Slashdot Mirror


Flat Earther's Homemade Rocket Launcher Breaks Down in His Driveway (desertsun.com)

The Desert Sun has an update on the progress of 61-year-old self-taught rocket scientist 'Mad' Mike Hughes: A man who believes Earth is flat, and was ready to launch himself from a rocket in California on Saturday afternoon to prove it, has canceled his plans. At least for now. Not having the required federal permits plus mechanical problems with his "motorhome/rocket launcher" forced self-taught rocket scientist "Mad" Mike Hughes to put his experiment on hold. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management "told me they would not allow me to do the event ... at least not at that location," Hughes said in a YouTube announcement, amid international attention over his plans to launch into the "atmosflat."

"It's been very disappointing," he said... "My feeling is that one of the top executives at the Bureau of Land Management called Needles, California, saying... 'What's going on? Who permitted this?'" Hughes said. Plus, as he and his team were preparing to leave Wednesday, the motorhome/rocket launcher broke down in his driveway, he said... His plan is to try again next week.

246 comments

  1. Altitude Record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    He hopes someday his rocket will go higher than a building.

    1. Re:Altitude Record by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      He already did that, about four years ago: Tail Camera

    2. Re:Altitude Record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, taller than any building. Not taller than short buildings. It's like saying superman's power allowed him to "leap tall buildings* in a single bound"

      *buildings being classed as including motorhomes and bungalows.

  2. It looks like by DaMattster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both Mad Mike and the Coyote have been shopping at ACME.

    1. Re:It looks like by AndyKron · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least the Coyote's rockets didn't break in his driveway

    2. Re:It looks like by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Both Mad Mike and the Coyote have been shopping at ACME.

      The Roadrunner owns ACME.

    3. Re:It looks like by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The difference is, Coyote had to mail order it all, using money.

      This guy got the flat earthers to pay him to build the rocket. It isn't his first rocket; his first one was also human-cannonball style.

      He converted to flat-earther when they agreed to pay him to do this, and fund construction. That is why it has their ad on the side.

      It is almost impressive the way he's gone from, "yeah, they're paying me to do it!" to just spewing their talking points wholeheartedly as the event approaches.

      He's a stunt man. It is a stunt.

    4. Re:It looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The difference is, Coyote had to mail order it all, using money.

      Leading to that age-old question, if Wile E. had enough money to order all that ACME crap, why didn't he just buy dinner?

    5. Re: It looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you can't just buy something as delicious as Roadrunner!

    6. Re: It looks like by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...one of the top executives at the Bureau of Land Management

      And a real brain, at that.

    7. Re: It looks like by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I don't mind it, I don't want our best and brightest to be stunt men. He's entertainment, and he's enjoying the ride, so whatever. It is as good a use for him as mowing lawns or whatnot.

  3. He should really get a paramotor by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    These flying wings can get to 15,000+ feet and are under $10,000 including training. (highest paraglider of any kind was 24,848 feet)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Bonus points- you can't see curvature of the earth from that low.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But maybe you can see the curvature of the edge of the disk from that height! (I hear it's a great tourist destination.)

    2. Re:He should really get a paramotor by yakumo.unr · · Score: 2

      A weather balloon, and a camera are a hell of a lot cheaper.

      https://phys.org/news/2017-01-...

    3. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can âoeseeâ the curvature of the earth at sea level. When the ship leaves port and you eventually canâ(TM)t see the mast anymore. Our ancestors may have been uneducated but they damn sure didnâ(TM)t really believe in this flat earth crap. Hope this guy gets his wish gets up high and crashes.

    4. Re:He should really get a paramotor by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      funny, at an altitude of the height of my eyeballs I can see evidence of the curvature of the earth as things move away with the bottoms disappearing first as they go "over the horizon"

    5. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bonus points- you can't see curvature of the earth from that low.

      Why do you have to see the curvature for proof?
      Pick a direction and keep flying that way, he'll either
        A. Circumnavigate the earth and come back to where he started, proving Flat Earth wrong.
        B. Eventually come to the end of the Flat Earth, and will be able to get photographic proof (that no Flat Earther has yet ever managed to provide)
        C. Keep going and end up in strange lands not on any map.

      But then again, watching some deluded twat do his best Wile E Coyote impression into a rock face is more entertaining.

    6. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Motard · · Score: 2

      I like watching bottoms too.

    7. Re:He should really get a paramotor by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      A. Circumnavigate the earth and come back to where he started, proving Flat Earth wrong.

      The same thing happened in King's Quest II and I'm pretty sure all the zones were flat.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should hope he gets up high enough to film the curvature of the earth, at which point he either is debunked by his own evidence or changes his opinion.

      Have you ever personally verified that the Earth is round? Few have. The fact that flat earthers are a thing means tha maybe a few more should.

    9. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprisingly, they have a counter argument for _every_ argument that has been thought of.

    10. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photos from those engineers fixing the ISS won't count?

    11. Re: He should really get a paramotor by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you ever personally verified that the Earth is round? Few have.

      Anyone who has travelled to a different latitude and has seen the difference in the positions of the stars has seen first-hand that the Earth is a spheroid. That's not a "few" people.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    12. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason for this according to flat earthers is that the light "falls down" and thus it LOOKS like the ships disappear into the horizon but instead what really happens is that the light from the ship falls down in front of you. First, of course, you start to no longer see the lower parts, because they're closer to the ground.

      Discussing flat earthers and other fringe theorists is a bit of a hobby of mine. They're a really creative bunch.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Their counter argument is that the Earth is a disc with the north pole at the center and the "south pole" actually being the edge of the disc. So circumnavigation is possible, but instead of around the ball, you travel along a circle on the disc.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the explanation why a flight from New York to Paris takes about 3 hours, a flight from Johannesburg to Perth about 4, despite on their "map" the latter is further than the distance between New York and Tokyo and should take at the very least 8-10 hours.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A short plane flight is likely to be cheaper still.

    16. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    17. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even bother with rational arguments. I'd bet that not one in a thousand who claim to "seriously believe" in a flat earth would actually stake their life on the correctness of their beliefs. They're just fans of ridiculous conspiracy theories, are contrarian by nature, or are desperate to seek attention (that describes this fellow, I think). The amount of physical evidence you'd have to willfully ignore to maintain such beliefs is somewhat staggering.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    18. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have mathematically verified not only the spherical nature of the earth but also its size and distance from the sun using techniques dating back to the ancient Greeks. This was part of my Astronomy 101 couse at the University of Virginia. Basic trigonometry and, in the original sense of the word, geometry should be part of every studentâ(TM)s experiences. I also helped some football players conduct the experiment, since it was a summer course. That too should be part of every studentâ(TM)s experiences, because it teaches the virtue of patience.

    19. Re: He should really get a paramotor by murdocj · · Score: 1

      As the grandparent said, if you've watched a ship sail away you can verify the curvature of the earth at sea level.

    20. Re:He should really get a paramotor by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      wow, so we live on the surface of a neutron star. that's why shoveling dirt is so tiring.

    21. Re: He should really get a paramotor by gwolf · · Score: 1

      at which point he either is debunked by his own evidence or changes his opinion.

      ”Oh, look what a strange optical illusion I found up here!”

      Have you ever personally verified that the Earth is round? Few have.

      Not in a single shot, but accumulating experiences from various trusted parties - I have met people living in Asia or Oceania in Europe and North America. We have discussed itineraries. They have sometimes travelled eastwards, sometimes westwards. So have I (flying from North America). The only way this would work is with a round Earth. It does not prove it is almost-spherical, though (FWIW it could be a cylinder).

    22. Re:He should really get a paramotor by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

      If he has as inquiring a mind as he claims, and has resources and is handy as he seems to be, then I have to wonder why he isn't off to find the edge of the world, that would prove us all wrong.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    23. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Millennium · · Score: 2

      Balloons are round. Clearly the makers must be in league with THEM.

    24. Re:He should really get a paramotor by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Problem is circumnavigating at the tropic of Capricorn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... versus the tropic of cancer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... They are kind of much the same distance rather than one being well, enormously larger than the other.

