Slashdot Mirror


Victims of Mystery Attacks In Cuba Left With Anomalies In Brain Tissue (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: American victims of mysterious attacks in Cuba have abnormalities in their brains' white matter, according to new medical testing reported by the Associated Press. But, so far, it's unclear how or if the white-matter anomalies seen in the victims relate to their symptoms. White matter is made up of dense nerve fibers that connect neurons in different areas of the brain, forming networks. It gets its name from the light-colored electrical insulation, myelin, that coats the fibers. Overall, the tissue is essential for rapidly transmitting brain signals critical for learning and cognitive function.

In August, U.S. authorities first acknowledged that American diplomats and their spouses stationed in Havana, Cuba, had been the targets of puzzling attacks for months. The attacks were carried out by unknown agents and for unknown reasons, using a completely baffling weaponry. The attacks were sometimes marked by bizarrely targeted and piercing noises or vibrations, but other times they were completely imperceptible. Victims complained of a range of symptoms, including dizziness, nausea, headaches, balance problems, ringing in the ears (tinnitus), nosebleeds, difficulty concentrating and recalling words, permanent hearing loss, and speech and vision problems. Doctors have also identified mild brain injuries, including swelling and concussion. U.S. officials now report that 24 Americans were injured in the attacks but wouldn't comment on how many showed abnormalities in their white matter.

129 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Fraud by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter how hostile and immoral in their spying the Cubans and Russians might be, there is so little factual basis to this story, and it's so absurd that no radiation is sensed, etc., and people have visible brain pathology.

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. There isn't any.

    1. Re:Fraud by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. There isn't any.

      Doesn't a fair number of people with similar and rare brain abnormalities constitute exactly that? I wasn't sure myself if anything was really going on, but this fact makes it seem much more compelling that something real was going on.

      Put it the way - why do you have reason to doubt what they are all saying?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Fraud by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Et Tu, Perens!

      Man, the pro-Russian shilling on here is getting out of hand.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Fraud by mlyle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A specific claim like "it was a sonic weapon used by the Russians" might require extraordinary evidence.

      But if there's a bunch of people in one place, and then there is credible evidence that they've all got an unusual injury-- isn't it a bit natural to draw the inference that the unusual injury may have been caused by a factor related to that place-- whether deliberate harm, accidental consequences of espionage, or some unknown pathogen, etc.

    4. Re:Fraud by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Considering there is zero precedent for any kind acoustic phenomenon to cause symptoms like this, I'd suggest that the allegation that it was a sonic weapon is no less of an extraordinary claim than anything else that might be proposed.

      I don't know what it is... Nobody who's investigated this has any idea what it is, because these symptoms have never been seen before.

      I'm not claiming that anything extraordinary happened here either, only something unknown.

    5. Re:Fraud by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Some continuous wave radar device that can "illuminate" a target system for recovery of "off net" information was lost?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have reason to doubt the implication that its the Cubans or the Russians who did it because US Intelligence agencies have just as much motive and opportunity.

    7. Re:Fraud by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I think you can add to your list of criteria for credibility: multiple sources. Not just one group that explicitly works with the state department.

    8. Re:Fraud by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Why, precisely, is it immoral to spy on the Russians and Cubans? Do you think they don't spy on us? Everybody spies on everybody, sometimes it's the only way to really know if you can trust each other.

      Considering these mystery weapons, we need to up our spying.

    9. Re:Fraud by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

      > A specific claim like "it was a sonic weapon used by the Russians" might require extraordinary evidence.

      Sure it does. They might as well write it was done by USG, testing some new weapon.. it holds the same amount of credibility as the "Russians did it" popular spin, if not more, considering what the USG is capable of.

      Until they have evidence (and no, an "IP address" is not evidence) , everybody will choose to believe in some of these stories, most will think Russians did it because they are guillable like that.

    10. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " there is so little factual basis to this story " Bruce you are being very foolish by assuming that. 24 dedicated professionals have documented symptoms. Yeah maybe they all slipped in the shower after a night of coconut bombs, but for you to ASSERT that there is no factual basis to the story because there are unanswered questions and high intrigue is the pique of ASSUMPTIVE AND REDUCTIVE PSEUDO-REASONING.

