Slashdot Mirror


Tokyo Preparing For Floods 'Beyond Anything We've Seen' (tampabay.com)

In the face of an era of extreme weather brought on by climate change, global cities are working to improve their defenses. The New York Times reports (Warning: may be paywalled; alternative source) of Tokyo's $2 billion underground anti-flood system that consists of tunnels that divert water away from the region's most vulnerable floodplains. The city is "preparing for flooding beyond anything we've seen," says Kuniharu Abe, head of the underground site. From the report: But even in Tokyo, the onset of more frequent and intense storms has forced officials to question whether the region's protections are strong enough, a concern that has become more urgent as the city prepares to host the 2020 Olympic Games. Across Japan, rainfall measuring more than 2 inches an hour has increased 30 percent over the past three decades, the Japan Meteorological Agency estimates. The frequency of rainfall of more than 3 inches an hour has jumped 70 percent. The agency attributes the increase of these intense rains to global warming, heralding a new era in a country that is among the world's wettest, with a language that has dozens of words for rain. [...]

Experts have also questioned the wisdom of erecting more concrete defenses in a country that has dammed most of its major river systems and fortified entire shorelines with breakwaters and concrete blocks. Some of these protections, they say, only encourage development in regions that could still be vulnerable to future flooding. In eastern Saitama, where the Kasukabe facility has done the most to reduce floods, local industry has flourished; the region has successfully attracted several large e-commerce distribution centers and a new shopping mall. Still, the Kasukabe operation remains a critical part of Tokyo's defenses, say officials at Japan's Land Ministry, which runs the site. Five vertical, underground cisterns, almost 250 feet deep, take in stormwater from four rivers north of Tokyo. A series of tunnels connect the cisterns to a vast tank, larger than a soccer field, with ceilings held up by 60-foot pillars that give the space a temple-like feel. From that tank, industrial pumps discharge the floodwater at a controlled pace into the Edo river, a larger river system that flushes the water into Tokyo Bay.

98 comments

  1. Take China as an example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    30 years ago whenever the monsoon struck or if there was a flood, number of dead were in the hundreds, sometimes, thousands

    Today's China, the death have fallen drastically due to a lot of extra-ordinary water channeling projects China has undertaken

    1. Re:Take China as an example by nojayuk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back in September 2011 two sequential typhoons hit the southern end of Honshu, Japan's main island and the subsequent flooding killed about 90 people. Killer typhoons hit the Japanese islands pretty much every year.

      Japan is a dangerous place to live, even more dangerous than California with its earthquakes, mudslides, floods and fires. Planning to control and mitigate such disasters is a necessary part of government hence the uprating of the flood control systems already in place around Tokyo.

    2. Re:Take China as an example by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too bad they don't have a plan to deal with sea level rise. Unless they can turn the whole island into a boat (if anyone could do it, it would be Japan, but... no) then they're just fucked over the medium term, let alone the long term.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Take China as an example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and Godzilla. They have no defences against Godzilla either.

    4. Re:Take China as an example by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      Levees and vaults are great, until they fail.

      These constructions reduce the frequency of flood damage, but when they fail the areas they protect are generally unprepared for the failure - and the failure tends to be dramatic.

      They also have (heretofore) unforeseen consequences with respect to deposition of sediments, shoreline erosion patterns, etc.

      It is an expensive solution, both in up front and (punful) downstream costs. Simply moving high density development away from the low lying areas is far more economical.

    5. Re:Take China as an example by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I imagine the solution will involve mecha holding up a very large tarp to bide time while still larger mecha lift the islands up so that they can be carried over to the mainland and dropped on top of China some place.

    6. Re:Take China as an example by jiriw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try to tell that to countries which check the following boxes:
      -high population density
      -little develop-able high ground

      Examples: Japan, the Netherlands, Bangladesh, various pacific atoll-island nations.

      Now filter out the countries that:

      -have enough technical expertise to be capable to defend against flooding
      -have enough wealth or capability to raise capital to invest in water management projects
      -are politically stable enough to effectively plan for long-term flooding defences

      Strike the first two, keep the rest.

      Be glad you live in a country where non-coastal land is in abundance, for you can ridicule global warming induced rising sea-levels all you like (unless you choose to live in Florida). We know if we don't invest now, and stay investing, we'll be destroyed soon(tm). Water management is a necessary part of keeping our nation... a nation and not a giant flood plane. Having said that, please consider some nations don't have the technology/money to solve these problems they were mostly not responsible for in the first place... Which will probably mean another stream of refugees in a couple of decades. Not that it's of your concern....

    7. Re:Take China as an example by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Too bad they don't have a plan to deal with sea level rise.

      Don't let the Dutch know, their country might sink.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Take China as an example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how many times Tokyo got stomped by ,different variations of Godzilla, flood control is nothing in comparison.

    9. Re:Take China as an example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad they don't have a plan to deal with sea level rise.

      Especially when the big earthquake of 2011 caused a 2 foot drop in the elevation of the Honshu coastline. Sudden events like that are impossible to predict.

    10. Re:Take China as an example by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      ... and Godzilla. They have no defences against Godzilla either.

      Not true. They have Mothra to defend themselves from Godzilla.

    11. Re:Take China as an example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to add Singapore to your list.

      Thankfully there is tech expertise / government wealth / political stability to get some things done here.

    12. Re:Take China as an example by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Don't let the Dutch know, their country might sink.

      Pretty much their country is also threatened. There's a limit to what you can accomplish with dikes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Re:Fake News by Knuckles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm amazed about the willingness of people to believe fake news such as global warming. Scientists have yet to present credible evidence that humans are causing global warming. The propagandists continue to promote their message that humans are responsible, but without hard evidence, we shouldn't believe that humans are causing the Earth to get warmer. There may well be legitimate reasons to prepare for possible dosasters, especially in an area that experiences powerful typhoons. But that isn't a reason to invoke the myth that humans are causing global warming.

    You are the only one to invoke it, there is not a single word about human causes in TFA and it's entirely irrelevant in its context.

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  3. Tokyo in the Future by mentil · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    As we all know, in the near future (20XX is coming up fast!) Tokyo will be nothing but skyscrapers accessed via flying car, so it doesn't much matter if the ground is permanently flooded or not. For rural areas, look on the bright side: no having to manually flood your rice paddies, they come pre-flooded for your convenience!

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  4. Re:Awful source for this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world looks mighty good to me, cause liberal bias are all I see. Whatever it is i think I see, Becomes liberal bias to me. Liberal bias how I love your chocolatety chew. Liberal bias I think I'm in love with you! Whatever it is I think I see, becomes liberal bias to me.

  5. Metric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFS! Post in metric you arseholes! Or if you must use that obsolete crap then post a translation as well!

    1. Re:Metric! by nadaou · · Score: 1

      Is it really that hard to divide by three as you read?

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    2. Re:Metric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 inches - 5.08cm
      3 inches - 7.62cm
      250 feet - 7,620cm
      60 feet - 1,828.8cm

      For future reference, 2.54cm in an Inch, 12 Inches in a Foot, and 1 New York Times in a USA (so tends to use the same units their majority readership uses).

    3. Re: Metric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      250 survey feet = 7620.01524003048 cm

    4. Re:Metric! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The source numbers can't be in inches, is it really that hard to quote the actual metric numbers from Japan and put inches in brackets?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:Metric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really that hard to divide by 2.54 as you read?

      FTFY

    6. Re:Metric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 inches - 5.08cm 3 inches - 7.62cm 250 feet - 7,620cm 60 feet - 1,828.8cm

      For future reference, 2.54cm in an Inch, 12 Inches in a Foot, and 1 New York Times in a USA (so tends to use the same units their majority readership uses).

      7,620cm? 1828.8 cm? FFS, 76 meters, 18 meters! 76.2 and 18.28 or rounded to 18.3 if you want to be pedantic. I don't know anybody who uses metric who uses 100s and 1000s of cm for anything.

      bloody anon because I already moderated

    7. Re:Metric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey you get ONE conversion from me, that's it. Your leetle "metric" system is so easy to use, YOU do the divide by 100 bit then! Good lord, and you people call Americans lazy!