      You could feel sorry for their lack of ability to understand but their world via their abilities to perceive and understand must be full of wonderment and magic, ignorance is bliss ( understanding kind of strips the fun out things, well at least at one level, at another it adds a new kind wonderment and magic ;D ).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    25. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Because apparently the edge of the world, what we mistakenly believe to be "Antarctica", is a giant ice ring 150 feet tall that holds all the oceans in, and is zealously guarded by NASA. Eclipses are hand-waved away with some "invisible" object that's blocking light. I don't know how the hell they explain away tides, or the Coriolis effect. GPS satellites are fakes to simply give the *illusion* of being on a globe. All NASA pictures are "Photoshopped", nevermind that the technology to effectively fake photos or video didn't even exist until well after the moon landings. And on and on and on, until the conspiracies are so deep, the conspiracy would involve literally hundreds of thousands of people.

      I suspect plenty of flat earthers are people who enjoy taking obviously counter-intuitive positions and trying to figure out how to effectively argue that position. It's probably something like an intellectual game to them, devising hypotheses to disprove what everybody knows to be fact. The rest are self-delusional simpletons who readily believe any pseudo-scientific arguments put in front of them, and simply want to believe that they're the only ones clever enough to have grasped this massive, literally world-wide conspiracy. A deeper examination of flat earthers would probably make for an interesting psychological study and paper.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    26. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally millions of people have verified that the Earth is a sphere. Basically anyone who has done much international travel has by taking multiple trips that would be impossible on a flat Earth.

    27. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. Don't see a kings quest reference every day. Well done.

    28. Re: He should really get a paramotor by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you ever personally verified that the Earth is round?

      Have any flat earthers personally verified that the Earth is flat ?

      Get a bunch of flat earthers from different places in the world in an on-line chat, and ask them to measure the angle of the sun. Repeat a few times at different hours. Now try to construct a flat Earth model that matches all the observations. Try the same with a standard round Earth.

    29. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Dude, he's seeking attention because they're paying him to do it with their logo on the side. Seeking attention is what advertising is about!

    30. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mathematic?
      Oh please that is just more of that racist science. You need to decolonize your mind.

    31. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lot of people have traveled around the globe. How does that fit with flat earth religion?

    32. Re:He should really get a paramotor by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 2

      From my experience many simply want to put themselves back in the centre of the universe - its a spiritual thing. Basically, they don't want to buy into the 'nihilistic' perspective that it is an uncaring universe and they are a tiny irrerevant spec (not how they would put it, but from reading between the lines and knowing them personally). Flat Earth and many other conspiracies help them create a world view where not only is the Earth at the centre of a much simpler universe (one probably created by God/Gods/Spiritual aliens) but they are also now 'in on' the great secrets.

    33. Re:He should really get a paramotor by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      Exactly. At one level I have to admire their world building skills. They should channel it into game design instead.

    34. Re:He should really get a paramotor by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      This specific launch wasn't meant to prove the Earth is flat. It was meant to be a stepping stone to an eventual space launch.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    35. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the Russian collusion people on your list? Just kidding, of course.

      Light falling is actually a great explanation, and accounts for many of the observations! But do you know how the flat earthers would explain the orbital mechanics? It seems that no amount of gravity would account for a satellite falling off the edge and re-appearing on the other edge... Warp field? Teleportation? Faked by the governments?

    36. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, first of all, NASA and all the other space agencies are in on a conspiracy. They pretty much have to be, or the pictures of Earth from space would be really hard to explain. So they're all conspiring so we keep paying them. Yes, including Russia and the US during the space race. They just both didn't debunk it because the Russians had their first space man and NASA of course wanted money for some black projects that were really expensive, so they didn't debunk the Russians.

      Satellites are just like weather balloons up there and going in circles over the disc. There is no orbital mechanics of course because there is no orbit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    37. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But of course! Since Earth is the center of the universe, it also must be axiomatically the heaviest thing in the universe.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame Russian Internet trolls sent by Putin for all these crazy conspiracy theories!

      ae911tuth dot org

    39. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "space"? Won't he just crash into the dome with the sun and the stars painted on?

    40. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he initially was using them strictly as revenue, but is being brainwashed like Tom Tuttle from Tacoma.

    41. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Ancient Greeks figured out the Earth was spherical about 2400 years ago, just based on observations of the stars and planets. It's basic math.

      --
      ~X~
    42. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /Techniques/ for the Earth-Sol distance, sure. But no one could do that very accurately until Huygens, in the mid-17th century.

    43. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the "bottom" of the earth looks like. Is it just rock, or is there an exhaust system of some sort.

    44. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, a conspiracy that's practically impossible to keep under wraps for 50+ years.

    45. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. So I'm curious: How do flat Earthers explain timezones?

      Or how we have airplanes and nobody has ever visited the edge?

    46. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your answer. That's unfortunate that they have to resort to the "global coverup."
      I rather enjoy internally consistent conspiracy theories that do not rely on "deus ex machina", and still have predictive powers.

      For instance, "our world as a computer simulation" theory actually has predictive powers such as the absence of universal reference frame, time dilation near massive objects, quantum uncertainty (due to the limitations of the underlying computer cluster hardware, presumably). Thinking back, I would not bet that this one isn't actually true.

      Another nice conspiracy theory is "the world was created 6,000 years ago," which has has a perfect internal consistency and full explanatory power, not requiring ongoing intervention of God to maintain... The predictions are weaker, however, but would include "special" things that should be observable about human history and biology (e.g. Alu transposon elements in the genomes of humans and chickens, the emergence of multiple mitochondrial ancestors, anachronistic discoveries such as Iraqi acid batteries and such)

      Another nice one is "Obama is a muslim that hates America." It also has a perfect internal consistency and an actually potent predictive power, such as establishing of ISIS, weakening of American interests in China and Russia, increased racial tensions and class disparity, rich getting richer, etc. However, it is self-limiting to describe a particular boundary case. I guess the overall framework would be the Rockefellers vs Rothschilds struggle or something.

      Know any other good ones?

    47. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, a smarter explanation would be "our world as a computer simulation" theory I mentioned in my other comment.

      In this particular case, the simulation would be programmed to warp the "edges" such that if you travel fast on an airplane, you would "teleport" to the other side. To test this, you'd have to try to look for the effects of "teleportation" somehow, probably by the fact that it should take a larger amount of computer cycles to suspend you and teleport you to the other side or simulation node. So if you move around the world on an airplane, your internal clock should slow down compared to a stationary clock.

      I believe such an experiment was done in the past with interesting results"

      Interestingly, such a theory would make other predictions, such as the absence of a universal reference frame, time dilation near massive objects, inherent uncertainty at small or fast scales (due to the limitations of the underlying computer cluster hardware, presumably).

    48. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The reason for this according to flat earthers is that the light "falls down" and thus it LOOKS like the ships disappear into the horizon but instead what really happens is that the light from the ship falls down in front of you.

      The problem with that is that for this to be an explanation the light would need to "rise up". If light "falls down" then it would be possible to see far over the horizon on a curved earth as the light "falls down" to follow the curve. With light "rising up" you could go to the top of the cliff and see the ship again once it had been lost to view from the beach.

      Flat earthers are too stupid to notice their '100% proofs' just don't work. But then I suspect that many, or most, of the flat-earth sites are parodies and it is almost impossible to tell the difference.

    49. Re:He should really get a paramotor by hey! · · Score: 1

      That actually leads to some testable predictions. If the effect is due to a tendency for light to be deflected downward over a distance, the distance to the horizon should increase more rapidly as you ascend than it would under the spherical Earth theory.

      Of course the spherical Earth theory also leads to testable predictions -- like the ability to sail around the world and return to your original position using inertial guidance.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    50. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should hope he gets up high enough to film the curvature of the earth, at which point he either is debunked by his own evidence or changes his opinion.

      Have you ever personally verified that the Earth is round?

      Yes I fucking have. How about taking a road trip a thousand miles north or south of your trailer park, stay there a couple of days and see the difference.

      You can also setup a webcam at home then take a trip over seas and see the difference between night and day.

      Few have

      Maybe few who live in your trailer park.But the millions of us who travel more than a few miles away from home certainly have.

      The fact that flat earthers are a thing means tha maybe a few more should.

      Bullshit, they're just either willfully ignorant or attention whores.

    51. Re: He should really get a paramotor by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Basically every 'scientist' back too minimum 10,000 BC knew that the earth is a sphere.
      That greek guy simply was one again who tried to calculate/measure how big the earth is.
      Older records about the size of the earth of e.g. the babylonians are simply lost, that is all.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    52. Re: He should really get a paramotor by KingRatMass · · Score: 2

      There are flat-earthers all around the globe. Don't fuck with them!

