Data Breach Hits Australia's Department of Social Services Credit Card System (theguardian.com)
Paul Karp, reporting for The Guardian: The Department of Social Services has written to 8,500 current and former employees warning them their personal data held by a contractor has been breached. In letters sent in early November the department alerted the employees to "a data compromise relating to staff profiles within the department's credit card management system prior to 2016." Compromised data includes credit card information, employees' names, user names, work phone numbers, work emails, system passwords, Australian government services number, public service classification and organisation unit. The department failed to warn staff how long the data was exposed for but a DSS spokesman told Guardian Australia that the contractor, Business Information Services, had advised that the data was open from June 2016 until October 2017. The data related to the period 2004 to 2015.
Am I forgetting any other first post?
Put another shrimp on the barbie
They stored "system passwords" in such a way that a data breach would reveal them?
For 16 months all information needed to impersonate various government officials was "open"?
I wonder if there will be actual negative consequences for them from this.
Why would there be consequences? This is fairly normal, outsourced Indochimp work quality. If the Indochimps haven’t faced any issues before why would they now?
Here are 2 other sites which have been breached. zoneedit.com 123-reg.co.uk Neither reported it and neither admit it.
Shame on whoever posted this racist garbage. Also, shame on the Slashdot users with mod points who have left the parent alone instead of modding it down. It's very disappointing that racism is tolerated on this site. I wonder what Slashdot's advertisers think of their ads appearing alongside the racist garbage in the parent. Why is racism tolerated on this site? Can anyone justify it? It's indefensible that the parent isn't at -1.
This is why I prefer crypto. It puts the power of money back in the hands of the spender where it belongs and removes an outdated pitifully incurable system. It also eliminates the risk businesses face of being defrauded.
Why is it that most of these data breaches seems to come fromthird parties that are contracted to serve their clients good, and then fall on their faces.
Is it because of that Willie Sutton "That's where the money is," or is it because these third parties have indemnified themselves legally, and really don't care?
Second question, would it even be a problem if the credit reporting agencies didn't make the Banks think your personal information was what really identified you, and your business value?
I’d rather color you surprised.
Lern2spell indochimp
Maybe in organizations like yours that outsources work to Indochimps. My company only hires red-blooded, big-penised Americans and we’ve never had a breach.
Just say no to outsourced Indochimps!
“The Department of Social Services has written to 8,500 current and former employees warning them their personal data held by a contractor has been breached."
In this day-and-age why wasn't such date held in an encrypted form?