Slashdot Mirror


Television's Most Infamous Hack Is Still a Mystery 30 Years Later (vice.com)

It has been 30 years since the Max Headroom hack, arguably the creepiest hack in the television history took place. Caroline Haskins, writes about the incident for Motherboard: It was a few minutes after 9 PM on Sunday, November 22, 1987. Chicago sportscaster Dan Roan was cheerily summarizing the Bears's victory that day for Channel 9 local news. Suddenly, televisions went silent, and their screens went black. At first, it seemed like an equipment malfunction. Without warning, televisions in the area blasted loud radio static. It was overlain with the screech of a power saw cutting into metal, or a jet engine malfunctioning. At center screen, a person wore a Max Headroom mask -- a character who appeared on various television shows and movies in the 1980s. He appeared to have yellow skin, yellow clothes, and yellow slicked-back hair. As purple and black lines spun behind him, Max nodded and swayed back and forth. His plastic face was stuck in laughter, and opaque sunglasses covered his eyes, which seemed to peer through the screen. The screen went black again. After a moment, Roan reappeared. "Well if you're wondering what'll happen," Roan said with a laugh, unaware of what had happened during the interruption, "so am I." Two hours later, it happened again on another channel. This time, Dr. Who had just turned to get his companion, Leela, a hot drink, when a line of static rolled across the screen, revealing the yellow man. After 30 years and an intense FCC investigation, the people behind the Headroom hack remain unknown. The correspondent has spoken to the newscasters who were interrupted and mocked that day. You can read the interview here.

116 comments

  1. Max Headroom by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Thus dude was one cool cat. Loved it!

    1. Re:Max Headroom by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Mitt Romney always reminded me of Max Headroom. I'm surprised the similarity was only lightly spoofed.

      "C-c-corporations are p-p-people, my friends."

    2. Re:Max Headroom by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Really? Mitt didn't have the whole stutter thing going on though.

    3. Re:Max Headroom by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      You loved Max Headroom, or you loved the TV Pirate who wore a Max Headroom mask and exposed his bare ass to all within reception range?

    4. Re:Max Headroom by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      You loved Max Headroom, or you loved the TV Pirate who wore a Max Headroom mask and exposed his bare ass to all within reception range?

      Yes!

  2. Inside job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or it was the russians.

    1. Re:Inside job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Russia, TV signal hacks YOU...

  3. This Hack Was... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...One of the most "Interesting" Parts of being a kid in Chicago in the 80's. It stands as one of the most successful TV hacks of all time. After 30 years. Whoever did this, was either a super genius, or should have flown to Vegas and hit the tables the day after!

    1. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you for becoming part of the problem and not part of the solution.

    2. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These days, the most "interesting" parts of being a kid in Chicago involves trying to dodge a hail of bullets every time you walk home from school. I've actually purchased two handguns and given them to my kids to have in their backpacks, just in case.

      You stupid dumbass. This is exactly the problem.

    3. Re:This Hack Was... by fisted · · Score: 1

      Or they just resisted the urge to brag about their hack on the Internet. Wonder why that is.

    4. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Not really a hack per se (but phreak as fuck). They just overpowered the uplink to the transmitter with their own signal. Back in the 80s no one bothered with spread specrtum or encryption or any of that crap. No one would build a microwave transmitter in their garage and then use brute force and ignorance to overpower competing signals....

      I've heard semi-credible reports it was a pair of brothers known to area phreakers of the day.

    5. Re:This Hack Was... by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      no, not part of the problem, If you gotta protect yourself you gotta protect yourself.

      its sad that it has come down to that (although in reality i think hes lying, metal detectors in chicago schools and all) but if you live in a rough neighborhood, you really do need some sort of protection. My girl has mace on her keychain

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:This Hack Was... by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      These days, the most "interesting" parts of being a kid in Chicago involves trying to dodge a hail of bullets

      I can kind of see why the rust belt voted for you-know-who. Lopsided trade did a Yuuuge number on the area, and neither party seemed to really care, as if the area were the sacrificial lamb in order for everyone else to have cheap imported Walmart crap.

      The rust belt happened to be key swing states this time, and they got payback by putting the F U candidate in office. T may not solve anything, but the Rust Belt sent a message: ignore us and you'll pay.