  6. Re:Awful source for this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That made me laugh. Thank you! Its been like 20 years since I heard that tune but you captured it perfectly.

  7. I don't know why they're even bothering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With this or the Olympics. It's going to blow up in 2019 anyway.

  8. Obligatory pun by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the summary basically boils down to Japan is dammed if they do, damned if they don't.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Obligatory pun by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That was terrible. And I feel bad about how much it made me laugh.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck does any of that drivel have to do with Tokyo becoming the Land of the Drying Concrete and convincing idiots to build in a flood plain cause "it must be safe they got dams and giant underground water storage tanks that also feature prominently in many anime and manga!"?

    Article is not about global warming.
    Article is not about mass shootings.

    Yeah we've all seen your posts, your constant, unceasing, unrelenting, 99% of the time off-topic posts about a hosts file. Literally no one gives a fuck. Pretty sure by this point it has nothing to do with actual moderation and has been scripted on the back end to detect your signature style and just mod you down automatically. Considering you have yet to show the intelligence required to change your style and attempt to get around it, I can only conclude your advice should be taken as seriously as advice on how to catch Santa Claus or the Lucky Charms leprechaun.

    Now to address your point: In this day and age, with the access to knowledge we have at our fingertips, the access to tools we have at our disposal, do you really believe a ban on bump stocks will stop illegal modifications to firearms? By which I actually mean have you bothered to familiarize yourself with the full workings of semi-automatic firearms and the processes to modify trigger pulls? Stop harping on the one thing the media has spoon-fed you t distract you from talking about real gun-control. A competent shooter could have pulled off almost the same rate of fire without any modifications at all. A competent shooter could get better parts to allow him to shoot even faster, and none of those parts are bump stocks. Its literally a matter of swapping out a few springs and reboring a hole and adding a different piston to make a semi-auto fire much faster. No part-ban is gonna fix that. So go, learn, and come back with a better proposition than banning a rather niche part meant for old farts who still want to shoot fast. Solve the problem, not a symptom.

  10. Storm water drains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Tokyo's $2 billion underground anti-flood system that consists of tunnels that divert water away"
    You mean like storm water drains/sewers? Like most of the cities in the world has? I know it's useless to complain, but why does everything have to be hyped up!?

    1. Re:Storm water drains by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      "Tokyo's $2 billion underground anti-flood system that consists of tunnels that divert water away"
      You mean like storm water drains/sewers? Like most of the cities in the world has? I know it's useless to complain, but why does everything have to be hyped up!?

      But they're "Library of Congress" sized storm drains.

    2. Re:Storm water drains by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Because it's not just storm drains. They have active measures to control the flow of water.

      Some places are fine with simple storm drains, but apparently Japan has required more extensive infrastructure.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    3. Re:Storm water drains by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      And really not that much either. Austin just blew 163 million on a flood control tunnel for downtown. One tunnel. Another factor the article may not have covered is impervious cover. The more development you have the more concrete that covers soil that previously soaked up rain. Austin is kind of a drought/flood area. I've wondered after living here awhile if maybe building codes should be changed so a cistern of say 50K gallons is required for new houses. This would absorb huge amounts of water during heavy rains and then provide irrigation water when dry.

    4. Re:Storm water drains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're okay with raising the cost to build a house by $50,000? That's what it would cost to put in a cistern of that size. It will have to be underground because lefties there don't want to see the eyesore those things would be above ground. What about small lots? You'd have to build the house above it costing even more to get the engineering right. All this would accomplish would be to make housing even less affordable to the lower and middle class.

    5. Re:Storm water drains by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      And Miami Beach is expecting to spend close to $500 million to combat the effects of rising sea level. That might buy them and extra 30-50 years before they have to abandon the city since sea level will continue rising for several hundred years at least.

    6. Re:Storm water drains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So NIMBY's are all "lefties" now? You are a simpleton douchebag asshole.

