Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Facebook and YouTube Are Full of Pirated Video Streams of Live NFL Games (cnbc.com)

Posted by msmash on from the free-stuff dept.

Pirated video streams of televised National Football League games are widespread on Facebook and on Google's YouTube service, CNBC has found. From a report: Using technology from these internet giants, thousands of football fans were able to watch long segments of many contests free of charge during the league's Week 13 schedule of games last Thursday and Sunday. Dozens of these video streams, pirated from CBS and NBC broadcasts, featured ads from well-known national brands interspersed with game action. This online activity comes as the league struggles with declining ratings that have been blamed variously on player protests during the national anthem and revelations about former players suffering from a brain disease caused by concussions. Yet this illegal distribution of NFL content may also be crimping the league's viewer numbers.

11 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Facts with long-leap conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    illegal distribution is not what is affecting numbers. It's how hard it is to watch the games. Outdated policies on which games can be run by the local affiliates, MNF on ESPN, Thursday night football on who-knows-where... and an all access sunday ticket available only through DirectTV for $300. This is a symptom of a larger issue.

    1. Re: Facts with long-leap conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      News at 11: companies want to make more money and there's lots of money to be leached from spectators.

      The entire sports theater is a consumer jerk around. Furthermore, sports are meant to be played, not watched. Go play a sport with the time you invest in watching and it will likely cost a lot less (depending on the sport) and the added benefit is it can reduce your sedentary lifestyle that could help your overall health (again, depending on the sport) which ultimately would reduce long term medical expenses related to heart disease and obesity/diabetes, a huge and growing problem here in the US.

      I'll never understand the fascination in watching sporting events where people are so far removed from the event and people actually involved. If you know the players in someway where you have direct regular contact then sure. Maybe if you're reviewing a spectacular event or a pro to improve your own approach, sure. Sitting around drinking beer and downing a load of carbs... kind of has nothing to do with sports.

    2. Re:Facts with long-leap conclusions by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is exactly why I watch less football. I can't find an option that will let me stream whatever live games I want. There are all kinds of packages I *could* buy, but they don't want to sell me what I actually want. If you go to the NFL's site you can see hey, watch all 256 games! But they're not live. OK fine, here's some live games but the one you want to watch isn't available because it's "out of market", whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean to me. Or here, every game live, for only 4 times as much as you want to pay and part of an entire cable TV package. I don't know why they don't understand that the old model of licensing specific games to specific networks is now costing them money if they are giving out exclusive deals so the games can only be shown in that one place. So, in my house, if Kodi is up for the job then we find a stream, and it not then I don't watch or just listen to the radio. Once they figure out that it might be a good idea to sell me what I want to buy then I'm happy to spend the money. Otherwise if I really, really need to watch that game I'll just go out to somewhere showing it. Either way, the NFL is leaving my money on the table.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  2. Free TV by Matheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I can watch it via an antennae (w/ Ads of course.. $$ has to come from somewhere) for free then I should be able to stream it on the internet for the same low price. (Consideration given of course for whatever whomever charges to recoup the cost of said streaming) The model of: "Select your cable subscription to stream for free" is BS. I shouldn't need a cable provider at home to have device freedom for my football.

    Fix that problem and I'll stop searching for pirate streams on YouTube (and people will be less inclined to want to put them up there)

    1. Re:Free TV by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the fact remains, "Any reproduction of this broadcast in whole or in part without the expressed written consent of the NFL is strictly prohibited". So no, you shouldn't be able to stream it in that way.

      If it's an actual broadcast, they lose all expectation to stop distribution once they put it out there. It's the equivalent of shouting from a mountain top (and in many cases it is literally that) and expecting all those who hear you to not repeat what you said. Even if copyright law is on their side, common sense says "fuck you".

    2. Re:Free TV by Wycliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. When you steam it, people in the home city may watch your stream rather than pay money to attend the game. You're taking money directly away from the team you're trying to watch.

      But again, this is why piracy exists. You are trying to dictate how people buy your product. Just sell the product and let the people decide. People go to the game because they enjoy the experience. People stay home and watch the game because they enjoy that experience. There is some overlap of people who might stay home because it is cheaper but, again, that should be their choice. Some people enjoy going to the game, some people enjoy watching it at home, and some people enjoy a mix. I live in a college town where everyone can go to the local game and everyone can watch every game on TV for free. Most games are still sold out. The blackout that the NFL does is stupid. Plenty of people will still want to go to the games even if they can watch it for free at home and the only thing the blackout does is piss off their most important fans which are the local ones nearby.

  3. Yet as a taxpayer, I pay for the stadiums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So fuck you NFL. A bunch of millionaires and billionaires taking my tax money for their party, and then charging me an arm and leg to watch them celebrate.

  4. Wrong by slshdtisctrldbysjws · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People are tired of blatant politicizing of everything and everything. They are tired of the hoops they have to jump through for low quality programming.

    In general they are just tired of being so exploited.

    --
    My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
  5. Re:They should be happy by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >The fact that anyone watches a game drag on for four hours or longer is amazing.

    I went to a football game once, and ever since I have understood why pre-game tailgate parties are so popular.

    How anyone other than the players could maintain interest for the whole game while sober is a mystery to me.

  6. Like The Global Warming Pause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    There was no Pause!

    We found the warming here, under this rock!

    There is no Ratings decline!

    We found the viewers on Facebook!

  7. Re:Senator Franken needs to resign. by edtice1559 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the only things he had done were constantly embarrassing himself and golfing, you wouldn't have gotten a -1 mod. It's the damage that he's doing to our country that upsets people.