Slashdot Mirror


Paradise Papers Leak Reveals Apple's Secret Tax Bolthole (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from BBC: The world's most profitable firm has a secretive new structure that would enable it to continue avoiding billions in taxes, the Paradise Papers show. They reveal how Apple sidestepped a 2013 crackdown on its controversial Irish tax practices by actively shopping around for a tax haven. It then moved the firm holding most of its untaxed offshore cash, now $252 billion, to the Channel Island of Jersey. Apple said the new structure had not lowered its taxes. It said it remained the world's largest taxpayer, paying about $35 billion in corporation tax over the past three years, that it had followed the law and its changes "did not reduce our tax payments in any country."

Leaked emails also make it clear that Apple wanted to keep the move secret. One email sent between senior partners at Appleby says: "For those of you who are not aware, Apple [officials] are extremely sensitive concerning publicity. They also expect the work that is being done for them only to be discussed amongst personnel who need to know." Apple chose Jersey, a UK Crown dependency that makes its own tax laws and which has a 0% corporate tax rate for foreign companies. Paradise Papers documents show Apple's two key Irish subsidiaries, Apple Operations International (AOI), believed to hold most of Apple's massive $252 billion overseas cash hoard, and Apple Sales International (ASI), were managed from Appleby's office in Jersey from the start of 2015 until early 2016. This would have enabled Apple to continue avoiding billions in tax around the world.
The report notes that Apple paid just $1.65 billion in taxes to foreign governments, despite making $44.7 billion outside the U.S. That's a tax rate of 3.7%, which is less than a sixth of the average rate of corporation tax in the world.

8 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Not a typo: I learned a new word today by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Informative
  2. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They can do this because... country laws allow it all over the world.

    I can't fucking stand Apple one bit.

    But I'm infinitely more annoyed that any such arrangements are legal, no matter which countries are involved in helping them do this, than anything else. That only happens because the people writing the laws are using the same tricks themselves.

    If governments wrote tax-laws properly, they wouldn't be losing out on such tax, no matter what arrangement Apple tried to use.

    1. Re:Sigh. by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Paying taxes is not a moral choice, it is a part of doing business.

      Paying taxes is the price that we have to pay for the right of living in a civilized society. Oliver Wendell Holmes.

    2. Re:Sigh. by Pascoea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, we get it, government is bad. Enjoy haggling with Fire Protection Corp about the cost of extinguishing a fire while your house burns down.

    3. Re:Sigh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That still doesn't make paying taxes have anything to do with morality.
      It is a legal obligation, nothing more.

      If you can afford to pay taxes to maintain the system that permits you to profit, and you don't and it causes people to suffer (which is how it works) then yeah, there's a moral issue there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Sigh. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If governments wrote tax-laws properly, they wouldn't be losing out on such tax, no matter what arrangement Apple tried to use.

      Governments don't write tax laws - corporate lawyers at companies like Apple do. You see the problem now, right?

    5. Re:Sigh. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What you're missing is that these laws don't have these "loopholes" by accident. This is the way it's supposed to be. They were bought and paid for years ago by the likes of Halliburton, Exxon, Arthur Anderson (Sorry... Accenture), Bechtel, the Koch brothers, and the like. The only reason that DC have their panties in a wad about Apple's, Google's, or Amazon's taxes... and are dragging their names through the mud in the propaganda campaigns that the public is eating up... is that they're not the ones who paid for the laws. They were just clever enough to realize that, once on the books, the laws apply to everyone and not just the companies who bought them. And if Congress were to change the laws, the original purchasers would scream bloody murder and have the offending reps and senators replaced.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  3. Re:"extremely sensitive concerning publicity" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The morality is in spending not inconsiderable amounts of money finding ways to subvert the clear intention of the tax law. Most people don't have that option, and those that do reduce their own tax burden at the expense of those people.

    Just because it is technically legal doesn't make it morally acceptable to shirk your responsibilities while enjoying the massive benefits of being able to operate in those countries.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC