Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Is Making a 'Lord of the Rings' Prequel Series (techcrunch.com)

Amazon is making a Lord of the Rings prequel TV series for its Amazon Instant streaming service. The show, which already carries a multi-season commitment, will "explore new storylines preceding J.R.R. Tolkien's The Fellowship of the Ring." TechCrunch reports: It's possible the new series will mine the ponderous but rich Silmarillion for material, as fan fiction writers and lore aficionados have done for decades. The exploits of the Elf-Lords of old would make for a stirring epic, while many would thrill at the possibility of seeing Moria at the height of its grandeur. So much depends on the quality of the adaptation, though. Amazon has been pretty good about its Originals, but this will be an undertaking far beyond the scope of anything its studios and partners have yet attempted. Amazon is partnering with New Line Cinema, which of course was the film company behind the much-loved trilogy that began in 2001, and the Tolkien Estate, as well as HarperCollins for some reason. The deal also "includes a potential additional spin-off series," presumably if it's popular enough.

4 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Silmarillion? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally, I loved reading it - but I'm not sure there's a huge television market of people wanting to watch stories where everyone eventually gets killed by the bad guys.

    In comparison to The Silmarillion, the Game of Thrones is a feel-good epic.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  2. One does not simply by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never mind...

  3. Isnt it... by meglon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And i always thought the name of the prequel to the Lord of the Rings was: The Hobbit.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  4. Re:Peter Jackson by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After the travesty of the Hobbit. I would not wish for this.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.