Slashdot Mirror


Why 'Shark Tank' Investor Kevin O'Leary Refuses To Spend $2.50 On a Cup of Coffee (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Kevin O'Leary has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in small businesses over the course of his tenure as a star and investor on ABC's "Shark Tank." But there is one business to which he refuses to fork over his hard-earned dollars: coffee shops. "Do I pay $2.50 for a coffee? Never, never, never do I do that," O'Leary tells CNBC Make It. "That is such a waste of money for something that costs 20 cents. I never buy a frape-latte-blah-blah-blah-woof-woof-woof for $2.50." Instead, he makes it at home. "I drink coffee, one cup every morning," he explains. "It costs about 18 cents to make it, and I invest the rest." That idea -- saving small sums and investing continually -- is central to O'Leary's personal finance advice. "The truth is, there is a lot of crap you don't need," he explains.

12 of 750 comments (clear)

  1. Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

    1. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee and overcharge for it. Hey, at least people get cute baristas once in awhile.

    2. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For coffee, the real difference is likely the capital cost. If you like espresso, then it costs a few hundred dollars to get a good machine. Even if you like filtered coffee (which is about the cheapest to produce) then you get a much better cup if you grind your own beans, which means buying a grinder as well as whatever you're using to make coffee, which can add up to a hundred dollars or so. In contrast, tea can be made with just a ten dollar kettle.

      Of course, this argument goes out of the window with places like Starbucks, where their entire business model revolves around making terrible coffee and then selling you syrups and creams to disguise the taste.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Known+Nutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up. In the 10 to 15 minutes (on average!) it takes someone to pop into Starbucks, they could have done it at home much faster and far cheaper, which throws the "time or your money" argument right out the window.

      $0.89 coffee at the 7/11 when you stop for gas? Okay, sure... $5 and 20 minutes at Starbucks?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by lucasnate1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I pay a coffee shop to rent their wifi and/or space in order to meet someone. That's worth the money.

    5. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's really the "convenience" explosion. You pay for the convenience of not having to fool with it.

      Decades ago, they made this machine that would automatically brew a hot cup of coffee at whatever time you set the coffee alarm to, so that people could wake up to a hot cup of coffee ready and waiting for them.

      The true stupidity is listening to the Starbucks generation dealing with store lines, drive thrus, and obscene prices, claiming their way is somehow more convenient.

    6. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also you can dress like it's fucking 1875, take your shoes off, plug in your Macbook and talk loudly about some hipster scripting language, which you clearly know nothing about.

      https://imgur.com/a/WX0eo

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  2. Yea Sure by jetkust · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I'm supposed to believe a guy that is worth more than $300 million never buys anything he doesn't need? Sounds legit.

  3. Treat it as a luxury by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are lots of things that are cheaper at home. Drinking a beer at home is a lot cheaper than drinking one at the pub, for example. You're not just paying for the drink, you're paying for the use of a big space where you can talk to other people. The problem isn't $2.50 coffee (actually, I'd be astonished if I could buy coffee that cheap around here), it's buying $2.50 coffee every day. Even once a day each week, that's $50/month on coffee. Two coffees a day and it's $100/month. Give that up, and you can afford a nice holiday somewhere, or pay back your mortgage earlier.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Hindustan Lever is an Indian cosmetics/soap and shampoo giant. It sells shampoo in single use sachets. Back in the day it used to cost 5 rupees, or 30 US cents back in the day. Now it is probably 20 Rupees, same 30cents. Proctor and Gamble's idea of marketing was to some how convince the buyer into buying shampoo in gallon size jugs and they are busily hatching up plans to convince America why it is a good idea to buy shampoo in barrels instead of gallon jugs.

    They both were locked into a serious battle in South Asian shampoo market. With all that might of P&G, HL was running circles around them

    My niece is a big shot in that circle (now working for Estee Lauder India) she explained the basic difference. "There are women who can not afford shampoo. But once in a while something nice happens, and she feels great and feels like treating herself to luxury. That thirty cent sachet of shampoo is a luxury for her. She will never have enough to buy a whole bottle ever, and will balk at the cost of a bottle. But... on any given day there are about a million such women willing to buy a sachet of shampoo for 30 cents. I am selling 300K a day. 100 million dollars a year."

    There are people for whom that 5$ coffee is a luxury they are treating themselves to. The American dream of owning a home and having a comfortable retirement is gone for them. They see themselves working till the day they are going to die. They see 80 year old grandmas trying to work as walmart greeters. From their perspective, "I have 5$ today, I am going to splurge!".

    A country this great, this wealthy, with that much of despair among the young ...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's basically the idea behind the Chinese economy boom. Produce the crap for the West but don't buy the shit yourself.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Re:That isn't advice by geekmux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's just the man's personality. As someone once said about writing code in a certain scripting language, there is more than one way to do it.

    Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

    Paying 20 cents for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $2,920

    That's a difference of over $40 thousand dollars. It's a hell of a lot more than that if you took that money and invested it over a 40-year span.

    This is advice. Financial advice. And the hipster masses perpetually carrying around a caramel-drizzled fuckachino bitching about always being broke would probably be wise to listen.