Slashdot Mirror


China Overtakes US In Latest Top 500 Supercomputer List (enterprisecloudnews.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Enterprise Cloud News: The release of the semiannual Top 500 Supercomputer List is a chance to gauge the who's who of countries that are pushing the boundaries of high-performance computing. The most recent list, released Monday, shows that China is now in a class by itself. China now claims 202 systems within the Top 500, while the United States -- once the dominant player -- tumbles to second place with 143 systems represented on the list. Only a few months ago, the U.S. had 169 systems within the Top 500 compared to China's 160. The growth of China and the decline of the United States within the Top 500 has prompted the U.S. Department of Energy to doll out $258 million in grants to several tech companies to develop exascale systems, the next great leap in HPC. These systems can handle a billion billion calculations a second, or 1 exaflop. However, even as these physical machines grow more and more powerful, a good portion of supercomputing power is moving to the cloud, where it can be accessed by more researchers and scientists, making the technology more democratic.

62 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. The cloud is on its way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Right now the big push is towards the chicken wing. Chicken Wing computing is similar to the cloud.... but it has wings, making your data more readily available and more secure with highly ruffled feathers on the network perimeter.
    Chicken wing storage and supercomputing is the future.

  2. You will bankrupt yourselves trying to keep up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    China has give or take 4.4 times pop. as USA. They have more middle class people than you have people total. That middle class is growing rapidly because there are a huge number of poor who are being raised up to middle class over time as the country prospers and more and more of the world economy moves to China, and the GDP/pop is going up very fast.

    Eventually you will be unable to keep up in any domain: computing, military, mfg, world clout, anything. Rather than drive yourselves into the dirt trying to keep up when you have no hope, better to accept your place as second tier with grace. Do not set the world against you, because you will need allies and partners who will trade with you. Do not treat other countries with the concept you have been. Do not spend all your money on frivolity, military and chest thumping, instead of education and medical care for your people.

    USA, you will not keep up with China any more than Thailand (pop 69m) could be an economic and military power comparable to USA.

    Please try not to take out the whole world in a fit of blind rage when you become second trumpet.

    1. Re:You will bankrupt yourselves trying to keep up. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Population size is a bad indicator of the ability to "keep up".

    2. Re:You will bankrupt yourselves trying to keep up. by boudie2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      USA have secret weapon. Donald J. Trump. Your MIPS supercomputer will be no help.

    3. Re:You will bankrupt yourselves trying to keep up. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Do you also address real arguments, or mainly just stick to this pathetic strawman shit? It's a bit sad, to be honest.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    4. Re:You will bankrupt yourselves trying to keep up. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Trump knows all about computers. You betcha. Chinese computers are a hoax.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:You will bankrupt yourselves trying to keep up. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Two bald men fighting over a fucking comb.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  3. Not just super computing... by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are also planning on becoming #1 in quantum computing, radio astronomy, and plans in the work to build the next huge super collider. Meanwhile, in the USA, we are planning on giving rich trust-fund babies even more money they didn't earn, cutting back on our education, and appointing people who hate science to run science-based federal departments.

    1. Re:Not just super computing... by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are also planning on becoming #1 [in many fields] Meanwhile, in the USA, we are planning on giving rich trust-fund babies even more money they didn't earn

      The rich spend boat-loads of money convincing the population that trickle-down either works, or would work if we reach a sufficient level of tax breaks and deregulation. So far this bribery, I mean investment, appears to be paying off because at least half the country accepts it.

      I do fear a slippery slope: the richer the rich get the more they spend on convincing the population that their own well-being depends on fat cats staying fat, given them even more power to get more power. The ever growing inequality since around 1980 is evidence of a slippery slope, or at least a trend somehow "stuck" going up.

      The idea of "corporate personhood" is not in the Constitution, but has slowly worked its way into common law by judges placed there by the rich. Some aspects of corporate personhood do have legal value in terms of deciding how to apply existing laws to corporations, but it's been way overdone.

    2. Re:Not just super computing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because, tyrants or not, the ruling class in China are composed of scientists and engineers. They are able to plan for the future with rational thought processes.

    3. Re:Not just super computing... by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Don't forget appointing judges who have never even tried a case as a lawyer

    4. Re:Not just super computing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It would be funny to "jail" a corporation, give it community service etc.

    5. Re:Not just super computing... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Or even a death penalty for companies.

      Knowingly break the rules killing hundreds?

