Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Mining Heats Home For Free In Siberia (qz.com)

Quartz has published a video on YouTube about two entrepreneurs who have figured out how to heat their homes for free by mining bitcoin. The "miner" -- that is, the machine mining the bitcoins -- warms up liquid that is then transferred to the underfloor heating system. The cottage has two miners, which bring in about $430 per month from processing bitcoin transactions -- all while keeping the 20 square meter space warm.

106 comments

  1. Mining vs Transaction by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Are they the same? I'll be honest, I know little about bitcoins. But it seems to me the money isn't actually coming from the mining?

    1. Re:Mining vs Transaction by Pfhorrest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pretty much yes. "Mining" bitcoin means doing the cryptographic work necessary to verify transactions, and that work is automatically rewarded by the system by the generation of new bitcoins for those who do the work.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    2. Re:Mining vs Transaction by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Yes, mining is brute forcing hashes to verify network transactions for a time, when a hash is deemed difficult enough the network releases a block but the difficulty automatically adjusts to the total mining power on the network so those blocks are released at a fixed rate. Along with the released blocks the miners get the transaction fees paid to give various transactions higher priority on the network. At some point when all the bitcoin blocks have been released those fees are meant to reward miners so that they will continue processing transactions.

      That is how the whole thing works, mining does serve a very important purpose, it isn't just a giveaway or complete waste of power like some people indicate. Mining provides actual value to the system and the more mining power on the network the greater the integrity of bitcoin transactions. It does require more power than a traditional transaction verification system simply because the whole thing is set up in a way so that math and statistics are all anyone needs to trust in.

    3. Re:Mining vs Transaction by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Partly wrong.
      There is also a transaction fee, in existing bitcoins, that they will get from the transactors.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    4. Re:Mining vs Transaction by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      I mean, it's kind of doing something. My bank doesn't need someone to burn tons of coal to keep track of my bank account. So it's also kind of doing nothing.

    5. Re:Mining vs Transaction by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

      It's "doing nothing" the same way the Secret Service is "doing nothing" when the President is out in public. It's busy making sure something underhanded isn't happening.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    6. Re: Mining vs Transaction by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

      Your bank can cook the ledgers if it wishes. There is no proof of work concept. Transactions can be doctored.

    7. Re:Mining vs Transaction by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You can pretty much guarantee one of the replies to this comment will give those Secret Service guys something to do.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:Mining vs Transaction by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Let's see what those Secret Service guys will do with The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory:

      Shitcock!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Mining vs Transaction by shaitand · · Score: 1

      True, but your bank can also rip you off, give your money away at the request of a third party; such as a robber like a gunman, the IRS, or someone in response to a court order. Also your money could be fake, the transaction that funded your balance could have fraud at some point in the history and be reversed or someone could just say it was fraud, etc. You might agree some of those things would be just or for the communal good but ultimately it doesn't matter what you think, people have the power to take what is yours even if they use fraudulent means to activate that power.

      The Bitcoin system is so computationally challenging because it makes it impossible to counterfeit or defraud the system itself, those miners can't take control of your money for any reason, just or unjust. Of course nothing about that prevents you from getting ripped off otherwise but it won't be your money system working against you.

    10. Re:Mining vs Transaction by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Wait, aren't people losing their bitcoins on exchanges all the time? Are there stories like that about banks?

    11. Re: Mining vs Transaction by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Has this happened in the last 100 years in the US?

    12. Re:Mining vs Transaction by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Exchanges are not part of the bitcoin system. Neither are tumblers, black markets, etc.

      But yes, people lose their money at banks ALL the time, it's happened to me and I'm sure it's happened to you at some point. It happens every time a bank charges a fee, pays out an electronic charge you didn't authorize, reverses a charge on a bounced check, holds/freezes funds on behalf of a government agency, pays out funds for identity theft, or issues loans because they come from newly created debt and not deposited funds and therefore dissolve all existing money. There aren't usually many "stories" about it because we are used to be robbed by the banks but there was the entire occupy wallstreet protest on the matter, a peaceful protest shut down in a not so peaceful manner by the government.

    13. Re: Mining vs Transaction by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Yes, constantly. Almost every major bank reorders transactions so that the highest value transactions occur first and the opposite is true of deposits which are applied after charges. This maximizes the chance for an overdraft and before occupy wallstreet and the banking reforms by Elizabeth Warren it maximized the number of transactions they could charge an OD fee on. Sometimes this could allow for charging five OD fees even though only one transaction of less than $1 was actually made with insufficient available funds in the account. Also banks will algorithmically apply those fees up to 72hrs later, they will apply a historical analysis to the account and retroactively apply the fee at any point that does the most damage.

      These things have less impact to those who can afford to maintain a notable buffer balance but for people living paycheck to paycheck

      Also Wells Fargo has been busted in a pretty major way very recently. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wells+fargo+accounts+scandal&atb=v72-3__&ia=news

    14. Re: Mining vs Transaction by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

      Actually the answer is irrelevant. Cryptocurrency and its decentralization is a new way of banking of the future where you don't have to trust any one entity. The computation of the nonce value implies one can't cook the books (that easily..nearly impossible). So it opens up new ways of doing transactions / way of life.

  2. just like growing weed indoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just like growing weed indoors

    1. Re: just like growing weed indoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the weed would be good for something.

  3. So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Ehh, maybe it is. I don't exactly go to eastern Europe to often, so I don't exactly know. But it seems like someone really isn't thinking this headline thorough and instead were just looking for headline.

    1. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess they mean that the value of the bitcoins covers the electricity cost. They must have some pretty serious mining capacity to earn enough and produce a several kilowatts of heat.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ehh, maybe it is. I don't exactly go to eastern Europe to often, so I don't exactly know. But it seems like someone really isn't thinking this headline thorough and instead were just looking for headline.

      Doubtful, but if you make enough money mining bitcoins to pay your for power bill, then your home heating is paying system for itself and therefore effectively free (outside of the initial capital cost, of course). I think that is what they were getting at.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is they are using electricity to generate heat AND enough money to pay for the electricity How did you miss that?

    4. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They were already paying for the electricity to mine. So yes, they are heating their cottage for free. Headline is perfectly fine.

    5. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 m^2 is 215sqft so......

    6. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by chipschap · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ehh, maybe it is. I don't exactly go to eastern Europe to often, so I don't exactly know.

      Didn't know Siberia had moved to Eastern Europe. I learn a lot on /.

    7. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by war4peace · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Siberia is not in Eastern Europe.
      2. There is profit to be made, in several ways. First, you no longer pay for heating, so you save that amount. Then, you make money out of generating cryptocurrency.
      3. The guys in TFA have built a prototype and they want to make a business out of it - sell it to people as a heating device.

      I keep one room in my home warm during the winter through cryptomining - and make a profit too.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they'll have to upgrade the miners every 4 months to remain profitable.

    9. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you are talking about.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    10. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did this back in 13/14. Wasn't getting enough heat out of my ASIC btc mining so I bought a few gaming cards for LTC. Cut a couple of holes in my main furnace duct and ran blower fans to pull the heat out of the utility room where the mining was happening. Made enough to pay for a natural gas system but decided to hodl. The coins would pay for half the house if o sold them now.

    11. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      several kilowatts of heat

      Only in the USA would you need several kilowatts of heat to keep a 20sqm space warm. Appropriate insulation and you can do it with less than 1.

    12. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miners get faster so yield drops.

      The thing is, if your heating bill is a dollar a day on average and you buy a $20 dumb resistive heater every year, your annual bill is $385.

      The bitcoin mining rig needed to net $1/day over power cost very likely cost more than that. And in a year they will only net $050 or even $0.10 a day.

    13. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, Siberia is sent to you!