    53. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever personally verified that the Earth is round?

      So how did I fly from Dallas to Sydney. Then continue on to London via Singapore and come back to Dallas from London? Sounds like I personally verified the Earth is round.

    54. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Timezones happen because the sun works like a lamp with a cone of light shining on the disc and this "lamp" moves around it. Light also works considerably different. It's a lot of "explaining on your feet" and making up shit as questions come along, but they have their bases covered. It starts to fall apart no later than when you leave the planet and try to explain the other planets and how they move (something the geocentric model had huge problems with, too) and of course the other stars and why some can be seen from different places on the planet.

      The reason why nobody visited the edge is that it's forbidden and nobody may go south of 60 degrees south. Anyone claiming that he was further down is either part of the conspiracy or could only go there on a guided tour where he is kept away from the edge and must not go to areas where you could see "the wall".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    55. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Poe's Law is very strong in these, indeed.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    56. Re: He should really get a paramotor by mmdurrant · · Score: 1
      I can see it now... he successfully launches the thing, gets up to space...

      "Holy shit. It is round. How about that."

      ... right before crashing down to earth and not being able to utilize his newfound knowledge because of the practical (and quite painful) lesson in Newton's laws of motion.

      --
      I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
    57. Re: He should really get a paramotor by spongman · · Score: 1

      you can see the curvature of the earth from 6 feet above sea level. not to mention ships & planes transiting the horizon.

    58. Re:He should really get a paramotor by famebait · · Score: 1

      The very last part there is the kicker, IMO.
      This goes for all conspiracy theories in particular, and a good way for most religions as well:
      The primary purpose is to aggrandize the believer.
      The more a faith delivers on that count, the more it appeals to people with a really strong need for that - whether it stems from pathological ego or just a sense of being marginalized, justified or not.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    59. Re: He should really get a paramotor by famebait · · Score: 1

      Easy. "They" just fly slower on some routes to prop up the hoax.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    60. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I guess even they don't dare to make that argument. Arguing that a bunch of rival space agencies in countries with competing social and economic systems work together is already stupidly impossible, but a near inexhaustible amount of non-governmental, for-profit organizations that literally come from EVERY country on the planet deliberately cutting into their own bottom line to perpetuate a lie that they themselves have exactly zero interest in...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    61. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly the Apollo missions landed on the near side of the moon.

      Well, the moon is clearly up above us, and if it has so much less gravity than earth, anything landing on the near side would just fall off!

      Clearly, they would have had to land on the far side (on top) of the moon to stay on it!

    62. Re:He should really get a paramotor by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you forgot the infinite stack of turtles under the earth. they cause earthquakes and smelly swamp gas.

    63. Re:He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There is no infinite stack of turtles, because the Earth Disc is perpetually accelerating upwards at exactly 9.81m/s, or where do you think what you call "gravity" comes from?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    64. Re: He should really get a paramotor by jomama717 · · Score: 1

      You don't need a rocket, or an airliner, or a tall ship on the ocean. Go to any decent sized lake (say, 1 mile across) with a telescope, lay the telescope on the ground and focus on the opposite side of the lake. You'll notice that you can't see the feet of the people walking on the other shore.

      --
      while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
    65. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I flew to Japan, the sun was rising when it "should" have been setting.

      Quite a few people have experienced time zones to this degree.

    66. Re: He should really get a paramotor by famebait · · Score: 1

      stupidly impossible

      When did that ever stop conspiracy theorists?
      The supposed moon landing cover up would have been much more expensive than just going...

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    67. Re: He should really get a paramotor by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But if it's impossible, what could they do?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    68. Re:He should really get a paramotor by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      well yes, we keep having to add turtles to maintain standard g, duh!

  4. encouragement by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    I'd like to encourage him, these amateur science projects are bound to encounter stangs from time to time, but on the other hand I don;t want to be complicit in him blowing himself up, so I'm torn...

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was looking for a live-stream. I hope there's one for next time. But I wonder how much he believes in flat-earth vs. how much needs financial support for his rocketeering habits. Maybe he researched which are the best buttons to push to get any kind of funding:

      "...And I’m a believer in the flat Earth ... I researched it for several months.”

      If someone was passing a hat for him, I'd gladly put $10 in it.

    2. Re:encouragement by sdinfoserv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you read the article, he states he does he does NOT believe in science. "There’s no difference between science and science fiction.”, he continues. So, in the name of "Non-Science", lets encourage this asshat to an expedient joining of the Darwin Awards club.

    3. Re:encouragement by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain that if he can get the project off the ground it will be a big hit...
      Feel free to write your own on target, large impact, smashing success and sky's the limit jokes...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:encouragement by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 1, Funny

      You have such a low self esteem and low sense of social security.

      There is no reason to level disdain and malice toward this man.
      He has his own sort of courage and intellect, let him be.
      We need more courageous people like him than cowards like you. We can teach people like him, but cowards like you are stuck in your miserable ways.

    5. Re:encouragement by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      We need more courageous people like him than cowards like you.

      You mean courageous people who don't believe in science? We already have lots of those. Here in the US, we call them, "Republicans".

      We can teach people like him

      Citation needed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:encouragement by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is no reason to level disdain and malice toward this man.
      He has his own sort of courage and intellect, let him be.

      Alas, no. His "courage and intellect" are not helpful. His motivation is not the kind of good-faith naïveté that seeks to discover new things. It is the kind of stubborn blindness that seeks to affirm rigid beliefs that are not supported by evidence.

      Let him be? Perhaps. But let's not celebrate his ignorance.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    7. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We can teach people like him"

      Bullshit. If you could, or wasn't such a coward to try, then he wouldn't still believe the world is flat.

      Regardless, this is just a man looking for 5 minutes of fame. And the internet is supplying it to him in spades.

    8. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need more courageous people like him than cowards like you.

      What would that achieve? It seems like the world already has enough morons.

    9. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean courageous people who don't believe in science? We already have lots of those. Here in the US, we call them, "Republicans".

      Wait a second, you're not from America! No true-blooded American would call a single Republican courageous.

      We can teach people like him

      Citation needed.

      Ivan Pavlov. As a Russian, you should know him.

    10. Re:encouragement by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No true-blooded American would call a single Republican courageous.

      It's Dutch courage.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:encouragement by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The point is the man has spirit and that is the result of delicate culture, something that is being systematically destroyed.
      He has LIFE, more than these twisted freaks who get pleasure from making fun of him. He has POTENTIAL. With real education his drive to create could be very valuable.

      What we have instead of education is psychological lobotomization and programming. The banks which control our government, economy, and most everything else, do not want competitors. They want brainless, soulless drones who can do linear tasks. They don't want people who will test barriers and live on their own terms. Guess which sort actually benefits everyone but the bankers?

      The argument "don't cause trouble, just lay down and take it" is not one which will lead to survival.

    12. Re:encouragement by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 0

      Yes, courageous people who will stand up to authority when they sense it is corrupt, even if they do not know all of the details. That is courage, that is sense, that is the essence of survival. You rarely have the luxury of waiting for all the proof to come in before the axe falling on your head strikes. You have emotion and instinct for a purpose.
      But you cowards never act, you always need more and more proof, and even when an incontravertable argument is assembled and dancing before your eyes you will still find an excuse to crawl into the corner and do nothing.

      You "science"-loving "fact"-preoccupied drones seem to think the entirety of human instinct is worthless, that our evolutionary history is obsolete and should be persecuted until only programmed behavior remains.
      You need ENDLESS "proof" in order to take action....really what you wait for is an authority to tell you it's okay.
      You take in "proof" and "fact" as substitutes for emotion and instinct, which you suppress absolutely. You are broken completely, half-human at best.
      Your brain was not meant to be a "fact" calculator. You are meant to use emotion and intuition and instinct in your great decisions.
      You evolved to make good decisions like this. Human history has been tough and rarely did we have the luxury of knowing all the "facts" before taking action.
      But you always submit to your programming that tells you that half your being is worthless and must be supressed, and when you see other people valuing their other half your programming demands that they should be ridiculed and hated, and you yourself are inspired to ridicule and hate because you are jealous of them, even though you are only dimly and subconsciously aware of what you have lost and they have kept, it is but a shadow of memory from your childhood.