    7. Re:Storm water drains by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      What I am suggesting is much like the city imposed a new drainage fee to ALL residents because new construction caused more flooding, maybe the time has come to make the new guy bear the cost for the problem they create. As to size, I'm suggesting that the size of the cistern offset the additional runoff of the construction. For a typical 2500 sq ft house in Austin, I am guessing that is around 50K gallons. And yes that is a big cistern. We can get a foot of water in a day with some regularity.

  11. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Troll.

    Humans are causing global "warming" and that is more complicated than just warming, it's causing weather extremes, changes in food (food absorbs more carbon, becomes less nutritious and much larger) and sea level rise from melting ice.

    If all ice melts today, the entire eastern seaboard of the United States will be flooded up to I95. The West coast will fare a bit better.

    At the rate things are going right now, humans will not be around much longer. It will simply get too hot, and we haven't figured out how to grow vegetables in climate controlled environments. Nuclear war isn't going to be the end of us, failing to adapt will. If the United States is unwilling to pay attention to the evidence today, then the United States is going to end up being the Somalia of 22xx, where it has to steal supplies from it's neighbors, where as countries that decided to adapt will be the only ones able to produce anything.

  12. Re:Fake News by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Humans are causing global warming but so is everything else. Everything affects everything else.

  13. Re:Awful source for this story by butzwonker · · Score: 2

    Bias has never been a problem for people who can think.

  14. Re: Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vague statements and platitudes. This is what the current political wedge of "the old days were better" supplies in place of the science that got us _out_ of the old days and its horrors. We were given brains, let's celebrate their ability to understand how things work, instead of fearing it.

  15. What hype? What is your problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, when they're talking abut storm drains, they can also be described as "anti-flood" and can also, for those who do not know what they do to do that, explain what they do. HOW IS THAT HYPING???? HOW IS THAT WRONG???? And if it costs 2 billion, it costs 2 billion. Are you whining about how slashdot is saying 2 billion in an article where the cost set aside for the project is 2 billion????

    Why do you retards get your knickers in a twist for the most dumbass of non-reasons? Is it so you can feel persecuted therefore vindicated and worthwhile, explain away your failure as the result of persecution rather than your own hopeless stupidity?

    1. Re:What hype? What is your problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in the English speaking world, you know, the language this article is written in, underground anti-flood systems are called storm water drains. It's got a name, use it!

    2. Re:What hype? What is your problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I know English. Like a native. And not those fakers with their "American English". And having known the language from a young age, there's nothing there that is "hyped up".

      But maybe your mongrel bastardisation of the language has built up a fake narrative in your view of the words so placed.

      Storm drains are what? Anti-flood systems of underground drainage systems that take water away from flooding the plains.

      US cities use them, but within the city. Therefore they're not taking it away from running INTO flood plains, but through them. Unlike this system described here. So despite both being "storm drains", their purpose is significantly different and not carried by the term "storm drain". For anyone who knew what language WAS, they would know that these differences would necessitate using descriptions rather than an ontic dump of a phrase into the place of the reality.

      Clearly your problem isn't English, it's the purpose of language.

    3. Re:What hype? What is your problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Calm down girl! Who has their knickers in a twist now?

      The original AC is right. Choosing underground anti-flood systems if you have a perfectly serviceable, if slightly boring, term like storm water drain available is trying to make it sound more exciting.
      I have a car? What do you have? A lateral displacement conveyance?

  16. The climate always changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it is 100% expected and unstoppable. Why is this suddenly news?

    Learn to swim!

  17. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You are the only one to invoke it, there is not a single word about human causes in TFA and it's entirely irrelevant in its context.

    The effect of global warming is visible for pretty much anyone to see. Probably much worse than the scientists say since they only talk about things that they have hard proven evidence for - "beyond reasonable doubt" rather than the "balance of probabilities" standard you would use to decide something in a civil court or a sane person would use to decide whether to take action. The only possible way the global warming denialists can persuade people to ignore that reality is for them to challenge everything which even suggests that the weather is getting more unstable. For you this is irrelevant. For him this is another fact; a part of reality; a challenge to his lie. There are massive amounts of clear scientific evidence showing that humans are causing global warming. He knows it. Anyone educated who just reads up on this in detail knows it. Anyone who simply has a basic scientific understanding and an attention span more than five years to remember the denialists previous predictions knows it.

