pure sake of it.

    2. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a denier, like you, but then my iPod broke (which I bought when Apple was known for quality hardware only, so pre-iPhone) and I inherited my wife's smartphone (Moto E2, which is still unmatched).
      But somehow I'm still not distracted, probably because I usually have mobile data turned off and no audible or tactile notifications for messages. Therefore I mostly do not get messages all the day and when I do, I don't notice until I'm deciding to look.
      Try it, it's great to have control over your life.

    3. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Github does not demand your real world identity and does not collect every last thing you do outside its domain. It does not perform facial recognition on photographs including your friends. It does not harvest your friends' contact info from your phone.

      Yours is an argument of false equivalence. Sure, if you want to be pedantic, github is a "social network", as is slashdot. But the key point is that they allow you to use them pseudonymously, even through an anonymizing proxy if you care to.

      Think in concepts, not buzzwords.

    4. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone have examples of "highly distracted" experiences outside of social networking on the web?

      Surfing porn and swatting at all the pop ups with Internet Explorer. Especially in the old days with less than 128 meg of ram and windows reading and writing to the page file as soon as two or three pop ups used up the ram. Ah the good old days of having to hit the power button just so you could get back to the original whitehouse.com or russianbabes.ru or friskyorientals.com etc, then formatting the drive and re-installing windows every few months just to get a computer that actually worked again.

      I miss having windows continuously compromised by the crafty webmasters that want my money for looking at their low brow pixel sprites.

    5. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GitHub doesn't need to demand your real world identity; social coders give their identities anyway. GitHub doesn't need to be full of photos; social coders fill it with photos anyway.

      GitHub membership doesn't need to be mandatory; social coders make it mandatory, and anyone doesn't use GitHub is simply not a coder.

      GitHub is even more insidious than Facebook, because social coders have built their social community around it.

    6. Re:web vs social networks? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does anyone have examples of "highly distracted" experiences outside of social networking on the web?

      The arrival of a new email, maybe?

      My boss beats me at this!! He had tens of thousands of unread emails, so doesn't notice when a new one comes in. I keep it at 0 and when the thunderbird icon shows a little red number, I have to click it to make it go away, or else.

      (Or else what? Fuck if I know. Don't ask me to explain that; ask a psychiatrist.)

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    7. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ lighten up...

    8. Re:web vs social networks? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Archie Bell tighten up...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a troll, GitHub is the largest host of open source projects... people don't just go on there to pose.

    10. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so full of shit, you clearly just hate GitHub, everything you said is not true or highly opinionated.

    11. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously. This is Slashdot. News for Nerds. We've never been ones to use mouthwash.

    12. Re:web vs social networks? by tomxor · · Score: 1

      The arrival of a new email, maybe?

      My boss beats me at this!! He had tens of thousands of unread emails, so doesn't notice when a new one comes in. I keep it at 0 and when the thunderbird icon shows a little red number, I have to click it to make it go away, or else.

      (Or else what? Fuck if I know. Don't ask me to explain that; ask a psychiatrist.)

      Yeah I can see this one, I think maybe not having a smart phone has allowed me to escape this, also even on the desktop, I ether keep it in my i3 scratchpad - out of sight, or close it all together if I need some high quality uninterrupted coding time.

      That reminds me of another actually, slack - I love and hate that thing, I hate it's huge size and It now absolutely must be close when i'm trying to get work done, other times it's indispensable when fast communication is needed between colleagues. Just gotta remember it's always an option to kill the thing, even email - i know that sounds crazy for some people, especially hard if you are a boss or manager.

    13. Re:web vs social networks? by tomxor · · Score: 1

      ...But somehow I'm still not distracted, probably because I usually have mobile data turned off and no audible or tactile notifications for messages. Therefore I mostly do not get messages all the day and when I do, I don't notice until I'm deciding to look. Try it, it's great to have control over your life.