      You don't even shroud your assertion, it's a full-on denial of something that you weren't around to witness and have no firsthand knowledge of. What's wrong with YOUR brain right now, Bruce? As someone who is famous for thinking well you certainly disappoint. People were provably damaged and you want to discount it from thousands of miles away - why? I'm biting my tongue, you're old enough to know how.
         

    11. Re:Fraud by sjames · · Score: 1

      I would think very narrow beams of microwaves would be more likely than ultrasound.

    12. Re:Fraud by guruevi · · Score: 1

      First of all, it's a claim that they have experienced issues and that there is brain damage by some unspecified doctors. Until the actual report comes out and someone actually peer reviews it, there isn't much that you can say about it.

      Second, some white tissue abnormalities is normal in humans, especially those with a more physical background will have more abnormalities. I don't see a claim of lesions, concussions, or traumatic brain injury in the news article, only, again the unspecified field doctors diagnosing someone with concussions.

      IMHO this sounds more like COINTELPRO than "them russians are blasting their stereos again". If they have actual TBI, concussions and lesions in the brain, then someone physically took these people out of the confines of the embassy, beat them up or did some serious head shaking with a significant force or duration, most likely repeatedly if they have developed lesions and then brought them back.

      If the Russians are capable of lifting an entire embassy for covert interrogations and then make them and all the guards either not see or forget about the incident, then Putin may actually be a space alien. Alternatively, we have a strong CIA presence there and they have a history of experimenting on people.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    13. Re:Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Put it the way - why do you have reason to doubt what they are all saying?

      Because no official report has been release yet? "Doctors treating the victims wouldn't speak to the AP, yet their findings are expected to be discussed in an article being submitted to the Journal of the American Medical Association, U.S. officials said." Anonymous U.S. officials. "Outside medical experts said that when the sample of patients is so small, it's difficult to establish cause and effect."

      Can't someone just be little skeptical until actual hard proof is presented?

      But since so many on Slashdot are willing to believe in conspiracy theories, I think that the whole thing is another example of unethical human experimentation by the CIA to be later blamed on Russia.

    14. Re: Fraud by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Okay, Canadians AND Americans got affected. There're your multiple sources, not in a single state department, but across more than one (that is a multiple.) Now shut the fuck up or produce certifiable proof of medical expertise... oh wait, you aren't a fucking doctor!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re:Fraud by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Whoa, citizen, careful there! Looks like you've had a little too much to think! I hope you know that our elites are absolutely chomping at the bit for war with Russia right now and will do anything, up and including false flags and false memos, to get it. Remember the Bay of Tonkin? Remember the Maine? Remember the fake WMD memo that led us into war with Iraq? Fun fact: you know who wrote it? Robert Mueller. Yup, the same one investigating Manafort and Podesta right now. These people know how to start wars.

      Input from independent doctors doesn't accomplish the goal and will not be allowed. You could very well get yourself on a watchlist with thinking like that! I'm going to let you off with a warning this time citizen, just make sure it doesn't happen again.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    16. Re:Fraud by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was zero precedent for people being killed by bullets until the gun was invented and used to shoot people.

      In many ways, what is described strongly resembles ultrasound except that ultrasound reflects from density gradients (and thus, for example, the skull). A signal with multiple carriers however sounds like a more interesting possibility, as then you can get harmonics between the two waves at frequencies which are much better transmitted into the body. You'd also get second and third and so forth harmonics, which is exactly the sort of pattern you see in the embassy recording believed to be of the attack.

      But that's just a hypothesis.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
    17. Re:Fraud by Alypius · · Score: 1

      Nah. Much easier to give in to the Two Minutes Hate of the Day. Two days ago it was Roy Moore. Yesterday it was Al Franken. Today it's Cuba. Tomorrow it'll be Russia. Next week it'll be Trump and/or Clinton. Enjoy your increase of twenty grams of chocolate a week.

    18. Re: Fraud by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      There always was, always is and always be doubt in all that mattes (in this case, science).

