Slashdot Mirror


The House's Tax Bill Levies a Tax On Graduate Student Tuition Waivers (nytimes.com)

Camel Pilot writes: The new GOP tax plan -- which just passed the House -- will tax tuition waivers as income. Graduate students working as research assistants on meager stipends would have to declare tuition waivers as income on the order of $80,000 income. This will force many graduate students of modest means to quit their career paths and walk away from their research. These are the next generation of scientists, engineers, inventors, educators, medical miracle workers and market makers. As Prof Claus Wilke points out: "This would be a disaster for U.S. STEM Ph.D. education." Slashdot reader Camel Pilot references a report via The New York Times, where Erin Rousseau explains how the House of Representatives' recently passed tax bill affects graduate research in the United States. Rousseau is a graduate student at M.I.T. who studies the neurological basis of mental health disorders. "My peers and I work between 40 and 80 hours a week as classroom teachers and laboratory researchers, and in return, our universities provide us with a tuition waiver for school. For M.I.T. students, this waiver keeps us from having to pay a tuition bill of about $50,000 every year -- a staggering amount, but one that is similar to the fees at many other colleges and universities," he writes. "No money from the tuition waivers actually ends up in our pockets, so under Section 117(d)(5), it isn't counted as taxable income." Rousseau continues by saying his tuition waivers will be taxed under the House's tax bill. "This means that M.I.T. graduate students would be responsible for paying taxes on an $80,000 annual salary, when we actually earn $33,000 a year. That's an increase of our tax burden by at least $10,000 annually."

45 of 578 comments (clear)

  1. Lets be honest by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This "tax cut" 10 years out fucks the 99% to help out the 1%. Everything I hear about it is wrong. It's truly amazing how the R's can't avoid putting the booger hook on the bang switch, taking off some tootsies in the process.

    1. Re:Lets be honest by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like how you've made substantial points illustrating the ways in which the plan is worse than the current arrangement. Your points are so compelling! Let me guess, you've learned this form of communication by hanging out with your fellow liberals? Man, they've really taught you how to impress. Keep up the good work! You're exactly why the left lost nearly a thousand legislative seats under Obama, most of the governorships, both houses of congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and the good will of millions of two-time Obama voters who walked away in disgust from a party that sounds just like you. Please, continue - right through the next couple of election cycles. Don't change a THING about how you make such lucid, detailed points about the strengths of your policy preferences. Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Lets be honest by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Economist had an article on taxes many moons ago . . . they stated that taxing is like plucking a goose for pillow feathers. You want to get a maximum of feathers, with a minimal amount of fuss.

      University graduate students are not very high up on the list of favored Republican supporters . . . actually they are probably not even high up on the list of favored Democrat supporters either.

      Graduate students are not going to go out on the streets with violent "Graduate Student Lives Matter!" protests.

      So Congress says, tax 'em, and let them whine.

      Fair? Who cares . . . taxes are not about being fair. Taxes need to bring in revenue.

      That's just tough shit . . . the government just needs to pick out the right group to tax. Cigarette smokers get the hell taxed out of them, but can't pull off a political coup. Graduate students won't be able to push any political pressure points either.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Lets be honest by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it's not double taxation. The federal government is only taxing your income once. Your tax-hungry blue states really, really love to also tax them. They've been giving their high income people a discount on their federal taxes by passing those costs along to some guy installing mufflers who lives in a state that doesn't hit their residents so hard. High time that changed.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Lets be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You trust republicans? OMG. I am anything but liberal in my politics, but the actual Republicans are horrible horrible people.

    5. Re:Lets be honest by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What this really shows is that the Republicans and their wealthy donors don't give a shit about the USA. This assault on education will impact the long term success of the USA in many ways.

      That's right: the very people who benefit from a strong economy (the top 0.1%) don't give a shit about the long term future of the USA. They plan to milk it then (mixing metaphors) abandon ship.

      I don't know what is the next country they plan to milk and screw over -- perhaps China? This is what is going on in Brazil right now and the result is large numbers of people living in the hovels they call favellas.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:Lets be honest by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So why does Republican Senator Ron Johnson say he's against the tax bill because it's screwing over small businesses in favor of big corporations?