  18. Who pays for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad this isn't done in the US, since it is a waste of taxpayer dollars. Why should people in California subsidize Texans living in a flood plain? Japan already has had a long term crappy economy, and projects like this just ensure it stays this way.

    It is amazing that only the US has Libertarians. Ayn Rand's philosophy and her words ring true again and again. Socialism doesn't work. If someone can't buy something, someone else shouldn't be paying for them to have it, especially with exotic anti-flooding measures beyond tunnels and sewers.

    1. Re:Who pays for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why should people in California subsidize Texans living in a flood plain?

      1. Sooner or later California will be subject to a LARGE earthquake, where likely many thousands will die and millions will be displaced from ruined their homes. Plate tectonics is hard science and it works slowly but unstoppably.

      That time you and your fellow californians could be evacuated to Texas and the mid-west to survive, but if the locals remember your former cavalier attitude towards their flood plain / hurricane / dust bowl / etc. problems, you will be refused entry by a shotgun-and-pitchfork wielding posse. It is their privately owned barn after all, you or even the Feds have no title to expect shelter there.

      2. Alternative explanation: G-d YHWH of the Genesis book in the Old Testament mandated that mankind multiply and populate ALL the lands. He didn't command to populate only the pleasant and docile lands.

      > Japan already has had a long term crappy economy,
      > It is amazing that only the US has Libertarians

      "Long term" has a very different meaning in the "rest of the world" compared to America. Do you realize that Japan has been a nation state for at least 1300 years, while USA is less than 300 y. o.? (*) With libertarians at the helm you can rest assured that USA won't live another 300 years.

      (* Provable records of the still ruling japanese imperial family being monarchs of the island nation go back to about 700 AD, more or less the timeframe between reigns of King Arthur and Charlemagne. Non-verifiable legends put the first japanese emperor at about the same time when Buddha was born, circa 2300-2500 years ago.)

      > If someone can't buy something, someone else shouldn't be paying for them to have it, especially with exotic anti-flooding measures beyond tunnels and sewers.

      Japanese people don't think like that. They think like this: if we don't help them with flood control and they get drowned, they won't be around to help us when we are hit by an earthquake, tsunami or typhoon.

      Similarly in Finland, a european country much colder than Canada, fathers teach their sons no to kill thy neighbours, cause then nobody will be there to lend them a helping hand during the winter and alone they won't survive till spring.

      There are many regions of the world, where various hardships mandate only co-operating and "good samaritan" communities can survive in the long term and individual desires must take a secondary or tertiary seat.

      Furthermore, there is no Texas or California in Japan. They are a unified nation state and they have been such for 400+ years (since 1603 AD at least). Their population is 98.5% ethnic japanese, with mostly philippines and koreans taking up the remaining little 1.5%. The population is so homogenous that people don't think about themselves as primarily individuals, but rather as temporarily formed droplets of Nippon, so all rush towards a common aim, just like a river runs to the ocean. Of course this homogenity causes side-effects like widespread xenophobia and a tendency to fall into stagnation but nobody is perfect anyhow.

      > Ayn Rand's philosophy

      As far as I read her "philosophy" was that women shall sexually submit to and serve as priestesses / walking decorations for the ubermensch tycoon worship religion.

    2. Re:Who pays for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably one of the best arguments I've read on Slashdot. I see this all the time, "Why do we need to pay for this, why do we need roads/power/sewage" stuff.

      Very simple reason: Because people want to do something other than exist. This philosophy of Ayn Rand that has permeated the US's congress is why the US doesn't go into space, nor leads the world in technology and manufacturing. This is a philosophy that will lead to mediocrity at best, collapse at the worst. This is a philosophy of mindless greed, which doesn't do much except ensure that we will wind up hitting another Great Depression, or that people get so desperate that the country winds up in a state of constant turmoil.

