Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Plans Factory In China, Discounts Insurance For Self-Driving US Cars (electrek.co)

Business Insider reports: Tesla has created a customized insurance package, InsureMyTesla, that is cheaper than traditional plans because it factors in the vehicles' Autopilot safety features and maintenance costs. InsureMyTesla has been available in 20 countries, but Tesla just recently partnered with Liberty Mutual to make the plan available in the U.S. InsureMyTesla shows how the insurance industry is bound for disruption as cars get safer with self-driving tech.
Electrek reports: There have been several false alarms over the past few years about Tesla building a factory in China. Earlier this year, Tesla finally confirmed working with the Shanghai government to establish a manufacturing facility in the region and promised an announcement by the end of the year. Now the Wall Street Journal reports that they have come to an agreement with the local authorities on a "wholly owned" factory in the region... China is already the biggest market for electric vehicles, or any vehicles for that matter, and Tesla profited from the demand by tripling its sales to over $1 billion in the country in 2016. Tesla continues to have strong sales in the country this year, where it leads foreign electric car sales with no close second.

104 comments

  1. They should close in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move it to Mexico ASAP.

    1. Re:They should close in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, UAW is working on it.

  2. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Chinese gigafactory is for the Chinese market (the largest EV market in the world). The US gigafactory is for the US and European markets (although the EU will likely get its own gigafactory eventually).

    --
    I'll BUILD someone to replace you. Some kind of gamma-powered monster, with a heart as black as coal!
  3. Collective? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    What is not clear is if InsureMyTesla will make rates equal for all drivers always, regardless of the accidents they get into as individuals. They all have the same flaws since they all use the same software, and therefore have the same risk. Therefore all owners should pay on a collective basis.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re: Collective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, RTFS or RTFA. Liberty Mutual is the insurer of record in the US, just like AARP insurance is really provided by Hartford.

    2. Re:Collective? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      They all have the same flaws since they all use the same software, and therefore have the same risk.

      Not true. If I commute everyday on the highway, and you drive twisty icy mountain roads, or if you live in a bad neighborhood with lots of uninsured drivers, the risks will not be the same. With conventional insurance, your zipcode can often affect your premiums as much as your driving record.

      Legal differences also matter, especially in how medical expenses are covered. Some states allow hospitals to bill auto insurance companies directly, while others require the hospitals to bill the patients medical insurance company, which is then reimbursed by the auto insurance company. The former leads to much higher costs than the latter.

    3. Re:Collective? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They all have the same flaws since they all use the same software, and therefore have the same risk.

      Only if the insurance only covers the driver while auto-pilot is engaged.

      I'm actually wondering if it is going to be the complete opposite where the insurance rate is not only determined by the driver history and traits, but also vehicle diagnostics. E.g. insurance rates go up if you accelerate heavily, break heavily, frequently suddenly turn the steering wheel, leave your hands off the wheel with auto pilot engaged for too long, go around corners too fast, speed, etc.

      Reminds me of our one of the company cars I had. It contained sensors that monitored acceleration when going into a corner and automatically SMS'd your boss if you're not taking corners gently enough. It did cut out nearly all accidents though.

    4. Re:Collective? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      No, I still think there should be a surcharge for stupid drivers.

      If you're young and stupid and decide to watch a blockbuster movie with your DVD player sitting on your passenger seat (while keeping your hands on the wheel, because otherwise, the car gets upset at you), then you could still get into a head-on collision.

      Also let's be honest here, killing an entire family with your car is probably going to be much more expensive in a place like LA or New York than a place like Arkansas. In Beverly Hills alone, a small 1 mm scratch on the wrong car could cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    5. Re:Collective? by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Legal differences also matter, especially in how medical expenses are covered. Some states allow hospitals to bill auto insurance companies directly, while others require the hospitals to bill the patients medical insurance company, which is then reimbursed by the auto insurance company.