    7. Re:Lets be honest by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, that guy down the street who's running a modest landscaping business and will come out thousands of dollars ahead every year, the hell with him?

      When the guy running the landscaping business finds out he can't deduct his family's medical expenses any more he's going to realize he just got screwed by the Republicans in congress. Especially since his landscaping business puts him in a category that usually has higher-than-average medical expenses

      And when he realizes that he's no longer going to get ANY sort of help for his insurance premiums and can't afford insurance at all, he's going to be royally pissed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re: Lets be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a hillbilly, yes, get your fucking social problems out of here. You've brought only poverty and misery. Your impressive victory has been destroying the economy and damaging the culture by paying people to not work. I'm sure, of course, that wasn't the intent, since poor people vote Democrat, we wouldn't want any more poor people. But, when the top five employers in the county are government subsidized and you pay people to not work, there's not much of a chance of getting industry restarted. Our culture would be a hell of a lot better without your meddleing and pill pushing.

    9. Re:Lets be honest by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you should stop and ask WHY it costs so much to live in blue states, and why for blue states, the metrics that matter are so awful.

      Because it's actually worth living there? Check e.g. the life expectancy per state.

      As for taxes: Surprising as it may seem, government is not sucking in money like a vacuum cleaner and then burning it in huge bonfires. It's spending the money, to a large part on services like roads, schools, policing, health services (well, in civilised societies), defence, and so on. Many of these services benefit from an enormous economy of scale (a road from one end of your private plot to the other end is unlikely to be particularly useful unless connected to other pieces of road), others have huge network benefits (even if you have a genius Harvard education, it will not be of much use in a society of uneducated dumbasses). Governments are not perfect, but the US social security service operates at much higher efficiency than private insurance companies.

      Taxation is the price which we pay for civilization

      --

      Stephan

    10. Re: Lets be honest by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think that most of our military spending over the past 15 years has been on "defense" instead of misdirected wars of aggression? Case in point, we invaded Iraq two years after 9/11. Did we do a damned thing to Saudi Arabia, the country that actually financed terrorist filth worldwide? Did we? Thinking about it...

      I'm not saying our military is completely useless, but if we cut spending on it by 50%, we'd still be fine as a country -- our quality of life would not be affected.

  2. Re:Taxation is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is removing a tax deduction classified as LEVYING a tax when it is on something leftists want, but cutting taxes on corporations is classified as taking money from the poor?

    All taxation is theft. It is the violent, forceful confiscation of the property of another. The only ethical tax rate is 0.

    Then move to Somalia you whiny motherfucker.

  3. This has been tried before by MangoCats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the early 1990s this tax on tuition waivers as income was proposed, I believe it never passed back then.

    I had just finished my masters' but I remember being incensed at the economics of it. With tuition waivers, I was living on $1200/month as a teaching assistant and getting my degree. Without tuition waivers, I would have been paying tax on $3000/month total "income" which would have taken away about half of my actual cash income - turning my situation from independent and sustainable to one of dependence on my parents to continue to foot the bills for my education. Other majors' TA salaries were much lower, and it would have turned them from earning small pocket money while getting a degree into paying out of pocket to cover the taxes.

    Face value of tuition is a farce, so many students are given tuition waivers, scholarships, reduced rates, etc. Taxing it at face value would be like paying sales tax on the sticker price of a car, regardless of what you negotiated it down to; but worse, cars are only marked up 20%, I'd put average tuition markup closer to 60% at many of the "higher priced" institutions.

  4. Representative Government at work by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The House GOP members are simply delivering what their constituents want.

    And by "constituents" I of course mean their rich donors.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Representative Government at work by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      all I am reading from social media (a total mix of red, blue and non-US folks) is that the conservatives are SO into 'stigginit' ('sticking it', as in sticking it to the liberals; fucking them over, basically) that they'll spite themselves just so that the other sides suffers.

      I cannot ever remember hearing a liberal WISH that conservatives suffer or experience pain or a bad life. NEVER in my life have I heard any liberal say that. but I'm always hearing about how conservatives HATE liberals (that word is now a curse word to them) and they'll do anything to make that class of people suffer.

      its so fucked up! one group inside the country really has such hatred for the other side, but I don't see it as 'both sides are bad' (BSAB). I see the liberals simply wanting to have progress in society and a rising wave lifts all vessels. and I see the conservatives just wishing the other side would go away and die in a corner.

      why is this so unbalanced?

      and why do the reds HATE the blues so much? with such passion? they tried 50 times to kill obamacare and they basically have their mission to back out ALL of obamas changes. they don't care who it hurts, even themselves, as long as they are stigginit to the libs.

      its so sad that this is what our country now is. a civil war (or really, class war) with everything but the actual battlefield. what I don't get is: most of the red state folks are middle or even lower class; why they keep voting to line the pockets of the ULTRA rich - I just don't understand that!!

      must be the supply-side jesus stuff. yeah, that must be it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Representative Government at work by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The House GOP members are simply delivering what their constituents want.

      And by "constituents" I of course mean their rich donors.

      Their rich donors? Much as I dislike them let's palace blame where blame is due. This is what the GOP base wants, for the GOP to choke the life out of the 'intellectual elite. I'm talking about those red cap wearing yahoos who think evil emperor and Sith Lord Barack "Palpatine" Obama, Darth Hillary and a whole legion of Zionist Occupied Government storm troopers are coming to take away their rights and it does not seem to disturb their fantasies that neither Obama nor Hillary are in office anymore. It's congress and the GOP dominated SCOTUS that are taking away American's rights. The level of indoctrination is simply astonishing. I just watched an American news crew ask random Americans in the street if Obama and Hillary should be impeached. Only one guy out of the lot realised that they could not be impeached because neither Obama nor Hillary are in office, the rest were all for it because, according to one of them: "Hillary is more dangerous than ISIS".

  5. Further highlights the outrageous tuition costs by bigmacx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some day, hopefully soon, we're going to have a Harvey Weinstein moment about these tuition costs and the criminal cabal that is the university employees, administrators, and loan companies. Because someone is spending that $50k income from that student's tuition.

    I'm glad the tax exempt status is going away. The only way this college crime syndicate is going to fall is when it hurts everyone everywhere.

    Then we'll all have the Weinstein Effect: "Hey that college rap$d me!" "You too, huh? They rap$d me too but I didn't say anything at the time" "#metoo, they fondl$d my tuition" "Well, I didn't get rap$d but the college stood right in front of me and raised tuition by 15% per year. I still have PTSD from that!"

    There a lot of bad people in this world and I'm absolutely certain anyone employed, owning, or managing a college nowadays or any business surrounding it is going to hell first. It's unconscionable what humanity has allowed to happen with education costs and the mortgaging of futures.

  6. Re:Taxation is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Youngsters like you have a lot of learning to do. When you graduate high school and move on to college, or a to work life, you'll eventually come to see all the things that this country could not do without a pool of money. The roads you drive on, the basic research that leads to medical and engineering advances, even the Internet, would be impossible without taxation. Taxation is not theft, it's simply expecting citizens to contribute to a collection of beneficial services.

    It's unfortunate that your high school curriculum is probably so simplified that you've been duped into believing something so simplistic and naive. The time is now, before you enter college, to accept that your limited life experience has not yet allowed you to comprehend the complexities of the world. It's not a personal insult -- many of us go through the stage where our ability to make (more or less) logical arguments exceeds our legitimate knowledge of the world. But the greatest barrier to your future learning as a young adult is your rigid certainty that you know all there is to know about the world. The sooner you acknowledge your limited experience, the sooner you will begin to understand the complexity around you.

    Best of luck in your future schooling.

  7. Re:It is income by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and in turn, reduces the number of intelligent, motivated and educated foreign students who will move to the USA.

    In turn the workforce will become less educated, productivity will drop and the USA will slide down the wealth tables.

    The influence of the USA worldwide will also reduce because there will be fewer students who get an advanced education in the USA and return to their home country, taking with them American values and mind share.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  8. Re:Then be honest. by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then be honest. The vast majority of the middle class takes the standard deduction, which doubles under the "R's" tax plan.

    The vast majority of the middle class making under $50k yearly per year take the standard deduction, but the majority of middle class families making over $75k yearly itemize their deductions. This plan does help the majority of middle class Americans a little, and helps wealthy Americans a lot. This is all paid for by the upper middle class, middle class citizens in many blue states, and all citizens overall by increasing national debt. It is the bill that wealthy donors have been working for years to get passed under the illusion it will help the economy. In truth it is merely a huge tax break for the wealthy.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  9. Re: In college courses they teach that taxes are g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Taxing people who don't have money isn't the same as taxing those who have loads of it and don't benefit society to the same extent.

  10. Re: Taxation is theft by Hetero · · Score: 1, Insightful

    LOL, Property rights! You MORON. If you have a RIGHT to property, you outright own it. If you have a TITLE to property, e.g. a car or real estate, you never own it and are forced to pay taxes on it. If you don't pay the taxes, you lose it or are penalized with more fines or jail time.

    Learn the difference, retard!

  11. Re:Why are they complaining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's OK. Other countries will pick up the slack that your fellow travelers in Washington are dropping.

    America had a good run... a violent revolution against difficult odds, an Industrial Revolution that never really ended, and two world wars that left us better off than everyone else on the planet.

    But all empires fall sooner or later, like dead trees in a forest that become food for the ecosystem. Our number is up. We're done. Next...

  12. Re:Taxation is theft by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I charge a million dollars for my service of replying to slashdot posts, but I'm waiting your fee for that today. Congrats, you now owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes to the feds.

    Since when is declining to make someone pay for a service the same as giving them income?

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  13. Attention STEM Grads by hyades1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ignore the small-souled bean counters who are entirely convinced you will never wind up making a contribution to a cure for cancer, or the first workable fusion reactor, or add a small piece of the puzzle to the problems of aging or perhaps limb regeneration.

    These are conservatives. They know the cost of everything and the value of nothing. As far as they're concerned, you aren't an investment. You're nothing but an up-scale counter clerk, worth not one cent more than the hours you worked yesterday.

    Come on up to Canada, or maybe move to the EU. The US is already falling behind in cutting edge research. The so-called "god particle" was discovered at CERN because these bean-counting half wits yanked funding from the planned US particle accelerator that would have relegated CERN's large hadron collider to the dustbin. And China has just built a hyper-sonic wind tunnel that blows the doors off anything in the US.

    Even if the current crop of envious, anti-intellectual cretins is swept from power, the damage they have already done will take a decade to fix, maybe longer. If you want to win a Nobel Prize some day, you would do better to come to a country where "research" isn't defined as "can you write software to cut a millisecond off e-trades and make Goldman Sachs even richer".

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  14. Re:It's changing by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a new group loosely called "populists", which are being elected under the guise of Republicans at the moment. These are the ones who put the welfare of the citizens ahead of everything else.

    I have a bridge to sell you, and some fine land in Florida.

    Seriously, they really have conned you, haven't they?

    These populists are blowhards who are supported by ultra-wealthy interests, who pander to the worst instincts of low information voters. People who want to impose their own will on others in many aspects of life. People who think that they alone have the framework for a moral life, rejecting any competing ideas.

    Just look at the tax plan: promoted by the biggest populist of them all: Donald Trump. It's a huge bung to ultra-wealthy, a minor tax cut for a few middle-class people, and a tax increase for many other middle class people.

    McConnell demanded that Moore leave the election, and told Moore that even if he won he would be immediately ousted from the Senate. All based on accusations, many which have been shown to be fraudulent.

    Well, there are two problems with that.

    1. Even if some of the accusations are fraudulent (and none have been proven to be so), others remain. Moore didn't even deny all the allegations.

    2. McConnell is also the enemy. You support the Republicans despite their policies being aimed to impoverish ordinary people and put your faith in people who are even more right-wing, even more determined to impoverish ordinary people.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  15. Re:Barter by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bartering is a Taxable transaction

    Well, we all know what really matters is that there will be new tax breaks for people who own private planes. You know...the middle class.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  16. Re: Taxation is theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The difference in this case is that they are working at below-market rates to get that waiver, so in some sense it really is part of their income. But the biggest problem with taxing it is determining the fair value of the waiver because tuition is often discounted for other reasons.

    I donâ(TM)t think it should be taxed, but there is a sane argument for doing so.

  17. snafu by meglon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Republicans... doing everything they can to destroy the future of the United States.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    1. Re:snafu by meglon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You don't "get it" because of all the shit you have where normal people have brains.

      Progressives are the reason this country exists. Conservatives prefer the authoritarian rulers, like King George, but progressives fought against that and formed a country where people had a say in their government. Those progressives are now the "left" you talk whine about.

      The civil war, conservatives in the south seceded from the union... the actually broke up this country, something you claim "the left" wants to do, but never has. It took more progressives to stand up and say no... that this was a United country.

      As a side point here... all this bullshit about confederate monuments being history or legacy... no. They are monuments to traitors to this country, who murdered hundreds of thousands citizens of the United States. Now, some intentionally ignorant prople may think "traitor" might be harsh... but, i use it in actual terms. Johnson pardoned the traitors, something he wouldn't have had to do if they were not traitors. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu...

      "The left" isn't trying to destroy the country they created, but now days they are not willing to compromise with those who think that the rights and benefits of the country should only be for some of the citizens. That's the position of the conservatives.... and has been for a while. Conservatives railed against blacks having rights, and when they lost that argument, they switched to gays. Conservatives have to have someone to blame, because they simply cannot accept responcibility for ANYTHING they've done.

      We do understand that out country has done some shitty things, but anyone with any functioning brain cells and open eyes should be able to see that. Global warmongers... yeh, that's us; more specifically, it's the god damn cowards we have in this country who are afraid of anyone that looks different, or big business that make their scratch off something some other country has and they want, or who directly produce military hardware.

      Slavery... yeh, that was us. People enslaving people. I really should have to say that's bad, but there are some people in the world (and in the USA) who are simply so damn stupid they can't see that's a bad thing. Jim Crow laws.... yep, anyone with a brain could see that was bad. Sadly, again, we have a lot of people without functioning brains in this country.

      Deplorable? Oh yeh, i get it... some people can't pay attention for more than a few seconds, so you need soundbites to help you out. Lets review:

      You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it.

      I'd argue that she was right... maybe not on the percentage, but certainly on the characterization. She defined who those she thought were deplorable by their traits... which is why it's funny, in a sad, stupid way, that people wear these t-shits with "deplorable" written on it. I'd normally at least give them props for honesty, but i doubt any of them even know what Hillary said... they just think it's because they're Trump supporters, instead of someone having some of the worst traits of the human species. Kinda like these dipshits wearing Gadsen Flag t-shirts with the Jefferson quote... they don't even know what the quote was about, but they twist it to something simplistic that they don't have to bother thinking about; if they only had a clue... which they obviously don't.

      Now, i understand.. you're probably like a lot of conservatives. You've been lied to by snake oil salesmen that want you to elect them, and you've been gullible enough to do just that. The problem is, these people only give a damn about themselves... not you, not me, not anyone that they can't get something from. They've brainwashed you into thinking completely backwards and ign

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  18. Not All Income Is Taxed by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are trying to argue that all income should be taxed.

    Estate Tax is being repealed in this very same GOP plan. How can anyone argue that inheritance isn't income? And the assets in an inheritance (property, stocks, bonds) have their basis (original cost) magically stepped up to present value and thereby dodging the normal Capital Gains tax.

    It appears the Republicans favor old money, the idle rich and trust fund babies than they do scientists, doctors, educators, engineers - you know the people that actually make American Great.

    1. Re:Not All Income Is Taxed by uncqual · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Inheritance income has already been taxed at least once. Taxing it again is double taxation.

      Should your kid pay taxes on every pancake you feed them at breakfast? Of course not, because you already paid taxes on the income to acquire the pancakes.

      It doesn't matter to society if you spend all your money before you die at 110 years old or if you die young at 60 and your kids inherit and spend that money. Why should more of it be diverted from the market economy to government spending (such as US military operations in foreign countries) just because you got cancer young?