      Thank you for setting a libertarian straight. These are people who have not passed economics (macro or micro).

  19. Its maximum flow must be staggering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets say its area equals to 2*soccer field, heavy rain means 2 inches each hour over all the area. It will take in water from way larger area than its own, say 10000 times its own area, about 55 square miles, then the tank's water level will rise at the rate of 5.5 inches per second.

    1. Re:Its maximum flow must be staggering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found some info about the pumps.. their combined flow is about 53000 gallons per second.

      "Bypassing a low-lying basin, it connects five watercourses to the main river. When they flood, the overflow from each river drains into a series of five giant cylinders joined by 6km of tunnels. Tokyo has, in effect, built a new river underground - 50m beneath the city - just for flood water. Powered by turbines modified from jet aircraft engines, these pumps are the heart of the system.

      Eiichi Oosu
      One of these pumps can pump out 50 cubic metres per second. There are four of these so we can discharge 200 cubic metres per second of water from this facility."
      http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/4112766.htm

    2. Re:Its maximum flow must be staggering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      53000 gallons per second is about 1/14 of the flow of Niagara falls.

  20. Re:Fake News by riverat1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm amazed about the willingness of people to believe fake news such as global warming. Scientists have yet to present credible evidence that humans are causing global warming. The propagandists continue to promote their message that humans are responsible, but without hard evidence, we shouldn't believe that humans are causing the Earth to get warmer. There may well be legitimate reasons to prepare for possible dosasters, especially in an area that experiences powerful typhoons. But that isn't a reason to invoke the myth that humans are causing global warming.

    Just because you're too stupid to recognize credible evidence about global warming doesn't mean that there isn't any. I'll start believing that global warming is fake news once people like you start producing credible evidence that the warming is natural.

  21. Re:Fake News by gtall · · Score: 3, Informative

    Statistics are your mathematical friend. Last we heard, critters other than humans were not digging up long buried hydrocarbons in statistically significant ways and dumping them into the atmosphere to catch those beautiful sun rays.

  22. Impersonating me? Weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Whoever you are attempting to impersonate me just proves I've REALLY gotten to you (thanks)!

    AssFux Ash-Fox? He's a weasel who ALWAYS starts w/ me (he's 'butthurt' I've busted him up on tech issues is all that is) - in fact, I'd bet you are HE doing this impersonating me.

    * HOWEVER (in a way) - I am with you on something though - there is a TON of bogus downmoderation but as the saying goes? "When all your opposition has is censorship you've obviously won"

    &

    I am highly against the LOON(s) who shot all those folks up in Vegas - I think it's somekind of falseflag OR an attempt @ further dividing our nation up ala the KING of bogus evil in that capacity, George Soros paying off groups like BLM & Antifa to do so - but GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE - people do. NO reason to ban guns!

    APK

    P.S.=> Provoking weasel reactions like yours is all the satisfaction anyone needs seeing as you try to "impersonate" me loser... apk

  23. Tokyo Preparing For 'Beyond Anything We've Seen' by Kludge · · Score: 4, Funny

    But will they be prepared for the surge of water when a 100 m tall monster rises from Tokyo Bay and rampages through the city?

  24. Massive waste of money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Another nation that will suffer from the Chinese global warming hoax. Too bad for them, but GREAT for us. They'll spend money on useless stuff while we forge ahead.

    1. Re: Massive waste of money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL you people are so dense man.

      Let's suppose for a minute that there was no global warming/cooling. These events would still be happening. They would still need this drainage system. This has 0 to do with global warming/cooling. They are just preparing for the worst, as we all should do.

    2. Re:Massive waste of money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a massive waste of a brain, skin and space. Your whole post reeks of stupid. Did you have someone type it out for you? Did you special needs nurse start your computer for you?

