Slashdot Mirror


Google Docs Is Randomly Flagging Files for Violating Its Terms of Service (vice.com)

Louise Matsakis, writing for Motherboard: Google Docs, the collaborative, cloud-based word processing software, appears to be randomly flagging files for supposedly "violating" Google's Terms of Service. A member of Motherboard's team, as well as numerous users on Twitter, report that their documents are being locked for no apparent reason. Once a document is flagged, the owner of that document can no longer share it with other users. Users who have already been shared on a document that's been flagged are kicked out and can no longer access it. When a draft Motherboard article was locked on Monday morning, a message took over the screen that read "This item has been flagged as inappropriate and can no longer be shared." It's not clear why this is happening, but it may be the result of a glitch in the system Google uses to monitor Google Docs. DownDetector is currently reporting Google Drive problems in the US and Europe, which may be part of the problem.

6 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. And everyone, on three: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Cloud is a nicer way of saying 'someone else's computer that you have no control over'."

  2. The "cloud" is just someone else's computer. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been seeing a lot of messages on twitter about people who can't access their documents and don't have local copies. I guess they won't make that mistake again.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  3. But it won't happen to me! by bagofbeans · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It continues to astound me how many people I know, who'd I'd expect to know better, have all their emails only accessed by webmail. No POP client to save a local copy.

    Ditto those who entire contact database is only on their cellphone.

  4. Re:monitoring? by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing his point in quoting all that is to show that, legally, when you upload your data to Google Drive, it's now *theirs*, and they can do what they want with it. If that means searching through it for stuff they don't like and then flagging it for violations, that's their right. If you don't like that, don't use it.

  5. Re:Paging Ric Romero (again . . . ) by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Insightful

    YouTube is a defacto monopoly at this point. It was set up to be a Commons where everybody could participate. It has no competitor of a similar scale.

    So perhaps it should be broken away from Google and made a separate entity again. Google can still contract with them to sell ads on it.

    Or maybe it should be made into a true Commons without a corporate overlord running it.

  6. Re:Paging Ric Romero (again . . . ) by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then maybe they should go get themselves a real job

    If you work a full week in order to produce content, how is that not a real job? If you employ a staff, and are actually running a small business, how are these not real jobs?

    They are new kinds of jobs, but real jobs nonetheless.

    or set up their own video service if they're not happy with YouTube

    Oh, everyone is very aware that YouTube is not their friend at this point. The problem is, most of the alternatives have either been scammers, or poor re-implementations of YouTube with all the same issues. None of them, for example, allow role-based administration of a channel (needed as soon as you grow beyond a 1-man shop).

    Everyone I follow with a larger following is Patreon-funded now, but you have to build your channel to that point, and you need an established service to build that following.

    No one's forcing these people to use YouTube.

    It's the only realistic option today. Sure, Google may "owe them" nothing .. nothing that is beyond not being a dick to your fellow man (aka: don't be evil).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.