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    2. Re:Not All Income Is Taxed by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People are trying to argue that all income should be taxed.

      Estate Tax is being repealed in this very same GOP plan. How can anyone argue that inheritance isn't income? And the assets in an inheritance (property, stocks, bonds) have their basis (original cost) magically stepped up to present value and thereby dodging the normal Capital Gains tax.

      It appears the Republicans favor old money, the idle rich and trust fund babies than they do scientists, doctors, educators, engineers - you know the people that actually make American Great.

      I have never been in favour of inheritance taxes. They lead to massive injustices like people inheriting their grandfather's old house in the city centre which the family has owned since the 19th century and which he inherited just after WWII. Only now that the real-estate prices have risen astronomically and you have to pay an inheritance tax calculated on the basis of ridiculously inflated land values resulting in tax payments that are beyond the means of any normal family. Plus, taxing people for the fact that their mother/father/aunt/uncle had the temerity to die is somehow creepy to say the least. Then there is the issue of double taxation and the fact that the aforementioned phenomenon has led to people of normal means being force do sell off any property they have in high land value areas to finance the death duties. Inheritance taxes are just a vile idea on every level.

  19. Re:It's changing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a new group loosely called "populists", which are being elected under the guise of Republicans at the moment. These are the ones who put the welfare of the citizens ahead of everything else.

    The "populists" are the ones who are making sure those middle and working class people can still get a tax write-off for their private planes, and will now be able to bring back "trophies" when they go on their African safaris.

    The "populists" are the ones laundering Russian drug money through their real estate deals. The "populists" are the ones trying to get $15,000,000.00 to kidnap and deliver a foreign national to a corrupt Turkish dictator. The "populists" are the ones who have been shown in the Paradise Papers to be involved in deals with Russian oligarchs worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Clearly, they're concerned about the well-being of the common American.

    McConnell demanded that Moore leave the election

    Because Moore is a pedophile. He diddled little girls to show what a staunch "populist" his is.

    Then Al Franken was accused with photographic evidence and... crickets from McConnell.

    Actually, McConnell immediately started a Senate Ethics Committee investigation into Franken. The same kind that got Bob Packwood tossed out of Congress not long ago.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  20. So set graduate tuition at $1 . . . by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they are going to tax the tuition waiver, set graduate tuition at $1 and let the student pay $0.20 or whatever to the IRS.

    Universities don't want to do this, of course, because it's a way of siphoning money from research grants into the general fund. Which is kind of hilarious (at least it was to me when I was a grad student) because the university already takes 'overhead' that is meant to cover mundane things infrastructure, grounds, offices, keeping the lights on. And it's not a small take, most overhead is calculated at 50% or so of the grant (that is, if the grant is $100K to do research, the NIH will kick in another $50K to the university, 1/3rd being overhead).

    So even after taking overhead, the university then wants to take the grant money and use it to pay itself a tuition waiver.

    A few notes before someone actually believes I'm a right wing troll: I think we should be increasing funding on research, I think we should better support grad students. Universities do provide a needed structure for all this, but are woefully inefficient and mismanaged, which in the end means less money for actual research and teaching. To be against this is not to be against the university, it's to be for the university's ultimate mission.

  21. So it's a tax scam ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't get it, perhaps because I'm British, but this sounds like a scam to me.

    "My peers and I work between 40 and 80 hours a week as classroom teachers and laboratory researchers, and in return, our universities provide us with a tuition waiver for school."

    In England, that would make you an employee of the university, not a "student". If you are working (picking a mid point) 60 hours a week, that's 12 hours a day (5 day week) or about 8.5 hours a day (7 day week). On the first it is impossible to study anything else if you eat and sleep, and on the second it could be a part time course at best.

    Here's what is sounds like. The University charges for "tuition" that they aren't actually getting , and this charge is subsidised by the government, so its effectively a handout to the University of $50k p.a. to each researcher.

  22. Re:It's changing by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 'populists' are useful idiots. All that is required to win their support is to wave the flag a lot, talk about how great America is and blame every problem upon immigrants and foreigners.

