The Future of Work Might Not Be So Bleak (bloomberg.com)

From a report, shared by readers: That said, technology can also favor standard salaried employment. The economists George Baker and Thomas Hubbard, for example, have noted how onboard computers could change U.S. trucking. By monitoring behavior, they would solve a moral hazard problem: Drivers have little incentive to be as careful with company trucks as they would with their own. As a result, more drivers could become employees of companies that buy and maintain fleets, rather than going it alone. They wouldn't have to invest in their own vehicles, which makes them vulnerable to recessions by putting their savings in the same sector as their labor; and they wouldn't be out of pocket and out of work when their trucks broke down. More generally, conventional jobs have a lot of advantages. First, a single worker or group of workers might lack the capital needed to set up a business, or prefer to avoid the stress and risk of running one (consider doctors or dentists who choose to be employees of a medical clinic). Second, business owners might not want their employees to have other bosses -- particularly if the work involves confidential information or team projects that require undivided time and attention. Third, reputations based on ratings might not be reliable: The economist Diane Coyle has shown that the quality of individual consultants can be hard to monitor, at least immediately, whereas a traditional consultancy may be more efficient at "guaranteeing" quality. In short, I believe that salaried employment will not disappear, although it might become less prevalent over time.

Comments

Not exactly

[rsilvergun]

vehicle ownership for truckers is a scam. They're low paid and vulnerable (living on the road is costly, you can't just look at their base pay). Trucking companies used that during the recession to force them into 'leases' where the truck company fronts them money for the truck and takes the cost of buying and maintaining it out of their paycheck. Think Uber but a million times worse. If you stop working the truck company takes the equity in the truck but if there's not enough they leave you with the debt. There was a big expose where a guy was working 90 hours a week and taking home pennies (literally, he showed some pay stubs that were around 20 cents after fees).

That said, this guy is full of crap. Automation will put truckers out of business. And even if it didn't there's no way the trucking companies are giving an arrangement that puts all the cost/risk on somebody else. Not unless the government steps in, and I know I'll get dinged for partisanship here but the Republicans control every single branch of government. I'm not holding my breath.

Re:What said?

[cayenne8]

Geez, there are just some people out there, that just do NOT seem to like the idea of independent contracting.

Granted, it isn't for everyone, but there are a LOT of us out here who really enjoy the freedom for working vs time off, negotiating bill rates, and being in charge of our own destiny with regard to retirement and investment....and if Obama care would cut the strings a bit, back to being able to pick better fits for our medical insurance needs based on our individual needs.

Even if you don't agree with that last point, the rest should be valid for anyone to respect someone wanting and enjoying.

Govt and some entities seem to want to make it harder for small, even individual businesses and contractors to do well.

Why is that?

Hell, these days, I find that incorporating myself (I have a S-Corp), and doing a bit of extra paperwork, is the best way out there for me to keep the maximum of my hard earned money from the tax man.

I like to take off when I want/need....and don't have to "earn" time off hours...etc.