      Michigan is the only state with *unlimited* medical liability coverage for automotive insurance. People here are always asking why our premiums are so incredibly high.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    6. Re:Collective? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But the driver does not have control how they drive on those twisty mountain roads. You're talking about penalizing people not by the performance of their driving but just by the fact that they are using the car in a certain situation. A person in a manual car may choose to drive 20 mph on that twisty icy road and never get in an accident. You want to hold them responsible for automation deciding that 60mph on the road is ok.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:Collective? by mspohr · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the US, they are using Liberty Mutual for "Insure my Tesla".
      Out of curiosity, I entered my information and received an insurance quote for my Tesla which is 4 times what I am currently paying.
      So... not a good deal... at all.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    8. Re:Collective? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Autonomy proponents seem to be all over the map with regards to whether it is actually safe or not. At one end of the range you have, "Autonomous driving is already way safer than people". On the other end you have, "people are stupid and might trust autonomous driving". Which the hell is it? It's two-faced and you can't have it both ways. If Tesla thinks Autopilot is safe, it should be insured as such. If autopilot is active then driver is not responsible. Otherwise it's not safe. It's that simple.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Collective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay more per year in insurance than what my vehicle is worth. Same was true for the last two vehicles I owned that were more than a few years old.

    10. Re:Collective? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      But the driver does not have control how they drive on those twisty mountain roads.

      But they do have a choice of where to live.

      If you choose to live in the mountains, don't expect others to subsidize your lifestyle.

    11. Re:Collective? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Oh my lord. Yes by all means, lets just have hospitals schools and firestations in heavily populated places as well. Let's not build and maintain roads there either, or pick up trash or provide clean water.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    12. Re:Collective? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they are planning on using data from your car. In the UK you can opt to have a telemetry box installed in your car which monitors your driving. If you drive "badly" it reports you to the insurance company and they jack up your premium, otherwise you get a small discount. They are not very reliable - for example some cars with very small engines need full throttle to get slow up steep hills, which looks to the box like you are accelerating really hard.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re: Collective? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      My current low cost insurance does that but Liberty doesn't.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  4. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And less need to worry about harassment lawsuits in China.

  5. If Tesla trusts its self driving by hsmith · · Score: 2

    Why do you have to pay insurance for their self driving? If Tesla trusted its self driving feature, it would indemnify the owners in the event of an accident. The fact you have to buy coverage hits on the fact it is an alpha release of âoeself driving.â

    1. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by Vairon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Legally in the US you are required to either have a minimum set of insurance or put up a large amount of money in a bond with the state in lieu of insurance. The latter may differ from state to state.

      If you are effectively forced to buy insurance anyway, Tesla is partnering with Liberty Mutual to offer discounted (supposedly) insurance that takes the cars self-driving and other safety features into account to hopefully give you a better insurance rate.

    2. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      When you drive your car, do you control all the external factors?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I would assume the driver is not responsible if autopilot is active.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Of course not but the important thing is that I have control to protect myself from any external factor I deem unsafe in the way that I drive. Of course no one will see everything, but a person has a choice to drive at a speed that is safe for them and that will leave a very negligible risk due to circumstances totally beyond their control. On the other hand, a person does not have the same freedoms if software is driving for them.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If you are effectively forced to buy insurance anyway, Tesla is partnering with Liberty Mutual to offer discounted (supposedly) insurance that takes the cars self-driving and other safety features into account to hopefully give you a better insurance rate.

      Unlike all other insurances, that blissfully ignore any vehicle's track record and safety features. This is just a PR stunt where Liberty Mutual offers a volume discount for Tesla to send customers their way.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If software is driving for them, the cars won't exceed speed limits. More software-driven cars means a more constant flow of traffic, means less accidents.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But people often drive below the speed limit because they want to be safe. Who is to say a person in a manual car driving way below the speed limit is not going to be safer than whatever automation chooses?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by aphelion_rock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if they are applying discounts for their own repair work. Tesla cars are notoriously expensive to repair and not all accidents are your own fault and not all other drivers are insured or will own up to a parking lot incident.
      This is what $30k of damage looks like.
      http://gas2.org/2015/01/06/thi...

    9. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to pay insurance for their self driving? If Tesla trusted its self driving feature, it would indemnify the owners in the event of an accident. The fact you have to buy coverage hits on the fact it is an alpha release of âoeself driving.â

      I guess you're talking about the liability portion of an auto insurance policy, which is what is required by law. If you finance your car purchase, the finance company will require you to also carry comprehensive and collision coverage. Liability insurance won't pay to fix your car if a tree falls on it while it's parked in your driveway, or if someone slams into it in a parking lot, or if a truck kicks up a rock that cracks your windshield.

    10. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Who is to say a person in a manual car driving way below the speed limit is not going to be safer than whatever automation chooses?

      Statistics. That's what insurance companies use.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:If Tesla trusts its self driving by mutantSushi · · Score: 1

      And Tesla autopilot's "superior safety" has nothing at all to do with those environment-caused damages. The only potential difference is re: driver caused damages. Which is Tesla autopilot's case, are Tesla's fault. So other than the superficial angle of Tesla just having deal with insurers to share profits of customers they attract, the only substantial question I have on this is the clauses Tesla includes in this, re: own liability. Enforced arbitration under corporate-friendly parameters is almost standard aspiration these days, so Tesla being involved in car owner-insurance relationship seems highly likely to be net beneficial to reducing Tesla's own ultimate legal liability for cases of accidents where autopilot was liable for accident.

  6. IP Theft by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    Expect a multitude of EV clones in China appearing that look strangely similar to Teslas.

    The Chinese market may be massive, but that market is only available to Chinese citizens for the long term. It will be known in history as the great IP theft of the west.

    1. Re:IP Theft by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Expect a multitude of EV clones in China appearing that look strangely similar to Teslas.

      Tesla Motors was created for the purpose of proving EVs were viable and proliferating them, so this would be a win for Elon. If you haven't you noticed, all their patents are free to use.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:IP Theft by Rei · · Score: 2

      Meh, you've never experienced quality until you've driven a Temla. Their new Optopilot system is amazing!

      --
      I'll BUILD someone to replace you. Some kind of gamma-powered monster, with a heart as black as coal!
    3. Re:IP Theft by LetterRip · · Score: 1

      Tesla Motors was created for the purpose of proving EVs were viable and proliferating them, so this would be a win for Elon. If you haven't you noticed, all their patents are free to use.

      Only for those companies that reciprocate and make all of their patents free to use for Tesla.

    4. Re:IP Theft by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sorry but Temla is crap. The best one out there is the Tesra, no contest.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re: IP Theft by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Correct. Patents are free to use. But Tesla, like SX, does not use patents only for IP. They have a large amount of trade secrets related to manufacturing. I'm guessing this plant will be assembly only.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:IP Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temla Tesra Tesla, all made in China!

    7. Re:IP Theft by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Only for those companies that reciprocate and make all of their patents free to use for Tesla.

      Obvious solution: Start up a shadow subsidiary that doesn't have any patents.

      This is easy to do in China, which has weak laws on corporate disclosure.

    8. Re:IP Theft by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Only for those companies that reciprocate and make all of their patents free to use for Tesla.

      Where did you get that information?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    9. Re: IP Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The warez I use to drive my Testa is awesome. Once we ran the debugger and figures out where to insert the NOPs, I mean.

    10. Re:IP Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What IP of interest would Tesla have to steal?

    11. Re:IP Theft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      China is already well ahead in the EV market. BYD has cars with similar range to Tesla but costing a fraction as much, which they developed themselves. They have fully electric busses and commercial vehicles, while Tesla has yet to show their electric truck prototype.

      Japan is getting very worried about it. Japanese manufacturers chose hybrid technology, thinking that batteries wouldn't be good enough for decades. There is a big scramble to develop not just fully electric cars, but for all the part manufacturers to pivot too. The guys making gearboxes are going to have a problem when cars don't have variable gears any more.

      Europe is also now racing to adopt EV technology by partnering with China and importing Chinese technology.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  7. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Christ you're dumb. Dominating global markets will mean factories all over the globe. This is a Good Thing for America.

  8. Close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >insurance industry is bound for disruption as cars get safer

    As self driving tech becomes mature liability shifts to the manufacturer, not the owner as the owner no longer operates the car. Another part of why there's an all-or-nothing factor to autonomous cars.

    1. Re:Close by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Cars have already gotten 'safer'. That generally means they cost _more_ to repair.

      Self driving tech is nowhere near ready to make cars safer. If it was, Tesla wouldn't be using statistical lies (e.g. comparing Tesla 'auto drive'* to all human driving, not similar driving) in an attempt to show that they are safer.

      * Autodrive: Lane following and adaptive cruise control.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Close by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      If Tesla's were actually safer, then Tesla wouldn't need to be forcing the hand of the insurance industry this way.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what incentive is there that insurance companies would reduce your rate willingly?

    4. Re:Close by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Paying customers. Duh.

      You don't 'get' markets, do you? Start every analysis by identifying the marxist class of players?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Competition is the incentive. If a company does not reduce rates, when their competitors do, they will appear expensive in comparison. This is the entire principle behind anti-collusion portions of anti-trust laws, and the rational behind splitting up large companies which can internally collude to set prices for large portions of a market.

      Both of the above comments show a complete lack of education regarding any economic principles. You both might consider reading a high school level economics book before posting.

  9. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China does what USdon't, as in promote EV policy. cf election of Trump and appointment of Pruitt.

  10. Re:Teslsa shoudl not exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean the LOAN that has been payed back? What part of loan is not free market economics ?

  11. Spyware by markdavis · · Score: 1

    What a wonderful idea. So you can get insurance from the company that has, essentially, unlimited spyware in your car. So they can charge you for your "risk" based on how hard you brake, how hard you accelerate, how hard you corner, how fast you drive, where you like to drive, what times you drive, and so much more, and all regardless of the ACTUAL outcomes or how actually safe you are.

    Pass

    1. Re:Spyware by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      You always have to read your policy. Some of them are quite devious.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  12. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't matter. Getting in bed with the Chinese apparently means they now have a significant influence within your company.

    Say, just as a completely hypothetical example, the Chinese government doesn't want a political dissenter living in New York to be able to broadcast videos critical of the Chinese government. Why, just drum up some evidence of harassment, and you get your YouTube and Facebook accounts blocked, just like that. Maybe you even pressure the Chinese security officer who is currently the head of Interpol to file some charges against him. And, naturally, it's completely coincidental that this happened during the once-every-five-years meeting of the Chinese communist party.

    But like I said, that's just a hypothetical example. I'm probably over-thinking this, right?

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  13. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Take US taxpayers' money and run away!

    If by run away you mean continue to manufacture in the USA while expanding and improving production, increasing economies of scale, all the while offsetting the carbon emissions in our world which was the primary purpose of the tax breaks in the first place, then I hope every company "runs away".

    Speaking of taxpayers' money, you do realise this is based on USA sales and productions right? Meaning none of this money goes to this factory? I guess that doesn't suit your anti Tesla / anti government subsidy rant though.

  14. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk has billions in US tax dollars in his pockets today. So shut the fuck up. If it wasn't for US tax dollars Tesla would be an unknown niche market to anyone who wasn't a car enthusiast or an environmentalist*.

    * And I mean real environmentalists, not the shitbags who think posting a few Facebook memes about the Paris Accord made a difference in anything.

  15. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You still don't get it. China is doing the things that the US won't, don't, and soon to be, can't, because of the GOP.

  16. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Musk has not taken federal taxpayer money. He has taken state taxpayer money, but those factories will remain there.
    In addition, the model 3 is the MOST American made car going, bar none.
    There is nothing from GM, Ford, Chrysler, etc that are more American made. And yet, you continue to troll here, likely on Koch's payroll.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  17. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by lalleglad · · Score: 1

    Yes, Daimler's plans are not new:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

  18. Re: Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Ford Model B....

  19. Shanghai Factory by fozzy1015 · · Score: 2

    Will ground be broke before or after the Tesla bankruptcy?

