Slashdot Mirror


All 500 of the World's Top 500 Supercomputers Are Running Linux (zdnet.com)

Freshly Exhumed shares a report from ZDnet: Linux rules supercomputing. This day has been coming since 1998, when Linux first appeared on the TOP500 Supercomputer list. Today, it finally happened: All 500 of the world's fastest supercomputers are running Linux. The last two non-Linux systems, a pair of Chinese IBM POWER computers running AIX, dropped off the November 2017 TOP500 Supercomputer list. When the first TOP500 supercomputer list was compiled in June 1993, Linux was barely more than a toy. It hadn't even adopted Tux as its mascot yet. It didn't take long for Linux to start its march on supercomputing.

From when it first appeared on the TOP500 in 1998, Linux was on its way to the top. Before Linux took the lead, Unix was supercomputing's top operating system. Since 2003, the TOP500 was on its way to Linux domination. By 2004, Linux had taken the lead for good. This happened for two reasons: First, since most of the world's top supercomputers are research machines built for specialized tasks, each machine is a standalone project with unique characteristics and optimization requirements. To save costs, no one wants to develop a custom operating system for each of these systems. With Linux, however, research teams can easily modify and optimize Linux's open-source code to their one-off designs.
The semiannual TOP500 Supercomputer List was released yesterday. It also shows that China now claims 202 systems within the TOP500, while the United States claims 143 systems.

4 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And these piece of shit Linux nodes fail all the time.

    That must be why all 500 are running Linux - for the great failure rate. Or maybe you're wrong.

  2. Re:That's because... by YukariHirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anybody still believe Linus Torvalds about how Linux was just for fun?

    Of course. Linux was just for fun; now he makes a living out of it. A person's motivations for doing something don't have to remain exactly the same for the whole time they do it.

  3. Re:This is the year by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it's quite literately the only logical choice

    Oh I know, right? But the big fact you danced around is, Linux is just better than the others. It's faster and more reliable. Otherwise top 500 would not use it. Like, they tried to use Windows, they really did. Microsoft was paying academic institutions to install it and providing teams of free engineers. Still didn't do it. Why? Windows can't handle the load, it can't run continuously under load. It just gets more and more unstable then it falls over. Even when it does stay up, it can't touch the storage, scheduling or memory management efficiency of Linux.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  4. Re:This is the year by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It has nothing to do with not being able to handle the load. It has everything to do with costs. Linux is free. Windows isn't.

    If I get you right, You spend all this money on a Supercomputer, so you logically use the cheapest OS out there instead of paid ones that should work better?

    Sounds legit.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.