Slashdot Mirror
Google Wants Google Doodles Taught In Public School, Warns Kids They Best Behave
theodp writes: Well, this year's Hour of Code is almost upon us, and if Google has its way, K-12 schoolchildren across the nation will be learning computer science by creating Google Doodles with Scratch (lesson plan). Curiously, the introductory video for the Create Your Own Google Logo Hour of Code activity from the Google Computer Science Education Department sternly warns kids, "While it is okay to use the Google logo for your personal Doodle, it is not okay [emphasis Google's] to use it anyplace else or outside this activity." In addition to respecting its intellectual property, Google instructs kids that they are to follow the Scratch Community Guidelines when they create Google logos: "Please stay positive, friendly, and supportive towards others in the Scratch Community. Help us keep Scratch a place where people of different backgrounds and interests feel welcome to hang out and create together."
Then decide it's not profitable and shut it down in 2 years. No more book reports bitches!
Yeah, that'll go over about as well as DARE.
This is wonderful progress, though - when 'fighting the man' is reduced to shitposting Google logos, well, it's clear that we've made real progress over the decades.
You are welcome to speak your mind in America*.
*Must comply with HR rules of your company, must not offend anyone, infringe on any business interests, or otherwise cause incitement of the public.
"While it is okay to use the Google logo for your personal Doodle, it is not okay [emphasis Google's] to use it anyplace else or outside this activity."
What we should be teaching children is the appropriate response to this:
"You want a logo design? Pay me."
Fuck you Google.
If you want to make people revolve around your every move then they get to do shit with your stuff you don't get to control.
If you don't like them using your logo for other things ... DON'T FUCKING MAKE IT THE CENTER OF AN EXPERIMENT ABOUT MODIFYING IMAGES WITH SOFTWARE YOU SELFISH FUCKS.
Use a logo developed to be public domain specifically for this purpose.
Anything else just shows your selfishness. My children will literally NEVER be allowed to participate in ANY Google summer of code bullshit.
captcha: comeback
Google apparently doesn't know the best way to get kids to do something, is to tell them not to do it.
It' is truly inappropriate for Google to come in with education agenda, legal and social agenda. That is for teachers and parents to decide. Not corporations. That just leads to all sorts of abuse. Microsoft and Apple have been pushing their products through schools and the results are future people who no nothing but the products pushed in the school. Not what I call an education. Oscar Wilde would have a field day with this. (see his statement about British education in "The Importance of being Earnest").
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
this is a test from an AC
That's just terrible. Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?
Now who wants to see Mark McGwire sock a few dingers!
This whole trend of Big Business dreaming up some curriculum and then trying to push it on public schools has got to stop.
Not only because it's an obvious shill for their particular technology, but it is often poorly thought out and in some instances politically charged.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
I'm moderately certain that one of the fair use exceptions is educational. If you're purposely inserting your IP into a lesson plan, I'm moderately certain you then can't complain about your IP being abused due to a fair use exception.
Ultimately, this appears to be a contract. Children cannot agree to contracts, and the school can't enter them into a contract without parental consent. So, kids, do whatever you want with your Google doodles, they are yours.
If nothing else, copyright applies.
I stand corrected. Google is my babysitter after all!
Because anyone firing an employee for stating an unpleasant political opinion would have to consider the community repercussions against them, which very well might have cost them their business.
Today, with companies spanning cities, states, and even nations, they can often do that with impunity and given the lack of physical community instilled in the current generation, it often won't even make a dent in their bottom line.
The reason there used to be so little legal pressure was because in the past societal/cultural pressure could be exerted in its place. Today however that is less true, outside of explosive events like the Catholic church, or hollywood sex scandals, or the rare major fallout of corporate misdeeds.
Google is a data acquisition and analysis company with ties to intelligence agencies and operated by liberal extremists. They should not be allowed to market to or provide "services" to classrooms in any manner as it just affords them the opportunity to persecute children for wrongthink before they have even developed the wherewithal to know what not to say. This will ruin people's lives.
I donâ(TM)t like tech companies demanding use of their semi proprietary standards. When I was in high school I took then optional courses for coding. We did everything in c++ html and some basic java. All cross platform all skills I can still use today.
