Why not also report the numbers by other vendors?
Why not also report what Apple themselves remove?
Why not put those number is an easy to access page?
Why? Because by mentioning the government numbers it get the public on your side. It manipulates public perception.
I've seen far too much changes made to many software all on the premise to make it easier for the end user.
My own view is that many of these features are nothing more than programming exercises.
Far too many designers and programmers have too much of a need to change things because they want to see how far they can takes things without a thought to the end user.
The ability to multicast over IP has been around for years, it's just that no one really wants to use it and the carriers have no interest in configuring their systems to enable it. It is easier to do in IPv6 though.
Ah yes, the Monty Python issue. And that came not long after LJ criticised booth babes, then showed the MP guy at a piano, naked. Who was it that left LJ after the abuse they received because of that hypocrisy?
Not everyone wants to code, not even a majority of people want to do that. There are many other jobs available that people aspire to, medicine, mechanical engineering, novel writing. The tech industry should get away from this notion that every child should learn to code.
1. The WHOIS database normally carries an abuse email address.
2. This does SFA for port scans, email abuse or other abuses not hosted on an web server.
This list contains more than just breaches.
It also contains email addresses scraped from mailing lists, as I have found a few I used.
I wish spammers would start weeding out the crap in their lists...
Yes, Ryan Air did propose much the same this a few years ago, then a couple of years later admitted they had no intention of going ahead with it and it was all to do with seeking publicity.
I hope the fuck that it is better than 4.4.
Having a LTS kernel come out with updates every few days is a complete joke. You may argue often, release early, but these are kernels used by the distos which do no such thing. Those that want release often, are more than likely to be using bleeding edge kernels, not LTS.
Opensuse is at the moment using 4.4.70, yet the latest is 4.4.73.
If you want Linux to succeed on the desktop, then bringing out new kernels every few days is not the way to do it.
Slashdot Mirror
It's 285 reasons why Linux will fail to win the desktop.
So why not create a command that only manipulated the routing policies? There is no reason to add it to some existing command, it's just ludicrous.
Why not also report the numbers by other vendors? Why not also report what Apple themselves remove? Why not put those number is an easy to access page? Why? Because by mentioning the government numbers it get the public on your side. It manipulates public perception.
I've seen far too much changes made to many software all on the premise to make it easier for the end user. My own view is that many of these features are nothing more than programming exercises. Far too many designers and programmers have too much of a need to change things because they want to see how far they can takes things without a thought to the end user.
The ability to multicast over IP has been around for years, it's just that no one really wants to use it and the carriers have no interest in configuring their systems to enable it. It is easier to do in IPv6 though.
AI operates mainly at the conscious level, whereas the brain operates mainly at the unconscious level.
The heading says "will", the body says "could", which is it? Someone needs to take a basic English course.
Yeah, that "arrogant fuck", Jim Al-Khalili, is a theoretical physicist. Go look him up shit for brain, and look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
A set of instructions which improves upon itself and repeats.
Ah yes, the Monty Python issue. And that came not long after LJ criticised booth babes, then showed the MP guy at a piano, naked. Who was it that left LJ after the abuse they received because of that hypocrisy?
I own no bitcoins and I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
Here are 2 other sites which have been breached. zoneedit.com 123-reg.co.uk Neither reported it and neither admit it.
Not everyone wants to code, not even a majority of people want to do that. There are many other jobs available that people aspire to, medicine, mechanical engineering, novel writing. The tech industry should get away from this notion that every child should learn to code.
Couldn't happen to a better company. The way they show posts must be one of the most fucked up ways of doing it.
The US and all the others should just ditch MM-DD-YYYY. Such a fucked up way representing a date.
1. The WHOIS database normally carries an abuse email address. 2. This does SFA for port scans, email abuse or other abuses not hosted on an web server.
This list contains more than just breaches. It also contains email addresses scraped from mailing lists, as I have found a few I used. I wish spammers would start weeding out the crap in their lists...
Google Play halves my battery life, I assume because I do not run a data or wifi connection. That pile of crap is disabled on my phone.
Why not just fucking use cacert.org? let's encrypt do not give a running fuck who use their certificates, even criminals as they have already stated.
Yes, Ryan Air did propose much the same this a few years ago, then a couple of years later admitted they had no intention of going ahead with it and it was all to do with seeking publicity.
I think that was sarcasm.
I hope the fuck that it is better than 4.4. Having a LTS kernel come out with updates every few days is a complete joke. You may argue often, release early, but these are kernels used by the distos which do no such thing. Those that want release often, are more than likely to be using bleeding edge kernels, not LTS. Opensuse is at the moment using 4.4.70, yet the latest is 4.4.73. If you want Linux to succeed on the desktop, then bringing out new kernels every few days is not the way to do it.
What the hell is the difference between this and the normal logs produced by the web server?
Until I can list only *xz files, that I would like to see (s)ftp continue.
Is this going to be in the same vane as Borland's Kylix, which could only use it's own supplied libraries?