    1. Re:Shanghai Factory by Rei · · Score: 1

      TTAC called, they want you for their Tesla Deathwatch column nearly a decade ago.

      --
      I'll BUILD someone to replace you. Some kind of gamma-powered monster, with a heart as black as coal!
    2. Re:Shanghai Factory by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      TTAC called, they want you for their Tesla Deathwatch column nearly a decade ago.

      If any of you knew how to read a 10K and actually looked into Tesla's finances, you'd realize that given their latest junk bond offering and negative cash flow, they are incapable of ever making a profit. It's losses all the way folks, until the inevitable reorg.

    3. Re:Shanghai Factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If any of you knew how to read a 10K and actually looked into Tesla's finances, you'd realize that given their latest junk bond offering and negative cash flow, they are incapable of ever making a profit. It's losses all the way folks, until the inevitable reorg.

      And yet, their stock trades at $345.10 a share, and their market cap is $57.59 billion.

      Another company that doesn't make a profit: Amazon. Shorting them too? Good luck with that.

    4. Re: Shanghai Factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they said about the dotcom bubble.

    5. Re:Shanghai Factory by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      And yet, their stock trades at $345.10 a share [google.com], and their market cap is $57.59 billion [google.com].

      That their stock price is ridiculously over valued is the best investment thesis you have?

      Another company that doesn't make a profit: Amazon [forbes.com]. Shorting them too? Good luck with that.

      Amazon has almost always had positive cash flow to fund their operations and growth. They had to go the capital markets just once many years ago. Tesla has to continually go the capital markets just to keep the lights on. https://imgur.com/a/IKilJ And their cash burn is still increasing - Q3 results will be the worse yet. Once they run out of OPM they are toast.

    6. Re:Shanghai Factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon has been profitable for years. They made their first profit back in 2001, went red in 2006, black in 2007, red in 2012, and back to black in 2013. Their profit margins have been small, with some years at less than 1%. The bulk of their profits these days are from cloud services.

      There are companies with little debt, good cash flow and profit whose net worth is more than their market cap. Often times the stock price has nothing to do financials. Tesla is a perfect example of this.

  20. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    Hmm...I'd say the Chevrolet Corvette is more american made than the model 3. Considering that the vast majority of all those expensive components in the model 3 batteries are mined in China, and those batteries make up a large portion of the cost of the car, it'd be hard to make a claim otherwise.

  21. Re:spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is whether you actually believe that, or whether you think other people are dumb enough to believe that.

  22. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    lets see.
    Tesla's CObalt is currently coming from Canada, with Idaho starting up as well
    Lithium is coming from Northern Mexico, along with Nevada.
    Nickel does come from Australia,Indonesia, and Japan, so, those will be imported.
    Steel and Aluminum are from all over, including America.
    However, these are the RAW materials. As it stands, IIRC, Model 3 is about 93% American made. Corvette, like its speed, does not touch it.,

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  23. They get an economy, we get fake manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know Elon Musk is against us. Everything he does is pure tech LARPing except, oh my goodness, a plant in China! That will bring America back for sure!

    1. Re:They get an economy, we get fake manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we know Elon Musk is against us!

      Only a SITH deals in absolutes.
      With us, against us, whatever. If Musk doesn't get dirty with the Chinese, someone else will, bigger and stronger like General Motors - China is the fastest growing market on Earth, get used to it. It's like if Boeing doesn't sell them airplanes, Airbus will. And if the U.S. pulls out of Korea and Japan because someone says they don't pay us enough for it, the Chinese will happily take our place. That's the planet we live on.
      Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer. Your enemies always get strong on what you leave behind.

