Slashdot Mirror


A Japanese Company Is Giving Nonsmokers Longer Vacations (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Marketing firm Piala introduced the new policy in September after nonsmokers complained that they were working more than their colleagues who smoked. The company's offices are reportedly on the 29th floor, meaning that popping out for a smoke break meant a solid 15 minutes away from work. Multiply that by several smoke breaks a day, and the hours start to add up, which began to tick off nonsmoking coworkers. A spokesman for the company told The Telegraph that one of those nonsmokers slipped a note in the company's suggestion box and the CEO agreed. Now nonsmokers are entitled to more vacation time, which the company hopes will encourage smokers to quit their filthy habit.

8 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. "Quit their filthy habit"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I, for one, am sick of this propaganda.

    If you want to illegalize it, fine. But I'm tired of the constant ads for "TRUTH" (now going all the way to claim that smoking is racist) all the while I'm counter propagandized (by some of the same companies) about how pot smoking is good for you and should be legalized.

    And I say this as a non-smoker!

    Are we going to give similar breaks to single employees without children and how great that is?
    Are we going to count those who take 5 coffee breaks a day?!
    How about those gym nuts that disappear for an hour a day (not including lunch) to go for a run and promise they'll make the time up later?!
    Spare me your sanctimonious bs.

  2. Re:Now how about healthcare? by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Smokers die young. Their lifetime healthcare costs are _lower_. Sense health care after age 65 is highly subsidised, we want _more_ smokers.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. That's great and all ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, good for the Japanese, bully for them.

    But honestly, when I step out for a smoke I step out with one or two of my co-workers, we actively discuss what we're working on and solve some problems, and then go back at it.

    Going out for a smoke doesn't necessarily mean you aren't working. Sometimes, you are actually working the whole time. I can't tell you how many times I've helped a co-worker sort out how to do something (or he helped me) while having a smoke.

    Just because I'm not typing doesn't mean I'm not working.

    It simply may not be true that you're doing less work -- in fact, I regularly see co-workers spend more time on Facebook or texting or what have you than I spend smoking every day. The difference being is I'm more likely to still be working while I'm smoking.

    Where I'm actively thinking doesn't change that I am actually doing it.

  4. Re:how much vacation? by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only if you assume the non-smokers don't goof off separately but equally.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  5. Re:Now how about healthcare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People love socialized medicine. Everyone who can afford it seems willing to sign up for voluntary socialized medicine, aka insurance.

  6. Re:how much vacation? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not much more than a placebo fix since Japanese workers are very hesitant to take a holiday anyway.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  7. Re:Now how about healthcare? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not where I work. We don't hire smokers. We ask about tobacco use at the very beginning of the interview process, and reject all users.

    Well, that's just stupid - you would really pass up a chance to hire the next Tesla or Hawkings, because they smoke? I bet your competition loves such counterproductive thinking.

    This is perfectly legal. Smokers have no rights.

    Not true - smokers have the exact same civil liberties as non-smokers. The key term here is "private company."

    since there are few smokers in California, and they tend to not be super bright.

    I cannot disagree that Californians do not seem to be all that bright.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  8. Re:Now how about healthcare? by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You ever met a smoker that smokes ONLY outside work hours and identifies as a smoker?

    Yes: me. I've been a pipe smoker (never cigarettes) for over forty years, and I've never had the slightest desire to slip out for a smoke. As I drive my own car to work, I can smoke then, or at home and have no need to smoke at work.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting