Slashdot Mirror


Homeland Security Claims DJI Drones Are Spying For China (engadget.com)

A memo from the Los Angeles office of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau (ICE) says that the officials assess "with moderate confidence that Chinese-based company DJI Science and Technology is providing U.S. critical infrastructure and law enforcement data to the Chinese government." It also says that the information is based on "open source reporting and a reliable source within the unmanned aerial systems industry with first and secondhand access." Engadget reports: Part of the memo focuses on targets that the LA ICE office believes to be of interest to DJI. "DJI's criteria for selecting accounts to target appears to focus on the account holder's ability to disrupt critical infrastructure," it said. The memo goes on to say that DJI is particularly interested in infrastructure like railroads and utilities, companies that provide drinking water as well as weapon storage facilities. The LA ICE office concludes that it, "assesses with high confidence the critical infrastructure and law enforcement entities using DJI systems are collecting sensitive intelligence that the Chinese government could use to conduct physical or cyber attacks against the United States and its population." The accusation that DJI is using its drones to spy on the US and scope out particular facilities for the Chinese government seems pretty wacky and the company itself told the New York Times that the memo was "based on clearly false and misleading claims."

82 comments

  1. Huh, I've always wondered... by Nabeel_co · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Huh, I've always wondered about this.

    Everything has powerful CPUs in them now and megabytes of firmware. It wouldn't be hard to do for almost anything.

    Add to the fact that most of everything comes from china, manufactured by the lowest bider, it wouldn't be hard.

    1. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It has been argued that part of the reason to supplement farmers income is to make sure our food supply is secure. Ultimately we probably need to bring back more tech production so we can have semi secure sources to build common items.

    2. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has been argued that part of the reason to supplement farmers income is to make sure our food supply is secure. Ultimately we probably need to bring back more tech production so we can have semi secure sources to build common items.

      Oh gawd I hope not the farm subsidy model is more rotten that road kill in July. Every year the subsidies for the farmers get bigger in the name of food supply security (cue flag waving and patriotic music) and more of the demands on these people to actually try to minimise the level of subsides and work for a living evaporates. I can't comment on the situation in the US but with 40-60% of farmer's direct incomes are being paid by the taxpayer and/or the EU depending on where you live in Europe. Every time somebody tries to reform the money eating black hole that is the farm subsidy system the farmers and their lobbyists go ape shit throwing crazy and choke any reform effort at birth. The last thing we need is a tech sector that works like that, where all drive for excellence and innovation has been ritually murdered by special interests cliques, lobbyists and pork barrel politics.

    3. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by outlander · · Score: 1

      Agree entirely - we need to have production facilities in the US.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    4. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Add to this that DJI far outsells American-made drones, and America is a capitalistic government, and ...

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    5. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Huh, I've always wondered about this.

      Everything has powerful CPUs in them now and megabytes of firmware. It wouldn't be hard to do for almost anything.

      Add to the fact that most of everything comes from china, manufactured by the lowest bider, it wouldn't be hard.

      This accusation is pure hogwash.

      This is simply a propaganda push to move the Overton Window closer towards eventually disallowing the civilian purchase of non-US-approved drones without the (soon) US-required remote kill switches and similar spying ability to benefit US TLAs/LEAs. Can't have civilians with drones exposing corruption, incompetence, and things the government and those within it are not supposed to do.

      The US intelligence services dislike foreign states spying on US citizens and manipulating US citizens with propaganda, as they resent the competition.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    6. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Informative

      re "Can't have civilians with drones exposing corruption, incompetence, and things the government and those within it are not supposed to do."
      That will be great news for the states with ag gag laws. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Civilians will have to pay for helicopters and light aircraft to once again get video of topics of interest to the public.
      No more low cost drone that can get viral video everyday.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Nabeel_co · · Score: 1

      The only claim I made was to the difficulty of doing it, not the actual action of doing so.

      Fun fact, a lot of keyboards, like Apple keyboards have a few MB of NAND flash for their couple K of unsigned and unencrypted firmware.

      Someone made a proof of concept virus that infects those keyboards and uses the flash memory as a keylogger, thereby making the actual keynoard a keylogger.

      So this sort of thing has been possible for a while.

    8. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Clear violation of the constitution. Getting the truth out hurts them far more than they could ever hope to sue your for in many cases. No such law would ever stop me, and I would never convict a person under any such law.

