Slashdot Mirror


US Preparing to Put Nuclear Bombers On 24-Hour Alert (defenseone.com)

DefenseOne reports on new preparations at Barksdale Air Force Base: The U.S. Air Force is preparing to put nuclear-armed bombers back on 24-hour ready alert, a status not seen since the Cold War ended in 1991. That means the long-dormant concrete pads at the ends of this base's 11,000-foot runway -- dubbed the "Christmas tree" for their angular markings -- could once again find several B-52s parked on them, laden with nuclear weapons and set to take off at a moment's notice... Gen. David Goldfein, Air Force chief of staff, and other senior defense officials stressed that the alert order had not been given, but that preparations were under way in anticipation that it might come...

Already, various improvements have been made to prepare Barksdale -- home to the 2d Bomb Wing and Air Force Global Strike Command, which oversees the service's nuclear forces -- to return B-52s to an alert posture. Near the alert pads, an old concrete building -- where B-52 crews during the Cold War would sleep, ready to run to their aircraft and take off at a moment's notice -- is being renovated. Inside, beds are being installed for more than 100 crew members, more than enough room for the crews that would man bombers positioned on the nine alert pads outside... Large paintings of the patches for each squadron at Barksdale adorn the walls of a large stairway. One painting -- a symbol of the Cold War -- depicts a silhouette of a B-52 with the words "Peace The Old Fashioned Way," written underneath.

General Goldfein, the Air Force's top officer and a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, "is asking his force to think about new ways that nuclear weapons could be used for deterrence, or even combat... 'It's no longer a bipolar world where it's just us and the Soviet Union. We've got other players out there who have nuclear capability. It's never been more important to make sure that we get this mission right.'"

3 of 578 comments (clear)

  1. Re: #MAGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yep, a total win. This is EXACTLY what I voted for. Killary would be gotten us into a stupid small war. TRUMP is serious. Big wars are glorious. Big wars are winning. Another win for Trump!

  2. Re:Strange days indeed.... by KiloByte · · Score: 1, Troll

    No, a single nuclear weapon removes the need for tens of thousands of soldiers to risk their lives. It is also drastically more cost effective. It's also the only way to reduce the loss of lives in cases like Seoul where people will have to endure "only" several hours of artillery strikes rather than weeks.

    Unlike a conventional weapon which can be easily counteracted with more force, nukes reduce even an enemy who's nuclear-armed themselves from a position of "do what we tell you, or else" to an equal stance. That's why the massive investment in propaganda that tells citizens of other nations to disarm.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  3. USA = harmful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The USA should be considered harmful for humanity. They need to be stopped and the nuclear armaments they and their lunatic president controls need to be dismantled - by force if necessary.

    The USA is extremely volatile and unreliable player on the global stage and the people have shown to be easily controllable, low educated and attracted by charismatic TV stars like Trump making extravagant promises.

    The USA is a threat to western democracy and global peace. It's a country controlled not by their people, but corporate greed and narcissistic white supremacists.

    They must be stopped.