      Yes, It seems like this is key (controlling the flow of information coming in), even though I don't have a smart phone I do get fed up with text messages sometimes and i'm not exactly a socialite. Often when I get home I turn it off or leave it in another room, in a sort of "collection" mode, that way it's more like me in control of it's attention rather than it in control of my attention, I know it's silly to describe a phone as if it's animate, but it illustrates the point.

    14. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ Best post so far, 'made me smile.

    15. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone have examples of "highly distracted" experiences outside of social networking on the web?

      Tvtropes

    16. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten up, Francis.

    17. Re:web vs social networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get at least 100 emails per day - and as of today I have 700+ unread in my inbox. No way I'm going to read all of them, let alone understand and provide a cogent answer to those that require replies. At a certain point, I just stop doing email, and do my real job. If something rises to importance that requires immediate response, someone will text, or phone me directly - and point me to the relevant email.

      Triage, that's the only way to handle it. Another thing I do is use other means of communication as much as possible. If something is interrogatory, and doesn't require a legal documentation of the interaction - I will pick up the phone or use text messaging to get the idea across quickly without generating yet another email.

    18. Re:web vs social networks? by rl117 · · Score: 1

      There's an element of truth to it. If I want to interact with any project which is on github, I'm coerced into joining that ecosystem whether or not I want to. Just like I might be coerced to join Facebook by friends using it.

  7. Wayne's World was ahead of its time by barrywalker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:Wayne's World was ahead of its time by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Indeed. The technical term is a Skinner Box

      99% of games are nothing more then a glorified, re-skinned, Skinner Box.

      --
      One of the Lies of Judaism: Murdering an innocent animal magically takes away sin. In fact the exact _opposite_ is true.
      Isaiah 66:3: But whoever sacrifices a bull is like one who kills a person, and whoever offers a lamb is like one who breaks a dog's neck; whoever makes a grain offering is like one who presents pig's blood, and whoever burns memorial incense is like one who worships an idol.

  8. Amish paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As usual, the right reaction isn't to shun new things, but to learn how to use them correctly. You can have a phone and not touch, tap and swipe all the time. You can have a Facebook account and not be constantly interrupted by notifications. And if you can't, then that's what you need to fix.

    1. Re:Amish paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have a Facebook account and not be constantly interrupted by notifications, but you can't have a Facebook account and not commodify yourself to the advertising industry and US intelligence community on the altar of convenience.

    2. Re:Amish paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can have a Facebook account and not be constantly interrupted by notifications, but you can't have a Facebook account and not commodify yourself to the advertising industry and US intelligence community on the altar of convenience.

      My key insight here was to realize that the altar of convenience wasn't even really a convenience.

      I added up all the time that I spent on Facebook, and divided it into three segments:
      1. Updates from friends that I wanted to see
      2. Updates from friends that I didn't care to see
      3. Advertising

      I realized that by simply contacting my friends directly (calling, emailing, sending a message on Signal, etc.), I could get almost all of #1, almost none of #2, and absolutely none of #3, and all in roughly the same amount of total time.

      Turns out Facebook wasn't doing anything useful for me.
      So I closed the account and haven't looked back since.

    3. Re:Amish paradise by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I don't spend a ton of time there, but I flip through a couple of times daily. For me, #1 is pretty important, and I know too many people who mostly/only put info on Facebook, and I wouldn't keep up well enough with otherwise. Also, I'm pushing pics/updates of my kids to family elders, all of whom embrace Facebook and it's easier for me to use one centralized tool than to keep 20 separate households in the loop.

      What I've found that really helps is an addon called FBPurity (or purify?). It's pretty customizable, but can cut out a lot of junk. Not just ads, but also a lot of the second-hand "so-and-so commented on this unrelated thing" notifications. It also can keep the feed in chronological order and resist duplicates. I'll flip through a couple of screens and then get a "if you want more stuff here, get more friends" which is Facebook's way of saying they've run out of pertinent data. It really makes a huge difference in how I interact with the site.

      (As for #2, if you don't want updates, you can technically be friends but just hide them from your feed, so that's already a solved problem.)