      You're now government property to be auctioned off to new owners.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Not just super computing... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't get it. There should be applause. Why the sudden jingoism woo woo USA #1 rhetoric we all know is bullshit? China has never bombed another country for peace. Can anyone imagine a worse world leader than America? It's about time the rogue superpower got shoved off the world stage and a peaceful country kicked their racist, redneck asses. Remember: Capitalism is incompatible with socialism but is 100% compatible with fascism. China is mostly quiet, doing stuff in their own country for the most part (that YOU might consider as anti whatever, but locals not so much). The US on the other hand is a loud mouth cowboy who pretends he's all just and moral while bombing the crap out of everything, rigging elections, installing puppet presidents, doing assassinations, drug trade, and then complaining when somebody does similar. Americans are the least educated and knowledgeable of foreign affairs, languages, and disparate cultures, societies, and social norms among all Westernized countries and the least exposed universally.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Not just super computing... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Nothing like that is needed. Simply fine an appreciable percentage of revenue. 10% for first offence would be a good level. Go up in increments of 10% after that.

      Won't happen, because 'lobbying' as a fig leaf for endemic corruption is completely acceptable.

      Of course, this would all come unstuck if the people started voting for people who might change all this, but that won't happen either.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    8. Re:Not just super computing... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I'm planning on marrying a supermodel. Think it will work?

      If you're sufficiently rich, of course.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    9. Re:Not just super computing... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Yeah. China's leadership boils down to tyranny/totalitarianism but you cannot deny they seem to actually know what they're doing. The US, on the other hand, elects a fucking babbling manchild. The UK votes to leave the EU. Both horrific self-inflicted injuries that the Chinese are laughing their asses off at.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    10. Re:Not just super computing... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't stand for anything.

    11. Re:Not just super computing... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      It's an abbreviation of Nationalsozialist. It was to differentiate the National Socialists from the Social Democratic party, often called âoeSoziâ or âoeSozisâ (plural), because âoeSocialâ¦â is written âoeSozialâ¦â in Germany. The 24th edition of Etymologisches Worterbuch der deutschen Sprache says the word Nazi was favored in southern Germany (supposedly from c. 1924) among opponents of National Socialism because the nickname Nazi, Naczi (from the masc. proper name Ignatz, German form of Ignatius) was used colloquially to mean "a foolish person, clumsy or awkward person."

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:Not just super computing... by penandpaper · · Score: 2

      um. TBH, I think both examples you mention for the US and UK are what make those two places better than China. Is it better to have a benevolent dictator or democracy? You seem to choose the benevolent dictator by your post. Democracy has always meant that a babbling man-child can be elected. Freedom means that you can impose self-inflicted injuries. The benevolent dictator is only better so long as they stay benevolent.

      China does have an interesting culture that has a very long sighted view. One example I can think of was a canal between two major cities taking hundreds of years that lasted through different dynasties and governments. Their civilization is thousands of years old and yet when the reigns of power change the important long term goals are still kept even if it takes a while.

    13. Re:Not just super computing... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'd say Roy Moore may be a tipping point. If he remains in the running, and it seems he's intent on it, watch the results.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    14. Re:Not just super computing... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      they will just move out...how many of your elite is not a dual citizen or have PR elsewhere?

      For one, most other countries will tax them fairly heavily. Second, it's not easy to move certain kinds of assets out.

    15. Re:Not just super computing... by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Even Chinese scientists are scared of China's lockdowns, and the quote is "The senior CAS official I spoke to clearly stated that the level of international collaboration currently enjoyed at LHC experiments will not be achievable at the Chinese supercollider". This will be an issue for all these major projects being done out of China. So my issue isn't about the US and a super collider (which we gave up on, even though we built the tunnels in Texas) but that the Communist party will own any and all tech that is produced there.

    16. Re:Not just super computing... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      How's that a bad thing? Instead of private companies hogging the benefits for themselves, all of society will benefit instead? I don't get it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  4. Using the cloud makes more sense... by saccade.com · · Score: 1

    Unless the researchers have a steady need for the computations, moving work to the cloud makes more sense. Why build a multi-million dollar facility when you can just rent the computers for a day or two for your computation? My guess is the list looks different if the data centers built by Amazon, Google, Microsoft, etc. are factored in.

    1. Re:Using the cloud makes more sense... by Junta · · Score: 1

      The Top500 list measures xhpl performance only. While it is hurt by poor interconnect, it can still turn out solid numbers on a typical 10gb network.