    14. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe, it's just an estimate. My Leaf has a very efficient heat pump rated for 3kW, just for the cabin.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      The Bitcoin operation must pay for its own electricity or there is no point. They are just piping the excess heat they generate anyway around the house.

      Presumably it just stayed in their house anyway, making that room warm and then escaping through the roof or walls, without much benefitting other rooms.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh hush! Your logic will only get in the way of their MAD PROFITZ discussion all these "millionaires" are having...

    17. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Maybe, it's just an estimate. My Leaf has a very efficient heat pump rated for 3kW, just for the cabin.

      You didn't just compare the insulation of a car to house did you? The walls of my place have an insulation barrier close to 200mm thick, tripple pane glass, and I don't even live in Siberia.

    18. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by dak664 · · Score: 2

      According to https://digiconomist.net/bitco... it's now 228kWh per transaction and somewhere north of a megawatt to generate that $530/month gross profit. Should keep the pipes from freezing!

      Of course not all of that energy is turned into heat, some goes into the blockchain entropy /s

    19. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're forgetting to scale to the base temperature you have to heat from. This isn't heating a house in average climate, you're talking about heating a house in Siberia. Granted, heating a house in Antarctica would be worse, but still.

    20. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      LTC seems to already have all the necessary patches in place to avoid the problems currently affecting BTC and their multiple forks.

      I say, hold you LTC. I'm still kicking myself for not buying a few hundred at $2.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    21. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say 200mm thick like we're supposed to be impressed but really, it's only 0.0002km thick.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    22. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If you mine something that's been designed to be resistant to ASICs, you need to use CPUs and GPUs to mine. Last time I checked, they don't double in computing power every year anymore.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    23. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh, maybe it is. I don't exactly go to eastern Europe to often, so I don't exactly know.

      It shows :-P Siberia is in Asia, not Europe.

    24. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My apartment is 36 sq m, and I heat it with a 4kW boiler. Once it's up to living temperature, it pulse burns at under 10% duty cycle even in the middle of winter.

      Yes, the UK isn't as cold as Siberia, but I'm top floor with 3 external walls. A smaller Siberian apartment isn't going to need 5 times the heating.

    25. Re: So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Flawed argument.
      That's what people have been saying when facing the decision to start mining, and they ended up not mining.
      Those who did... well, they are richer now.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    26. Re:So I guess Elecrity is free in Siberia? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Well I did just compare 200mm to 0.8mm of sheet metal. That's like ... orders of magnitude man :-)

  4. Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want mine your own crypto currency, you need a motherboard with 19 PCIe 1X slots to plug in 19 GPUs and a couple of 1200W PSUs. Running 19 GPUs is enough to burn down a shack.

    1. Re:Be sure to get the right motherboard... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Platinum Micro, Inc salesperson. How many times are you going to post this?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you buy my boards you fuck. Buy them!!! You stupid fucker!!

    3. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was able to heat a 2800 square foot home near Montana with six GPU's. R40 insulation and decent solar paige design.

    4. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Please, I could do that with a single Pentium 4 or FX-9590.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Be sure to get the right motherboard... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      If you want mine your own crypto currency, you need a motherboard with 19 PCIe 1X slots to plug in 19 GPUs and a couple of 1200W PSUs. Running 19 GPUs is enough to burn down a shack.

      Wait, do people still mine BTC with video cards!?!? Sounds expensive, and very 2012.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anaerin · · Score: 1

      Not really. For Bitcoin using GPUs is no longer fast or efficient enough, you need customized ASICs to do the work. For other, more complex (and/or ASIC-resistant) cryptocurrencies, however, that is a good choice.

    7. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just post a link to newegg or Amazon or wherever that sells the $10 pcie via usb adapter. Mining doesn't need huge bandwidth.

    8. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear I've never posted this before but...
      LOL!!! :)

    9. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I think there's a difference between heating a home near Montana and heating a home in Siberia (annual average temperature -5 degrees C).