  9. Unemployables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As soon as they stop advertising their personal brand, their employability will die, and with it their chances of ever having income. These big-ego losers will literally die penniless in obscurity as soon as their money runs out.

    1. Re:Unemployables by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      This is why I'm saving to retire and buy a small farm or woods. I can D/C from this nonsense and go back to living. Assuming my high stress high tech job doesn't kill me with a stroke or something first.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  10. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So non attention seekers, get some attention?

  11. Host files by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    I also can do this through the use of host files.

    1. Re:Host files by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the neurotic need to add to the hosts file, to futilely seek the unobtainable comprehensiveness, has been shown to be even more addicting and mentally crippling than smart phone use.

    2. Re:Host files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt it. I use a hosts file and rarely add to it.

    3. Re:Host files by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you misunderstand, this application requires the Giant Hosts File; your puny little config file is to that as a dart is to an ICBM

  12. Re:Ask Ash-Fox about his NDA lie rotflmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still mad bro?

    kisses, AF

  13. Ask Ash-Fox about his NDA lie rotflmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Ash-Fox about his NDA lie + dns fuckups rotflmao https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11188265&cid=55322595/ as he's a no degree liar.

  14. almost there but not by choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I have spent decades deciding which technologies I wish to support and which I do not. I support ones that (a) leave control in the hands of users, not $BIGCORP, (b) do not constantly spy and send back every bit of data they can collect to $BIGCORP and $PARTNERCORPS.

    Over decades the rest of the world has supported the exact opposite: technologies which leave them powerless, and spy on them constantly.

    That would be fine, except in that eventually your ability to interact with other people utterly disappears, because everyone has moved to $EVILTECH and I insist on $NONEVILTECH. Other times $NONEVILTECH simply stops working. (Tried browsing the web without javascript recently?)

    So this is a totally self made problem on society's part. We didn't HAVE to put ad agencies in control of everything. We did that because we are bloody unthinking idiots.

  15. I tend to agree with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    How many of us were adults when the Internet was just beginning to be offered to the general public? I helped the company I was working for at the time, back in the 90's, get a page on this newfangled 'world wide web' thing, email, and so on. We did everything on dialup modems because that's all there was. Then there was this new thing called 'broadband', and I had cable or DSL at home. Information was available in ways that it had never been before. Just like everyone else, I thought it was great, and had a bright future. But look at where we are now? The Internet is so toxic and cancerous in one way or another that some of us are in fact thinking about bailing out on it. Fighting SPAM. Fighting intrusive or just plain obnoxious advertising. Everyone trying to find some way to squeeze money out of you. Spreading propaganda and misinformation. Chronic attention whores. People addicted to their smartphones. Cybercrime on a level of endangering the stability of entire countries or causing disasters. Just having a computer connected to the Internet puts it at risk of being infected with malicious code, and if you have a smartphone it's more likely than not that it's infected with something right now that either spies on you, or steals from you. Governments using the Internet as a surveillance tool to the point where they'll commit what for a private citizen would be considered a felony (hacking). The list goes on. Is the living tree that is the Internet rotten at it's core? I'm thinking that it is, and maybe can't be saved at this point, the diseases that it's infected with may be fatal.

    I'm a logged-in user but I just don't feel like all the hate and usual Internet bullshit I'll get subjected to if I post this as me, so I'm not going to. Deal with it, this is how I feel about the Internet today, fuck you if you don't like it or don't agree with it. More of you than not are responsible for it being the sewer it is today.

    1. Re:I tend to agree with this guy by taskforceken · · Score: 0

      +1. Don't forget Equifax. Ironically, we would be better off if Chinese intelligence were behind the hack, than Russian crime rings intent on committing fraud.

      And it can get worse, much worse.
      Right-wing + internet = Trump 2016
      Trump + Twitter + Kim-jong-un = another Korean war.
      Imagine that, a presidential squabble on twitter, leads to a low-yield nuke delivered on Los Angeles.

    2. Re:I tend to agree with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As long as they do it while Trumpsky is visiting I'll consider it a fair trade.

  16. Smartphones damage cognitive ability even when off by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Other reported side effects from smartphones being off include diminished cellular reception, darker display, and a less-responsible touch-screen.

  17. Re:Ask Ash-Fox about his NDA lie rotflmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apk's run you out of your downmod points AshFox and gotten quite a reaction from you. Truth hurt? Yes obviously. Apk's posting it in every article and you have to endure it publicly. How humiliating for you. Hilarious. Priceless.

  18. Not just Silicon Valley ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a lot of us who are disengaging from this BS level of connectivity, don't care about smart phones, and refuse to be tethered, tweeted at, and constantly checking our email.

    I've had managers who can't put down their phone for two minutes, they call a meeting so we can explain something to them, and check their email so often they keep saying "what? sorry, I missed that" and you have to repeat what you said.

    I now have a hard limit of two of those before I leave the meeting. If you aren't capable of listening, then I'm not going to bother trying. If you can put your phone down long enough, great, I'll happily explain it to you .. otherwise I'll send your ADD ass an email and you can stop wasting my time trying to have an in person meeting with you while you're doing everything but paying attention. It's a waste of everybody's time in a meeting when half of the people are looking at 5 other things.

    And I'm not wasting my time if you have the attention span of a 6 year old or can only digest information in tweet sized chunks.

    Maybe this is an age thing, those of us who remember BBS's, IRC, and usenet are no longer quite so enthralled with the shiny baubles, and we want to get our damned work done.

    When work day is done, my phone stays in my laptop bag, or on the desk of my home office. I may periodically bring it with me if something specific is happening, but otherwise I'm not interested in being leashed to my email 24x7, I'm not checking my email constantly once the work day is done. And I sure as hell don't want a twitter feed, and endless stream of texts, or some stupid game which feels it must alert me every two minutes to be sure I'm playing (you know, seeing ads and spending money).

    You kids should try it, walking away from technology and not being constantly harassed by beeping phones is much more relaxing, and a whole lot healthier than jumping at your phone in the hopes that something awesome is about to unfold.

    People are like crack junkies with their phone, twitching and jonesing for the next time it goes ping. No thanks, not interested.

    I'm no luddite, I've been in the tech industry for a few decades, and I'm currently surrounded by 5 LCD displays all over 22", plus two phones. And like most people who have, the immediacy of the cool technology has lost its luster.

    But when I walk away from this heap of technology which surrounds me, I don't give it a second thought.

  19. Re:Ask Ash-Fox about his NDA lie rotflmao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep blowing your downmodpoints AshFox. You'll run out soon. It proves apk is getting to your lame lying ass here https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11203031&cid=55324025/

  20. Chicken Farm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my former managers would always say that his plan was to flush all the nonsense and buy a chicken farm. Funny thing, this was the 1970s, so times don't really change.

  21. Re:Smartphones damage cognitive ability even when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excessive smartphone use causes the user to scramble to hit the POST button without proofreading.

  22. It is true by cjonslashdot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I strongly believe that programmer productivity today is less than it was decades ago, partly a result of distraction and the inability to think deeply, and partly due to the poor quality of todayâ(TM)s tools and tool documentation. It is hard to measure programmer productivity, but I recall that when I worked on a DevOps team a few years back, there were things that should have taken minutes to do that I spent days on, âoebanging my head against a wallâ - because the tool did not work as advertised, or the API I wanted to use was poorly documented, and so I had to resort to trial and error. In addition, I recall that while I enjoyed working in an open room, I would often stop thinking and just stare at my screen, waiting for a nearby conversation to conclude. When I had to think deeply, I found that I could not - and so I would go home, do the deep thinking, and then return to the office the next day to code it up. I found that coding did not require deep thinking as long as the problem was "obvious", but if it was complex, I could not do it effectively in the open room. As for email, I learned long ago that I need to close my email program while I am working, and only check it at intervals. As for the phone, I don't use the phone that much - I am in the "older generation" and did not pick up the habit of always looking at it, and I discourage people from texting me, because I find that texting - which is pre-emptive - is very disruptive to deep thought.

