Kaspersky CEO Says Hack Claims Cutting US Cyber Security Sales (reuters.com)
Eugene Kaspersky told news agency Reuters on Friday that his cyber security firm that bears his name would see a 'single digit' drop in U.S. sales this year as a result of suspicions about his company's ties to the Russian government, but global revenue should still increase. From a report: By turns frustrated and defiant in an 80-minute interview in his Moscow office, the founder and head of the embattled antivirus software maker denounced what he called an "information war" against his company, repeatedly asserting that "we've done nothing wrong." Anton Shingarev, Kaspersky Lab's vice president of public affairs, also told Reuters during the interview the company had abandoned efforts to sell its services to the U.S. government and that it would wind down its Washington-area subsidiary, KGSS. Kaspersky Lab has become a lightning rod in recent months as it has faced allegations by the U.S. government that its antivirus products can be used by Russian spies to conduct cyber espionage. Office Depot, Staples and Best Buy have stopped selling Kaspersky's security suite in their stores.
Here's how Kaspersky could get out of this:
1) change name to "Uranium Two"
2) donate to the Clinton Global Initiative
3) ??? (impeach Trump?)
4) profit!
The company is either corrupt (complicit in the hacking) or incompetent (unable to protect their own stuff).
Both are extremely good reasons not to use their software.
Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
Considering that independent testing has generally placed them at or near the top of world antivirus companies and their software does so without being slow or intrusive, I think it may actually be safer to place your trust in them, being a US citizen, than to trust the American companies that are beholden to the NSA and the like. Frankly, there is nothing useful that Russia can gain from a backdoor to my computer. On the other hand, I fully expect NSA to be compiling list of undesirable persons based on race, religion, desire for digital security and privacy, software used, and most importantly - political affiliations. They are not going to make a mistake again at the next presidential election and let it actually proceed unmolested domestically. Next time the appropriate winner will be assured.