Slashdot Mirror


Amazon: Heat From Data Centers Will Be Used as a Furnace (vox.com)

Vox reports on Amazon's recent push for "corporate sustainability": It plans to have 15 rooftop solar systems, with a total capacity of around 41 MW, deployed atop fulfillment centers by the end of this year, with plans to have 50 such systems installed by 2020. Amazon was the lead corporate purchaser of green energy in 2016. That year, it also announced its largest wind energy project to date, the 253 MW Amazon Wind Farm Texas. Overall, the company says, it has "announced or commenced construction on wind and solar projects that will generate a total of 3.6 million megawatt hours (MWh) of renewable energy annually."
But here's the most interesting part. GeekWire reports: Amazon is moving ahead with a unique plan to use heat generated from data centers in the nearby Westin Building to warm some of its new buildings downtown. The system transfers the heat from the data centers via water piped underground to the Amazon buildings. The water is then returned to the Westin Building once it's cooled down to help cool the data centers. The setup will be unusual. "Certainly there are other people using waste heat from server farms but you don't hear a lot about tying it in with buildings across the street from each other," said Seattle City Councilmember Mike O'Brien.

52 comments

  1. Not new by markdavis · · Score: 4, Informative

    >"But here's the most interesting part. GeekWire reports: Amazon is moving ahead with a unique plan to use heat generated from data centers in the nearby Westin Building to warm some of its new buildings downtown. The system transfers the heat from the data centers via water piped underground to the Amazon buildings"

    Factories and businesses that generate waste heat have been doing that for at least two centuries now, all over the world. Where I work, some 80 years ago they ran waste heat steam lines from the laundry building to other places on the campus, including 1/4 mile away for some residences. Data centers have also been doing it in many places for many years both on and off capus. http://www.datacenterknowledge...

    It is great to hear, but really nothing new.

    1. Re:Not new by sittingnut · · Score: 2

      GeekWire reports: Amazon is moving ahead with a unique plan ...

      Factories and businesses that generate waste heat have been doing that for at least two centuries now, all over the world. ...>

      It is great to hear, but really nothing new.

      here is another no new thing - modern self styled "geeks"/"nerds"/"technophiles"/etc(and most of others), especially those who write/edit for public consumption, are illiterate on all subjects except highly abstracted, designed to death, interfaces of modern tech.
      they stand on shoulders of giants, but can't see the giants and never heard of them.

    2. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but really nothing new.

      But if Amazon/Google/SpaceX/Tesla is doing it,it is new to them. And that's all that counts.

    3. Re:Not new by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, really, there's very little new under the sun; but when a company with worldwide impact adopts an energy strategy that's efficient and progressive, my hat's off to them.

      They don't have to care about the conservation of resources, and yet, they do.

      Measure this against countless corporate juggernauts who give less than a damn.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:Not new by Betty+Crocker · · Score: 1

      Correct, sir. I was looking for info on Fukushima to get an update a few days ago and ran across an RT video. The anchor and anti-nuke expert that they had on knew way too much and knew way too many questions for me to be comfortable. Maybe that's just a normalcy bias.

      And while we're talking about nukes, Chernobyl NPP had a steam system that went all throughout the adjoining town and provided the buildings with heat.

      Just like college campuses have been doing for, what, A HUNDRED PLUS YEARS? Central steam generation plants are still everywhere. This isn't all that newsworthy.

    5. Re:Not new by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >"They don't have to care about the conservation of resources, and yet, they do."

      In this particular example, however, there is nothing altruistic about it- using waste heat just makes economic sense. Unless, of course, there is so little heat that paying for the infrastructure to reuse it doesn't make sense. Doing the "right" thing often is right for many reasons. It is the best kind of right.

      Just like what primarily drives solar, wind, and other renewables. We can believe it is for some "save the earth" type concept, or we can know for a fact that it points the way to national energy independence, reduces dependence on a fragile grid, lessens foreign violence, and is actually a good investment as it never runs out and won't see ever increasing costs.

    6. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reverting to hundreds of years old standard practice seems regressive. Progress would by making more efficient systems that do not generate waste heat.

    7. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is great to hear, but really nothing new.

      This does involve the uploading of shit to the 'cloud' though.

    8. Re: Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not new for me either. When the lab chiller went offline, our data center heated half the buildings on the lab. We weren't popular.

    9. Re:Not new by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The colorado school of mines (i.e. MIT of the midwest) is heated largely by waste heat from the nearby Coors (yes that Coors) brewery. They run the steam vents under major sidewalks to help keep them clear of water and ice during the winter. Pretty cool to show up on campus and there's one sidewalk that's just bone dry all the time with green grass on either side. This has been going on since at least the 1950s, probably much earlier.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    10. Re:Not new by Rei · · Score: 1, Informative

      If it "just makes economic sense", why does the US do it so little? This is one thing I never got about the US. You drive through a city (or the countryside around one) and there's factories and powerplants belching clouds of hot steam on a winter's day, and then all over the same city you have people burning natural gas to heat their homes. I mean, what the heck, America?

      Here in Iceland we produce power from geothermal water, which means a thermal power plant, like any other. But once the water's gone through turbines we put it to use - plants that are "reasonably close" to cities (generally under a 30 minute drive or so) pipe the water to them for home heating, while ones in more remote places usually are used for "nature spas" or greenhouse heating or the like. Peoples' homes get hot water piped to them as well as cold, and it's cheap. Almost too cheap - there's IMHO not enough incentive to do weather sealing and the like.

      There's nothing magical about geothermal heat that lets you pipe it to homes while other kinds of heat must be thrown away.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    11. Re:Not new by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because gas lobbies to maintain it's effective monopoly. To make use of that waste heat would require new infrastructure, which the gas supplier would do everything in their power to resist it.

      Interference in this process is considered socialism, or even communism by many Americans. The free market has decided that burning gas is the correct solution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Not new by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      They don't have to care about the conservation of resources, and yet, they do.

      nope, it's 'green washing' to make themselves look good and distract from the awful treatment they deal to their workforce...

      http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/u...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    13. Re:Not new by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Steam runs at a considerably higher temperature than CPUs, though, making it more practical to use waste heat from Coors than from a data center.
      Also, in my experience, the melting snow on the sidewalks is just a side-effect of the minimal insulation of the steam pipes in the steam tunnels.

    14. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is this other than a virtue-signalling press release? I mean, good job to Amazon for being thrifty, but the real reason is that they can heat their own buildings and probably charge a fee or come into some agreement with another business that needs heat. Meanwhile, it let's a bunch of naive pawns feel good in their tum-tums and turn a blind eye to Amazon's monopolistic business practices and scorn for it's own employees. It's a beautiful thing but don't buy too much into the marketing press releases, please.

    15. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, let's just build massive data centers in every for the sole purpose of generating waste heat so that you can stick it to the natural gas lobby. Where do you suspect the electricity to run these data centers will come from?

    16. Re:Not new by Rei · · Score: 0

      That is, of course, not remotely what was being discussed in this thread.

      This thread is about using existing waste heat as a utility, remedying the ridiculous situation, common in the US, of factories and power plants exhausting billowing clouds of steam in the winter while meanwhile nearby residents burn natural gas to heat their homes and businesses. Most parts of the US aren't used to thinking of heat as a utility. But it's an extremely beneficial paradigm.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    17. Re: Not new by Arnold+Reinhold · · Score: 1

      Much of Manhattan in New York City has long been heated by waste heat steam from the power company (ConEd).

    18. Re:Not new by xtronics · · Score: 1

      The sad part is so few understand the limitations that exergy places on us..

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    19. Re:Not new by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      Yep, nothing new. Lived in Moscow for a while, where their power stations heat water and pump it all over the city for heating and hot water. It's very effective even in -30C. One problem is that in old buildings, i.e. most of them, the radiators are so old that the valves on them are seized. You can't turn the radiators off and so if you get too hot, you have to open a window or two. It's not uncommon to see a lot of open windows on old apartment buildings during the freezing Moscow winters.

      BTW, here's a list of district heating systems: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... The biggest and oldest are in northern Europe with the exception of Seoul, S. Korea.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    20. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this particular example, however, there is nothing altruistic about it- using waste heat just makes economic sense.

      All the better!

      If it isn't altruism, but regular old greed, then maybe it will actually be DONE!

  2. strange uninformed additional to the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Certainly there are other people using waste heat from server farms but you don't hear a lot about tying it in with buildings across the street from each other" ummm no, this is actually the common use case when heating buildings from datacenter waste heat, in fact I can't think of an example where it was anything but this type of setup (I am sure there are but they would not be the norm as most datacenters don't have large office spaces in to make it worthwhile)

  3. And not only datacenters by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

    Industrial waste heat too. For example in my home town, waste heat from a trash incineration facility is combined with waste heat from chemical plant Akzo Nobel, and provides a number of homes & other buildings in the area with heating and hot water. Overview here:

    Warmtenet Hengelo

    There exist many similar projects in my country & elsewhere.