    Moore did not win because he was standing up for the people: He won because he isn't ashamed to tell the people that Christians are the best, nonbelievers are all America-hating commie filth, and that homosexuals are plotting to rape their children. It's Alabama, that sort of thing goes down well there.

  23. Re:It is income by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not the one who's been fooled into thinking that making an education as economically unfeasible as possible is something to gloat about.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  24. Yes, yes, we get it by golodh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No need to stress the point really.

    Republicans, in their current composition, don't like education, don't like people who aren't millionares, and don't like people to be upwardly mobile. We got it.

    So, that's one less avenue to university education. The remaining ones are: (a) be frightfully good and get a full scholarship, (b) have rich parents, (c) join the army and try to qualify for a paid-for education.

    Everyone else leave for Canada, the UK, or Europe. Don't worry, we'll make good the shortfall with Indians, Chinese, and Europeans in the software and engineering R&D jobs and PhD. classes.

  25. Re: In college courses they teach that taxes are by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not robbing rich people. Maintaining a civilization costs money, someone has to pay for it. Rich people have benefited the most from it, so why shouldn't they pay more?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  26. Re: Why are they complaining? by shilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, America is going to collapse because too many of you think this is an adequate riposte to the OP. Whether the result of ideology, stupidity or some toxic mix, this impoverished thinking is what will do for you.

  27. College is not always a scam. by lenski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For decades the skills and liars in government, media, and banking have perpetuated the myth that everyone should go to college. Tens of millions of Americans were promised that their degree would lead to a good job.

    It was all a pack of lies (to quote the great Phil Collins). College is largely a scam. It serves mostly as an indoctrination center to keep people have thinking critically, and while wasting four years and gobs of money, most graduates walk away with no useful skills.

    "largely a scam".... Bogus generalization and demonstrably false.

    As a developer, I have worked with many people who went to college, many who did not. Those who attended a good program of study were consistently better prepared for the work. More disciplined, better informed, more confident, better prepared to keep up with the changes to the intellectual environment required to make proper contribution to our products. That has been true in every organization I have worked in from Cable TV through avionics, logistics automation, communication, industrial data acquisition and control. Co-workers with the discipline to get a proper grounding in the theory consistently hit the ground running and are more productive, more flexible, and arrive with a better toolkit for delivering results.

    There have been exceptional workers who are just plain brilliant and have learned on the job, and there have been those who managed to get through the course of study while avoiding the getting education part of it, but those are exceptions not the general rule.

    On the original subject: Taxing people who managed to get into and be successful in advanced grad programs for the tuition that they would be paying if not for doing the work of teaching or research is a perfect example of short term thinking. It shows a complete failure to understand where improvements in productivity that produce true economic growth come from.

  28. Seems like it. by wonkavader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Normally I'd think that neither leftists nor rightists want to discourage people from pursuing graduate degrees. Now I'm not so sure. If only the rich can afford to go to school, then only the rich will profit from the rewards of education. Is this what Rs want?

    It doesn't seem to make sense -- one would think that uneducated people cost the system more money than they return. But the more I look at our education system, the more I think that it is indeed the case that the rich want to keep the poor and middle class from getting an education.

    This tax bill includes a removal of the ability of teachers to deduct a few hundred bucks spent on school supplies for their work. Talk about going out of your way to make things hard for little gain. Seems crazy to suffer the political penalty for doing this unless they really believe that publicly available education should work poorly.

  29. Re: Barter by werepants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Definitely not. Trump is, first and foremost, an authoritarian, the exact opposite of a classical liberal. Classical liberals like JS Mill, John Locke, and Thomas Paine provided the inspiration for the American experiment in democracy.

    Authoritarians like Hitler, Stalin, and Trump revile free speech, education, science, and empiricism. Divine authority cannot tolerate questioning. It requires unassailable certitude and ignorant compliance from the masses. So we can expect this new wave of Trumpism to make education, especially at advanced levels, a primary target.

  30. Great job citrus boi by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After the war on drugs and the war on terror comes the war on science. Congratulations.

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /