Slashdot Mirror


CIA Releases 321GB of Bin Laden's Digital Library (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Today, the Central Intelligence Agency posted a cache of files obtained from Osama Bin Laden's personal computer and other devices recovered from his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan by Navy SEALs during the raid in which he was killed on May 2, 2011. The 470,000 files, 321 gigabytes in all, include documents, images, videos, and audio recordings, including Al Qaeda propaganda and planning documents, home videos of Bin Laden's son Hazma, and "drafts" of propaganda videos. There is also a lot of digital junk among the files.

The CIA site presents a raft of warnings about the content of the downloads: "The material in this file collection may contain content that is offensive and/or emotionally disturbing. This material may not be suitable for all ages. Please view it with discretion. Prior to accessing this file collection, please understand that this material was seized from a terrorist organization. While the files underwent interagency review, there is no absolute guarantee that all malware has been removed."

20 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Does this include... by Vylen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... his porn stash?

    1. Re:Does this include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope:

      the information remaining in the collection that has not been released publicly includes materials that are protected by copyright; sensitive such that their release would directly damage efforts to keep the nation secure; pornography; ...

    2. Re:Does this include... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      Probably young boys. Boys are for fucking and girls are for making babies. Ask people who have spent time in Afghanistan about young boy Thursdays. On Friday they pray the sins away.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Does this include... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Ask people who have spent time in Afghanistan about young boy Thursdays.

      Yes, especially about your tax dollars at work.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Does this include... by seven+of+five · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but there's only 72 videos...

  2. Article content by kwerle · · Score: 4, Informative

    In an effort to further enhance public understanding of al-Qa'ida, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on 1 November 2017 released additional materials recovered in the 2 May 2011 raid on Usama Bin Ladin's compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

    With the release of these materials, the information remaining in the collection that has not been released publicly includes materials that are protected by copyright; sensitive such that their release would directly damage efforts to keep the nation secure; pornography; malware; and blank, corrupted, and duplicate files. The entire collection has been available to the US Intelligence Community and Department of Defense organizations for years.

    The Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) previously released documents from the collection on 20 May 2015, 1 March 2016, and 19 January 2017 after an interagency review spearheaded by the CIA. The releases align with ODNI initiatives for increased transparency - consistent with national security prerogatives - and the 2014 Intelligence Authorization Act, which required the ODNI to conduct a review of the documents for release.

    CIA's 1 November 2017 release includes additional al-Qa'ida letters, videos, audio files, and communications, as well as routine family correspondence. As a result, it builds on the ODNI releases that provided material relevant to understanding the plans and workings of terrorist organizations. The material is posted in the original Arabic and in as close to the original form as possible, modified only so the files cannot be edited.

    1. Re:Article content by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Some of the content could land you in trouble in some parts of the world.

      The terrorism stuff could be illegal to view in the UK.

      The home videos could violate the subjects' right to privacy if (re) published in the EU.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. there is no absolute guarantee . . . by queequeg1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    . . .there is no absolute guarantee that all malware has been removed.

    Sure. But I wouldn't be surprised if malware were added.

  4. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have they ever done this before? Why would they do this? Who needs to see this anyway? The only reason I can think of is they planted their own malware and will be tracking everyone and anyone who even so much as accesses that website.

    1. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Re: "Why would they do this?" AC

      To track the ip of everyone who looks.
      An easy way to collect the locations of interested bloggers, the media, press, journalists, independent journalists, students, historians.
      Recall
      "NSA likely targets anybody who's 'Tor-curious'"
      https://www.cnet.com/g00/news/...
      ".. selection rules that potentially add to an NSA watch list anybody who has not only used, but visited online privacy-protection tools .."

      Re "malware". The security services get the ip, the actual ip behind most of the consumer grade VPN products used by people looking the site.
      Cooking gov, mil grade malware into the files is just going to push out quality gov malware onto a lot of people who might have very good anti virus.
      Better to sort the ip lists of people who looked and then push malware down to the interesting people. Less for the better quality AV products to find globally.
      Push too much malware out and it gets detected. The results also have to be understood by gov/mil/contractors in real time.

      Malware tends to be held back for interesting people. Everyone gets tracked. 4 hops of their connections, friends get reviewed.
      Lots of friends in the elite north east of the USA? Interesting they looked, but not that interesting.

      Lots of friends and connections globally? Human review. Appropriate malware considered for the system found, AV the person updated for, type of person.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. Re:Strange vibe by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't have any problem with it, but it just seems like a weird thing to do.

    Toss out a big, juicy net that fish can just not resist.

    Have "Osama bin Laden, Director's Cut" phone home when downloaded and installed.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  6. As in "redacted" ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    There is also a lot of digital junk among the files.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  7. Anyone want to guess by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what nasty thing they're doing that this is supposed to distract us from? I will never believe that our CIA does anything out of the goodness of their heart. If I saw one of them reach down to pet a puppy I'd have it checked by a bomb squad.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Anyone want to guess by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 3, Informative

      what nasty thing they're doing that this is supposed to distract us from? I will never believe that our CIA does anything out of the goodness of their heart. If I saw one of them reach down to pet a puppy I'd have it checked by a bomb squad.

      For the record...

      The release came in accordance with a 2014 appropriations bill for intelligence activity that required the Director of National Intelligence to review documents obtained from the raid, and make the files it declassified from the review available to the public.

      Wednesday's document dump is the latest addition to the public collection, dubbed "bin Laden's bookshelf" by the DNI. The collection includes three previous releases since May 2015.
      http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/01/...

  8. Re:Obama wouldn't release cuz he worked with Iran by mean+pun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kinda crazy to sign off on allowing Iran to get nukes and pay them a few hundred billion dollars when the Iranian regime is working closely with al Qaeda, isn't it?

    Those lies never get old, do they? As part of the deal, Iran stopped working on their nuclear program, and allowed extensive verification of this. How can you possibly spin this into 'allowing Iran to get nukes'? The money was not a payment, it was Iranian money that was frozen as part of the sanctions against Iran. Big difference.

    And to trot out an old quote: You don't make peace with your friends. You make peace with your enemies.

  9. Re:Obama wouldn't release cuz he worked with Iran by mcl630 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda crazy to sign off on allowing Iran to get nukes and pay them a few hundred billion dollars when the Iranian regime is working closely with al Qaeda, isn't it?

    Except he didn't "sign off on allowing Iran to get nukes", nor did he pay them hundreds of billions of dollars. The Iran deal bars Iran from developing nuclear weapons. And the "payments" you refer to were millions, not billions, and were Iran's money to begin with, we had frozen those assets in 1979 and had never returned it, until ordered by international courts to do so, which coincidentally was about the same time as the nuclear deal.

  10. Oh sure by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the CIA releases Al Qaeda propaganda it's perfectly fine.

    If I were to even say something nice about the bastards then I'd be labelled a terrorist and find myself in a 0-star suite in Cuba wearing an orange jumpsuit. I thought that the CIA was supposed to be fighting the CIA, not becoming their web provider.

  11. Re:So, like retweeting propaganda? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

    One reason to release the propaganda videos is so that people can see for themselves just how he was trying to push his ideas on the world so that they could recognize it when they see it. Another one might be to discredit them by showing the world that all they were was propaganda with no basis (presumably) in reality. I've no idea how relevant they are any more, or why they didn't do this sooner, but it is a possible motive for them.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  12. do not touch by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who here would want to have their computer analyzed at some later date for an unrelated charge and have what amounts to recruiting material for a terrorist organization found on their laptop? Even if you could explain it away, that might well be only after spending heaploads in lawyer fees.

    Sounds like one should not touch any of this release. Bad ju-ju.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  13. Re:So, like retweeting propaganda? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    It all comes down to The Rule of Goats: even if you say you're only fucking goats ironically, you're still a goatfucker.

    https://twitter.com/popehat/st...
    https://www.popehat.com/2017/0...

    I'm not going to watch binny boy's pr0n stash, I don't care if the CIA says it is the good stuff. For the same reason I wouldn't click on an image link from slashdot. I don't care if it is an ironic goat.