      Truth is, the crappiness of a single dimension to measure the Top500 has been a well-known thing for at least 15 years. Interconnect can matter for a great deal of technical computing, but then again, sometimes plain ethernet is fine. Sometimes you don't need large memory amounts per node or decent single-threaded performance, but then again sometimes you do. Technical computing is a very diverse landscape and some of these hyper-specialized publicity stunts of Top500 systems suck at doing much of anything apart form running xhpl.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Using the cloud makes more sense... by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      Unless the researchers have a steady need for the computations, moving work to the cloud makes more sense. Why build a multi-million dollar facility when you can just rent the computers for a day or two for your computation?

      Of course we do. Top500 centres are almost exclusively used for scientific computations. In my field 128-256 GiB of RAM per node and an InfiniBand interconnect @40gbps+ are needed for reasonable performance, with typical jobs using hundreds of CPU cores and larger ones perhaps 8192 CPU cores. Most of sparse matrix algebra requires a lot of comms, things grind to a halt when the interconnect is slow. You can't do this kind of stuff in the cloud, not today.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    3. Re:Using the cloud makes more sense... by AnilJ · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. Graph 500 benchmarks are also important.

    4. Re:Using the cloud makes more sense... by AnilJ · · Score: 1

      problems have to be reformulated and new algorithms with tight asymptotic bounds need to be employed while pushing down the constants hidden in big O/Theta notation with highly tuned implementation. All old codes which are currently employed in scientific computing at national labs and/or universities were written with a different computational model in mind.

  5. Country of the century by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    The 20th century was dominated by the USA. The 19th century was dominated by the United Kingdom. It looks rather likely (as demonstrated by this story) that the 21st century will be dominated by China. Can we find other nice clean examples?
    I suggest:
    16th century Spain (on the back of New World gold and silver)

    Anything earlier than this is well short of global impact, due to lack of communications (particularly between the Americas and the rest of the world)
    13th century Mongolia
    8th century expansion of Islam
    1st century BCE Rome
    2nd century BCE Qin
    3rd century BCE Macedonia

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Country of the century by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I remember when people kept bleating that Japan was going to take over the world. Whatever happened to Japan?

    2. Re:Country of the century by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      Um, post WWII Japan after WWII, with its pacifist constitution is a protected state of the US. Japan is also a democracy. None of those is true for China. China is building up its economy and military to directly challenge the US. China believes its prefect blend of authoritarian capitalism is a superior system to our flawed democracy. A better comparison will be to compare China to pre WWII Japan.

    3. Re:Country of the century by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      When American democracy bombs the shit out of neutral country after neutral country, I think maybe we should let China run things for a while. The world has been demanding an end to the era of American bullying for quite some time now. The biggest threat to world peace is American globalism. This is hardly a controversial conclusion nor one unbacked by copious evidence.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Country of the century by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      No, the biggest threat to world peace is American nativsim and isolationism

      The world has been demanding an end to American meddling for quite some time. Maybe you've been watching fake news?

      Fifteen years ago, the prominent political analyst Samuel Huntington, professor of the science of government at Harvard, warned in the establishment journal Foreign Affairs that for much of the world the U.S. was "becoming the rogue superpower... the single greatest external threat to their societies." Shortly after, his words were echoed by Robert Jervis, the president of the American Political Science Association: "In the eyes of much of the world, in fact, the prime rogue state today is the United States." As we have seen, global opinion supports this judgment by a substantial margin.

      https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2001-07-01/weapons-without-purpose-nuclear-strategy-post-cold-war-era

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  6. As a German ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who cares?
    Stop thinking in countries! And in US VS THEM. Research never gave a crap about any of that.

    First and foremost, we are humans. And first and foremost, our research is meant to benefit all of us! So no matter if the people who did it happen to be born in an Area that we are told to currently call "China" or an area that we are currently told to call "USA" ... yay! Well done! You are a role model for humans everywhere!

    I can be happy for them, because in any case, I see them as US, not as THEM.

    But maybe my mindset is still a result of our own evil empire imploding. ... *patronizingly* You'll get there. :P

    1. Re:As a German ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see that Germany is finally leader of the free world now, ever since Trump gave up world leadership when he abandoned the Paris agreement. Although I am getting a bit impatient for Germany to actually lead. The German-Chinese cooperation as promised by Merkel should be getting off the ground by now, no?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  7. There's always a reason by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    This will change now that Donald Trump is president. If it doesn't I'm sure he'll blame someone else.

  8. What are we trying to accomplish? by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should we really be worried about this? Maybe it's heresy here; but what are they doing with these systems? Are the Chinese using them to solve problems that are more interesting and important, or are they just using them to build prestige? Does it really say anything about the country, or are these systems just the computing equivalent of Dubai skyscrapers? Dubai is blowing us away in the skyscraper dept., but I don't want to live there. China might blow us away in flops on these computers, but if they're not doing any interesting science or other applications on them, so what?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Good question. I think the Chinese will want to keep those answers under wraps, because their probably using a lot of them for military work. Regarding the pissing contest, everyone "games" benchmarks like these. They call it "tuning" for the workload. The exclusive workload in these cases are--waitforit--the benchmarks themselves. So, they're certainly an indication of what one might expect IRL, but, like auto MPG ratings, not the final word.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      They are doing interesting science. Unlike us here in the US who now have laurel imprints on our fat overweight buttocks, the Chinese are actually thinking about the future. They're going to eat our lunch in every field, in every sector, because we have let fat rich assholes systematically dismantle and destroy everything that used to be innovative in this country. The fat cats have drained so much wealth out of the system that just about everyone starts out in debt. Researchers have to fight for scraps from congress's table. The anti-education/anti-intellectual movement in this country will soon achieve it's holy grail of pushing religious dogma into schools and supplanting science.

      Just look at our president. That's what America is today. An old bloated idiot standing on the front lawn yelling at clouds.

      In another decade or two not only will China be kicking our asses by every conceivable measure, they'll also own this country through the enormous amount of debt fucking morons like Trump and the so-called fiscally conservative Republicans have run up in the name making their buddies richer. The Chinese aren't stupid. They know how this ends, so they're more than happy to keep smiling and watching as we slowly collapse under our own weight.

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Why do you sound pissed off? You should be applauding along with the rest of the world as the America bully finally gets his comeuppance. You can't actually believe in any of that USA #1 bullshit, right? It's racist and jingoist to believe in that kind of thing. China deserves its place in the sun and to avoid a destructive war, America needs to gently retire. Britain had the good sense to do this after WWII and it saved a lot of lives, and now it's America's turn. Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I think he's annoyed that the US has been sold off to rich, rent-seeking dickheads. I can see his point to be honest.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      OK well time to burn it down. China can be world leader and the whole planet will be a better place. Just imagine the loud cheers from every country as America suffers humiliation after humiliation, and most of all imagine the USA #1 morons crying in their shitty watery Lite beers. It's a wonderful future.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They are using their supercomputers for things like materials science, developing new medicines and therapies, AI systems, climate science, genetic modelling... And the tech trickles down too, both in terms of the hardware that is developed and the techniques developed for managing hugely parallel machines.

      Also, in a few years they will have all the bitcoins.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:What are we trying to accomplish? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Should we really be worried about this? Maybe it's heresy here; but what are they doing with these systems? Are the Chinese using them to solve problems that are more interesting and important, or are they just using them to build prestige?M

      Despite what the West likes to think about China, I highly doubt the Chinese are building these just for mere prestige. They are building know-how. We use to do that. Now, if we cannot immediately predict a definite ROI, we do not even bother to investigate, build know-how or develop social capital.

      Does it really say anything about the country, or are these systems just the computing equivalent of Dubai skyscrapers? Dubai is blowing us away in the skyscraper dept., but I don't want to live there. China might blow us away in flops on these computers, but if they're not doing any interesting science or other applications on them, so what?

      Are you sure about that, that they are not doing anything interesting or useful (assuming then that accumulating know-how is not useful in itself.) I'm sorry but comparing Dubai's skyscrapper rush with Chinese cloud computing doesn't even make sense (different beasts, different conditions, different purposes.)

  9. Re:It's really only the U.S. and China by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

    How big are the clouds at Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc? I suspect if you could afford it, AWS would be #1.

  10. Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They gave up on this world, too many stinking Westerners, instead they've taken over via world with dragons, hot loli princesses, and talking cats.

    Quite the improvement, really.

  11. Re:Germany would like to have a word with you ... by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

    I'm with you except for the poet part. Have you read German poetry? The Germans I know don't even like German poetry. Maybe I could at least see an argument for opera or symphony, but Poetry?