  4. This technology is very old by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    And it has been used for typical city-wide distances for a long time. Where the heat comes form is unimportant as long as it is available with reasonable dependability or there are fallback alternate heat sources. This whole system was probably available from a catalog already. May have been an European catalog, but still.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:This technology is very old by dj245 · · Score: 1

      And it has been used for typical city-wide distances for a long time. Where the heat comes form is unimportant as long as it is available with reasonable dependability or there are fallback alternate heat sources. This whole system was probably available from a catalog already. May have been an European catalog, but still.

      These kinds of systems are usually 1-off designs, even in Europe. The engineering calculations are fairly trivial and most of the components are commodity items such as piping, heat exchangers, pumps, etc. Bidding and designing such a project is not that difficult, if sufficient space is available for equipment. Projects constrained by land use or existing infrastructure are considerably more difficult. Executing the project is the tricky part- it requires good project management from the beginning to the end.

      I have come to realize that almost all large projects are not difficult because of the underlying technology, but the problem of organization and managing the project correctly.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  5. It's actually well known in some parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they don't have the Internet in Seattle though, so they don't know.

  6. Screw Amazon! by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/u...

    Monstrous working conditions. SCREW AMAZON!

  7. Why not build on top of the data center? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Although as others have noted people have been using waste heat from all sorts of things for a long time in similar ways, I was wondering - why are there not more buildings that sit on top of the data centers to use heat? It seems like it would be possible to use the heat even more directly. In particular, a greenhouse on top of a data center in colder climates would seem like a nice mixture.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why not build on top of the data center? by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      A greenhouse would probably compromise your ability to use the roof space for solar PV; a bit of a balancing act would be required to see where the cost-benefit fell.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  8. name in the news.... no good reason. by starblazer · · Score: 2

    It's the holiday season... so AMAZON IN THE NEWS!!! AMAZON IS DOING GLOBAL GOOD!!!! AMAZON IS DOING X, Y, AND Z!!!

    All this Amazon press is just keeping their name in your brain so you shop there during the Christmas season.

    As others have said, this isn't new.

  9. It has a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called a district heating system.

  10. Today's curmudgeonly comment by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    3.6 million megawatt hours (MWh) of renewable energy annually

    The power industry seems to act like there's a law that says they have to somehow include an "hours" factor in every physical quantity they discuss.

    Why not just call it what it is: an average of 411 megawatts.

    1. Re:Today's curmudgeonly comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because MWhs and average MWs are different metrics. One is energy the other is power. Don't conflate energy and power, especially with renewables which produce such variable output.

    2. Re:Today's curmudgeonly comment by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Because MWhs and average MWs are different metrics. One is energy the other is power. Don't conflate energy and power, especially with renewables which produce such variable output.

      You're the confused one. They were talking about MWhs per year. That's power.

      That's exactly what I was complaining about: Their terminology makes people like you who either skim or simply don't understand the text completely misunderstand the meaning.

  11. This is NOT a new idea by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

    It is not a new idea even in computing.

    In 1981, I worked a summer job at Charter Information Corp. in Austin TX. They'd recently moved to Austin from Woburn MA. They were a small data processing service bureau, and ran a Xerox Sigma 6 computer.

    In Massachusetts, they'd run a duct, with a valve, from the waste heat outflow from the Sigma 6 cooling system to their building HVAC ducts. They had NEVER had to light their oil burner for office heat in the winter: waste heat from the Sigma 6 was more than adequate to keep their offices quite comfortable.

  12. Cloud&Heat by tepples · · Score: 2

    most datacenters don't have large office spaces

    Which is why Cloud&Heat brings the water-cooled server rack to the office space.

  13. W connotes peak, Wh/yr average by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can think of a reason for using "watt hours per year" other than that it's what people are used to from their electric bill. I hear "watts" and think instantaneous power, or at least an average over a period no longer than one second. But the familiar renewable power sources (wind and solar) are anything but constant over the course of a day or year, making use of an instantaneous power measurement misleading. The "watt hours per year" unit emphasizes that a power measurement is a long-term average.

  14. It's 2017, and Amazon invents recyling waste heat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, Donald Trump has invented the idea of using extra Federal government spending to, as he puts it, "prime the pump" of investment spending by businesses.

  15. Windows can be solar panels too by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You could still use the land around for solar (which most do already anyway) , and you can make greenhouse glass that contains a translucent solar power material to gain some energy from it - probably not as efficient as full panels but close enough to make the project worthwhile, not to mention you would have a lot more surface area generating electricity from a dome than just panels on a roof.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  16. Furnace? It will be used to burn/melt shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your machines are running _WAY_ too hot!

  17. Is the Gradient enough? by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    Assuming you want to keep your CPUs under 45 C then the returning water will be at most 37 - 40 C. I would guess closer to 37C. You then pipe it a couple of km and assuming no loss then you are heating a building to 21 or 22 C. Usually your return water on your home radiator is close 40 C, so warmer than input temperature Amazon will provide. It's do able but you would be pumping so much water that I'm not sure it works. I guess if you add in a heat pump? Still by the time you count the power pumping the water your gain is going to be marginal. Also most of the year Seatle might be damp but it's not really cold. This idea works with other industries that are boiling water but amazon isn't generating anything with a big enough temperature difference to make sense.

    1. Re:Is the Gradient enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you want to keep your CPUs under 45 C

      Dell server warranty is up to 45C for the server room, not the CPU (which will be considerably warmer).

    2. Re:Is the Gradient enough? by dizzy8578 · · Score: 1

      I worked many years in the Westin building. By 2001 all the lawyers, consuls and misc office drones had been pushed out and the telcos, isps and several big name startups had to find cheaper office space since it was damn near all being converted to datacenter. The parking garage lost several floors to generators and cooling overflow and the roof top looked like a fucking torch in the infrared. Seattle internet exchange started in the Westin (1997 ish) using a sparc 10 and a dumb hub and a couple of cat-3 cables we threw across the wall to real networks. Now it is massive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... I am pretty sure the building will not come down in a "big-one" earthquake since it is by my guess about 20% fiber-optic and copper cabling by weight. :)

      --
      *"Cogito Ergo Liberalis"*
    3. Re:Is the Gradient enough? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      60C to 70C is arguably the internal CPU temperature under load. By the time the heat is transferred to the water, it would be around 50C to 60C. This is cooler than the typical hydronic heating system supply water temperature, which means the heat exchangers on the other side have to be bigger than normal to get the same amount of heat out. Under lighter loads, you would be operating at even lower temperatures. In addition, there would be an inordinate amount of piping and a massive number of connections to tap into all the CPUs (with each fitting a potential source of damaging leaks). So, although green, this is probably not very economical. If you were going to go water-cooled CPUs, anyway, maybe it could be worth it certain circumstances, but compared to air cooled, you're spending a lot of up front capital investment that most companies not flush with cash couldn't afford even if they wanted to.

    4. Re:Is the Gradient enough? by ruddk · · Score: 1

      Yes, they often use heat pumps when using heat in municipal heating systems that has been generated in a factory. It is very efficient.

      Apple are building a new datacenter here in Denmark and wants to deliver the produced heat to the already existing municipal heating.
      They ran into some tax problems and I don't know if they have been resolved. The heat became a product from the company that they were selling and the taxes made it too expensive, at least that were their story.
      http://appleinsider.com/articl...

      https://investinviborg.com/Dat...

    5. Re:Is the Gradient enough? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I guess if you add in a heat pump? Still by the time you count the power pumping the water your gain is going to be marginal.

      A heat pump working against merely warm water is in a much better situation than a heat pump working against cold outside air and it cools the return water. The water has to be pumped whether the heat pump is used or not and with it, the flow rate may be lowered significantly.

      I remember one cold wave we had in southern California when we lived in an all electric house with a heat pump. That was a miserable situation.

  18. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can be used to incinerate the workers made redundant by robots! And their families too, so they won't have to face poverty! It's called progress, embrace it!

  19. Is this really new? by CptPicard · · Score: 1

    At least here in Finland piping hot water into buildings is a common form of heating in the cities, and there are experiments in using the same system for cooling in the summer. There is nothing particularly special in the idea of plugging as server farm as a heat source.

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  20. I'll point it out again by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Man has changed the albedo of the Earth and will continue to do so. There should be a total accounting of sources of heat rise on the Earth, including the effect of the heat retention of growing cities, roads and technologies like solar panels. (You may laugh here)

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  21. Not that new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The technology isn't new. Might be a new thing to North America, but where I work we've been heating others for years http://www.renewableenergyfocus.com/view/29800/uk-s-largest-single-phase-district-energy-scheme-completed-in-leicester/

    Its good to see that this kind of thing is getting some thought, and making it into the media though. There are a number of benefits for people, organisations, and the environment.