      The truth is "science" has become heavily manipulated and corrupted, a sign of the corrupt authority that funds it.
      We are all meant to be slaves to this authority, and some people rebel when they get the chance. They should be commended, even if their rebellion has no immediate goal. We need the inspiration they provide. We need the inspiration for a real rebellion.

      Bless this crazy man. He is worth ten thousand of the average slashdot poster.

    13. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He absolutely deserves disdain. I only agree that malice is uncalled for. If he is lucky, then he has some ulterior motives rather than actually being that stupid.

    14. Re: encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do the bankers (or "ruling elite") train their replacements? I've been to two Ivy League schools and visited many more. Yes, plenty of toss-pots around the place, but no real conspiracy of ruling elites.

    15. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great story man.

    16. Re: encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ÐÐÐÑÐбо, komrad!

    17. Re: encouragement by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      "With real education?" This guy had a chance at real education already, and rejected it. He believes there is no difference between science and science fiction. And yet the laws of aerodynamics and Newton don't seem fictional to him.

      When I hear you rant about banks and education, I anticipate something next about "precious bodily fluids."

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    18. Re:encouragement by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I fully encourage this splat-earther mission. May Darwin bless him.

      --
      ~X~
    19. Re: encouragement by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 1

      You're an insane brainwashed animal trying to defend your irrational reaction to this story.

    20. Re:encouragement by hey! · · Score: 1

      If he wanted to see the curvature of the Earth, he could launch a weather balloon; for an attempt on an altitude sufficient to see the Earth's curvature you can obtain the balloon itself off of Amazon for about $100; along with the instrument package your total costs would be well less than $1000. It's been done by student groups, he could do this also.

      So I'd characterize this person as stupid rather than heroic. In fact he's a specific kind of stupid -- the kind that stubbornly won't learn from the experience and work of other people. The method he has chosen will never get him to an altitude where he'd be able to see the curvature of the Earth according to estimates of the Earth's diameter that date back to the ancient Greeks.

      If he'd had the intelligence to learn from the work of others, he'd have chosen a different approach than a steam rocket. There's a reason nobody uses them except for near-Earth applications. They are easy to build but hard to scale. The simplest technology that will get him high enough to disprove the Earth being a sphere of roughly the accepted diameter is a balloon; it's very cheap for non-manned applications and the cheapest and safest choice for manned excursions into the stratosphere. In fact there are commercial companies developing tourist ventures that will allow you to see the curvature of the Earth with your own eyes.

      Long before any steam rocket is big enough to get the altitude he'd need to disprove anything, it's cost will greatly exceed that of a conventional rocket -- not to mention a balloon. So the best he will do is launch himself as high as a rocket he builds can take him, and what will that prove? Nothing, because it's not high enough. If he'd bothered to research the question he'd know that.

      I wouldn't characterize risking your life in a futile attempt when there are safer, cheaper, and more feasible alternatives as "brave". It's stupid. In fact it's a kind of stupid that arises from moral cowardice: an unwillingness to open your mind to ideas.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    21. Re:encouragement by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 1

      the point is not his specific man, but the mob's reaction to anyone remotely like them, and how they will continue to strawman dissenters based on the burned-in preconception they get from obsessing over this story

    22. Re:encouragement by hey! · · Score: 2

      I don't have any problem with someone who wants to see how high he can shoot himself in a steam rocket *for thrills*. Or for the satisfaction of building and operating a really dangerous contraption.

      The problem I have is the arrogant ignorance of thinking that *proves* something.

      When I was in college I learned to read tarot cards on a lark; I saw them in the bookstore and the design appealed to me. It turned out I was really good at it, uncannily good at it. But it's purest egotism to believe that kind of thing makes you special or magical. An honest postmortem of an uncanny-seeming reading will show that it's the subject's reaction to the often divergent interpretations open to you as a reader that guide you to a reading that is personally significant to them.

      The point is that you can convince yourself you have access to truth that other, more ordinary people around you don't have, if you never look for a truth that's bigger than yourself.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    23. Re:encouragement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes courage to walk off of a 100 foot cliff and trust in the hands of gods to preserve you... Not much brains, but courage....

    24. Re:encouragement by whyyisthissohard · · Score: 1

      he's just a stunt man doing what he does, the media is the one hyping the flat earth aspect

    25. Re:encouragement by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      sure... we need many more people who lack critical thinking skills.
      People who continue to rally for coal companies because they don't believe in global warming
      People who promote cigarette smoking because they don't believe it is addicting or causes cancer
      People who refuse to believe in medicine because "god cures all" while they let their children die.
      Rather than build on successes of the past ,or, as we used to say “standing on the shoulders of giants”, build a better future from lessons learned-
      na, let’s just repeat past failures without learning from them.
      "Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it."-George Santayana
      Ya, we need a bunch more of these people - they have sooo much to teach us.
      tool.

    26. Re:encouragement by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The other problem is that the thing is going to come down somewhere, if it takes off, and I'd rather not be killed by a flat-earther with a homemade steam rocket. Can you imagine explaining that to whoever you encounter after death?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. He deserves his horrible fiery death let's face it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no fixing stupid, there's only crashing it into the ground at a hundred miles an hour of its own stupid volition.

  6. permit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My feeling is that one of the top executives at the Bureau of Land Management called Needles, California, saying... 'What's going on? Who permitted this?'"

    Yes, but probably not for the conspiratorial reason he thinks. More along the lines of a standard attempt to containing idiocy.

    1. Re:permit by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's what the globe producing lobby wants you to think.

      There's a reason they call it a global conspiracy.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    2. Re:permit by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's a reason they call it a global conspiracy.

      Damn straight. Those conspiracy theorists are flat wrong. Good thing there are level headed people in charge.

    3. Re:permit by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      That's what the globe producing lobby wants you to think.

      There's a reason they call it a global conspiracy.

      Now that's funny right there!
      Sorry Larry

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:permit by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      But doesn't the mapmaking lobby have some counter-influence? Surely they sell a lot more flat maps than globes these days.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    5. Re:permit by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That's what the globe producing lobby wants you to think. There's a reason they call it a global conspiracy.

      You could almost call it Big Globe...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:permit by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Map-making lobby ARE the globe producing lobby.
      A globe is nothing but a 3D map. And a map is nothing but a projection of a surface of a sphere onto a flat plane.
      Clever way to hide in plane sight, isn't it not?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  7. His "team" by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... as he and his team were preparing to leave Wednesday ...

    Meaning, his wife, dog, and two grand-kids visiting for Thanksgiving -- all holding globes of the Earth they got at the airport gift shop (and, yes, that includes the dog).

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  8. Of course it did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why give any publicity to this nutjob? You don't need a rocket to see if the planet is flat, just stick a camera on a weather balloon, as countless people have already done, with a parachute for the way back down.

    When you hold an irrational belief in the face of blatantly obvious evidence, then your own ego will sabotage you from ever admitting the truth. So he will continue to have endless setbacks, many of which will be his own delusions.

    1. Re:Of course it did by easyTree · · Score: 1

      You don't need a rocket to see if the planet is flat, just stick a camera on a weather balloon, as countless people have already done, with a parachute for the way back down.

      Or stand on a beach and look at the horizon - it clearly curves.

    2. Re:Of course it did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just stick a camera on a weather balloon

      That doesn't prove anything, given the shape of the balloon. It might work if you only use flat balloons though.

  9. Failure is sometimes terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be interesting...

  10. From T (original) FA by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    “I don’t believe in science,” said Hughes, whose main sponsor for the rocket is Research Flat Earth. “I know about aerodynamics and fluid dynamics and how things move through the air, about the certain size of rocket nozzles, and thrust. But that’s not science, that’s just a formula. There’s no difference between science and science fiction.”

    I can't even ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:From T (original) FA by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      “I don’t believe in science,” said Hughes, whose main sponsor for the rocket is Research Flat Earth. “I know about aerodynamics and fluid dynamics and how things move through the air, about the certain size of rocket nozzles, and thrust. But that’s not science, that’s just a formula. There’s no difference between science and science fiction.”

      I can't even ...

      If words fail you that's OK, they let him down pretty badly too...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were born in different circumstances, you would be this stupid too.

      Of course, I don't mean that to imply that you shouldn't shame him for his ridiculous nonsense. Stupid people are quite dangerous, and we should do as much as we can to protect the world from them. I am only pointing that to invite a little bit of humility beforehand.