    1. Re:It is true by tomxor · · Score: 1

      I recall that while I enjoyed working in an open room, I would often stop thinking and just stare at my screen, waiting for a nearby conversation to conclude. When I had to think deeply, I found that I could not - and so I would go home, do the deep thinking

      omg this! I enjoy the company of my colleagues, but the downside is that sometimes you have to wait for the "end of the working day" or WFH to get serious work done... headphones can work for me sometimes if I am driven enough and clear about what I am doing, but when as you say "deep thought" is needed, then it must be in a quiet environment. But I find this to be a huge dilemma for software development, because coding is only one part of it, sure it's the most important, but communication is necessary, and huge meetings are a waste of time and continuous interruptions are a waste of brain power... the solution seems to be to find a natural break in between coding to discuss things with managers, designers and others who happen to be in the "disturb me" mode. maybe if some perfectly noise cancelling headphones for silence came with open plan offices it would all work out...

    2. Re:It is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. The open plan cubicle farm of the 1990s is just as bad as the collaborative spaces of today. I always thought that a development team should have offices with doors, and everyone should have specific times when others can interact. Outside of those times, the doors are closed and software development is happening.

      Given that most programmers are anti-social - I do strongly believe that structured interactive time with colleagues, project managers, and most importantly users of their systems is highly desirable - in order to enhance the quality of what they do produce when the doors are closed.

    3. Re:It is true by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I strongly believe that programmer productivity today is less than it was decades ago, partly a result of distraction and the inability to think deeply, and partly due to the poor quality of todayâ(TM)s tools and tool documentation.

      I don't think so, as automation, orchestration (DevOps), code generation, software models, and pre-written frameworks allows you to do more. It used to be if you wanted an OS-agnostic set of bindings for I/O you had to write something, now you just pull it off the shelf. You had to worry about vendor-specific extensions for languages, but now standards reduce that requirement. If you wanted to build a complex set of software over multiple platforms, it could be hard to orchestrate it, but now with Jenkins and a bit of Docker, or another framework, and you can do that. With maven you can build a number of additional items along with the software build. Automated testing is better. So even if a programmer goofs off twice as much as 30 years ago, they should still be more productive in terms of delivered functionality. If DevOps isn't improving productivity something is going wrong, and yes, it's not a silver bullet.

    4. Re:It is true by cjonslashdot · · Score: 1

      Yes, good points. Orchestration frameworks definitely add a-lot in terms of what one can do. And automated testing is better too, you are right on that. Guess I am just griping about the things that are worse, and forgetting that some things have improved!

  23. Too much technology a crutch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think technology is becoming a crutch for our own thinking. In fact we don't think, we looked to a technology to answer everything. How many can find their way around a map? No they input point A and point B and follow the directions. Of course how many have ended up not where they wanted and never realized it until it was too late? Why? Because they relied on the technology to be right. Never bothered to verify, just believed it was correct. Sadly, we become a technology slave where if our cell phones don't work, internet is down, we can't figure out how to survive.

  24. FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "their companies are making the world a better place."

    Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

  25. "Everyone is distracted all of the time." by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm calling BULLSHIT on this claim.

    Gee, if only there was a "Do-Not-Disturb" on my phone -- oh wait, there is!

    Moreover, just because more and more people can't focus on something longer then 10 seconds doesn't imply _everyone_ is this neurotic.

    Hmm, if only there was a word for this ... I guess no one remembers the term: Self-Discipline

    > swipe or tap their phone 2,617 times a day.
    Holy shit are these people insecure and slaves to their addictions. Let me guess, this is because of "Social Media."

    Guess what, you have a CHOICE. Start living your own life instead of following someone's virtual life.

    You can still have an "online" presence and live a balanced life.
    i.e.
    Check your email / facebook / etc. 3 times a day -- morning, noon, and evening.