    9. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Food security isn't about flag waiving and patriotic music, it's about basic defense. Maybe it's not needed anymore but the reality is that a disruption in food supply can be awful and maintaining not just production but local know-how is key to basic survival.

      Look no further than Venezuela right now for what can happen when international food supplies are interrupted and local production is insignificant. Venezuela imported everything for so many years that they don't even know how to produce food on mass scale anymore. That know how is critical and the result is a population that's on the verge of starvation and the average person has lost almost 20 lbs trying to survive. In the ends all the kids growing up during this will be stunted because of insufficient calories.

      Food security is not a minor issue.

    10. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I stop copying half my username into the body of each and every one of my posts? I look around and everyone else has this figured out but me. Please tell me how to not do that?

      Strat

    11. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how it is in your country. Here in the US, most agricultural subsidies go to lumber producers. Some goes to provide income for fallow fields. The wisdom behind this goes back to ancient Egypt and has biblical reference. The need for a surplus of food production was the literal writing on the wall that Joseph saw. Bounty and lean times are still viewable in hieroglyphics on the walls in Egypt. Fallow fields allows for quick increases in production when crops have failed. This reduces the need for actual food in storage to some degree. Also, in the US we have had large corporations destroying farmers then snatching up the land. This has resulted in a huge political and economic shift that has been bad all around. So be glad you have some independent minded people with land in your country.

    12. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever wondered about how it communicates back to supposed evil Chinese spies? It just "does it"? There are a lot of things you should be wondering about, in particular why the U.S. government is increasingly accusing foreign manufacturers of software and technology for doing bad things, without any actual real solid evidence.

    13. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Nabeel_co · · Score: 1

      I sure have thought about that, and it would be stupid easy, since DJIs primarlly work connected to an internet connected smart phone.

      Speaking more broadly: It's not a question of IF something like this is happening, but rather a question of who's doing it.

    14. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, look!

      Dude has fans! Top-kek!

    15. Re: Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That last paragraph does not add any value to the story. "Whacky" - the claim is either true or false. The company denied it? What else were they going to do?

    16. Re: Huh, I've always wondered... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't work in a worthwhile industry. Chinese spying is pretty prevalent in Canadian technology industries. We've lost billions in R&D to Chinese espionage. Denying it shows your ignorance to history and facts.

    17. Re: Huh, I've always wondered... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't work in a worthwhile industry. Chinese spying is pretty prevalent in Canadian technology industries. We've lost billions in R&D to Chinese espionage. Denying it shows your ignorance to history and facts.

      You don't increase industrial/military security by reducing the freedom of the entire population. That path leads to effectively becoming the same as the enemy you were defending against from the population's perspective. It's the same wrongthink US TLAs use to justify mass domestic surveillance and the Chinese use to justify the Great Firewall.

      Sorry, but *I* am not the one lacking in knowledge and understanding of history and facts, here.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    18. Re:Huh, I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may sound like tin-foil hat conspiracy but then so did all the shit we found out from Snowden that our beloved Government were up to.

  2. Oops they noticed that by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Maybe they might notice the secure web is:

    a. not secure
    b. leaks like a sieve
    c. feeds Russian intel

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Oops they noticed that by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      re c. feeds other nations intel
      Think of the epic struggle in the US, 5 eye and the NATO intelligence community over that cyber question.
      The NSA, GCHQ, CIA and MI6 are sure they have the cyber skill ready to alter that flow of raw cyber data in real time to any nation.
      The US fusion centers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... have reports from critical infrastructure security and local law enforcement about consumer drones flying near their infrastructure.
      Ban the drones near US navy, US army sites, near critical infrastructure and US law enforcement?
      Who win that one? The cyber ready clandestine services? US law enforcement seeing drones flying above them?
      The drone looks down and makes a mockery of the new sally ports and big fences. Designs that can only keep ground level dslr photographers, people doing a First Amendment audit from seeing hidden sensitive things.

      The eyes flying a drone that always stays over public property cannot trespass :)

      Expect a lot more field interviews and chat downs of anyone found with a drone near critical infrastructure and US law enforcement.
      A new generation of first Amendment audit video work to enjoy. Just fly a drone around and wait for the law enforcement chat down.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re: Oops they noticed that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drones do not necessarily have to phone home and get constant instruction.

