Slashdot Mirror


Dutch Government Confirms Plan To Ban New Petrol, Diesel Cars By 2030 (electrek.co)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Electrek: Today, the new Dutch government presented its detailed plan for the coming years and it includes making all new cars emission-free by 2030 -- virtually banning petrol- and diesel-powered cars in favor of battery-powered vehicles. The four coalition parties have been negotiating their plans since the election in March and now after over 200 days, they have finally released the plan they agreed upon. NL Times posted all the main points of the plan and in "transportation," it includes: By 2030 all cars in the Netherlands must be emission free. While some local publications are reporting "all cars," we are told that it would be for "all new cars" as it is the case for the countries with similar bans under consideration. The potential for the ban has been under consideration in the country since last year. The year 2025, like in Norway, has been mentioned, but they apparently decided for the less ambitious goal of 2030.

7 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What happens by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hope you're able to make enough Lithium batteries for 2 billion cars a year.

    Nonsense. There aren't 2 billion cars on earth, and even if there were they would not all need to be replaced in one year.

    There are about 60 million cars made per year. With the expected shift to on-demand SDC taxis, that could decline dramatically.

    Known lithium reserves are about 15 million tonnes. A car with a 300 km range uses about 10kg of lithium. So we have enough for 1.5 billion cars, or about enough to replace every gas car on earth.

    Of course, new lithium reserves will be found, and as a fallback we can extract lithium from geologic brine, or even the oceans which contain about 230 billion tonnes (enough for 30 trillion cars).

  2. Re:There they go again by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll admit I can't be bothered to RTFA. But, from what I'm seeing, they're banning gasoline & diesel engines.

    It doesn't sounds to me like they're picking "winners." Electric, hydrogen fuel cell, hydrogen IC, and CNG should all pass, as well as cars that run on smugness, self-satisfaction, or pixie dust. What fails is gasoline and diesel.

      So it sounds more like they picked the "losers."

  3. Re:What happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're in England, than you know what a good car is.

    One made in Germany...

  4. As for motorcycles... by burhop · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... The link also says "The cabinet is banning criminal motorcycle gangs."

    I'm glad the legal gangs with their electric scooters aren't being targeted.

    (Just gave up my right to mod this article for this post)

  5. Re:There they go again by Chuq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then it's going to turn out that manufacturing and remanufacturing batteries en masse is a dirty and expensive business

    It seems the Koch brothers propaganda and smear tactics are working well on some people.

    --
    - Chuq
  6. Re:What happens by dunkelfalke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe in the USA where it is apparently the norm to repeal decisions of the previous government purely out of spite, but in Europe legislation can easily survive for centuries.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  7. Re:There they go again by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) All cars have greatly increased in safety over time, not just smaller cars. How anyone could interpret this as a bad thing is beyond me. And vehicle sizes vary alongside the cost to purchase and operate them, which should surprise nobody; no conspiracy or "value judgement" is required.

    2) Since when has anyone seen natural gas vehicles as "bad"? They've never been popular, but that's not the same as "bad".

    3) Corn ethanol has never been popular among environmentalists; they've been someone of the most adamant opponents. Some support other biofuels, such as algal biodiesel or switchgrass ethanol, but others don't support any biofuels at all. As for corn ethanol, it's popular among farmers (and consequently, their representatives in congress).

    4) No, EV batteries don't contain heavy metals (like your gasoline vehicle's battery does). The worst things that they contain (and which aren't a fundamental requirement) are nickel and cobalt (like you find in stainless steel alloys - minus the much more problematic chromium). Nickel has contact sensitivity, but you're not going to be wearing EV cathodes as earrings. Both have health effects as dusts or soluble salts (not at abnormally low concentrations, mind you) - but neither are in the form of dusts or soluble salts, they're in the form of inert oxides (less prone to leaching than even stainless steel). Minor leaching from battery packs would actually be a good thing, mind you, because large chunks of the world's grasslands are cobalt deficient, which hinders B12 production (cobalamin). Not that you'd actually leave them just sitting around, because nickel and cobalt are valuable ($10 and $50/kg, respectively), and the cathodes are surprisingly similar to rich nickel-cobalt ores already.

    5) Yes, there always will be something better because that's what the advancement in technology leads to. If you don't like that, go Amish.

    --
    "If there was an antonym to 'Elon Musk', it would be 'Richard Branson'."