Slashdot Mirror


Toronto To Be Home To Google Parent's Biggest Smart City Project Yet (techcrunch.com)

Sidewalk Labs, the smart city subsidiary of Alphabet (the parent company of Google) with the stated goal of "reimagining cities from the Internet up," now has a very big sandbox in which to conduct its high-tech experiments. From a report: That's obviously an ambitious project, but some of the groundwork is already being laid: Alphabet's Google will be the flagship tenant for the new neighbourhood, anchoring the easter waterfront, to be called "Quayside," and Sidewalk Labs has committed $50 million to kick off pilot testing and planning in partnership with the City of Toronto. Sidewalk Labs won the contract through its response to a Request for Proposals issues by Waterfront Toronto, and organization created by the Canadian federal government, the Ontario provincial government and the City of Toronto together to foster development of Toronto's lakefront areas in ways that address urban sprawl while respecting the realities of climate change and taking into account the ability of the city's residents to get around efficiently. The area involved in the RFP that Sidewalk Labs will work with the government coalition to develop spans around 800 acres (though 12 acres are specified for the initial project), and is one of the largest underdeveloped urban areas in any North American city, making it a good target for Sidewalk's ambitious vision, which involves building smart cities holistically from the very start. Ultimately, the partners hope to turn the area into a "place for tens of thousands of people to live, work, learn and play -- and to create and advance new ideas that improve city life," according to a release from Sidewalk.

10 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Quayside? by ganjadude · · Score: 2

    so the san francisco of canada?

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  2. "building smart cities holistically" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    which involves building smart cities holistically from the very start

    Toronto is well known for these planned communities that end up becoming total disasters. Regent Park is a 1940s/1950s-era attempt at a planned community that failed. St. James Town is a 1960s-era attempt at a planned community that failed. Crescent Town is a 1970s-era attempt at a planned community that failed. Don Valley Village is yet another 1960s/1970s-era attempt at a planned community that failed. Those areas became well-known as hotbeds of crime and poverty. Why should anyone expect this "building smart cities holistically from the very start" initiative to fare any better?

    1. Re:"building smart cities holistically" by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Toronto is well known for these planned communities that end up becoming total disasters.

      I don't think you understand what planned communities mean - because your example are housing projects and apartment complexes, not planned communities.

  3. Re:Wut? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2

    It's like the difference between a regular TV and a smart TV.

    So in a smart city, you can do cool stuff you can't do in a dumb city, but you risk bricking the city with every software update.

  4. More gentrification? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    Is this just more places to live for rich people, and the middle class and poor can just bugger off? If so then GTFO, Google.

    1. Re:More gentrification? by doconnor · · Score: 2

      This is empty, former industrial land.

    2. Re:More gentrification? by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      If you really want places for the middle classes and poor to live, then you should support more density in your neighborhood.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:More gentrification? by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      I see, if your neighborhood allowed more density, you would be evicted from your house and forced to "live stacked on top of other people and sharing walls."

      Thanks for clearing that up!

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  5. Ubisoft Toronto by dristoph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Somewhat ironic choice of city; Ubisoft Toronto was the developer for Watch Dogs 2, a pretty fun game which explores the implications of ubiquitous "smart city" tech under the ownership of monolithic organizations.

  6. Re:we must dissent by JohnFen · · Score: 2

    I haven't played Alpha Centauri in a very long time. Now I want to play it again. Thanks for destroying all of my free time for the next several months!