Slashdot Mirror


San Francisco Just Took a Huge Step Toward Internet Utopia (wired.com)

Susan Crawford, writing for Backchannel: Last week, San Francisco became the first major city in America to pledge to connect all of its homes and businesses to a fiber optic network. I urge you to read that sentence again. It's a ray of light. In an era of short-term, deeply partisan do-nothing-ism, the city's straightforward, deeply practical determination shines. Americans, it turns out, are capable of great things -- even if only at the city level these days. [...] San Francisco's dilemma is a compact form of the crisis in communications facing the rest of the country: Although fiber is the necessary infrastructure for every policy goal we have -- advanced healthcare, the emergence of new forms of industries, a chance for every child to get an education, managed use of energy, and on and on -- the private sector, left to its own devices, has no particular incentive to ensure a widespread upgrade to fiber optic connections. Comcast dominates access in the city, but has no plans to replace its cable lines -- great at downloads, not so great at uploads, no opportunity to scale to the capacity of fiber thanks to the laws of physics, and expensive to subscribe to -- with fiber. And its planned enhancements to its cable lines have, in other cities, resulted in a product costing $150 per month. AT&T will say it's upgrading to fiber in San Francisco, but so far its work in many other US cities has been incremental, confined to areas where it has existing business customers to serve or where it already has fiber in place. Other, smaller providers similarly have no plans to do a city-wide upgrade, leaving San Francisco with a deeply uneven patchwork of connectivity. Just as in the rest of the country, poorer and less-well-educated San Franciscans tend not to subscribe to a wire at home, but instead rely wholly on smartphone data plans -- no substitutes, given their expense and throttled capacity, for what's possible using a wired connection.

2 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bigger priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    That's the most important thing to the people that matter

    San Fran doesn't care about little people or making a better city. Just virtue signaling to create a perception. When in reality, those virtue signalers live in a smug bubble oblivious to the reality in their City and State and the destruction that their policies have. All the while calling those unfortunate people that are suffering from their decisions every name in the book and shaming them for not giving up enough.

    Fuck that city and fuck those smug ass holes.

  2. Biased article from nitwit by jimmifett · · Score: -1, Troll

    " the private sector, left to its own devices, has no particular incentive to ensure a widespread upgrade to fiber optic connections".

    Sure it does, MONEY and PROFIT! That's incentive enough all by itself.

    Of course, this is countered by prohibitive regulations, unionized labor costs, zoning, permits, etc. It takes a great deal of capital to invest fiber into an area, and if the area does not appear to be capable of recouping those costs, it makes no sense to build in that area if no other form of recompense exists.

    Personally, i'd rather my tax dollars go towards something else than a neighbor's pornhub streaming, something useful and beneficial like *ominous thundercrash of feigned evil* cleaning up/out the homeless and deporting illegal immigrants.