  3. No! They're spying for RUSSIA! Get it right!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn if Slashdot hasn't fucked up the fearmongering, too.

  4. Western intelligence services just say no by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    If huge amounts of new raw cyber data was flowing back to other nations from imported consumer devices all over the USA what are the Western cyber intelligence services doing?
    Buy US law enforcement drones that Western intelligence services have faith in?
    A short list of drones approved by the USA for use in the USA and NATO?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: Western intelligence services just say no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the Mr. Steele Youtube channel for parts lists and build out configs. If we really want spyware free parts, we should also support more open source hardware.

  5. Not likely by ironicsky · · Score: 0

    Unless DJI drones have a sim card in them, how the hell do they expect the drone to magically send the signal back to China? Typically drones are used in rural areas, since they are banned in most urban places, which means no WIFI either.

    If you hook up the drone to a computer to download the footage from the SD Card, it should be quite easy to determine if the drone is sending the footage home through your computer - just run netstat and look for weird connections, or a lot of data transfers through your router.

    This seems just as likely as Kaperskey spying for the Russians.

    1. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless DJI drones have a sim card in them, how the hell do they expect the drone to magically send the signal back to China? Typically drones are used in rural areas, since they are banned in most urban places, which means no WIFI either.

      If you hook up the drone to a computer to download the footage from the SD Card, it should be quite easy to determine if the drone is sending the footage home through your computer - just run netstat and look for weird connections, or a lot of data transfers through your router.

      This seems just as likely as Kaperskey spying for the Russians.

      Your thinking is "narrow minded". Think outside the box.

      With Wi-Fi becoming more and more widespread, all the drone has to do is periodically test available Wi-Fi signals for Internet access by pinging a remote server or trying to download a remote URL. If that test succeeeds, then the drone knows it can "call home".

      Now the question is this: "How much storage does sdrone have onboard?"

      If the amount of onboard storage is minimal, then anything being "called home" is "realtime data", and that is scary enough. So imagine what these things can send back to wherever if they had onboard storage of any type.

    2. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those two are not the only information gathering vectors. What about regular people running drones around a neighborhood and sending plain old emails/chats back to China. And being paid to do it.

    3. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you are talking about a nation spying you then you only need a satellite. giving that the advertised on the ground range is 7km getting a signal into space is doable.

    4. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drones are broadcasting on frequencies that can be picked up by satellite.

    5. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drones are broadcasting data and video on frequencies which can be picked up by satellite.

    6. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their current drones absolutely call home to DJI. These are not the grocery-store drones you fly at the park as a toy, they are the camera drones used by amateur and pro film-makers and companies that use drones to inspect wires, roofs, structures, etc. The drones have a wifi antenna and communicate with your smart phone either via wifi (if you are flying with just your phone and no controller) or via direct USB cable between the controller and the phone if you are using both. The DJI app on your phone is where you see the real-time video feed of what the drone camera is seeing. The app is how you access most of the advanced functionality and settings of the drone. It is also how you activate the drone in the first place. Their EULAs are open about the fact that they record and can store your flight telemetry and I believe also images from the drone's camera. The app requires access to basically EVERYTHING on your phone including your camera and microphone. It think it even required access to "accounts" and permission to change system settings, so I imagine they can read your texts, email, etc. if they want to, though I don't know if they actually do.

      The problem is that once you have sacrificed $1000 or more for your drone, you're kind of up a creek when you discover you can't use the thing without granting DJI full access to your phone. In fact, even after granting initial access, they will brick your drone if you don't install updates that are even more intrusive. My DJI drone stopped working a while ago because I didn't update it to a new firmware and app version when I found out they had implemented the "feature" of broadcasting your ID and location to local law enforcement (who can buy a device from DJI to receive the broadcasts to see what DJI drones are in the air and the location of their pilot). The drone stopped flying with a message that the device was locked because an update was required. Because of the heavy-handed control they take of the device you purchased, the over-the-top amount of access they require to your phone, and because every company operating in China has to obey the Chinese government to survive, I would be very surprised indeed if DJI is not giving data to the Chinese government. Maybe they don't call it "spying" but I'd suspect they are either selling data or complying with demands to share lots of of the data they collect with their government, which is basically the same thing.

    7. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that bullshit was added because America said they had to add it. Who's to blame here dipshit? Also if you can afford a $1000 drone, buy a $10 used android phone to fly it with. Problem solved.

    8. Re: Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese spying, US spying, same thing if the authorities do not have your best interests at heart, which they don't.

    9. Re: Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Authorities is incorrect. The correct term is "self-proclaimed authorities"

  6. slanted attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spy-guy behavior from a whopter-copter ! And you expect what else from a patriotic slant ? Chi.com central ... 'Course American business-traitor$$$ make their chi.com loot and run to New Zealand ... where they believe a righteously angry American yeomanry would not follow and butcher them out.

    1. Re:slanted attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friends don't let friends type drunk.

  7. repeat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this reported here yesterday?

    1. Re:repeat? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Wasn't this reported here yesterday?"

      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.

  8. On the title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The accusation that DJI is using its drones to spy on the US and scope out particular facilities for the Chinese government seems pretty wacky

    What the fuck kind of retard is writing this shit? Someone working for Ch News agency????

  9. Because China xan't ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    ... get to Google Maps?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Because China xan't ... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      ... get to Google Maps?

      Google Maps does not show drone-level detail, and not is "real time". Nor does Google Maps reveal particular interest in particular locations by particular people.

      The memo goes on to say that DJI is particularly interested in infrastructure like railroads and utilities, companies that provide drinking water as well as weapon storage facilities.

      On this point, I think these areas are areas that any commercial drone manufacturer would be interested in selling to, I mean who else?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Because China xan't ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      It's inherently obvious you don't know what you're talking about.

      I work for a law firm that has access to near-real time Google maps.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Because China xan't ... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      It's inherently obvious you don't know what you're talking about.

      It is inherently obvious you are full of shit.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Because China xan't ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you enter google street view.

    5. Re:Because China xan't ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck is "near-real time Google maps"? They get their images from aircraft and satellite imagery that is inherently not "real-time".

    6. Re: Because China xan't ... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Your IT guy is probably laughing at you behind your back. The rest of us would be talking about map DATA. Next time you're looking at the map, check the lower corner for the date the data was taken.

    7. Re: Because China xan't ... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Your IT guy is probably laughing at you behind your back. The rest of us would be talking about map DATA. Next time you're looking at the map, check the lower corner for the date the data was taken.

      Yes, I'm fully aware of how to tell when a map was produced, moron. And there is a lot more data that can be obtained. You can also see a historic time-line on Google Earth.

      Yet you have still not addressed what I was saying - probably because you don't understand it. Your responses show a huge amount of both hubris and stupidity.

      Once again, Google does not show the detail that a drone will produce, and what the drone owner is actually interested in - such as a leaky pipe, a hole in a fence, the faces of a bunch of protesters, what have you. If you can't understand what I'm telling you, well, I'm not surprised. You communicate like a underachieving pompous pasty white neck-beard who spends his time in mom's basement drinking Mountain Dew from a 55 ounce Big Gulp cup while masturbating to porn.

      Perhaps you should get back to the fry station before you boss realizes you've been in the shitter for 20 minutes smoking weed.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  10. Bull by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The Chinese don't need to attack stuff, they just buy it.

  11. Of course they are spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese are building their own CPUs and own OS because they believe we do the same thing.

    1. Re:Of course they are spying by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Refer to IME NSA "bug" released with Shadow Brokers leak to understand why any state that has any competition with any party headquartered in US should be looking to do just that.

  12. I keep trying to sound the alarm by ckatko · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but nobody seems to listen.

    China is DEFINITELY a threat to us all. They make up a majority of all known hacking attacks. Election influence? Google Chinagate where it was proven beyond a doubt they were trying to influence our elections in the 90's. They have recently stolen BILLIONS of dollars in weapons research, nuclear sub technology, and nuke information. And they have the largest standing army in the world.

    They are gearing up, and they are ABSOLUTELY enjoying the "OMG Russia!" distraction.

    1. Re:I keep trying to sound the alarm by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Blame the dirty foreigners? Seriously? People actually still fall for this one in this day and age? America is the warmongering government that the world needs to fear.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  13. If I were the China spy agency, I'd do it by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I ran the Chinese spy agency and I knew that my country was sending hundreds of thousands of drones to fly high resolution cameras over the US, I darn sure would look at tapping into that. I don't know if they *have*, but they are incompetent if they haven't considered it.

    1. Re:If I were the China spy agency, I'd do it by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But - how do you do it and why would you bother?

      This whole thing smells pretty skanky. Yes, the DJI quadcopters can produce fairly high quality GPS tagged video. No questions there. And, should you be of a particular persuasion, you can upload that data to SkyPixel (owned by DJI) or YouTube or FaceBook or whatever. But you have to work a bit to do it. It's not automatic and there is absolutely no data to suggest that the drones and controllers are sending back unsolicited video. Further, if you don't take the images off the SD card, all you get is 720P - at best (from the downlink). Woot.

      So, some poor Chinese intelligence intern is pouring through gigabytes of pictures of Americans' back yards, local parks and smoggy sunsets in order to glean some tiny bits of information? Sucks to be him (or her). It would be a whole lot easier to just pick off areas of interest on Google Earth. Or even buy some satellite time. Or launch your own.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:If I were the China spy agency, I'd do it by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      All drone data flows to another nation, within the USA, UK to a staging server, a front company set up in the USA would be seen by the NSA and GCHQ.
      The FBI and MI5 then look at who is been used as a person, front company to fly the drone near sensitive sites and critical infrastructure.
      Field interviews, chat downs then follow. Two FBI agents to witness each others questions at the front door ask to be invited in for a chat.
      Better just to use human spies. Nothing for the GCHQ and NSA to detect moving around networks

      With no networks for the GCHQ and NSA to follow back to someone in the USA, UK local police have to interview everyone with a drone.
      Is it a tourist? A local person with a hobby? An anorak https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... trying a drone?
      A first amendment audit using a drone to induce a field interview and the police demand for the drone details and photo ID?
      Always fun to see photo ID been demanded by state and city police in a state with no stop and identify statutes.
      Just having a dslr and drone is the reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity :)

      Other nations understand the internet is global collection for the NSA and GCHQ.
      They will not risk generations of their well placed spies all over the USA to fly a registered drone and attract a police interview.
      Better to put efforts in human spies around all US ports and bases to make friends with lonely contractors and over worked mil officers.
      Base workers looking for a friend who really understands the stress of mil life.
      Conversation with a new friend that last a long time.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:If I were the China spy agency, I'd do it by link-error · · Score: 1

      First, it says they are targeting specific customers, so less video to analyze.

          Second, have you seen the latest software AI that can identify/classify video objects/contents in realtime or better? It's pretty amazing.

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
  14. DHS is clueless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the same clowns who're claiming that a guy who fell into a culvert and hit his head and died was "attacked", despite there being absolutely ZERO evidence of any attack, attackers or anything out of the ordinary at all.

  15. Moderate confidence by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    Is "Moderate confidence" the synonym for "Someone told us it would be possible, but we have no evidence"?

    1. Re:Moderate confidence by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Low confidence is "it's politically necessary to cast shit in this direction to see if some of it will stick". Moderate is "this is kind of, sort of possible if it was us with our capabilities and our organisational structures, not sure if others are quite at our level yet".

      "High confidence" is where you start thinking they may be on to something concrete rather than just assumptions. May be being the key words.

    2. Re:Moderate confidence by dwpro · · Score: 1
      I'm assuming your joking, but it's worth noting that there is a definition:

      Moderate confidence generally means credibly sourced and plausible information, but not of sufficient quality or corroboration to warrant a higher level of confidence

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  16. You said GPS, then forgot? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > Yes, the DJI quadcopters can produce fairly high quality GPS tagged video. ...
    > So, some poor Chinese intelligence intern is pouring through gigabytes of pictures of Americans' back yards, local parks and smoggy sunsets in order to glean some tiny bits of information?

    If I'm running Chinese intelligence, no I'm not looking at video of some backyard in Wisconsin. Except maybe one particular house in downtown Janesville, Wisconsin - where Speaker of the House Paul Ryan lives. I might be curious who is visiting him and generally what he's up to when he goes home every weekend.

  17. Back it up there buddy. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    The LA ICE office concludes that it, "assesses with high confidence the critical infrastructure and law enforcement entities using DJI systems are collecting sensitive intelligence that the Chinese government could use to conduct physical or cyber attacks against the United States and its population."