  24. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US imports 74% of its cobalt, and Canada isn't even in the top 4 suppliers. China Norway Findland and Japan round out the top 4.
    Try some facts instead of some wishful thinking PR fluff.

  25. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    LOL.
    Why do you dicks continue to lie and just make up bull shit.
    This was for 2016: 1) Congo : 66,000 MT.
    2) CHina: 7700 MT.
    3) Canada: 7300 MT (which provides for Tesla).
    4) Russia: 6200 MT.
    5) Australia.5100 MT.
    6) Zambia 4600 MT
    7) Cuba 4200 MT
    8) Phillipines 3500 MT
    9) Madagascar 3300 MT
    10) New Caledonia 3300 MT.

    Where is Finland, Norway, and Japan? They are NOT part of it. And Tesla has said that they get all of their metals from nations that are not controversial (though that was before they struck a deal on rare earth with china).

    Nice job trolling. I am guessing that you work for the koch bros?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    Let's see.

    http://www.american.edu/kogod/...

    Corvette comes in #3, while the Tesla Model S comes in #14. Unless the model 3 has radically increased it's sourcing from the US, I suspect the Model 3 will remain around the 14th rank.

  27. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    No, the model 3 has RADICALLY brought most of it inhouse. That is why I said, model 3. It is supposed to be in the 90s American made.
    OTOH, MS/MX are around 50-55% American made, which is JUST ENOUGH to pass NAFTA and nothing more.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  28. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    oh hey, interesting link. Sorry, but I did not look at the prior to posting. But, I like that link (cool that it backs me up).
    Yeah, it shows that GM, Ford, etc just plain sux for what they are doing to America. The fact that W and O bailed them out is just disgusting. If we are going to bail them out (and yes, we bailed out Ford by giving them 22+ billion loan with no interest and it is STILL NOT PAID OFF), we should have broken them up into multiple small car makers. That way they would turn out to be like Tesla as opposed to what we have now.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  29. Re: Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Where do you think the oil and gas in the Corvette come from?

  30. they're holding $16B worth of Model 3 orders... by Brannon · · Score: 1

    so maybe they'll just barely scrape by. But please, by all means, short TSLA. Thanks for the free money.

    1. Re:they're holding $16B worth of Model 3 orders... by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      they're holding $16B worth of Model 3 orders

      A $1000 refundable deposit to hold a spot in line is not an order. A fraction of those will turn into actual orders. What was the last number of deposits that Musk gave out? 457,000? Given Musk's propensity to fudge numbers, do you really even believe that number was accurate at the time? What do you think the continuing Model 3 delay will do to that number? Which may all be a moot issue, since Tesla has yet to show they can even make a car at a profit. Tesla can't figure out how to make money at $100K - $150K a car, what makes you think they can do it selling a car at $35K - $60K?

    2. Re:they're holding $16B worth of Model 3 orders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      economies of scale?

    3. Re:they're holding $16B worth of Model 3 orders... by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      economies of scale?

      Economies of scale didn't help Tesla make a profit selling the much more expensive Model S or X, even before they had to institute massive discounts to move metal.

  31. Re: Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Executed is probably better than being sexually harassed. Though I would bet the China Tesla plant would just rape the employee.

  32. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if Tesla doesn't go bankrupt long before.

  33. And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese company produces exact Tesla clone.
    If you manufacture in China, they WILL steal your design. I've had two companies I worked for have this happen, with Chinese engineers ( after a little booze) let on that the back room we weren't allowed to see was them breaking down our machines to make copies.

  34. did you know one person buys all dead tesla autos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    repairs the parts and sells them to the insurance companies directly. because tesla cant get parts or their shit together. hahaha sell yours soon!!

  35. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiot, you were talking about American imports of Cobalt. Not global exports of Cobalt.
    https://minerals.usgs.gov/mine...
    All your links were just wishful thinking and aspirational PR pieces. Try a fact or 2 for a change.

  36. Re: Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    The gasoline and oil in the corvette uses, is almost completely produced in the US.

    https://www.eia.gov/energyexpl...