      The Belt "hacked" the election the way this guy hacked TV and gave a big F U to America.

    7. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What hack? Powering a sufficiently large antenna is not hacking

    8. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The law was broken when the handguns were supposedly handed to the kids. Plus, they likely would have been seized by the guys manning the metal detectors.

    9. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about you, but with Libertarian ideals as the example in Congress and the executive branch, we have seen the stock market at the highest it has ever been, full employment, and the US doing quite well with regards to trade deals. The US is the only country with these ideals, and it is doing extremely well, and only will get better as socialism is sent packing from our shores.

      Trump is doing quite a good job, and is arguably serving as both a moral and business leader for the country, doing both capacities admirably.

    10. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days, the most "interesting" parts of being a kid in Chicago involves trying to dodge a hail of bullets

      I can kind of see why the rust belt voted for you-know-who. Lopsided trade did a Yuuuge number on the area, and neither party seemed to really care, as if the area were the sacrificial lamb in order for everyone else to have cheap imported Walmart crap.

      The rust belt happened to be key swing states this time, and they got payback by putting the F U candidate in office. T may not solve anything, but the Rust Belt sent a message: ignore us and you'll pay.

      The Belt "hacked" the election the way this guy hacked TV and gave a big F U to America.

      Pat yourself on the back...you are the archetypal characterization of the spoiled know-nothings that were screaming up at the sky on November 8th!

    11. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employment does not necessarily equate to prosperity.

    12. Re:This Hack Was... by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      3d printed plastic guns. nuff said.

    13. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard semi-credible reports it was a pair of brothers known to area phreakers of the day.

      Yes.

    14. Re:This Hack Was... by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      Were these "semi-credible reports" TFA?

    15. Re:This Hack Was... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really all he did was overpower the microwave input the broadcaster was using to the transmitter - which are relatively low power, but even then - it's not like building or buying that kind of equipment is easy and certainly would have left a paper trail (it sounds like the FBI investigated it as well). These days of course all those aux broadcast channels are encrypted.

      Maybe he was an ex employee who carted off backup or discarded spares or something?

    16. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You and your kids are why there are signs all over the city banning guns inside every school and business and public building.

    17. Re:This Hack Was... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 0

      That may explain why they voted, but it's not going to help them. There are solid economic reasons for the decline in American manufacturing, and there's not much that Trump can do about them. Even if he does, it won't bring back the glory days - modern industry is far more automated. Coal mines don't need hundreds of men swinging picks at the coal face any more - they need a few men operating excavators. Even the trucks have grown to a massive size, requiring a fraction of the drivers per ton-hour haulage capacity. The rust belt is stuck trying to recreate a dead past.

    18. Re:This Hack Was... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Come on, T barely changed anything about the economy. The economy has been on cruse control for several years.

      And while things are good now, we are do for recession soon (AKA "business cycle downturn"), and the ugly circumstances that usually entails. The rust belt is still trailing the rest of the country: a recession would thus hit them harder.

    19. Re:This Hack Was... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      modern industry is far more automated.

      True, but it still employs hundreds of millions of Chinese, and some of those jobs perhaps would still be in the USA if we didn't permit huge trade imbalances with them.

      I will agree that "free" trade probably has net advantages even if one party cheats some, BUT the advantages are not spread evenly: some people lose, and the rust belt took it in the arse.

    20. Re:This Hack Was... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      correction: "due for a recession..."

    21. Re:This Hack Was... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      bullets still got metal, it would still go off. I see your point but realistically, not happening, not in any school in chicago anyway

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    22. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that have anything to do with Max Head Room... oh wait...

    23. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The head of my penis was making maximum room in his pooper.

    24. Re: This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I've heard semi-credible reports it was a pair of brothers known to area phreakers of the day.

      Not even close.

    25. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullets go inside metal pen casing with shortened functional portion at the tip that you put aside when the "pen" sets it off.and pick up after. Hollywood already figured this one out back in 1993.

    26. Re:This Hack Was... by hey! · · Score: 1

      A hack it may be, but I don't find it all that interesting. Interesting hacks make a point.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    27. Re:This Hack Was... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The studio-transmitter links of the time were all analog, all NTSC, no security at all. The transmitters were all on the same tower. All one really had to do was get a hold of the STL hardware, set the channel, beam a signal from a nearby location, and roll tape.

      It used to also be that you could set the brakes on a freight train with a walkie-talkie, by sending the right command to a device at the end of the train. It might even still be the case. Nobody considered that someone else could get on your frequency back then.

    28. Re:This Hack Was... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Or a mace for a keychain? :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    29. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Lawful gun owners are the problem? You probably meant to say n|ggers. The spics from MS13 aren't helping either.

      Gosh, I can't imagine why people keep associating the NRA and racists!

    30. Re:This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the story told by reddit user bpoag. He's since learned that it's unlikely to be "K" and "J" as the specifics would have been out of their range.

    31. Re: This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he's the stupid dumbass here.

    32. Re: This Hack Was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see elementary school has the holiday off and the kiddies are home.

  4. My Brother Did It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Broadcasted from our garage in Chicago. My brother was wearing the mask. Freaking liberals are still trying to ID us? What a bunch of clowns.

    1. Re:My Brother Did It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vlad, it's past your bedtime so off you go.

    2. Re:My Brother Did It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why was he spanking himself?

    3. Re:My Brother Did It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it the Manhole or the Vortex?

    4. Re:My Brother Did It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They made the rounds at both. There were lots of dicks in need of servicing that night.

  5. In other news by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    it's a really slow news day.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How slow is it?

      So slow we're going to run a story that says nothing but "We still don't know anything about this weird thing that happened 30 years ago". .... :facepalm:

    2. Re:In other news by MobileC · · Score: 1

      A really s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-slow n-n-n-n-n-n-ews day...

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the News has been interrupted by Max Headroom again.

  6. The second breakin - My Story by nevermindme · · Score: 2

    I was 16, dead asleep on the couch that night, never could make it through a Dr. Who on WTTW at that started at 11pm and sometimes ran as late at 12:30 or 1. The VCR did start on time and on channel, that spinup and hum allowed me to crash to sleep at 10:55. I heard about it on the news in the morning and sure enough I had a perfect recording of this "event". Beyond a few minutes of attempting to decipher gibberish, watched the Dr Who episode and taped over it the next week. Local story, thought this happened everywhere when uplink signals were still sent up and down to national satellites in the clear.

    With about 5 to 10 thousand dr who fans in the greater Chicago area it was the local did you see it in sci fi event to talk about.

    1. Re:The second breakin - My Story by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Local story, thought this happened everywhere when uplink signals were still sent up and down to national satellites in the clear.

      The local news program does not uplink to a satellite for distribution to the transmitter. It's a simple STL - studio transmitter link. Studio in middle of city needs way to get programming to the hilltop where the transmitter is. Radio. Not magic.

      If you have a transmitter that sends the same signal, and your signal is stronger, well, you get the idea.

      Back in those days, stations did not do live link to satellite feeds, they recorded the downlink for later play. I remember watching many programs coming down and going onto two inch tape just that way.

    2. Re:The second breakin - My Story by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      They were called wildfeeds, and some of them were rebroadcast live, especially news reports with the reporter standing around waiting for their turn, fixing their hair and picking their nose and stuff.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:The second breakin - My Story by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      They were called wildfeeds, and some of them were rebroadcast live,

      If the local anchor was interrupted in a story by hacked video, it wasn't because his video was being sent up to a satellite and the uplink or downlink was hacked. It was a simple terrestrial STL.

      If it was Dr. Who, then it was a tape delay feed from Lionheart. You would not try to do such a program live because what happens if the feed fails? If the feed fails while you are taping it you have some time to find a replacement program, or you can call the source and say you need it again. If the feed fails during a live satellite feed, you have to find something NOW.

  7. John Titor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was one of his many jaunts to our little corner of the multiverse.

  8. Hail Asteron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creepiest? Maybe in the US. Internationally though, my money's still on the 1977 intrusion in the UK, by Asteron, a supposedly authorised representative of the "Intergalactic Mission". Dude went for six minutes!

  9. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by Desler · · Score: 2

    What would be the point? It was finished at 480i on videotape.

  10. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an 80s TV show where the main character carried a camcorder. Blu-ray isn't going to improve the quality at all. DVD is already overkill but it's the lowest common format for video release.

  11. Easier than you think. by jrmcferren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This kind of attack was easy for an advanced electronics experimenter to pull off. All that needed done was to overpower the studio's signal on the studio to transmitter link with the appropriate signal and you were in. Most of the information was provided by the sign off program as the studio to transmitter link station identification occurred during this time and the frequency was provided. This was basically a terrestrial version of the HBO attacks.

    --
    sudo mod me up
    1. Re:Easier than you think. by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly this. The STLs (Studio->Transmitter Links) are on 900 MHz and 2.8 GHz in Chicago. The studios are in smaller buildings (not many stories) but the main TX sites are all the tall buildings (Sears/Willis, Hancock, etc.).

      The links are directional beams or dishes and they are usually directly aimed at one another, but they are not that high power and can be overridden, especially if you have equipment maintenance penthouse access and can get up to the levels those things are at. Getting that access these days is much harder, post 9/11. It would probably be impossible to replicate that hack today, plus the STL's are digital and probably encrypted these days.

      Every once in a while some of my old acquaintances used to get drunk and someone would bump into one of the STL dishes causing a momentary "outage". :)

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:Easier than you think. by swb · · Score: 1

      I think this makes sense as the most likely explanation.

      But....where would you get the equipment able to encode and transmit the signal correctly and at enough power to override the studio signal? I'd imagine your theoretical "advanced electronics experimenter" might be able to build something like this, but I'd also guess it wouldn't be a simple project and some key parts would have been expensive. I'd also guess there's probably some encoding/modulation info you'd have to know as well.

      And if the studio-transmitter link was microwave, isn't there some direction and aiming dependency? It doesn't seem like you'd be able to aim at it from just anywhere convenient, you'd have to be fairly close to the studio to get the transmitter aimed correctly.

      I'm curious what Chicago-area broadcast techs thought about this hack in its era. I'd wager the odds were good it was a short list of people with enough know-how to do it and they might have actually known who in the community was capable of it.

    3. Re:Easier than you think. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      If it's analog, the signal will be simple UHF with a frequency shift, because that's easy for the transmitter to then shift down again for broadcast. Generating the UHF source is trivial, especially in the 80s - every VCR and home computer had a UHF modulator. Probably used a camcorder to film himself. The microwave side is harder, though. Any experienced radio amateur would be able to build the mixer and filters for a converter. That just leaves the power amplifier. How he got hold of one of those, I do not know. Built it, possibly - though it may have taken some inventive design to cobble together from a lot of low-power transistors.

      If I had to speculate, I'd say you are looking for a ham, or a friend of a ham. They'd have the skills to construct and use the equipment.

    4. Re: Easier than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should read old zines young generationY.

    5. Re:Easier than you think. by swb · · Score: 1

      My guess would be someone who's an actual broadcast engineer or in a closely aligned field. They would certainly understand the uplink transmitter technology well and know how to produce the right signal, and probably have sources for the parts and equipment.

    6. Re:Easier than you think. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If it's analog, the signal will be simple UHF with a frequency shift, because that's easy for the transmitter to then shift down again for broadcast.

      "UHF with a frequency shift"? The transmitter will "shift down again"? No. You send the video and audio signal via whatever band you were licensed to use for your STL (UHF, SHF, whatever), the received baseband video and audio is modulated onto the TV carrier, along with any other subcarrier signals.

      Generating the UHF source is trivial, especially in the 80s - every VCR and home computer had a UHF modulator.

      That's funny, because all of mine had VHF. You got a choice of channel 3 or channel 4. You were pretty sure to have one or the other empty because the FCC would not license two stations in the same market next to each other, to prevent interference. The receivers were not that good back then.

      I didn't get a UHF modulator until I picked up a Sony video redistribution system that was intended to put multiple sources onto a cable. That wasn't until the late 90's or early 2000's.

      If I had to speculate, I'd say you are looking for a ham, or a friend of a ham. They'd have the skills to construct and use the equipment.

      Most hams would not. Very few hams do ATV or would construct wideband transmitters. It's a better bet that someone got the transmitter equipment via surplus, all ready to go once it was tuned to the right frequency.

    7. Re:Easier than you think. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      "That's funny, because all of mine had VHF. You got a choice of channel 3 or channel 4"

      Oh, right. American. We don't do VHF TV over here in the UK - it's all UHF.

    8. Re:Easier than you think. by havana9 · · Score: 1

      In Italy there was in use an analogue method of relay, called ping-pong, where the signal from the broadcast studio or the main tower was sent in a regular VHF or UHF channel and used by the local TV set, to cover the valleys and hills the signal was received and frequency converted in another VHF or UHF channel. This method was used to relay the channel from Switzerland, France or Yugoslavia.
      You could jam a signal with a CATV single-channel amplifier and a TV modulator, but the bigges problem on some sites was that sometimes weird propagation make te secondary transmitter to start broadcast other station or get a garbled signal.

    9. Re: Easier than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about.

    10. Re: Easier than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EBS no longer exists, Einstein.

    11. Re: Easier than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the broadcast engineers and half of the hams in northern illinois could pull this off. It wasn't rocket science.

  12. only 80's kids will remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuttin' harder than a half nekkid woman in animal skins.
    If you don't agree, Leela will CUT YOU!

  13. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I can upgrade all your JPEG porn to high-quality, non-lossy PNG... for a price.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  14. Reddit comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a buried comment on reddit on this topic. A guy chimed in saying he was somehow related to the guy who pulled this off along with his friends. He talked about how they set up a rogue transmitter from a van or something. The comment was very matter of fact and low key, and won't mostly un-noticed but it rang true.

  15. if still alive come clean the time for prison is o by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    if still alive come clean the time for prison is over hell the captain midnight guy did zero 0 days and he had more risk of damaging stuff

  16. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point was that someone wanted to post an affiliate link, which will hopefully be modded to -1, but currently sits at 0.

  17. Movie Used Cars by p51d007 · · Score: 2
    1. Re: Movie Used Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Even the comments here about rumors of the two brothers who may have pulled this off remind you of the Eddie and Freddie characters in the movie.

  18. GOODEVENING HBO by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    GOODEVENING HBO
    FROM CAPTAIN MIDNIGHT
    $12.95/MONTH ?
    NO WAY !
      [SHOWTIME/MOVIE CHANNEL BEWARE!]

  19. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by Desler · · Score: 1

    So it’s creimer spamming affiliate links again?

  20. Uplink hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overpowering the main transmitter seems unlikely for more than a small area.

    I wonder how the studio was connected to the transmitter?
    If it was a radio link, then perhaps somebody managed to get in the middle and override the studio signal.

    If not, then sounds like somebody with physical access to one of the ends.

    1. Re:Uplink hacked? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, most studio to transmitter links were radio, unidirectional, and LOS, so not a lot of power required. Easily overridden with say... an old van with a generator in it and a transmitter aimed at the transmitter's antenna.

      Now days, it is mostly done via fiber optic links, so less of a chance there, but since most TVs still accept and work with analog signals, odds are pretty good you could just blast your own signal high enough locally to do this same thing.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Uplink hacked? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      but since most TVs still accept and work with analog signals,

      If your TV is tuned to a channel it knows is digital, it will not switch over to analog. It will be looking for the digital stream with the specific ID code of the channel you are tuned to. If that is disrupted for any reason, you get the black screen of "no signal".

      There are very few analog stations in the US anymore. I don't know if the LPTV and translators are still analog, but they were the last holdouts. The likelyhood of anyone viewing an analog signal right when you want to take over the video is very small. If you do have a TV tuned to an analog signal, it is almost certainly the output of a DTV translator box and it would be very hard to get enough ingress into the cable between the DTV box and TV to cause issues.

    3. Re:Uplink hacked? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "If your TV is tuned to a channel it knows is digital, it will not switch over to analog."

      My 2009 Samsung will do it any time I kick on my analog USB wireless microscope when the input is set to OTA and I'm getting digital PBS. Maybe you should try with yours.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re: Uplink hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your usb microscope certainly doesn't output analog ntsc on a vhf high/uhf tv channel. Complete bs.

    5. Re: Uplink hacked? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. UHF is 300 to 3000 MHz and the signal from the analog scope runs 1,860 MHz and is broadcast at 380mW antenna power. It is designed to work with either regular plain TVs or computers.

      Piss off until you have your HAM license.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re: Uplink hacked? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. UHF is 300 to 3000 MHz and the signal from the analog scope runs 1,860 MHz and is broadcast at 380mW antenna power.

      Then it is not a USB microscope, now is it?

      Please tell me which magical channel you watched this USB microscope on, when the top end of the old UHF TV band was channel 83 at a measly 890 or so MHz. Well below the 1.860 GHz you claim your microscope used for USB.

      It is designed to work with either regular plain TVs or computers.

      Plain TVs don't have USB input; plain computers don't have 1.86GHz inputs. Your USB microscope that outputs 1,860MHz is an, umm, odd beast, to say the least.

      Piss off until you have your HAM license.

      How does him having a ham license change what you've described? I have one, by the way. I don't need it to know about frequencies and USB and stuff.

  21. Just ponder what this would get you today by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I think it's a bit like hacking back then. Nobody really cared TOO much if you did. Getting caught meant a slap on the wrist, if that, and a stern lecture.

    Try any of this shit today and you'll probably be doing quite some time for a lot of ridiculous reasons and everything that COULD have happened. Not to mention the billions of damage you did because a network couldn't broadcast their bullshit for 2 minutes.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by barbariccow · · Score: 1

    All the best porn is animated gif. Everyone knows that.

  23. So what dead ppl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God is dead. You're next.

  24. Re:Collection is only available in DVD... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  25. Because the hacker was SMART. by Chas · · Score: 5, Informative

    He limited his exposure.

    And he hasn't succumbed to the need to "be famous".

    The FCC had essentially NOTHING to go on.

    FLAWLESS VICTORY!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Because the hacker was SMART. by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Back in the Day, fame was based on your skills, your ability to share, and signature style of the hack ( like putting up a sticker ). Not the public knowing shit but the people whom would you would respect.

      I had the best dumpsters back then, heck I could almost know the entire color code of a 64 pair twisted wire.

      funny thing is, I always look at telephone poles and try to understand some of the new devices mounted. amazing what you can learn.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  26. It's more common than you think by plopez · · Score: 1

    See
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... for more examples. The same prankster or different prankster? Who knows.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  27. Still Waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a Max Headroom virus infecting all Windows 10 PCs. He'll say "This is Windows calling..."

    1. Re:Still Waiting... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      this is bob from Windows tech support we see that your system has errors and we can fix them for only $99.99

  28. If you want to get away with a crime... by netsavior · · Score: 1

    It is pretty simple to get away with a crime, just don't tell anyone about it. Ever. It is harder than you think.

  29. HBO attacks were more notorious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary claims that a hack override of a local Chicago TV signal is more notorious than the HBO hack. The HBO attack was against the satellite dish and effected a much larger viewing audience.

  30. Obviously done by Blank Reg ! by swell · · Score: 1

    Blank Reg was the pirate television broadcaster seen in the Max Headroom TV series of the 1980s. He traveled in his well equipped broadcast van, avoiding authorities and offering 'alternative' video that competed with the big broadcasters.

    Someone at Gizmodo
    https://io9.gizmodo.com/560967...
    talks about the prescience of that TV show so long ago...

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  31. Wow by easyTree · · Score: 1

    So, the the meta-story here is: noone knows anything worth writing about? Glad this was covered so well.

  32. Even bigger mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an even bigger TV mystery: How the fuck did the Star Wars Holiday Special actually happen?

  33. Blitverts by emaname · · Score: 1

    What sticks with me is the concept of the "blitvert." The Max Headroom writer(s) showed remarkable prescience by featuring that idea. Look at the commercials broadcast today. A large number of commercials are resorting to using a barrage of images many of which are irrelevant and utterly meaningless. It's not uncommon to see a commercial where they'll run a series of images at around 1 every 0.5 seconds if not faster. Then there's also the method of rapidly cycling the screen between brightness and darkness. This doesn't do anything to make me want to buy their product.

    --
    An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    1. Re:Blitverts by ct_zero_interupt · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure they were Blipverts not Blitverts

      --
      Mal's Content http://malcontent.malcolmcampbell.org