    Oblig Ice station Zebra: "The Russians put our camera made by *our* German scientists and your film made by *your* German scientists into their satellite made by *their* German scientists."

  12. what happened to Japan ? by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Reagan popped their bubble.

    1. Re:what happened to Japan ? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      That was the USSR. I'd say Japan popped their own bubble.

  13. Re:Germany would like to have a word with you ... by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    I'm with you except for the poet part. Have you read German poetry?

    The Vogons would like a word with you...

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  14. Re:Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Problem being that 60-75% of their entries are Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent. Whether as a favor to their vendors or for the national image, they let their resources be used to make China look good.

    This would be akin to Microsoft, Amazon, and Google colluding to use their install footprint to maximize US share on the list. Instead, they are very secretive and screw their vendors over and don't really have any incentive to prop up the story of US as an HPC leader.

  15. Who would have guessed by lucm · · Score: 1

    The year of the Linux supercomputer happened before the year of the Linux desktop.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Who would have guessed by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      anyone who has followed supercomputers for more than 20 years knows that, Linux supercomputers existed in the late 1990s.

  16. Re: It's really only the U.S. and China by Yohahn · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of problems that can happily use conviently parallel algorithms. The interconnect latency usually only matters if you are simulating a large memory.

  17. Re:Expansionism vs China by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    My criterion was world-dominant nations, and world domination tends to require expansion. I'm pacifist, so if you want to make a list of countries which achieved great influence without expansionism, I'd be happy to receive it.

    20th C USA and 21st C China are (so far) not so much into expanding their borders, although they are into projecting military and economic power to influence other parts of the world to their advantage. (The non-expansionism is recent: 19th C USA was very much into expanding its borders, and 20th C China nabbed Tibet.)

    I'm not sure I agree with your classification of Qin as non-expansionist.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  18. Re:It's really only the U.S. and China by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the Japanese have their own hardware, and they've also recently acquired ARM which is suddenly relevant for HPC.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  19. Re:CPU design by Maritz · · Score: 1

    That's the most painfully obvious troll I've seen in ages. Try fucking harder.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  20. Re:Where is Africa on the list? by Maritz · · Score: 1

    You think Africa is a country do you?

    Holy shit, you're stupid.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  21. Get Behind, Stay Behind by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Once leadership in any area is established it becomes next to impossible to change the pecking order of dominance. In the past we have seen both the US and Great Britain achieve economic and military dominance. It seems to take a couple of centuries to change that sort of thing. with computers and electronics the problem may be amplified. For example, powerful computers may be used to design ever more powerful computers. Therefore in order to leap beyond another nation one needs to have the most powerful computers already in hand. This same issue may also apply to automation and robotics. In essence if we want the public to do well financially or be safe from foreign enemies we need to clearly dominate the leadership in electronics computing and other areas as well. If we get one step behind we are in huge trouble.

    1. Re:Get Behind, Stay Behind by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Then the big news here is Switzerland overtaking the U.S.A and Japan and moving to #3. Watch out, the future will be a noisy place of yodeling and coo-coo clocks, and your cheese will have empty voids in it.

    2. Re:Get Behind, Stay Behind by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      Jolly old England got ahead and stayed ahead for several hundred years before they lost the number one spot. The US had about 80 years before we lost the number one spot. One would think that the top position would shift every few weeks as new developments take place. But it does not work that way. Money attracts money and power attracts power. A nation with money and power can hold other nations down for centuries. This is a huge factor in the generation of war. A nation feeling that it can be higher in the pecking order than another nation will often attack trying to gain status, money and power. Japan in 1938 was like that. Japan felt that they had the knowledge and ability to do much better but were smothered by a lack of natural resources. There was no way out of that trap other than taking areas that could provide natural resources. Germany was similar. First Germany is cold and thus is limited in crop production. Germany also needed sea ports to export more products. With no way to get more land or more ports the solution appeared to be to take some from other nations. Even after WW2 Germany was thought of as an oddball sort of place by the US public. Instead of realizing just how advanced Germany was in engineering and science they were treated as some sort of oddball or defective people. Children in my generation were in our sand boxes with our toy planes and tanks exterminating the filthy yellow menace. Adults felt it was wonderful that we were out back killing off Tojo and his filthy yellow fiends. Then after dinner, which started with a prayer, we watched the wonderful cowboys kill the disgusting and vile Indians on TV. Or we watched Gunsmoke in which the bad guys got shot or hung. Then we wonder why our citizens are so very willing to gun each other down.