I may have been using a Windows pc to write the code but the c code worked with very minor tweaks in GCC on Linux when I tried it. Thatâ(TM)s what makes it useful. I can use it anywhere and as the basis for learning new stuff because the concepts are all the same in OO languages.
"I notice that you have a printout of your child's Google Doodle (tm) on your refrigerator.
Please be aware that you are in violation of the Universal EULA. As such, until such time as you remove the offending item, all Google Services, including but not limited to gmail, your autonomous vehicle permissions, electricity, and access to Amazon will be revoked.
Please also be aware that until such time as you complete the mandatory three day course "Google Loves Me: Why I should Love Google", you will be ineligible to receive your daily Google Credits.
Remember, we at Google want what is best for you and for the children you entrust to us."
Check your premises.
"And we are watching EVERYTHING you do. We KNOW if you have been naughty or nice, and unlike Santa, we are real and we never forget"
...by introducing them to the boring and tedious world of copyright and trademarks.
When our kids were in school, decades ago, our battles along these lines were many. There was McDonald's handing out arithmetic worksheets asking the students to add up the costs of Big Macs and fries, decorated with the company's cartoon characters. There were even charities that lobbied for sales or other fund raising activities, for themselves, during school instruction hours. So it's not simply big business (unless one also puts some charities in that same bucket). All of these activities had the strong support of the school district's leadership and it took a lot of effort to get these stopped or limited. Eventually, the primary supporter was voted out of office. Some district leaders continue to think of these programs as "free" instructional material or other supposed benefits. But it's all really designed to sell product or reduce instruction time, and should continue to be fought.
At the same time, we supported other fund raising activities, for the school itself, when they were held outside of instruction hours. That might be the annual Walk-A-Thon type event held on a weekend or a bake sale after school. And we involved our kids in our own charitable giving. But absolutely none of this on school time.
In the case of Google's offer, this might be a fine example to use to explain the concepts of copyright, fair use, and even open source to the targets of this unacceptable activity.
Public schools are a prison system.
Students are forced to attend and labor under duress. There is no indictment or jury. If they fail to attend, they or their parents can be penalized or even arrested.
Taxation is theft
War is murder
The draft is slavery
Public schools are prisons
what? the people at Google couldn't come up with new doodles and now need small children to create content for them. Sounds about right for the goog.
on top of that i still think that it is debatable that programming in scratch will actually teach you any of the principals of programming. All scratch does is add another layer of abstraction (obfuscation) to the stack and it will hinder people when they need to actually start typing out commands. FWIW Logo is a much better start followed up with Turing or basic Java
Troy: (on TV) Now turn to the next problem. If you have three Pepsis and drink one, how much more refreshed are you? You, the redhead in the Chicago school system?
Girl: Pepsi?
Troy: Partial credit!
https://www.simpsonsarchive.co...
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
on the Engineering Quadrangle, Google had students queued up to get a donut along with a chance to win a Google Donut or whatever they call their clone of the Amazon Echo. They were totally slow because you had to give over your personal information to even get the kind of donut you could eat, and they had this Disney-ride line-control labyrinth filled with students by 8:30 AM. Sure wish I had my camera to photograph Google treating a large mob of Engineering students like cattle in a feedlot.
What did this have to do with the mission of the College of Engineering?
Where corporations own literally everything, even your doodles. How far away are we from a day when a corporation owns the genes in your pets. And Facebook and Instagram already owns any photos you posted.
...although I wonder if The Circle floundered* because it isn't a great movie (I read the book, but who reads?), or because so many people are already buying into and seeking a tech company to guide their lives and give them transcendental meaning? /. people see through stuff like this at a much higher than the great unwashed public.
Too bad. Even a poor movie with the concepts in it might inoculate some % against stuff like this.
For all it's faults,
*According to Wikipedia it cost $18 million to make and the Box office was $33.8 million. I guess according Mediathink, that is an abject failure. But then only the top movie of any week is a success, and all the others are abject failures.
Fuck Google, fuck their logo, and fuck their scratch rules. Disrupt Disrupt Disrupt should be what kids are doing with Google, not buying into their corporate horseshit.
Use their logo however you want, the more obscene the better lol.
Don't be a pussy (or Ballsacker...which is the same thing).