Slashdot Mirror


FBI Couldn't Access Nearly 7,000 Devices Because of Encryption (foxbusiness.com)

Michael Balsamo, writing for Associated Press: The FBI hasn't been able to retrieve data from more than half of the mobile devices it tried to access in less than a year, FBI Director Christopher Wray said Sunday, turning up the heat on a debate between technology companies and law enforcement officials trying to recover encrypted communications. In the first 11 months of the fiscal year, federal agents were unable to access the content of more than 6,900 mobile devices, Wray said in a speech at the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in Philadelphia. "To put it mildly, this is a huge, huge problem," Wray said. "It impacts investigations across the board -- narcotics, human trafficking, counterterrorism, counterintelligence, gangs, organized crime, child exploitation." The FBI and other law enforcement officials have long complained about being unable to unlock and recover evidence from cellphones and other devices seized from suspects even if they have a warrant, while technology companies have insisted they must protect customers' digital privacy.

5 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. apples new face unlock will make it easy! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    apples new face unlock will make it easy!

    1. Re:apples new face unlock will make it easy! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Funny

      The safest way is to use the SSN of the NSA chief. I find nobody ever uses this as their PIN, and it's ironic.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  2. Re:Crybabies by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Funny

    FBI confirmed for whiny crybabies who want to be spoonfed everything instead of doing the jobs they were hired to do.

    Let's face the facts. There can only be two choices when it comes to encryption: Ban ALL encryption for consumer devices (which would be a gigantic leap backwards and create a massive security issue for everyone) or leave encryption alone. Compromising encryption algorithms IS A NON-STARTER.

    Of course if they banned encrytion, then of course the rich, and politicians would still manage to have it, as would EVERY SINGLE CRIMINAL AND TERRORIST with the means and wherewithal to find and use it, so banning encryption is also a NON-STARTER. The Djinn is already out of the bottle, we do not have time travel machines, you can't go back in time and prevent encryption from being invented, fucking DEAL WITH IT, LAW ENFORCEMENT!

    Do you use bold and all-caps because you only want me to read those bits, or is it because you want me to read those bits more intensely than the non-bold-or-all-caps bits?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  3. Re:Maybe by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're right. I usually traffic my drugghumans with pickup trucks.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  4. Re:Great news by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Funny

    All that you touch
    And all that you see
    All that you taste
    All you feel
    And all that you love
    And all that you hate
    All you distrust
    All you save
    And all that you give
    And all that you deal
    And all that you buy
    Beg, borrow, or steal
    And all you create
    And all you destroy
    And all that you do
    And all that you say
    And all that you eat
    And everyone you meet
    And all that you slight
    And everyone you fight
    And all that is now
    And all that is gone
    And all that's to come
    And everything under the sun is in tune
    But the sun is eclipsed by the moon

    -- Pink Floyd