  37. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    I agree as part of the bailout, we should have broken the companies up. Both GM and Ford likely would be better today if they were (as well as the consumers).

  38. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    Your link was last year BEFORE Tesla started importing.
    Tesla already said Canada for Cobalt. In fact, they have said that they would not use any nation that has issues,SUCH as CHina and Congo, though they did cut a deal with China for rare earth.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  39. Then mortgage your trailer and short the stock. by Brannon · · Score: 1

    But we both know that you don't really *believe* that Tesla is going to fail, you just really, really want them to.

    1. Re:Then mortgage your trailer and short the stock. by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      But we both know that you don't really *believe* that Tesla is going to fail, you just really, really want them to.

      Yes, I do. Just calling it as I would a terminally ill patient. Some company will pick up the pieces after the reorg and the Tesla name will probably continue, and hopefully Tesla car owners will still have a company that'll service them and perhaps build newer models in a profitable manner.

  40. Good thing you have 1014 other burner accounts by Brannon · · Score: 1

    because I'm going to wait a couple years and then stalk you through every thread, and replay those words back to you. Congratulations on learning nothing from: "No wifi, less space than a Nomad, Lame".

    Until then, here's some Econ 101:
    1. There's a big difference between not turning a profit because noone wants to buy your crap and not turning a profit because you can't manufacture products fast enough to keep up with demand and every $ of revenue is reinvested into expanding capacity.
    2. You can't make a product fail by hating the company's CEO.

    1. Re:Good thing you have 1014 other burner accounts by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      because I'm going to wait a couple years and then stalk you through every thread, and replay those words back to you.

      How mature; comes out in your investment decisions.

      Congratulations on learning nothing from: "No wifi, less space than a Nomad, Lame".

      When has Apple lost money on every unit it sold?

      There's a big difference between not turning a profit because noone wants to buy your crap and not turning a profit because you can't manufacture products fast enough to keep up with demand and every $ of revenue is reinvested into expanding capacity.

      So many people want the Model S and Model X that Tesla had to offer massive discounts last quarter just to keep sales flat.

      r and every $ of revenue is reinvested into expanding capacity.

      Tesla needs capital raises just to keep the lights on. They have negative cash flow. The comparisons to Amazon are flawed.

      You can't make a product fail by hating the company's CEO.

      There are financial reasons to stay away from Tesla as an investor, besides the fact they have PT Barnum for a CEO.

    2. Re:Good thing you have 1014 other burner accounts by Brannon · · Score: 1

      > When has Apple lost money on every unit it sold?

      Every company loses money on 'every unit sold' until the point that they've paid back the R & D. That is true for literally every product ever made. When the R&D is especially capital-intensive (like a new car or rocket) then it takes longer. Pretty much every time this happens some moron looks at the shareholder report and says "Company X is losing $Y on every unit!!! They should stop making units!!!".

      Companies that are growing fast don't give dividends, instead every $ of revenue is re-invested in expanding capacity, future R&D, etc. So look at any company in a capital-intensive business that then grew into something big, and you'll see a company that looks at least somewhat like Tesla.

      But seriously, if you are so certain that Tesla is going to fail, they why not short it? Put every dollar you have into a short position on TSLA.

      I'll see you back here in 2 years.

    3. Re:Good thing you have 1014 other burner accounts by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      Every company loses money on 'every unit sold' until the point that they've paid back the R & D. That is true for literally every product ever made. When the R&D is especially capital-intensive (like a new car or rocket) then it takes longer. Pretty much every time this happens some moron looks at the shareholder report and says "Company X is losing $Y on every unit!!! They should stop making units!!!".

      Musk said 2 years ago Tesla would be cash flow positive and not need another capital raise. It's been several raises later and yet another one is just around the corner. BTW, the Chief Accounting Officer at Tesla just dumped a block of shares: http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/f... You sure you want to be one left holding the bag?

  41. Re:Great, now it'll ALL be made in CHINA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes all aspirational PR bullshit that you yourself just said they already reneged on...