      That's how material knowledge work.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    19. Re:Fraud by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I have no real opinion about the topic (don't know enough about the story), however this is wrong:
      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
      Evidence is evidence, regardless how mundane, and regardless how extraordinary the claim is. That is a basic principle of science and law.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:Fraud by ve3oat · · Score: 2

      Are you talking about "harmonics" or "heterodyne products" (some call it mixing products). Multiple combinations of sums and differences?
      As in x +/- y
      x +/- 2y
      y +/- 2x
      2x +/- 3y
      2y +/- 3x
      etc etc
      It might be just a hypothesis but please explain more clearly.

    21. Re:Fraud by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Oh oh, of courrse an IP adress is evidence!
      The question is what you can prove with it!

      My router has a static IP adress, if you get packets from that adress, you know they come from my rooter. That is pretty solid evidence.

      What you don't know is: who behind my router has sent the packages.
      And what you also don't know: was the router active at a certain time, or was it deactivated and somone else temporarily used my IP adress 'somehow'.

      Nevertheless you have a solid starting point to start further investigations.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:Fraud by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Considering there is zero precedent for any kind acoustic phenomenon to cause symptoms like this
      Do you live behind the moon or under a rock?
      We have sound effect weapons since the 50s ... most wales, Orca, Dolphine can stun small enough prey with as an ultra sonic pulse ...

      There are infra sonic riot control weapons that make every one womit in its influence area.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:Fraud by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Doesn't a fair number of people with similar and rare brain abnormalities constitute exactly that?

      I don't particularly trust this administration to be telling the truth. Their record on that isn't very good.

      I'd like to see information from independent doctors rather than ones who work with the state department and are publishing their paper with state department input.

      I'm not a fan of Trump, but your position is incredibly obtuse. In this case, your skepticism is not logical.

    24. Re:Fraud by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fan of Trump, but your position is incredibly obtuse. In this case, your skepticism is not logical.

      Well, it's based on the understanding that most forms of attack using ionizing, electromargnetic, optical, and sonic radiation are heavily monitored around our embassies and their staff, starting from the exposure of the Great Seal Bug in 1952. So, those are out as causes or someone is really not doing their job. The US is pretty good at detecting chemical and physical attack methods, too. So, we are down to something like prion infection as in CJD/BSE, which could come from bad meat and have nothing to do with an attack.

      People in San Francisco houseboats heard funny noises too, and had all manner of conspiracy theories. It was traced to the Humming Toadfish. I bring this up to point out how accusations can be misdirected.

      I have no reason to like the Cubans or their erstwhile and perhaps still friends the Russians. But this one sounds just too strange.

    25. Re:Fraud by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I didn't suggest that acoustic phenomenon could not produce debilitating results, not did I suggest that sonic weapons don't exist. I said there are no known kinds of acoustic phenomena that can produce the precise combination of symptoms that are being seen here. Especially the brain damage.

      Are there things that can cause this kinds of damage? Obviously... but caused by sound? Not so much.

      I have been saying it ever since this story broke... it is a mistake to presume it is a weapon until you can actually at least establish a working theory of a weapon that both actually exists in the real world, and not simply on paper, and actually produces the effects we are seeing here.

      Until we know what happened, the people who were affected by this are probably going to be under close scientific scrutiny in the interim... up to the remainder of their entire life.

      It's not a crime to say that we don't know what happened, even if the results were life-threatening and serious. It means that we need to study it closely, and maybe, with a bit of luck, figure it out.

      I have a feeling that we will not, however, unless it should happen again.

    26. Re:Fraud by skelly33 · · Score: 1

      This is what I was going to suggest as well. A silent weapon which fires at the speed of light, completely silent, only requiring direct line of sight. And a low intensity might cause damage without causing detectable pain at the time of the attack... (?)

    27. Re:Fraud by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I said there are no known kinds of acoustic phenomena that can produce the precise combination of symptoms that are being seen here. Especially the brain damage.
      And there you are wrong, sorry.

      https://www.scientificamerican...