  25. Cross your fingers by spinitch · · Score: 2

    38M is greater Tokyo region, quite a large area and not that many people at risk if a huge event occurred. However the city center with wards like Edogawa at sea level with multiple rivers running on both sides could be swamped if sudden & or prolonged heavy rain over ran existing drainage. The system upstream can help alleviate heavy rain flooding more proactively. It wonâ(TM)t stop all flooding but should help minimize and most of all hopefully avoid a catastrophic flood.

  26. Anecdote by thomst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was a child, my family lived in the Tokyo area for a while. The first couple of years we were there, we lived in a suburban area that was pretty crowded, albeit with mostly low-rise residential and commercial properties.

    Our rental house sat about halfway up a fairly steep hill, at the bottom of which was an open-air market crowded with noodle vendors and the like. When I was five, there was a pretty intense typhoon. As I recall, it rained continuously for three days - and I mean it just bucketed down to the point where it was difficult to see the houses across the one-and-a-half-lane street.

    The fourth day was clear, bright, and almost cloudless, so I finally got to go outside again. I wanted to visit the marketplace, but I couldn't, because the bottom of the hill was submerged under about 10 feet of water.

    So, local severe flooding is nothing new for Japan - although I have no doubt it's getting worse - and addressing it via infrastructure improvements is certainly non-trivial in a nation whose population is almost entirely urban nowadays.

    (BTW - I also experienced my first major earthquake in that house. It had to have been at least a 6.5, because it lasted at least half a minute. But that's a story for another time ... )

    --
    Check out my novel.
  27. Not this shit again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the Japanese don't have 50 words for rain. Just like the Inuit don't have 50 words for snow. They have words for different types and compound words to describe different rain situations - ala 'downpour', and they have many phrases/coloquialisms as well like 'fuu' which is an onomatopoeia for wind/blowing, and can be used to reference a windy/stormy rain.

    Stupid liberal mystical orientalist bullshit.

    1. Re:Not this shit again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, if someone is wrong on the internet they are a liberal.

  28. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists have yet to present credible evidence that humans are causing global warming.

    Yes, because it might be the squirrels causing it.

    There has actually been an excessive amount of credible evidence presented. It seems that none of it made it as far as the hole you keep your head in.

  29. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    History shows, again and again, how nature points out the folly of men.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, oh! They say he's got to go, go go Godzilla!
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T65rW_SIzg0

  30. Re:Fake News by EndlessNameless · · Score: 2

    Scientists have yet to present credible evidence that humans are causing global warming.

    OK, then. You explain the increase in rainfall that has been observed in Japan over the last 30 years.

    Your explanation must be backed by sound theory, historical evidence, and peer-reviewed research. We're all looking forward to receiving your wisdom. Best of luck, and godspeed.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  31. Re:MODERATORS ARE CENSORING POSTS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People couldn't impersonate you effortlessly if you created an account and logged in.

    This is your own problem. Cry about it somewhere else.

  32. Global progressivism at its best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brought on by Climate change lol

  33. Re:Real News but called fake by big oil supporters by Utgard-xyz · · Score: 1

    We are doomed. With stupidity like this as rampant as it is, it's hopeless.

  34. Foods beyond anything we've seen by mick129 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tokyo is preparing even weirder foods? I'd read about that.

    Oh, floods. Boo.

    --
    Move along, no sig to see here.
  35. Re:Fake News by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    Global warming is an irrelevant factor to such defenses. Any large metropolis that wants to maintain such a classification for hundreds of years must assume that a 1,-10,000 year event of each major natural disaster present in the area has a good chance of occurring and should engineer accordingly if it wants to remain a large metropolis after the fact.

  36. Humans and other causes of global warming by XXongo · · Score: 2

    Humans are causing global warming but so is everything else. Everything affects everything else.

    That statement is so vague as to be almost meaningless, but, yes, for a restricted set of "everything", it is true.

    The vagueness lies in the unaddressed question, how much global warming is caused by humans, and what is the effect of that? The answer is, an estimated 3 plus or minus 1.5 degrees of global warming is caused by humans due to each doubling of carbon dioxide concentration in the air, and the effects of that are hard to calculate, but will definitely include sea level rise, shifts of growing areas, and very likely changes in the severity of storms.

