Slashdot Mirror
'Bomb on Board' Wi-Fi Network Causes Turkish Airlines Flight To Be Diverted (reuters.com)
A Turkish Airlines flight from Nairobi to Istanbul was diverted after the detection of a wi-fi network called "bomb on board" that alarmed the passengers, the airline said on Thursday. From a report: In a statement, Turkish Airlines said the flight made an emergency landing at the Khartoum airport in Sudan, but the flight was safely resumed after security inspections on all passengers and the aircraft. Individuals can create personal wi-fi networks on devices such as mobile phones and name them what they want.
And I'm talking about everyone who thought the name of a network means doodley-squat.
What's next, I name my network 'you need to take a dump' and everyone on the plane rushes to the toilets?
https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
why would you want to criminalize someone for naming an access point?
Why would you want to criminalize someone for yelling fire in a crowded theater, leading to a stampede that kills people? There are limits to most anything.
The minor action isn't what needs to be stopped, it's the extreme over-reaction that needs to be addressed.
If I'm driving down the road and forgot to turn off my turn signal, and suddenly I've got road blocks and swat teams and snipers ahead trying to stop my car, we don't say "!ow guess he shouldn't have left his turn signal on, look at that huge commotion he caused, we gotta do something about those turn signals!" Yes the signal was a problem and you might want to do something about it, but it's the extreme over-reaction that really demands some examination, because there's no reasonable justification my turn signal should lead to an evacuation of two city blocks.
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
Yes, definitely, we should have the death penalty for scaring people... You're a fucking idiot.
It's a childish joke, and nobody has ever been arrested for impersonating a federal officer because of it. And before anyone says the obvious joke, no, they are not the FBI either
You're 100% correct. Now, the next time you're in a TSA interview make a few childish jokes about bombs and how you're carrying a package someone outside gave you.
Time and place my man. Time and place.
There's a huge difference between calling something "surveillance van" and "bomb on board". Since you don't seem to get it, I'll break it down for you. The first implies someone is watching. Ooo scary. The second implies that you might die in a fiery explosion, or as you fall from the sky when the plane is crippled. See the difference?
If you still don't get it, do the following for a real-world education: Go to the bank and deposit two different deposits. On the first deposit slip's back write "FBI surveillance van", and on the second write "I'm carrying a bomb". The police will be happy to give you some percussive education.
Yes, this was definitely scary because if a terrorist did put a bomb on board, we all know that the second thing he would do would be to make a wifi network called, "Bomb on Board", alerting everyone to it.
Whew! Good thing they diverted the plane!
why would you want to criminalize someone for naming an access point?
Because they may name it "Armenian genocide" or "Kurdistan".
So, my good neighbors, the Turks -i am a Greek...!-, have laws to prosecute (/persecute) anyone mentioning such (and much more) "anti-Turkish things". One great example is that women can not wear cloths colored in a way that if combined may resemble the flag of Kurdistan! And please remember: you may not be a Turk, not ever being in Turkey, but, if you publicize something about the Armenian genocide, you may end up with an international arrest warrant...
Yeah, sure, and it should be illegal to scare people, and of course everyone should know what frightens everyone else so they can avoid scaring each other, ever. What a bunch of damn snowflakes. Toughen up buttercup.
Your turn signal isn't a potential threat to human life. If you can't see the difference then you shouldn't be allowed to fly.
What's the difference in these scenarios?
95 times out of 100 these are all nothing. But you have to check them out. When human lives are potentially at stake, you can't ignore such statements. Do you want your pilot / cabin crew to make the decision "Well it says there's a bomb, but it's probably just a joke. Let's ignore it."? No. It's their professional obligation to take all possible threats seriously.
Now there's a 99.99% chance this was some idiot who forgot to change their default network name, or who was trying to be funny. Even so, you can't ignore it. If there's .01% chance the bomb is real - some deranged attention seekers advertise their intentions, hoping to get caught - you have to treat every potential threat as legitimate. Is getting to your destination a few hours later really worth risking hundreds of lives?
There's a lot of bad security and overreaction in the world. This is not one of those times.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.