      Sonoluminescence and Cavitation are real effects. No idea where you spent your time the last 50 years.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  2. Soviet tech? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cuba was under the protection of the USSR for quite some time. I imagine they could have been testing and developing some kind of new technology and now the Cubans have it? A lot of experimental stuff was tried all throughout the Cold War by both sides.

    Be interesting if we ever learn what caused this. Normally I'd discount such bizzare reports as silly, but a lot of people were affected by this. So I think something was definitely done to them.

    1. Re:Soviet tech? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      My guess the weapon they deployed was this one, after the US started complaining initially https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and the Cubans decided to troll them and imagine all sorts of shit.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Soviet tech? by Rei · · Score: 2

      The US sounds pretty convinced that the Cubans didn't do it - and Trump has no love for Cuba. I'd wager that the US intelligence has recordings of Cuban officials in private being confused as heck about what's going on and scrambling to figure it out, or something similar.

      If Cuba didn't do it, then it's someone who wants to throw a wrench into recently-warmed Cuban-American relations.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
    3. Re:Soviet tech? by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Im not surprised, the whole thing seems a bit too "Dr Evil" for it to be real.

      My guess is that there might have been some sort of contaminant or environmental factor thats caused a neurological disorder. There are all sorts of brain injuries that can cause ringing sensations.

      Shit, for all we know the whole building came down with a particularly nasty stain of Toxoplasmosis from the embassys house cat.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    4. Re:Soviet tech? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It might actually be Russia doing it. These days their main foreign policy objective seems to be to destabilize other countries and drive wedges between nations.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re: Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lets see you point to a single documented case of someone psychologically inducing actual damage to their own brain tissue. What a jerk. This is nothing like PTSD.

  4. Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Such a puzzling variety of symptoms were seen with the first BSE Patients. Not the same ones, but similar in their oddity.
    It may be best not to ascribe to nefarious motives, what can simply be explained away by bad hygiene.

    Captcha: gerbil...
    Gerbil?

    1. Re:Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gerbils, FTW! The Plot Sickens:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymphocytic_choriomeningitis#Symptoms

      "However, infection may occur wherever an infected rodent host population exists.[10] LCMV occurs worldwide and its natural host, the rodent, has become established on all continents, except Antarctica."..."Meningoencephalitis is characterized by more profound neurological signs such as confusion, drowsiness, sensory abnormalities and motor signs. Under reported complications include myelitis, Guillain–Barré-type syndrome, cranial nerve palsies, transient or permanent hydrocephalus, sensorineural hearing loss, orchitis, arthritis and parotitis."

      Mr. President, we must not allow a Gerbil gap!

      Captcha: saluted

    2. Re:Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      I don't understand why, when Guillain Barre syndrome was discovered, they didn't just kill Guillain Barre, burn his body and cut the problem off at the root.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't understand why, when Guillain Barre syndrome was discovered, they didn't just kill Guillain Barre

      Yeah! And Lou Gehrig died of Lou Gehrig's disease. You'd think he would have seen that coming.

    4. Re:Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      The inhabitants of Barnsley in the UK, on learning of Parkinson's Disease, killed all the people in the town with that name.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why, when Guillain Barre syndrome was discovered, they didn't just kill Guillain Barre

      Yeah! And Lou Gehrig died of Lou Gehrig's disease. You'd think he would have seen that coming.

      The old ones are the best.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Or Maybe Just Bad Pork by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They didn't get the chat-show host. He buggered off down South as soon as he got a bit of brass. Aye, proper lah-di-dah.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Control group? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not going to propose that there is no mystery here, but when probing something this mysterious and examining people as intensely as they are likely examining these individuals, I'd want to go with a setup that tests both people who were there and people who weren't. I'd also want to hide the identities from those reading the scans.

    No human would be without anomalies if tested intensively enough.

    1. Re:Control group? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No human would be without anomalies if tested intensively enough.

      Yes but a group wouldn't have identical anomalies. Also everytime you go to the doctor do you take a healthy person with you and when the doctor asks you to say "aaaah" do you then say you won't believe him that your throat is red until he checks the control group?

      If I touch water and find it is wet, do I also need a control group? When do I get to fall back on the past experience of what the brain looks like, what a normal throat looks like, or what my hands feel like when they aren't touching water?