    3. Re:From T (original) FA by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I haven't been evening since he was quoted as saying this a few days ago. I'm not actually sure if I can even again.

    4. Re: From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a world of such free information, is there really an acceptable excuse for such blatant ignorance?

    5. Re:From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “I don’t believe in science,” said Hughes, whose main sponsor for the rocket is Research Flat Earth. “I know about aerodynamics and fluid dynamics and how things move through the air, about the certain size of rocket nozzles, and thrust. But that’s not science, that’s just a formula. There’s no difference between science and science fiction.”

      I can't even ...

      If he collects enough fuel to "launch" this and he really is in his driveway, then i'd be inclined to throw the book at him. It has basically three outcomes.

      1. It never works. The neighbors live.
      2. It blows up on the ground. People may die.
      3. It actually launches, but is probably uncontrolled. People may die.
      4. It blows up right after launch, depending on how far after people may die or not.

      Now if he wants to get the right permits and launch it somewhere vaguely safe, like the middle of the desert, aka Mythbusters, then I wish him the best (not really). Either way someone that is either actually so stupid as to be seriously planning to use enough chemical propellant to launch a rocket from his driveway, is not someone that I want owning or being able to buy such things.

      The real question is why this whack job even makes news other than perhaps when he gets hauled off for breaking laws or for a psychiatric consult. Of course the state of our current politics asks people to believe other such nonsense such as, "If we massively cut government income well the magic fairy will have us grow so much that it pays for itself." Growth does occur, but there is not such a simple relationship. and even if you find a semi accurate model that shows a positive outcome, well, the model means nothing if you don't run it until all the debt added is removed. It also means zip if you have no intention of honoring the models configuration, such as with the "temporary" middle class tax cuts, which republicans say will be extended.

    6. Re:From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if hes claiming his rocket will propel him into the upper atmosphere, then he must have sufficient propellant. i think that may qualify his rocket as a ballistic missile, in other words, a WMD. maybe someone from the DOE or DOD should call on him. LOX is not just smoked salmon....

    7. Re:From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he collects enough fuel

      planning to use enough chemical propellant

      I'm guessing you didn't look into his design at all.

    8. Re:From T (original) FA by sheramil · · Score: 1

      Now if he wants to get the right permits and launch it somewhere vaguely safe, like the middle of the desert, aka Mythbusters, then I wish him the best (not really).

      Exactly. If he'd done this as par of Burning Man, nobody would have noticed, until it exploded and killed a bunch of people.

    9. Re:From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part about science is that it doesn't require anyone to believe in it at all, ever. It is too bad the launch was stopped, I would have enjoyed watching him become fictional.

    10. Re:From T (original) FA by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      How odd

    11. Re: From T (original) FA by narcc · · Score: 1

      You're on Slashdot: a site full of impossibly ignorant fools that pride themselves on their knowledge, skill, and competence.

      If "an acceptable excuse for such blatant ignorance" exists, this isn't a bad place to start looking.

    12. Re: From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would have been the burning man!

    13. Re:From T (original) FA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I can't even ...

      Apparently neither can he.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will use a steam cannon. It will not go to the upper atmosphere. He is planning on flying around 1500ft iirc, which isn't very high assuming a ballistic trajectory. So yes, a small ballistic projectile launcher, but I think in most states that is legal to posses and maybe even fire if far away from people and the FAA is aware. He did it once before, with moderate success. It flew a few hundred feet, but he got a bit injured on the landing

    15. Re: From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, a ballistic missile does not need to be a WMD. If there is a conventional payload in it (or a person in this case) it is obviously not a WMD.

    16. Re:From T (original) FA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'd make a perfect White House Science Advisor. He speaks Trumpism very well.

    17. Re:From T (original) FA by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Were I born in different circumstances, I'd be ignorant. Stupid is a different thing entirely.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  11. He 'believes' because it got him sponsership by outofoptions · · Score: 1

    I was reading that a look at his history shows no belief in a flat earth until he found out he could get some funding out of it.

    1. Re:He 'believes' because it got him sponsership by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      From his interviews, the timeline seems to be, he did the first launch just as a stunt man. That is why his design flies mostly horizontal; it is human-cannonball style.

      Then he met one of the "research flat earth" people, who offered to pay to put the logo on the side for another launch. It was after he agreed to do it that he says he started thinking about their ideas.

    2. Re:He 'believes' because it got him sponsership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong; it's also because it's hilarious.

  12. Re:He deserves his horrible fiery death let's face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a steam powered rocket, like the one Evil Knievel used to jump Snake canyon. I think he should use a cluster of 25,000 Estes C6-7 motors instead of steam. It would make the news. Or, if he's serious... Aerotech Consumer Aerospace has AP rocket motors that'll lift his motorhome off the ground.

  13. Are the movie rights to this story still up for gr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This Flat Earther is about to find out... That failing Physics... Is a hell of a lot more painful than failing Geography."

  14. Motor-home/Rocket-launcher by Required+Snark · · Score: 2

    Kind of sums it all up.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:Motor-home/Rocket-launcher by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Motorhome/rocket-launcher?

      That's something I expect from North Korea or a 1980s Bill Murray movie. Sometimes I get the two confused.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  15. He did pick up flat Earth AFTER fundraising by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I've read that he did start hanging out with the flat-Earth people AFTER he'd been fundraising for his rocket project.

    1. Re:He did pick up flat Earth AFTER fundraising by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      I've read that he did start hanging out with the flat-Earth people AFTER he'd been fundraising for his rocket project.

      A group of idiots and their money are soon parted.

  16. Next weeks Darwin Award winner. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the guy made his own rocket, yet can't get a motorhome to work ?
    I wonder if he has life insurance?

  17. Well Dang by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    That would at least have been interesting.

    Ferret

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  18. Re:He deserves his horrible fiery death let's face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/science/madcap-scientist-prepares-launch-himself-11565850 - The nutter almost nearly crippled himself in his 2015 attempt. You can't fix stupid.

  19. scientist by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >"forced self-taught rocket scientist "Mad" Mike "

    "scientist", really? Seems like a very odd word to use in a summary explaining he seriously [??] thinks the earth is flat?

    Perhaps self-taught mechanic, or self-taught assembler or something.

    1. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They let Bill Nye call himself a scientist, and if he can, anyone can...

    2. Re:scientist by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      "scientist", really?

      I mean... he has a hypothesis and he's testing it. Sounds like science. Still a nutjob.

    3. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He DOESN'T believe the world is flat. He is just an amateur rocket builder and he needed sponsorship. The Flat Earth society were willing to give him money for his projects, so he now tows their line. I'm sure he is having fun with it all.

    4. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I've self-taught several forms of Assembler as well..:) On more serious note, this guy is either nuts, or has a firm goal to win the next Darwin award for physics. Seriously.

    5. Re:scientist by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      "scientist", really?

      Contrary to popular belief, there are stupid scientists. There's no rule that says scientists have to be brilliant and smart, they can be stupid and dimwitted too.

      Heck, may as well go on and say, there are probably more stupid scientists than smart ones. There's no reason the scientist label is exempt from the norm of humanity. Way more stupid than there is smart.

    6. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not towing anything as his motorhome is broken. He toes their line.

    7. Re:scientist by Frank+Burly · · Score: 1, Informative

      Per wikipedia. he has a degree in Mechanical Engineering, took an astronomy course from Carl Sagan, and got a couple patents while working in aerospace. Please don't compare him to a flat-Earther just because he doesn't believe in a six-day creation or Exxon's scientists.

    8. Re:scientist by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "scientist", really?

      I mean... he has a hypothesis and he's testing it. Sounds like science. Still a nutjob.

      What exactly ie the hypothesis? For the life of me, I can't think of anything that would prove the earth flat or globular at 1500 feet.

      This is just more 21st century American reality Television race to the bottom bullshit where we make stupid people famous. And my gawd, it shows. The best thing to come out of it might be his life serving as a warning to others.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:scientist by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "scientist", really?

      Contrary to popular belief, there are stupid scientists. There's no rule that says scientists have to be brilliant and smart, they can be stupid and dimwitted too.

      Now explain how a person who states that he doesn't believe in science can be a scientist. Most of us have a belief in science as a mandatory requirement.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:scientist by Solandri · · Score: 1

      "scientist", really? Seems like a very odd word to use in a summary explaining he seriously [??] thinks the earth is flat?