    10. Re: Be sure to get the right motherboard... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I prefer to heat my house with 2750 ATmega328P.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  5. Are they prepared to freeze once their mining... by ffkom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... no longer pays for the electricity bill?

  6. energy bob, the little pieces by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Seriously... no it's not free. He's paying for the electricity consumed by the processors performing bitcoin mining which create heat.

    1. Re:energy bob, the little pieces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which then earns enough bitcoins, along with the increase in value, is enough to pay for the power bill, and the byproduct heat is a free benefit.

    2. Re:energy bob, the little pieces by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      He's paying for the electricity consumed by the processors performing bitcoin mining which create heat.

      He's paying for it with the bitcoins he mines. That's how it's free.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:energy bob, the little pieces by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

      So neither free as in beer nor free as in software, but free as in marketing.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    4. Re:energy bob, the little pieces by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's free in the sense that a by-product is free; it arises as a side-effect of making something else.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:energy bob, the little pieces by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Free as in doesn't cost him anything. Sheesh.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:energy bob, the little pieces by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Does it make sense to buy anything with bitcoin? A few months ago I heard bitcoin was worth $1000. Then I heard it was $6000. If I was taking a chance I would just keep holding it. There is a possibility of a crash, but then what? How would I sell or spend it fast enough while it's still worth something?

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  7. Mining in Mining Towns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siberian miners mining to keep warm while not mining.

    1. Re:Mining in Mining Towns by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Siberian miners mining to keep warm while not mining.

      You can mine as a minor, even if you can't be a miner.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  8. Re:Are they prepared to freeze once their mining.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the will use vodka to keep warm. With bears.

  9. Re:Are they prepared to freeze once their mining.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, obviously no one who could rig their house to be heated with bitcoin miners could possibly have another heating system or figure something else out. A very intelligent observation.

  10. Well, Obviously. by dow · · Score: 1

    I think everyone who ever tried a bit of mining with any enthusiasm found their home a little warmer. 4 Gpus running flat out all day will keep a room warm. I heard some good stories about the uses for this heat a few years ago, but one guy on a forum I remember who tried to run a fairly large operation with several dozen gpus in his basement. He was using the heat produced to keep his house warm, but his method for redistributing the heat throughout the property was just to leave all the doors open. He was experiencing psu/gpu failures daily due to the temperature down there, which he said was so hot he could only go in for a few minutes at a time. Everyone was telling him he had to force some cool air in from outdoors and do something to move the hot air out, the whole time he was just cursing yet another hardware failure and not doing anything about the problem. He didn't even have any large fans anywhere in his basement to move the bulk of the air around, just the dozens of little fans whining away on the gpus, power supplies and cpus as they each slowly died from heat stroke.

    1. Re: Well, Obviously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it was as simple as putting the mining in my furnace room and cutting two holes in my main furnace duct where I ran two blower fans 24/7. Six GPUs and R40 insulation. Was able to turn the furnace off the entire 13/14 winter near Montana.

  11. Two sources for excess electricity consumption by no-body · · Score: 1

    - growing pot (illegal in some areas and consumption or IR dwelling image can be cause for ....)
    - bitcoin mining - just creates more costs as profit as it seems:

    https://www.buybitcoinworldwid...

    > While mining is still technically possible for anyone, those with underpowered setups will find more money is spent on electricity than is generated through mining.

    1. Re:Two sources for excess electricity consumption by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      While mining is still technically possible for anyone, those with underpowered setups will find more money is spent on electricity than is generated through mining.

      There's crypto-currencies made to be mined by CPUs and GPUs, ASICs can't mine it by design.

      There's also speculation involved, mining LTC a year ago might not have been beneficial or just barely enough to pay for the electricity, but today the value of LTC has gone up and could pay ten times what was paid in electricity a year ago.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  12. I'm doing the same by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    My apartment is being heated by 3x RX580's and my shop is being heat by 4 large mining rigs. Since I have to pay electric heat anyway, I might as well get some money out of it.

  13. The Devil is in the Details by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    The story offered no detail at all, really - but maybe you can speak to your setup with regards to these significant, unanswered questions:

    - Are those rigs the *only* source of heat in your apartment and shop?
    - If so, how warm do they keep those spaces during mid-winter?
    - What was your mid-winter electricity bill before you did this, and what is it now?
    - How much income per month are you getting from the bitcoin mining?

    And, for a rather important comparison with the story... where do you live?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: The Devil is in the Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you so skeptical? I don't use heating or AC at any time in the year, so a slightly cooler climate could easily be heated by machines spewing several kilowatts of heat.

    2. Re:The Devil is in the Details by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      So far it's only gotten down to about 35F overnight but in the morning I arrived and it was 72F inside the shop with everything running. So I assume it didn't drop too low overnight. We do have gas heating here which is cheaper than electrical but it costs about $15 in electrical for every $100 I make operating the miners. My normal electrical usage at the shop is $120/mo and in September it was $388 but we had the AC running 24/7 and it was 90F outside and to offset 1000W takes like 1300W minimum. So that was terribly efficient. At my apartment it costs $45 with the AC blasting all summer plus a gaming PC and in the winter with electric heat it's around $150 because it's poorly insulated. So that I assume will be almost entirely offset by the 1 mining unit.

  14. HW Specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What rig X 2 do you need to earn $430 mining bitcoin?

    1. Re:HW Specs? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      What rig X 2 do you need to earn $430 mining bitcoin?

      $430 over 50 years? If you want to make $430 a month mining BTC, it will be an expensive rig not based on GPUs. PC + graphics card mining of bitcoins is no longer worthwhile. You need specialized hardware, and it will likely take quite a while to pay for itself.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re: HW Specs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just mine alt coins then and convert them to BTC

    3. Re: HW Specs? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Wow, you can convert coins to BTC? Holy cow I'm going to be rich, I have 500K flappycoins!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  15. Hardly a new invention by Talla · · Score: 1

    This guy did the same thing in 2011:
    https://bitcointalk.org/index....

    1. Re:Hardly a new invention by stinerman · · Score: 1

      No doubt. How many of us turn on Folding@Home or maybe SETI@Home once it gets cold? I've been doing that for years.

  16. 3D Printers are better by somenickname · · Score: 1

    I'd much rather dump heat into my house with 3D printers than bitcoin miners. If your electricity is cheap enough, sure, you are effectively heating your house for free but, you've still paid for the miners and they will be obsolete in 6 months (Actually, they are usually obsolete by the time China ships them to you). After a single winter you are going to have a pile of very hot, very expensive ASICs that no longer mine fast enough to pay for their electricity costs.

    A 3D printer is presumably creating something you want so the heat is a beneficial winter-time byproduct. I have two in my home office. It's currently snowing outside and I have my thermostat set at 62F. The rest of the house is a bit cold but, they keep a 12ft x 12ft office nice and cozy and every few hours something interesting pops out of them. I didn't buy them to heat my office but, I suspect that my electric bill will be lower this winter because I'm basically just heating the room I'm usually sitting in.

    1. Re: 3D Printers are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had sold all my mining equipment and BTC after the 13/14 winter, I would have had a small profit. I hung onto the BTC and if sold today it would pay for half the total cost of the 2800 square foot house. It got too hot and the profitability of mining at the end of the winter was low so I stopped. Kicking myself for not going longer.

    2. Re: 3D Printers are better by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      If I had sold all my mining equipment and BTC after the 13/14 winter, I would have had a small profit. I hung onto the BTC and if sold today it would pay for half the total cost of the 2800 square foot house. It got too hot and the profitability of mining at the end of the winter was low so I stopped. Kicking myself for not going longer.

