Slashdot Mirror


'Quark Fusion' Produces Eight Times More Energy Than Nuclear Fusion (futurism.com)

walterbyrd shares a report from Futurism: This new source of energy, according to researchers Marek Karliner and Jonathan Rosner, comes from the fusion of subatomic particles known as quarks. These particles are usually produced as a result of colliding atoms that move at high speeds within the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), where these component parts split from their parent atoms. It doesn't stop there, however, as these disassociated quarks also tend to collide with one another and fuse into particles called baryons. It is this fusion of quarks that Karliner and Rosner focused on, as they found that this fusion is capable of producing energy even greater than what's produced in hydrogen fusion. In particular, they studied how fused quarks configure into what's called a doubly-charmed baryon. Fusing quarks require 130 MeV to become doubly-charmed baryons, which, in turn, releases energy that's 12 MeV more energy. Turning their calculations to heavier bottom quarks, which need 230 MeV to fuse, they found that a resulting baryon could produce approximately 138 MeV of net energy -- about eight times more than what hydrogen fusion releases. The new study has been published in the journal Nature.

11 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Re: 8x more powerful X zero chain reaction = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have to get more people buying these large hadron colliders! When the price goes down everyone will get one put in their backyard and we will all be rolling in the quarks.

  2. Re:Hooray! Bigger bombs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    100MT should be enough for anyone.

  3. Oh, Great! by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This means that ubiquitous fusion energy is 50 years away again!

  4. Re: 8x more powerful X zero chain reaction = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I'm going to be rolling in the Quarks, will I be a Top or a Bottom? I'm already considered a bit Strange, and without any Charm. But those are the Ups and Downs of walking around with a Hadron all the time.

  5. Re:8x more powerful X zero chain reaction = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How dare you question the mantra of endless progress! We have millions of times more computing power than in the 1960s! Just look at how everything else progressed!

    We live in the same houses, drive on the same roads, with cars that go the same speed driving on the same tires, while airplanes fly at the same height and speed burning the same fuel!

    See? Endless progress! This means the glorious 3D printed private-space asteroid-mined quark-fused warp drive is JUST AROUND THE CORNER!

    Look at how many cores my laptop has (and curiously is brought to its knees every four hours because a web browser needs to wade through gigabytes of temporary files!)

  6. Re: Don't get too exited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course Quark fusion is unacceptably unstable. While not quite as good, there is an alternative which is much more stable. Ladies and gentlemen, get ready for...

    PageMaker Fusion!

  7. Re:8x more powerful X zero chain reaction = 0 by thegreatbob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quark Fusion; it shall always be 200 years off from becoming a commercially viable power source.

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  8. Re:Hooray! Bigger bombs! by maroberts · · Score: 3, Funny

    (In short, they decay faster than Trump's attention span.)

    Nope, Scientific tests have proven that nothing decays faster than Trump's attention span. However, it seems like a Twitter containment field can prevent such decay

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  9. Sadly... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...your post is lacking any truth or beauty!

  10. Re:Democrat wins VA governorship by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    people went to church every sunday

    And to a picnic every labor day.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Re:Hooray! Bigger bombs! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    *sigh*

    Fuck, when will people ever get it right. The Twitter Containment Field (or TCF) only creates a snapshot, it does not conserve a state. And even though to the untrained eye the TCF seems to conserve a state, its attention half life is even shorter than what is contained therein, making it even less important than what it contains.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.