    2. Re:Control group? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      On /. you always need a controll group. Because without it is oooouuuu not science!
      A few years ago I posted my counterexample: you have 50 parachutes, 25 are placebos, the other 25 are real.
      Both groups don't know in which group they are, we simply later check who landwd with a placebo and who landed with a real chute.
      Obviously without the placebo group we never would know if the real chutes realy work ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Control group? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      On /. you always need a controll group. Because without it is oooouuuu not science!

      You're fucking right it isn't.

      Obviously without the placebo group we never would know if the real chutes realy work ...

      And that is 100% correct. But unless you are a homocidal maniac, you would use dummies instead of real people.

    4. Re:Control group? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Also everytime you go to the doctor do you take a healthy person with you and when the doctor asks you to say "aaaah" do you then say you won't believe him that your throat is red until he checks the control group?

      If you claim to be doing medical research, that's exactly what you must do.

    5. Re:Control group? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And that is 100% correct. But unless you are a homocidal maniac, you would use dummies instead of real people.
      Then we still don't know if the placebo will fail on rwal people or if the real chutes work on real people.

      You are just the idiot I adressed with my previous post.

      When Gallileo discovered the laws of gravity, he had no placebo gravity, placebo stones, placebo tower etc. to make his experiments with.

      If there is a law that describes your experiments and the results you expect, you don't need a placebo law, placebo experiemt etc. placebo group.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  6. Re:Paranoia by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmm, sounds like self inflicted injuries. One thing happened, the professional paranoid got a hold of it, exaggerated the hell out of it and then all of them felt they were under attack. That constant psychological stress, affected their brains sufficiently to affect the senses they are attached to. Don't think of it as a one off but in affect a sustained psychological attack upon their own people, generating a continuous state of high stress, fear, paranoia, all feeding into delusions that created real physical harm.

    Hmm, sounds like Aliens.

    Think of it grinding on, hour after hour, day after day, for months, the threat of someone attacking you and destroying you mind, the message reinforced again and again and again, have you been attacked, have you heard anything, have you felt anything, every thing a possible threat, fully exposed to the enemy. They drove their own people crazy and generated real physical harm as a result.

    Think of exposure to alien mind rays grinding on, hour after hour, day after day, for months attacking you and destroying your mind.

  7. alrighty slashdotters with medical training by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read the list of major infectious diseases in Cuba and see several that attack brain/nervous system and some of which can even cause "brain alteration"

    could this "attack" be a natural pathogen? It's the first thing that came to my mind reading the mass media hysteria over it, and after looking at all the interesting nasties that are in Cuba....

    1. Re:alrighty slashdotters with medical training by guruevi · · Score: 1

      So does chlamydia and syphilis though and Zika actually has very similar neurological symptoms (swelling of the brain (aka concussion), white matter damage). A yet unknown strain of any of them (or something else completely) may be causing all this.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:alrighty slashdotters with medical training by cyn1c77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I read the list of major infectious diseases in Cuba and see several that attack brain/nervous system and some of which can even cause "brain alteration"

      could this "attack" be a natural pathogen? It's the first thing that came to my mind reading the mass media hysteria over it, and after looking at all the interesting nasties that are in Cuba....

      Only if you believe that it could trick the person into hearing the noise while in a very specific location in their room (like their bed), but then have the noise stop as soon as they moved away from their bed.

      And it only applies to US embassy workers in Cuba.

      I am going to go with the infectious disease called "Terrorism."

    3. Re:alrighty slashdotters with medical training by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      In 1945 our ambassador in Moscow was given a passive RF bugging device designed by Theremin himself. It was exposed in 1952. Optical passive spying devices such as the laser window bug are also well-known. For that reason, I would expect that electromagnetic/sound/optical wavelengths around embassies and their staff are all monitored. So, it's not that.

    4. Re:alrighty slashdotters with medical training by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, because the effects of all those things are well known and inconsistent with the symptoms.

      It is well known what the effects of microwaves are, it heats tissues and can cause tumors in the parts of the body without blood circulation: eyes and testes. Incidence of such tumors higher in techs that work around the gear, especially in military. Look it up.

