Slashdot Mirror


Bipartisan US Election Group Issues Security Tips (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Reuters: A bipartisan Harvard University project aimed at protecting elections from hacking and propaganda will release its first set of recommendations today on how U.S. elections can be defended from hacking attacks. The 27-page guidebook calls for campaign leaders to emphasize security from the start and insist on practices such as two-factor authentication for access to email and documents and fully encrypted messaging via services including Signal and Wickr. The guidelines are intended to reduce risks in low-budget local races as well as the high-stakes Congressional midterm contests next year.

Though most of the suggestions cost little or nothing to implement and will strike security professionals as common sense, notorious attacks including the leak of the emails of Hillary Clinton's campaign chair, John Podesta, have succeeded because basic security practices were not followed... "We heard from campaigns that there is nothing like this that exists," said Debora Plunkett, a 31-year veteran of the National Security Agency who joined the Belfer Center this year. "We had security experts who understood security and election experts who understood campaigns, and both sides were eager to learn how the other part worked."

The group includes "top security experts" from both Google and Facebook.

6 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. "notorious attack" - LMAO at that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    notorious attacks including the leak of the emails of Hillary Clinton's campaign chair, John Podesta

    Someone who wants to be one of the most powerful persons in the world falling for a simple phishing attempt is now a "notorious attack".

    If someone on your company network did that, you'd call him a foolish idiot and take away his computer.

  2. Who needs hacking and propganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Between the meandering redistricting and Fox News - that goes out of its way to misinform their viewers - who needs foreign hacking?

    And an electorate that refuses to actually learn the issues but instead listens to only what it wants to hear, we are just headed towards an "Idiocracy".

    The election of a reality TV show host is the start. Trump just shows how stupid we've become as a society.

    Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho is coming.

    1. Re:Who needs hacking and propganda? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Media shows why it's so mistrusted after falsified Trump fish-feeding 'story'. Here are several credible mainstream media outlets and Jezebel reporting the story.

      Bloomberg's White House reporter: Trump and Abe spooning fish food into a pond. (Toward the end, @potus decided to just dump the whole box in for the fish)

      New York Magazine: Trump Under Fire for Improper Fish-Feeding Technique

      Jezebel: Big stupid baby dumps a load of fish food on Japanese koi pond http://bit.ly/2zAyCD6

      CNBC's Christina Wilkie (in a now-deleted tweet): "Trump and Japanese PM Shinzo Abe were scheduled to feed koi spoonfuls of food. Until Trump poured his entire box of fish food into the pond."

      New York Daily News: Photo of Donald Trump dumping fish food into koi pond during Japan visit draws Obama comparisons

      The Guardian: "White House reporters, keen perhaps to pick up on a Trump gaffe, captured the moment when he upended his box on their smartphones and tweeted evidence of his questionable grasp of fish keeping. Some speculated that a poor palace employee would be dispatched to the scene to clean up the mess as soon as the two leaders disappeared inside."

      CNN: Trump feeds fish, winds up pouring entire box of food into koi pond

      The media was not only blatantly overt, but intentional in its deception. The greatest danger to our nation comes from a free press that chooses sides in the political process. And that has openly and unapologetically taken place.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  3. Re:Bipartisan vs Google and Facebook by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    False dichotomy. She lost. Enough of her dirt got out. Get over it.

    CNN will never fully recover. Credibility is very slow to come back. They aren't even trying yet, more like doubling down. CNN is with MSNBC now, the stink won't wash off.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. More tips: by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. "Stop breaking the law, asshole!"
    2. Instant Runoff Voting
    3. Blockchains
    4. Purging instead of promoting the worst people within a party
    5. Hiring security professionals based on qualification, not on their connections to your bribery machines.

    But I suspect that none of these will be implemented because they aren't interested in secure elections, just holding power.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  5. Easier Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just disallow the GOP from winning elections. After all, none of this was ANY concern before Trump was elected, in fact Obama had stated numerous times that the election couldn't be hacked, that it was fair, that voter id wouldn't help, there is absolutely nothing wrong with how votes happen, etc.

    This week we are being told that even if Judge Moore WINS his election in Alabama, he will not be seated as a Senator because the Senate does not allow sexual molesters to be members. He was never convicted nor admitted to it, however Franken is up to 4 admitted cases and not a word about him being a Senator.

    It seems the rules are just going to be written so GOP is not allowed to win no matter what. If the rules would prevent a DNC member, they will be ignored.

    Fuck you if you vote GOP, is the clear message I get from the DNC and DC in general these days.