      Haha. I remember selling BTC for like $5, and we were in heaven when we sold for $20 and $100 a coin. I stopped mining when Radeon 5850's and 6950's were on the way out and people were switching to ASICs, and commercial mining was taking over. If I would have hung onto what I sold at those levels, I could pay off my house today, and buy a much nicer one with cash (or BTC). Damn you, hindsight... Who knew?

      It looks like Satoshi may still have billions of dollars worth of BTC, but converting that much to fiat could be problematic, as well as have a huge effect on the market. Since the number of BTC in existence will always be limited, Satoshi holds a significant stake no matter what the price/$ is, unless he sells. As legitimate as bitcoin has become, he might be the beneficiary of the biggest pyramid scheme in history, even if semi-unintentionally.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    3. Re:3D Printers are better by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but around here 3D printer filament isn't cheap.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:3D Printers are better by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      > because I'm basically just heating the room I'm usually sitting in.

      That's how it works for supermodels. Which is why I use them for my heating.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  17. Drrr, the Russians did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those evil Russians are at it again. This time their nefarious plot is to mine all the Bitcoin in the world and use it built a gigantic Rock Monster with which to destroy the whole world!

    1. Re:Drrr, the Russians did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those evil Russians are at it again. This time their nefarious plot is to mine all the Bitcoin in the world and use it built a gigantic Rock Monster with which to destroy the whole world!

      I'm just disappointed that Russian-owned BTC-e got taken down. That was my favorite crypto exchange, Rock Monsters aside.

  18. waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it would be possible to cross this software with something like boinc so that all that cpu time is spent crunching data instead of creating useless numbers. I don't know what I'm talking about either so.. but it seems like a lot of waste.

  19. For decision purposes, only one question by raymorris · · Score: 1

    For purposes of initially deciding whether this might make any sense for you, there is one big question: do you have to use electric heating? Pretty much any other common type of heating is better.

    IF you have to use electric heating there is basically no such thing as "efficient" electric heating and "inefficient". As long as you are heating the rooms you want to heat, you're perfectly efficient, more or less. ("Waste" from any sort of inefficient system ends up as heat. Since heat it what you want, it's 100% efficient.)

    Since your electric furnace will be no more efficient than a mining rig, you may as well use that electricity do something while it's making heat. Maybe a mining rig. It won't useany more electricity. Just throttle it down if it produces more heat than you need.

    Since electricity costs are equal with any kind of electric heat, it then comes down to the cost of buying the hardware. See if the hardware you're looking at will produce enough junkcoin to pay for itself in one winter.

    1. Re:For decision purposes, only one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more efficient ways of heating with electricity though. Even an air source heat pump system (think an air conditioner run in reverse, cooling the outside and dumping hot air inside) produces a couple of times more usable heat than it uses in electricity. Ground source heat pumps can be even more effective if you have outdoor space you can drill deep enough in.

    2. Re:For decision purposes, only one question by j-beda · · Score: 1

      For purposes of initially deciding whether this might make any sense for you, there is one big question: do you have to use electric heating? Pretty much any other common type of heating is better.

      This is why if you are heating with electrical resistive heaters, your lightbulb choice doesn't really matter - the inefficiency in your lighting just contributes heat to the room that doesn't need to be added by your heating system.

      There are heat pump systems that can give higher than 100% efficiency in that they can move more heat energy from the outside to the inside than they use in electrical energy. Window mounted air-to-air units do exist but are not as efficient as ones that extract heat from underground, and those ones are pretty involved to install. Heat pumps can usually be run in reverse to provide interior cooling when desired.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      For every joule of electrical energy used, resistive heaters provide one joule of heat engery, while an air-to-air heat pump can provide range from 3.2 to 4.5 joules of heat energy for air source heat pumps and 4.2 to 5.2 joules for ground source heat pumps.

      Depending on the costs of the equipment and the expected useful lifespan, "miniming" might not be as good of an investment as buying a heat pump.

      Another option might be to invest in solar panels.

  20. Tiny scale by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    If you think this is a great deal, be aware that this mentions heating a 20 square cottage. That is equivalent to heating about 2/3 of my modest home's living room only. In American terms, that's like 215 square feet - not a lot.
    And, of course, if you are considering jumping into the mining game now, you need to do some calculations to figure out when you might break even and maybe begin to profit on your investment. Bitcoin mining hardware is not cheap, it isn't usable for much else (other than heating), the difficulty of mining will continue to rise over time (read: the number of BTC you will mine will go down, and hardware becomes less effective), your electricity cost is a factor, and then there's the whole notion of cryptocurrencies possibly being a big bubble.
    You should definitely think about harvesting the waste heat if you are a miner, but individuals may have missed the boat at this point.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    1. Re:Tiny scale by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You need to mine something else, Monero being a good example of ASIC-resistant crypto-currency.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  21. Re:Are they prepared to freeze once their mining.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Gasp* You're right! Depending on Bitcoin's price they may be facing a future where their heating is not entirely free! There only options would be to pay for heating or freeze and, obviously, paying for heating is out of the question.

    Is there nothing we can do to help these people?

  22. Re:Are they prepared to freeze once their mining.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're probably already dead.

  23. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is like saying free health care in Canada. Yea, you don't pay any direct cost for heating the house, but you still pay for the power that the computers use. Could say it is more expensive to heat the house using the computers then with a normal way, if not for the bitcoins.

  24. Not Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not free heat. The ones paying for the heat are mostly fools and criminals. "And some, I assume, are good people."

  25. Re: Are they prepared to freeze once their mining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If theyre gay you can count on it.

    Why arent we bestfriends with Russia again??

  26. Great, but old idea. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    I've been doing the same for the last couple of decades. I'd leave my machines running all night for heat. Before it was ripping CD's which used to take forever.

    After that it was SETI

    These days it's running computers for BOINC which now comes along with gridcoins.

    Yes I am still paying for the electricity, but it is doing something useful for me in addition to heat.

  27. This is news? by xtal · · Score: 1

    I do this here, minus the air/water heat exchange.

    Selling 1kW of GPU easily covers ~$0.12/kWh. This is a decent chunk of my heating budget. I heat with electric, so I'm burning the electrons anyway - might as well make them do some productive work before they return to ground potential.

    If trends continue I'll add another 500-750W of cards.

    The mining and profit covered my heating bill for last winter. It isn't making money, per se, but losing less.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do this here, minus the air/water heat exchange.

      Selling 1kW of GPU easily covers ~$0.12/kWh. This is a decent chunk of my heating budget. I heat with electric, so I'm burning the electrons anyway - might as well make them do some productive work before they return to ground potential.

      If trends continue I'll add another 500-750W of cards.

      The mining and profit covered my heating bill for last winter. It isn't making money, per se, but losing less.

      So assist your situation with a solar array. If you get enough sunlight you might break even on your energy consumption versus generation.

      There are still a number of costs involved, like installation and ongoing maintenance of the array, to be factored into the financial projection of such a project.

    2. Re:This is news? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I heat with electric, so I'm burning the electrons anyway - might as well make them do some productive work before they return to ground potential.

      Switching to a heat-pump would give you three or four (or more?) times as much heat energy as the electrical energy used, which might be a better long term investment of capital than bigger computing rigs - the electrical savings would continue long after the mining becomes non-cost efficient.

  28. Bitcoin bitcoin bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa, sounds like Bitcoin is the "real deal"! Guess I'd better get on the Bitcoin bandwagon! I am a real person and not pumping Bitcoin!

  29. Their home or their walk-in closet? by Whooty+McWhooface · · Score: 1

    Heating 20 square feet, that is not exactly heating their home/cottage.

    So, so both of these people live in this cabin? Is there a kitchenette, let alone a toilet?

    If you have to go outside to do your business, kind of lose all that warmth you were enjoying. Of course, $430 a month is a lot of beer money.

  30. Slightly cooler climate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siberia average annual temperature is -5C. Perhaps more than slightly cooler?