    The "true" part, however, is also important to keep in mind: anthropogenic global warming does not occur instead of natural causes of variation; it is in addition to natural causes of variation. There will still be natural flucturations on top of the more or less steady increase in temperature due to human actions.

  37. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? I'm not sure I'm seeing global warming...

    I just read an article that reasoned that we have not seen an increase in global temperature in the past 20 years is because a little Ice Age we are in or coming out of has negated global warming. smh.

    There's so much climate change horse crap flying everywhere...

  38. Redundant words? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In the face of an era of extreme weather brought on by climate change" What other reason are there for extreme weather than climate change? Err... Sorry, huge nukes, volcanoes and big ass meteorites. I guess they have to specify that its not to protect from extreme weather for those reasons.

  39. Re:Fake News by riverat1 · · Score: 2

    So the raw data is available. Why hasn't anyone posted graphs based on that? The answer is because they still show warming. In fact if you go back 100 years the raw data shows a higher rate of warming than the adjusted data (mainly because of the way sea surface temperatures were measured before WW II with buckets thrown over the side that cooled some before they got them on deck to measure the temperature).

  40. Indeed by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Japan is threatened more by Climate Change, because it is nearer to China who invented it, according to a fucking moron.

  41. Re:Fake News by mean+pun · · Score: 1

    It is a stone fact there has been no warming of any kind, man-made or natural, in the past 20 years.

    Surely you mean a stoned fact? Because that is the only way this makes any sense.

  42. Re:Fake News by Doc+Right · · Score: 0

    Guessing you missed the IPCC report that no warming has occurred lately.

  43. Galatea and Akira by williamyf · · Score: 2

    This is fake news.

    The "tunnels for floods" is a cover up.

    The real reason for the network of tunnels is to provide hidden burial places for Akira and Galatea.

    Nuff' said!

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  44. Preparing for what? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Is is bad that I read the title as:
        Tokyo Preparing For Foods 'Beyond Anything We've Seen'
    ?
     

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  45. In other news, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, country entirely surrounded by water gets lots of rain.

    Glad to see a city taking its flooding problem seriously I wish Houston had spent money on actual drainage rather than just retention ponds.

    The increase in rain events over 3" of rain per hour might be due to the increase in the number of rain gauges / weather stations.

  46. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God dammit grandpa, I told you to get off my internet.

  47. Re:Fake News by DaRyuujin · · Score: 1

    Every time somebody talks about "climate change" and the "extreme weather it causes" is pushing the idea that our planet's environment is undergoing some rapid change and it's just not the case. "global warming" hasn't been proved to be anything more than typical climate change thats natural to our planet. Anybody insulting those who have that stance are ignorant to do so because if they looked at the actual science (not these "97% of climate scientists agree" fuckers who misrepresent scientific papers and studies but real scientists you would see there is by NO means a large consensus among scientists that man made climate change is causing extreme weather. So let them sling their insults, hold your head up high knowing you go off facts not propaganda.

  48. Re: Fake News by Knuckles · · Score: 1

    This is also irrelevant as the only thing that matters here are the locally increased flooding events, regardless of the reasons

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  49. You. You are the girl with their knickers in a wad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You whined about it being hype. No reason. You whined about me not knowing English. You were wrong. And now you're trying to pretend that you being wrong is my fault.

    And still no reason why you whined to begin with.

    So who is the girl with their knickers in a wad? You.

  50. Re:Impersonating me? Weak by fisted · · Score: 1

    Whoever is "impersonating" you seems to be doing a decent job as their incoherent retarded gibberish is indistinguishable from your incoherent retarded gibberish.

  51. Re:Impersonating me? Weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard the guy in Vegas was using a Hosts file to protect himself....

  52. Re:Awful source for this story by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    Bias of any sort is a problem for everyone. It's a gentle nudge in a direction, not a hard push.
    If you think intelligence keeps you from being influenced by bias, or being biased yourself, you're deluding yourself.

  53. Re:Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't read that report, because it only exists in your made-up fairy land.