Slashdot Mirror
Could VR Field Trips Replace the Real Thing? (theindychannel.com)
turkeydance shares a report from RTV6, which cites a new editorial in the journal Science that explores the question, "Could VR field trips replace the real thing?" Virtual field trips have been around for a while, but they used to be pretty boring: some photos, some text -- basically a Wikipedia entry. But they've come a long way. Nearpod and Google Expeditions let students immerse themselves in places they couldn't normally visit, like Antarctica or even Mars. These virtual field trips are safer and easier to organize than real outings, and they might soon be cheaper, too. Douglas McCauley, assistant professor of ecology at the University of California, Santa Barbara, says traditional field trips have already declined under budget constraints, so schools might be tempted to simply make a switch. McCauley says he's excited about the possibilities of VR. Taking students back to prehistoric times or forward to witness the results of climate change could be a powerful teaching tool.
Field trips haven't just declined, they've been decimated. VR would be an improvement over nothing. VR that allows group participation (similar to conference type VR) with the teacher in the VR would be very useful.
But, it would be better to look at this as something new that opens up doors that field trips never could. VR can take you anywhere from inside a molecule or cell to visiting anyplace on Earth at any time in history to walking on the moon. It's a potential boon to the learners that have to see things, walk around them, etc.
no. Add to them, ok. Replace them? Only for people that don't care.
places they couldn't normally visit, like Antarctica or even Mars. These virtual field trips are safer and easier to organize than real outings, and they might soon be cheaper, too
The guy claims that the reason (OK, one reason) for the decline in field trips is budgetary. Then the article tells us that VR trips might be cheaper?
Well if they only "might" be cheaper (though I would expect them to be a dam' sight cheaper than a trip to Mars - or Antarctica) then that doesn't sound like they are addressing the issue claimed.
However, the real reason field trips have declined is simply because of all the litigious parents and liabilities that schools incur, need to insure against and have to account for. Trips are simply not worth the hassle of organising and dealing with the fallout.
Though I expect there are already parents gearing up to sue the arse of schools and teachers for the "stress" of making their little darlings wear a VR helmet - or the cost of their "destroyed" hair-do.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
the question is the same as "Could VR Field Trips be better than not doing it at all?" because there's no way they're going there in any way otherwise.
But seriously, why would anyone want a VR "woods simulator" instead of taking them to the woods, for example?
VR will replace the screen for space and mecha games. In short, it will replace where it makes the experience *more* real, not less.
So, no, VR is not a replacement for field trips and never will be.
Captain Obvious was glad to help.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
then it can replace real field trips. In its current state, it's just a slightly better version of a 3D movie.
If it's for big and well known things, fuck yes indeed .... completely ruining the experience
- most of those museums/sights/... are completely overrun by tourist, tourist shops,
- and even if you get a nice look at it, you can't stand there for a few minutes enjoying it since there are hundreds of people waiting behind you...
- and just the ecological sense of going somewhere for seeing something like that etc...
- and indeed, all the practical shit that comes along with it
give me a decent virtual tour of any big monument/museum/... over going there! i might actually enjoy just being able to look at an important work for more than a few minutes, not be tired of a stupid travel to get there, not be bothered by tons of other people also wanting to see it and having to make photographs with their flash on, etc... etc... etc...
now if it's for a nice relaxing vacation on some remote place just enjoying the fresh air and sitting in a tent, i doubt VR will replace that XD.