      So too effects of ultrasonic, infrasonic sounds of high decibel level.

      X-rays, now you make me laugh since I know very well the various effects of electromagnetic radiation from UV and up. I've worked in national lab and nuke plant and we were required to learn all symptoms and problems known to man caused by those. And they are VERY well known.

      The claims could just be paranoid apings of things the person heard others say.

    5. Re:alrighty slashdotters with medical training by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Those reported sounds could just be people suddenly paying attention because of suggestion and fear after hearing about others. Try paying attention yourself and have fun listening to your own body, ringing in ears, transformer buzzings, slightly malfunctioning flourescent bulb screaming (yes, some do make high pitched noise and they shouldn't), etc. as you wind down for the evening and then lay in bed tonight.

      Until biopsy is done on brain tissue I'm voting for pathogen. And note no biopsy done to date, because it's drastic procedure.

  8. Microwave auditory effect device? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have wondered from the first time I read about these embassy attacks if someone was playing with a device that utilizes the "microwave auditory effect" that this wired article was discussing in 2008.

    Perhaps they were attempting to project voices into their heads and had some sort of tuning issue that caused it to have a range of other effects.

    1. Re:Microwave auditory effect device? by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wow, that article is eerily similar to what's been described.

      This one uses the so-called "microwave auditory effect": a beam of microwaves is turned into sound by the interaction with your head. Nobody else can hear it unless they are in the beam as well.

      There are health risks, he notes. But the biggest issue from the microwave weapon is not the radiation. It's the risk of brain damage from the high-intensity shockwave created by the microwave pulse.

      But if it does prove hazardous, that does not mean an end to weapons research in this area: a device that delivered a lethal shockwave inside the target's skull might make an effective death ray.

      Such a device had apparently already been built and tested by the US. The interesting thing to me is that the sound comes from a shockwave of the beam interacting with the body of whoever is in the beam; it's not a hallucinatory effect of the brain damage. That would mean that interactions with other objects (including microphones) in the path of the beam could also result in recordable sound, which would explain the recordings that are being analyzed.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
    2. Re:Microwave auditory effect device? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Just clicked this article to share the same information, I'd bet a lot of money this is what the unknown attackers are using.
      It would be so easy to disguise the equipment as well.

    3. Re:Microwave auditory effect device? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      The US has been monitoring electromagnetic radiation around embassies and diplomats since the Great Seal Bug was exposed in our Moscow embassy in 1952. Known spy technology using RF, UV/infrared (as in laser window bugs), ionizing radiation (x-rays, etc.) would be monitored. US is also pretty good at detecting chemical agents, other physical attacks. Maybe less good at Prion infection as in CJD/BSD.

    4. Re:Microwave auditory effect device? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I meant BSE, not BSD. :-)

  9. There is no mystery here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These symptoms are all explained by high-power microwave exposure. Someone simply used
    surplus microwave or radar emitters at relatively short range to try and cause physical harm.
    Although this may sound sophisticated, it's actually pretty low tech. Most likely North Korean
    agents in Cuba, but acting without the knowledge or permission of the Cuban government.

    1. Re:There is no mystery here... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Could be surveillance

      https://science.slashdot.org/c...

      Used by the Russians to spy on the US embassy - they needed to embed a resonator into a Great Seal of the US which they presented as a gift.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Also used by the UK and US to spy on Russians. Peter Wright worked out how to do it with the sides of filing cabinets, and hence not need to give Trojan Horse gifts

      https://www.schneier.com/blog/...

      The US is quite justified to say to the Cubans 'It's a small island. It's also a police state. You have a good intelligence service. You probably know who's doing it. Get them to stop. Until then no more diplomats".

      All these people mocking the idea are probably the paid Russian trolls I keep getting warned about. Of course the irony is the same people warning me about Russian trolls are the ones mocking this story.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:There is no mystery here... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

      Two former US officials with a background in intelligence and surveillance said they had doubts that the health problems were the result of a deliberate attack with a sonic weapon. They pointed out that the symptoms were first noticed in late 2016, when US-Cuban relations were the best they had been in decades, following the visit of Barack Obama to Havana.