    Why are law enforcement entities using drones?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Back it up there buddy. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Have you seen operational costs of a helicopter?

      It's called "not squandering tax payer money when you can do same job for far less cost".

    2. Re:Back it up there buddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better fitting question is why gob agency are using foreing drones.

  18. Re:No! They're spying for RUSSIA! Get it right!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No this is the start of the Red Dawn! Better prepare those sporty kids to face the enemy before it's all too late!! The unrestricted gun access will save us all!!!

  19. Cars anyone? by kaur · · Score: 1

    Wait till you have Chinese or Russian-made connected cars.
    With telemetry and update channels ending up at their respective makers.
    Those are effectively civilian surveillance bots.
    With remote software update (giving potential full remote control), they also can "break away" from their drivers's control and do whatever the central hub tells them to do.

    Then think of the reverse.
    US-made smart cars in Russia or China.
    Will Russia allow US-built, US-connected Teslas on their roads?
    Can you have an Israel-made car driving in Egypt? Lebanese or Iranian car in Israel?

    With everyhing having a telemetry uplink up to their maker, the countries caring for they national safety have two options:
    - ban everything "smart",
    - terminate and proxy all connections.

    It is a fight waiting to happen.

    1. Re:Cars anyone? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Then think of the reverse.
      US-made smart cars in Russia or China."

      The West had fun with that idea years ago. Filled hard to search areas on trusted container ships with powerful collection equipment.
      As the ships moved up rivers in deep into China, everything was collected on. The ships returned to the West and the data was studied.
      The fun that a self driving car mapping out every network it finds for better "navigation" will open real time data sets for spies.
      Every new car will spy.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  20. DJI pilots - Foreign Agents? by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, the DJI pilots in the USA should register themselves as Foreign Agents? And this is it. The problem solved.

  21. Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is not more easy to use google street view ot google earth to do that?

  22. And Russian AV software is spying for putin. Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And next you will hear that German cars are spying for Angela Merkel and the EU, and that Swedish communication equipment from Ericsson is spying for the Swedish government.

    Every product that is either part of a huge market or has to do with security and communication, will eventually be attacked with propaganda and lies from U.S. government agencies, to trick consumers into avoiding them. This is how far people are willing to blindly trust America's word.

    They can now literally just lie and people will believe it. This is how America will conduct its war on markets and countries in this century, by lying and scaring dumb people all over the world to stop buying products that aren't American.

  23. Could have supported 3DR and open-source by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    But noooOOOOOoooooooo. You HAD to buy into a Chinese company with a closed-source system that HAS to phone home every time you launch the app.

    1. Re:Could have supported 3DR and open-source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the ITAR restrictions that make me no to buy a 3DR drone in 2014 because i wasn't an US or Canadian citizen.

  24. Yeah, not surprising by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    All major nations are spying on each other. Two big differences is that Russia and China are in a cold war with the west, and are EXTREMELY active in what they are doing. The other is that American leaders, Trump, O, and W, but esp Trump, have been STUPID WRT these nations and what they are doing to the west.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Yeah, not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, all nations do something, but only China and Russia are bad because of it.

    2. Re: Yeah, not surprising by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Sorry comrade, but with regard to the west, esp America, they ARE bad for the west.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re: Yeah, not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with respect to any other country, America is bad for them too.
      Did you have a point? Or a quota of anti-Russian posts you have to churn through?

  25. government gives a list of sensitive locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government has created a list of sensitive locations where the drone isn't supposed to fly. If I were a chinese spy company I would have some strange gps errors that occasionally would fly over gps sensitive areas while reporting the gps as a nearby area safe to fly.

  26. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And is this not expected?

    American made drones spy on behalf of the American government.

    I do not see any point in this article.

  27. wow great gobs of cunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y'all just figured this shit out eh?

    Drones? Facebook is just China's remote profile backup storage.

  28. not surprising at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats just idiotic, in what way is China in a Cold War with the West?
    Hyperbolie at it finest.

  29. DJI Spying? by n329619 · · Score: 1

    more like leaking info everywhere. This is the same DJI where a security researcher (who didn't accept DJI terrible condition for the $30,000 award) found their server with user ID and passport info. I'll say it's worst than spying.