      If you map the earth in a spherical reference frame, it's flat.

    11. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well he is following the scientific method, so it's an accurate description. Maybe not a particularly bright scientist, but a scientist none-the-less.

    12. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "scientist", really?

      Contrary to popular belief, there are stupid scientists. There's no rule that says scientists have to be brilliant and smart, they can be stupid and dimwitted too.

      Now explain how a person who states that he doesn't believe in science can be a scientist. Most of us have a belief in science as a mandatory requirement.

      I believe the word for that is *irony*. Delicious, hilarious irony.

    13. Re:scientist by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Their line is written on the side of the rocket. And he will tow it across the sky, trolling for dollars.

      But if he wants to toe up to the line, he better call for a tow.

    14. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably all scientific theories/evidence he doesn't believe in, he labels as "science", and all scientific theories/evidence he does believe in, he labels as "facts"/"formulas".
      So he is a scientist, in the sense he uses science, but a really bad one, considering he uses it as far as it suits his agenda.
      That he incorrectly labels things, says more about his intelligence or mental health, than about him being a scientist or not.
      It's a bit like hipsters which all look/act kinda similar, all have the same psychological issues and coping mechanisms, and socialize within the same group (hence the common label given to them by society), yet consider themselves to be too unique/original to be labeled.

    15. Re:scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His hypothesis is that he can build a rocket that can reach 1500 ft. He has already found one design that won't work.

    16. Re:scientist by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "scientist", really?

      Contrary to popular belief, there are stupid scientists. There's no rule that says scientists have to be brilliant and smart, they can be stupid and dimwitted too.

      Now explain how a person who states that he doesn't believe in science can be a scientist. Most of us have a belief in science as a mandatory requirement.

      I believe the word for that is *irony*. Delicious, hilarious irony.

      I believe you are correct.

      We have allowed the idiots to take charge long enough. When denying science becomes a platform and litmus test for those who dare to call themselves "conservative" it's time for the adults to take charge again.

      Accepting science is not a liberal or conservative value. Denying it apparently is.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:scientist by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Probably all scientific theories/evidence he doesn't believe in, he labels as "science", and all scientific theories/evidence he does believe in, he labels as "facts"/"formulas".

      Strange no one pointed that out until now. Yes, Fluid dynamics is certainly science. All of the aspects of Rocket propulsion are science. Pressure and thrust. If it wasn't science, and if no science was needed, you could fill the rocket cylinder full of rocks, and they would work just as well as his pressurized steam Rocket.

      I hope to high heaven he has tested the stability of his whacked out device. You don't just put fins on a cylinder and a seat in it and have it fly. There are stable designs, such as the rockets you see without tail fins, and designs that need some help to remain stable. And there are many that are pretty much unstable. His "rocket" looks more like a rocket plane than a rocket. There is a big difference that he might learn upon attempting to lift off. And his design is very likely unstable for even a rocket plane.

      Popcorn, Tequila and beer chasers are advised when we watch this.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:scientist by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      His hypothesis is that he can build a rocket that can reach 1500 ft. He has already found one design that won't work.

      Yeah, but I mean what is gaining 1500 feet in altitude going to do for him? Is there something he's going to see there that requires his silly rocket to show?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  20. Mad Mike Is Right by dryriver · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is a massive conspiracy to cover up the fact that the earth is flat. That is why secret operatives sent by no other than the United Nations and led by Colonel Kofi Annan personally broke his trailer. Once the truth gets out about what you see when you rocketeer above 300 feet, the world will never be the same again. What is that I hear you say? There are buildings taller than that? Those buildings are only real up to 299 feet. Everything above that is a strikingly realistic hologram. In fact, if you get into an elevator in a very tall building and press the button for the top floor, you are never seen again. They take you out of the elevator on the "extraction floor" at 299 feet, take you to the secret underground United Nations subterranean train station that was secretly built under every tall building 200 years ago, and send you on a one way journey to the edge of the world. What happens when you get there? You get thrown over the edge. Where do you land when they do that? On your ass of course.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    1. Re:Mad Mike Is Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citing Poe's Law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law), I demand that you state your intentions.

      I can't tell whether you are joking or a shill for Trumpism.

  21. Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by cahuenga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So he builds a rocket expected to reach 1,500 feet.... When there is an 11,500 foot mountain 50 miles from Amboy with a trail right to the tippy top.and a 360 degree view of the horizon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Call me crazy but I really don't think this has anything to do with 'flat earth', science or rockets. He got his picture in the paper. End of story.

    1. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      He should launch from the top.

    2. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by quantaman · · Score: 1

      So he builds a rocket expected to reach 1,500 feet.... When there is an 11,500 foot mountain 50 miles from Amboy with a trail right to the tippy top.and a 360 degree view of the horizon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Call me crazy but I really don't think this has anything to do with 'flat earth', science or rockets. He got his picture in the paper. End of story.

      Or if he didn't want to make the drive he could have taken a ride in a hot air balloon:

      HOW HIGH DO BALLOONS GO?

      Flights in hot air balloons have been recorded at over 50,000 feet. However, the sport of ballooning is most enjoyable when flying 1,200 to 3,000 feet. Or just above the treetops. When balloons fly over populated areas, they maintain an altitude of at least 1,000 feet.

      This has nothing to do with proving a flat earth, it's entirely about the publicity and the fact he wanted to make a rocket.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes. or buy a plane ticket and see the earth from 30,000 feet.

    4. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was funded by a bunch of idiots. Whether or not he ever planned to actually build a working rocket or not, he collected money to do so. He collected it from people unable to make observations of reality all around them, why would they be able to see thru his BS?

      No, the guy's a genius.

    5. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So he builds a rocket expected to reach 1,500 feet.... When there is an 11,500 foot mountain 50 miles from Amboy with a trail right to the tippy top.and a 360 degree view of the horizon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Call me crazy but I really don't think this has anything to do with 'flat earth', science or rockets. He got his picture in the paper. End of story.

      He wants a reality show series on the Discovery Channel that comes on right after Ancielt Aliens.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's a test launch on the path to an eventual space flight. He says.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's not planning to prove the earth flat on this particular 'test flight'. He plans for his next excursion to be a rocket launched from a balloon at 60,000 feet. This particular event is all about publicity, and possibly testing his design. He may be stringing the Flat Earthers on as a funding source for his real goal (fame), but he's not clueless enough to assume a 1500 foot flight ceiling is going to prove anything.

    8. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      So he builds a rocket expected to reach 1,500 feet.... When there is an 11,500 foot mountain 50 miles from Amboy with a trail right to the tippy top.and a 360 degree view of the horizon - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Call me crazy but I really don't think this has anything to do with 'flat earth', science or rockets. He got his picture in the paper. End of story.

      Lies!

      Did you not RTFA? The earth is flat!

      That "mountain" is clearly an optical illusion!

    9. Re:Viewing curvature from 1500 feet by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, basic fail there.

      And in the desert, there are days when you can visually "prove" that the Earth is not flat, but rather is a concave bowl: damp morning and a local inversion can turn valleys into lenses that produce this bowl-like optical illusion, and also let you see distant stuff that's normally over the horizon.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  22. That's ok - it's what wisdom is gained from... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Punches in the head (fails) are great teachers/lessons to learn - learn by it, polish it up & try again 'cuz "If @ 1st you DON'T succeed? Try, TRY again..." (but TRY is not DO).

    * To quote Forrest Gump "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" (anyone remember me using THAT? LMAO (drinking beer now, so cut me some slack lads)): "Forrest Gump: My Mama always said you've got to put the past behind you before you can move on." Forrest Gump ... & no matter WHO you are? You're "forrest" to someone on THEIR ballcourt (for awhile @ least).
    (I can't recall right now who basically said (edison maybe?) "it's 99% work, 1% inspiration" & IMO @ least? CHUMPS give up - Champions don't!) + "you make 1000 mistakes to make a breakthru - mistakes, are learning" (or, something like that, lol).

    It's PUREST truth.

    APK

    P.S.=> Sooner or later? You make YOUR DREAMS come true -but giving up? DUMB (but NOT thinking thru what you're after 1st? DUMBER)... apk

  23. The actual reason: his mom grounded him by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    With no desert

    1. Re:The actual reason: his mom grounded him by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I think the actual reason is that he was worried about crashing his rocket... with no survivors. Now was, in fact, the time for fear.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:The actual reason: his mom grounded him by careysub · · Score: 1

      With no desert

      That must be why he is so keen to launch this thing in the desert, because his mom wouldn't give him any.