    Anything more then 3-7 times a day and you probably should seek professional help.

    1. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      checking facebook 3 times a day sounds like an addiction to me.

      Checking email once a day if you're at work and include the notion of "checking it at 8 AM and stopping at 5 PM" is my normal work routine. Doing that at home is addiction.

    2. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your email / facebook / etc. 3 times a day -- morning, noon, and evening.

      Anything more then 3-7 times a day and you probably should seek professional help.

      Or you will lose your job in the next round of cuts because your boss thinks you aren't a team player for not responding to every email within 10 minutes.

      Welcome to the modern world.

    3. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Never had a boss like this, wouldn't work for one that was. Get a little self respect.

    4. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the classic "this-wouldn't-be-a-problem-if-everyone-was-as-cool-as-me" argument.

      Guess what, they're not. Let's discuss the world as it is, not some hypothetical utopia populated by super-rational self-disciplined gods. If we lived there, we wouldn't have to contend with nine-tenths of the shit that gets discussed here. You don't need to point out that fact every time.

    5. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I'm out in the carport wrenching on the car, I'm not thinking about anything but my busted knuckles and how much I wish I had a garage with a concrete slab. I'm not thinking about celebrity bullshit I wish I could block from my stream entirely, or about how my last Slashdot comment was received, I'm trying to keep dirt out of a fresh flex line during a brake job. My cellphone isn't even in my pocket, because that's a good way to break it while you're rolling around on the ground.

      Maybe just about everyone whose job mostly involves sitting on ass is distracted all of the time, I'd buy that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a greybeard I know what you're talking about. But youngn'z do not know what it is to live without such things.
      So to them self-discipline is just not responding right away, living disconnected is unheard of for them.

      It's like growing up with vices in the family. One invites those same things on one's life because it is natural to them.

    7. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your email / facebook / etc. 3 times a day -- morning, noon, and evening

      You make it sound like it's as important as brushing your teeth, just dispose of that shit and go cold turkey, you will be happier. Do you even remember life without it? if you can't you should find out what it's like.

    8. Re:"Everyone is distracted all of the time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self respect is nice, but I need the money more.

  26. Re:That button is an icon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Designing an "awesome" button is so 1990's.

    Except the button was designed in 2007. You *do* know what the "awesome" button they're referring to is, don't you creimer?

    You should try being one of the silicon valley heretics by disconnecting yourself from the internet.

  27. Re:That button is an icon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ***Pay attention to the Moon update please***

    C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

    But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

    Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
    Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
    All the king's horses
    And all the king's men
    Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
    Together again.

    Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    With "Vice President Pence Vowing US Astronauts Will Return To the Moon", we are sure they will need miracle workers up there, here is what it would look like. Note that Creimy takes care of bringing a lot of food to the moon as depicted below:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Creimy's real pictures:
    Before the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/cc7Ddw
    After the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Creimy's "enterprise-level" chair, he talks about it all the time on slashdot:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Creimy's head, while his supervisor was talking to him, not with him, since it is impossible to do with Creimy:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    Creimy acting in educational resource document, he actually confirmed himself on Slashdot that he was handled by Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education! He is really a king Dumpty!:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

  28. Re:That button is an icon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! We, at Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education, couldn't agree more with you!

    For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

    IMPORTANT UPDATE:
    Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    -Nancy Guerrero

  29. Re:That button is an icon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you are spamming amazon affiliate links with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

    I tried to write to you nicely and apologizing but you are still ignoring me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

    Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

    How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

    The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

    You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

    When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

    Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

    Bonus:
    Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

    The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

    So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

    Signed:
    The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

  30. Re:Smartphones damage cognitive ability even when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You jest, but according to research ...

    Researchers at the University of Texas discovered that people are worse at conducting tasks and remembering information if they have a smartphone within eye shot. In two experiments they found phones sitting on a desk or even in a pocket or handbag would distract users and lead to worse test scores even when it was set up not to disturb test subjects.

    The effect was measurable even when the phones were switched off, and was worse for those who were deemed more dependent on their mobiles.

