Slashdot Mirror


KDE Plasma 5.11 Released (kde.org)

jrepin writes: KDE publishes this autumn's Plasma feature release, KDE Plasma 5.11. Plasma 5.11 desktop environment brings a redesigned settings app, improved notifications, a more powerful task manager. Plasma 5.11 is the first release to contain the new "Vault," a system to allow the user to encrypt and open sets of documents in a secure and user-friendly way, making Plasma an excellent choice for people dealing with private and confidential information.

4 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. what underlies "vault"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is vault a GUI around ecryptfs? I could not find the underpinning technology in TFA.

    I like KDE. It has flaws sure and it is easy to pick on those. However it still offers great and easy configurability: you can have focus follow mouse or click to focus. Auto-raise on hover or not, with configurable time. Different policies for remembering window pos/size on open, on a per-window or per-app basis if you like. Almost anything can be configured.

    When all other desktops are chasing the "no configuration for YOU" model, it is nice to have a single one left which still believes I am able to decide for myself how I want it to work, even if that single one still has troubles here and there.

  2. Re:Design Inconsistency by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop trying to copy Apple and Microsoft designs!

    Why? They've done all the hard work figuring out how to make things people will use and people are accustomed to and productive with it.

    Do something different, something innovative, something that will make people want to use it over Apple and Microsoft

    Being fast, stable and not being proprietary or invasive is all the innovation I require.

    KDE seems to have gotten the message. Don't indulge iconoclasts and convolute the basic functionality of a traditional desktop. There was never anything actually wrong with the design of traditional desktops except when they fail to fully exploit the capabilities of hardware. Today that problem is apparent when dealing with scaling on high resolution displays. Users just want that issue solved; scale, do it without glitches and disruptions and leave the rest alone. Do that and we're good for another ten years until we're all wearing VR headsets or something.

    You're free to go make whatever innovate thing pleases you; nothing is stopping you. But the fact that KDE is no longer among the DEs trying to force feed "innovation" on its users is a minor miracle as far as I'm concerned. Thank you KDE.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  3. Re: Design Inconsistency by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, right after Microsoft copied from KDE they copied it right back! Actally Microsoft still doesn't have most of the capabilities KDE has. Go ahead, change your Windows to look like OS X, with the buttons on the upper left, and while you are at it create several named virtual desktops and application groups that automagically go them when launched with Windows.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  4. Re:Design Inconsistency by CRC'99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    KDE seems to have gotten the message. Don't indulge iconoclasts and convolute the basic functionality of a traditional desktop. There was never anything actually wrong with the design of traditional desktops except when they fail to fully exploit the capabilities of hardware. Today that problem is apparent when dealing with scaling on high resolution displays. Users just want that issue solved; scale, do it without glitches and disruptions and leave the rest alone.

    In a nutshell, this. I get flamed every time I call Gnome for being the shitty system it is. I'm typing this on Fedora 27 Beta using KDE with 3 x 1920x1080 screens - and it just works. It doesn't take 1/4 of a window with big ass thumb/touchscreen friendly bars. It stays out of my way and lets me get the rest of the stuff I want to do done.

    If KDE got the manpower behind it that gets wasted with Gnome, it wouldn't just be superior, it'd be fantastic.

    --
    Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.