      But she gave him plenty of dessert, which is why he didn't become a pastry chef.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  24. PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please stop wasting your time and our time with stories from an uneducated desert dweller. If we want to see these types of stories, Duck Dynasty has it covered...

  25. Future Darwin Award by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    I hope it blows up spectacularly. He'll get a darwin award for sure.

    1. Re:Future Darwin Award by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      He's 61, I think he is out of the gene pool already.

    2. Re:Future Darwin Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is male. Unless he has had a vasectomy or is a eunuch, he has not yet removed himself from the gene pool.

      Even if he was a she (with a uterus), the oldest mother recorded is 66:

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_over_age_50

  26. The Flat Bit by Travco · · Score: 1

    Is on his shoulders

  27. Just to be clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not convinced this guy is really a "flat earther." Apparently, he only started "believing" in it within the last year or so, and after his first failed Kickstarted didn't generate enough backers. Suddenly, he starts advertising his Flat Earth chops and his follow up Kickstarter gets the attention needed for proper funding.

    Sounds more like a marketing tactic to me...

    Anyway, I'm not trying to call the guy out as some kind of Flat Earth Wannabe or anything, but the media seems really committed to playing right into his hand.

    1. Re:Just to be clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard Hillary has rebranded as Flat Earth to drain the account of Trump supporters on Kickstarter... No really! It's genius!

    2. Re:Just to be clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's building his own rockets and actually going up in them. I wish him the best no matter what he believes.

    3. Re:Just to be clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't playing into his hands. They are playing the hand they want to play, which is to run a nonsense story about Flat Earth. However, at this stage, any news about Flat Earth is helping.

      Space is fake. The Earth is flat. The eclipses prove it.

      captcha: distort

    4. Re:Just to be clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says he canceled "the event". Words give you a view into what a person is thinking. Stunt, Event, Show... not Experiment, Launch, Test.

      He's profiting from stupid people. It's a thing (see Trump, Donald, R-Idiot)

    5. Re:Just to be clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced this guy is really a "flat earther."

      Sounds more like a marketing tactic to me...

      If someone desperate for funding accepts funding from a "notorious" source, then I believe all of the stank associated with that group should cling to that person. I think the negativity should be amplified if the person doesn't actually believe what the notorious group promotes, because then the person is a hypocrite.

      So in this case, whether or not this person is a Flat Earther is irrelevant. I don't want to make the mistake of humanizing him by trying to guess his motivations. He is allowing a group of anti-science individuals to get media attention, and deserves every bit of shame and derision pissed out towards him. In my eyes, he is a monster - not as big a threat as most people out there, but certainly not someone to regard with bemusement. He represents something dangerous and pernicious.

    6. Re:Just to be clear... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Flat-Eathers are trolls.
      Nothing more, nothing less.
      Good try though.

  28. He trolled you by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    Almost all rockets are steam powered. It's what you get when you burn hydrogen. He may very well have made a perfectly usable rocket.

  29. Flatcoin, now backed by Tesla stock by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > A group of idiots and their money are soon parted.

    Hmm, good point. Now announcing the newest and hottest pyramid^H^H^H^H^H^H^H blockchain currency, Flatcoin! The Flatcoin algorithm is designed to radically increase the value of the your Flatcoin as California falls off the edge of the flat earth due to glob^H^H^H^Hplatal warming. But wait, there's more! Today only, you can buy your very own solid-state Flatcoin mining rig which is powered by unlimited free energy from nuclear fallout from unsustainable banana farming.* Get yours today before availability is destroyed by returning to prehistoric 2015 and earlier network regulation without network neutrality rules which were ignored for the year and a half they were in effect anyway!

    * 120V @ 15A electric service required to harvest free energy.

    1. Re:Flatcoin, now backed by Tesla stock by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Blockchain cures breast cancer! Bitcoin breasts! What can't it do? Blockchain buddhism! Smart contracts for God! I wish I were making that stuff up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Flatcoin, now backed by Tesla stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's nothing. Blockchain cures breast cancer! Bitcoin breasts! What can't it do?

      "Titcoin"? Sign me up!

  30. Black Rock City - Burning Man by michaelcole · · Score: 1

    Brother, the place you're looking for is Black Rock City. You will be welcomed as a hero my friend. Google "burning man" and ask for an artists grant.

  31. Just as well by gijoel · · Score: 2

    He might have hit one of the turtles.

    1. Re:Just as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a couple... all the way down

  32. No worries, buddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just science. You have to keep trying until your hypothesis for what will make for a working rocket actually gets somewhere. You could also just spend that money on a round-the-world flight, upper pills to keep you awake, and some GPS equipment to prove that you landed where you started while flying in a non-circle, but I suppose it's easier to just repeat the failures of everyone else who built their own rocket.

  33. Typical Conspiracy Theorist... by thatDBA · · Score: 1

    When you can't do something blame the government.

  34. The Waiting Is Killing Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon Mike, just launch already! We all know you are headed for disaster so do it already!

    I can't wait for the YouTube footage of you turning yourself into bug butter. So what in the H3LL are you waiting for, mechanical breakdowns mean nothing to me! In fact if you launch while dropping parts like a bad Iraqi Scud missile, so much the better!!

    You're a man who isn't going to let science, logic or good sense get in the way. I respect that. Let's get this show going!

  35. It's a conspiracy by Big Rocket by sandbagger · · Score: 3, Funny

    They just want to keep their monopoly on chemical reactions and Newtonian mechanics.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:It's a conspiracy by Big Rocket by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      They just want to keep their monopoly on chemical reactions and Newtonian mechanics.

      You just gave me a great idea... I'm going to patent Physics! Thank you so much I'm going to be RICH!!!

      --
      We'll make great pets
  36. Flat Earthers - Trump supporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. Motor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to buy high power motors for what he needs, heâ(TM)d have to have a level 3 certification from either the National Association of Rocketry or Tripoli Association (NAR AND TRA). No company will see them to anybody who can not produce those.

    Iâ(TM)m guessing itâ(TM)s a homemade motor. 20 bucks says it either doesnâ(TM)t light or blows up on ignition.

  38. Re:He deserves his horrible fiery death let's face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he should use a cluster of 25,000 Estes C6-7 motors instead of steam. It would make the news.

    I think he should get a whole bunch of C-4 and test a low-rent version of the proposed Orion system without the nukes.

    I think that would make news. When all the pieces came down.

  39. Re:He deserves his horrible fiery death let's face by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think he should use a cluster of 25,000 Estes C6-7 motors instead of steam.

    I once used an Estes C6-7 to launch a Revell model of a 1966 Thunderbird that belonged to my cousin. We never found the wreckage, so I assume it made it out of the Earth's gravitational field and is probably orbiting the Earth. My cousin was pissed off, but it was either his model Thunderbird or his hamster, so I'm pretty sure he got off easy.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  40. Airline Navigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Earth is flat, the back and forth travel of airliners at Pacific Ocean (PACOTS) and Atlantic Ocean (NAT Tracks) won't add up.
    There are photos of satellites and cosmonauts that shows the shape of the Earth.

    1. Re:Airline Navigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that taking into consideration the round-disc model for a flat Earth?

    2. Re:Airline Navigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Round disc? It was proven by pilots and route planners that direct flights and avoiding North Pole is longer than by just flying near North Pole. Since Jet A1 fuel is very expensive, most planners prefer to fly near North Pole for EU to North America flights.

  41. Needles, California by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    I drove through Needles, California back in August when we moved here to the Central Coast from Houston. I can understand why he would want to launch himself into space.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Needles, California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needles makes Barstow look like Paris.

  42. Space is fake. The Earth is flat. Eclipses prove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a few careful observations, you can begin to understand that the
    heliocentric model is a lie, and you live on a flat plane.

    Solar Eclipse: https://vimeo.com/230976895
    Corona not shaped in a spherical configuration; orients toward Earth. Corona lines can be observed to move faster than the speed of light. Light of the corona can be observed on the back of the moon. Light of the chromosphere can be observed on the back of the moon. Light of protuberences can be observed on the back of the moon. Sun and Moon same size and near. In other videos: Last and first light of the sun disappears in a tight circle, not a sweep across the sky.

    Lunar Eclipse: https://vimeo.com/92378881
    Irregular shadow shape, progression. Shadow is black, then changes color to reddish: Shadows don't change color. Moon glow of uneclipsed portion increases as shadow becomes reddish, detail lost. Moon has no rotation(see Nikola Tesla): we always see the same face. Moon emits own light. Craters not from impacts: Too round.
    No model of the lunar eclipse correctly captures it:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/06/why-does-the-moon-turn-red-during-a-lunar-eclipse/
    https://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/in/usa/scottsdale?iso=20140415
    Next lunar eclipse: January 30/31, 2018 North America

  43. Mod down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those can be hacked by Russians looking to spread FUD to Americans. Once they are that high up, they are well within GoldenEye (which was based on a real story btw) style lasers fired from the vicinity of Moscow. The lasers can be used to reprogram the camera to make the earth look like a ball and the sun not be a disc. BeauHD and I discussed this at length.

  44. Don't think he knows about balloons.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he wanted to collect any kind of data the easier and safer way is just some high altitude balloon launches. Even a hot air balloon would take him higher than his rocket. He dismisses them because they're spherical in nature and will just prove him wrong.

  45. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone that has publicly decided that the world is flat... decides to use a rocket to prove it. What is this? Steam-punk revival? Bad Santa 3.0? Idiocracy.. the sequel?

    Back when Evil Knievil tried to get re-famous with the Snake River jump... some percentage of the non mouth-breathers actually thought he'd do it. He didn't and it went terribly wrong on camera.

    Now this clown (IMHO) tries to recreate the suspense of a proposed daredevil... and it goes bad.

    Who knew?????

  46. Be Supportive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be negative, be supportive of this person and others like him. Encourage them! Tell them how brave they are. Get folks like this fine American all fired up to follow their dreams.

    Because in a generation or 2 there is going to be waaaaay too many fucking people on the planet. We won't be able to feed them all or provide energy or jobs to all of them. We've got to trim the herd, people. Just a few words of encouragement and just let nature and the principles of Darwinism take over. Great gaggles of these lemmings will be strapping themselves into their dynamite powered "Heaven's Gate" scooters in order to prove that the "common sense of the American working man" is far greater then so called science.

  47. Re: He deserves his horrible fiery death let's fac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a great story, but I'm sorry to say your rocket did not escape the Earth's gravity well.

  48. Flat by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's because his driveway is flat. Everyone knows driveways should be round.

    1. Re:Flat by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      It's because his driveway is flat. Everyone knows driveways should be round.

      Think before you comment. What are the definitions of the following words?

      Spherical
      Curved
      Round

      You're welcome.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    2. Re:Flat by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's a joke, for Pete's Sake. Jokes normally don't need to be well-defined, but I guess on /. the rules are different.

  49. Shooting for the Darwin awards? by chefren · · Score: 1

    I bet this guy has us all tricked and he is really just trying to win the Darwin Award.

    1. Re:Shooting for the Darwin awards? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      I bet this guy has us all tricked and he is really just trying to win the Darwin Award.

      And the golden casket award for best Darwin award goes to....(drum roll)...

      --
      We'll make great pets
  50. What about the edges of the Earth? by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    An immediate conclusion of Earth being flat is it having edges. Where these people think that these parts are located and how are they picturing them? It would make much more sense to believe in it being a cube or any other 3D geometry avoiding that 2D limitation of having boundaries/edges/end. You don't even need to ever find such boundaries to understand that they are extremely incompatible with things like seas; or how should seas deal with the edges of the world? Water systematically falling down? To where? And how could seas recover from losing so much water? You might even just look at all what surrounds you to understand that spheres are an extremely common shape in nature, unlikely planes or other 2D forms.

    Some people might think that my comment is extremely evident and nobody in their right mind can think that the Earth is flat. I have personally never met a flat-earther, but have seen a relevant amount of (online) ignorance blindly defended/attacked by people who have a similarly bad understanding about what they are attacking/defending; and even becoming extremely aggressive in doing so, true fanatics of what they don't even understand.

    When you start replacing adequately understanding something with blind trust in it being in certain way, you enter in the realm of faith/beliefs; it doesn't matter the formal name of that field or how many people (you think that) think the same, all what matters is your (un)willingness to properly understand and behave accordingly (= "don't talk if you don't know"). If you go one step forward in that direction and start trying to impose your views on others and to attack anyone thinking differently than you, you would become a fanatic. I do respect everyone's beliefs, even in-denial attitude regarding what their actual knowledge/contribution is; at least, for as long as they don't become fanatics seriously expecting me to accept their truths. Any personality defined by "I believe in X and am happy with that" is very respect-worthy for me; on the other hand, "things have to be in that way" actions don't deserve any kind of tolerance.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  51. He doesn't actually believe it's flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be clear. He needed the publicity of saying he's a flat earther. He doesn't actually believe that.

  52. Not surprising... by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    ...considering the intelligence of someone who believes the Earth is flat despite the fact that Eratostenes proved that it was curved in the 3rd Century BC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    We'll make great pets
  53. Why a rocket? by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

    Does he also not believe that airplanes get to 35,000 ft? I mean, why launch yourself a few thousand feet using a steam rocket when you could buy a nice comfy first class ticket and enjoy the view of the curvature from 35,000 ft?

    Unless he thinks that a large chunk of the human population (air travelers) is in on the conspiracy.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
    1. Re:Why a rocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of his great intellect

  54. Re: Because the authorites say so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Crazy round Earth conspiracy theories! The authorities say it's flat, end of discussion. ae911truth dot org

  55. Ahhhh. Faith and the science of anti-science by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Faith allows one to believe the unbelievable. Indeed that is often the point. The anti-science firestorm we are witnessing is fascinating and somewhat scary, but it is nothing new. The other term for The Dark Ages is The Age of Faith. Truth was defined by a doctrine of authority, not necessarily by evidence. This served the power elite. Then the Church. We now have powerful institutions whose interests often run counter to scientific evidence. So they contrive a doctrine of authority deliberately by bribing and coercing people in authority (pols and preachers) to deny the relevant science. They do so just as the medievalists saw it to their advantage to deny the wisdom of the ancients because it threatened their temporal authority. The Ancient Greeks knew the earth was a sphere and Eratosthenes even calculated exactly how big it was. (Paradoxically elements within the church preserved the knowledge cast aside elsewhere. )

    There will always be Flat Earthers in a literal as well as a figurative sense. Science demands we let go of preconceptions to interpret evidence. Some people see a flat earth stretching out before them on a beach holiday and perhaps cannot let go of their preconceptions despite evidence that their intuition is not the whole picture. Others, like scam artist Mad Mike, see their own interests and truth is of no account to them. Others stand up and are open to new ideas.

    Isaac Newton was reluctantly willing to forgo the Lucasian Chair in mathematics because he would not accept ordination as an Anglican priest, which would have required him to accept the trinity mystery -- which as a mathematician of sublime genius he would not do. Ordination was then a requirement for a Cambridge fellowship. King Charles II made an exception for Newton who had made a good case for himself. Score one for Science. As for Mad MIke? Well, clearly he wants to live to spend his skim.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  56. We should help fund a much bigger version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one that can carry all the flat-Earthers. Either it will work, and they'll all finally see the truth - problem solved.... or it will fail, and problem solved.

  57. Rewhat does the underside of the earth look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Turtles..all the way down...

  58. Sad, really... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    I just got done polishing and shining up his Darwin Award too...

  59. Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you pushing the "broke down in the driveway" narrative rather than the key bit of information in the article that he wasn't able to get federal permits for the launch? I really hate clickbait.

  60. Re: He deserves his horrible fiery death let's fac by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Are you saying his rocket escaped the Earth's gravity badly?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  61. Oh my god it's full of stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crash, bang, thump, boom!

  62. No award for you by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    No Darwin award for you!

    This time.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  63. As Frank once said.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    "There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life" - Frank Zappa

  64. light "falls down" by n329619 · · Score: 1

    I can only imagine light as mini humans, trip and face planting themselves on the floor. When they got up, the ships set sail, so the ships are gone.

  65. Re:He deserves his horrible fiery death let's face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Orbiting the earth"? Hope you aimed it well enough to fly between the legs of the elephants.