    In other words, if you are near your phone, and even if it's off, and especially if you're a slave to your phone ... then it is absolutely damaging to your cognitive ability. It literally makes you dumber, it's like withdrawal.

    For those of us who aren't addicted to our phones, we have seen this in action. It's alarming how many people can't put their phone down for even a short period of time -- alarming but not surprising, because we see it all the time.

    Learn to put the phone down and walk away.

  31. I totally get this. by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I do. As far as digital content and connectivity goes, we live in a world of abundance. Today true wealth lies in focus. And today, disconnecting from always-online can provide that to a very high degree, much better than trying to discipline yourself. Every time upgrading my smartphone is due, I think about going back to a feature phone and a paper calendar / filofax.

    I never really dug the Internet in whole. This always-online thing was suspicious to me back in the 90ies and - to a certain extent - still is today. I remember the Fidonet and pulling/pushing my stuff once a day. Perfect.

    Long story short, disconnecting is a good idea and I understand that for some only a radical move does the trick. I could be that one.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I totally get this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. As far as digital content and connectivity goes, we live in a world of abundance.

      I would say the exact opposite, it used to be that anyone could read the whole NY times for free by looking in any recycling bin. You could keep up with the latest literature for free, just go to the library. You used to be able to watch sports on free television with an antenna and no subscription. Now all the "good" content is behind paywalls, the NY times charges MORE to read the old stinky paper from the dumpster than the brand new one.

  32. I am glad by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    that someone has the courage to speak up. This addicition to live, real-time information is not healthy psychologically and physiologically. Every time I try to disconnect from the internet, the longest I've ever been able to make it has been 3 days.

  33. Backhoes and brainpower by istartedi · · Score: 1

    We've been living in a world of fossil-fuel powered earth movers instead of shovels. A lot of people are weak and/or fat, but not everybody. Some people hit the gym. For simple jobs some of us still use shovels. Computers can be for the brain what construction equipment is for the muscles. They can help us build things faster and better; but we can't use them as a crutch all the time. We need to hit the *mental* gym sometimes. I'm not sure what that looks like. Maybe it's as simple as reading, playing games like Chess and poker, or working a few math problems in your head once in a while. It's probably more than just turning off the phone for a while. Merely idling a dump truck doesn't give you stronger muscles.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  34. "Everyone is distracted, all of the time." by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Only to those of us who own such devices. I've never seen the need.

  35. My ~67 year old dad is the same way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He checked out from tech right before the dot com bubble burst, hasn't touched a computer except for email/web services since, but now since he got a fancy smartphone he spends his time pointedly ignoring people to futz around on it instead.

    I appear to be in the minority now in that I use the internet to try and help socialize or socialize with people I can't meet face to face often, whereas many people now use it to avoid socializing instead.

    1. Re: My ~67 year old dad is the same way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get him some hearing aids. And make him learn to use them

    2. Re: My ~67 year old dad is the same way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heâ(TM)ll use hearing aids the same way. By turning them down when he feels like it to about interacting with boring people.

  36. I AM NOT CREIMER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SO please tell me what's up wif this fool and a girl and a phermone clicker script. This sounds hilarious as shit.

  37. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people just can't seem to do things in moderation

  38. Social Cooling by mrwireless · · Score: 1

    There's another serious unintended consequence that I'm more worried about: Social Cooling. It describes how the reputation scores that databrokers like Equifax make and sell are increasingly influencing your job opportunities and other aspects of your life. As people become aware of this reputation economy they start to self-censor and avoid risk in order to have good scores.

    https://www.socialcooling.com/

    It will even get some attention in a public hearing on 'horizontal privacy' by the Dutch Government this thursday.

  39. Let's take a trip to 1960 by afc · · Score: 1

    And watch as a group of heretic TV producers disconnects from the medium because it's being used for advertisement instead of the arts...

    --
    Information wants to be beer, or something like that.
  40. Fun at parties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are probably as annoying as those people who go out of their way to tell you that they don't own a TV.