      CNN quoted a US official saying Washington was investigating whether a third country was involved as "payback" for actions the US has taken elsewhere and to "drive a wedge between the US and Cuba". However, at least one Canadian diplomat is also said to have been affected, suggesting whatever happened did not exclusively target the US embassy.

      "You can't rule out harassment, but why do it when you want things to go well, and why the Canadians? Nobody dislikes the Canadians!" said James Lewis, a former state department official and US military adviser with expertise in intelligence and spy technology.

      Lewis said it was much more likely that a sonic surveillance device, designed to remotely pick up the vibrations caused by speech, could have been wrongly configured and emitted harmful sound waves as a result.

      "We know with 100% certainly that the embassies are under surveillance, and the technology being used could just be crude and over-powered," he added. Although Nauert had said the Cuban incidents was unprecedented, Lewis pointed to a wave of health problems at the US embassy in Moscow in the 1970s thought to be linked to the use of microwave surveillance devices.

      John Sipher, who spent 28 years in the CIA's National Clandestine Service, argued that while direct targeting of US diplomats is rare, unintended harm caused by surveillance efforts that go wrong are much more common.

      "These efforts, while designed to further surveillance and eavesdropping and not to cause malicious damage, nevertheless risked or resulted in residual physical harm to US diplomats," Sipher said in a commentary on the Just Security website.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re: There is no mystery here... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if it were the North Koreans or Cubans or some other third world Stalinist hellhole's spooks doing it, they may well have done it in an incompetent way that caused health problems due to them effectively microwaving the embassy people on too high a power.

      If it was a competent country they'd have figured out how to do it in an undetectable way - e.g. spread spectrum signals near the noise floor

      http://www.ni.com/white-paper/...

      The rapid phase transition (chip rate Tc) signal has a larger bandwidth given that the rate is greater Rc (without changing the power of the original signal) and behaves similar to noise in such a way that their spectrums are similar for bandwidth in scope. In fact, the power density amplitude of the spread spectrum output signal is similar to the noise floor. The signal is âoehiddenâ under the noise

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:There is no mystery here... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      All these people mocking the idea are probably the paid Russian trolls I keep getting warned about. Of course the irony is the same people warning me about Russian trolls are the ones mocking this story.

      Every single posting on the internet is either by a paid Russian troll, or about a paid Russian troll, with an infinite regression of bluff and counter bluff.

      It's basically a Russian doll of Russian trolls.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:There is no mystery here... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Making fun of the problem eh?

      Nice try, Ivan.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  10. hypothesis by hdyoung · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'll bite. Here's my theories. I'm in the "ultrasonic or electromagnetic attack" camp, but I suspect that a phased-array system is being used to try to focus the energy at the heads of the people while they sleep. Aiming phased arrays is somewhat non-trivial, so the spot of focus isn't perfect and has lots of local minima and maxima. Given the lack of knowledge about the exact insides of the room and what's in the walls, the instigator probably can't control the exact shape of the focused spot even if they completely understand the performance of their device. This explains the range of symptoms. Some consular personnel were hit with maxima in the ears, some on the eyes, some on the brain, etc. etc. Maybe there's a chemical explanation - something toxic to nerves. But some of the people had concussions. Can a person get a concussion from a chemical? Outside of my expertise.... It'll be interesting to eventually find out who is doing this. I would say that it requires doctorate-level skill in either physics, or mechanical or electrical engineering to do something like this, so we're talking about smart people. But there are a lot of those around nowadays, in lots of parts of the world. This isn't the work of a first-rate or even second-rate intelligence agency. As far as espionage/sabotage goes, this is super-sloppy work. Who would be so dumb as to try this on US people... and so many times...... one wrong move and the US will get a person in custody, or capture the tricked-out van that's doing this, or intercept a cell phone call, and figure out who's behind it. At that point, if it's sponsored by a country, there will probably be holy hell to pay. A small terrorist group? This seems a bit out of the ability of most terrorist types. Most of them can barely put a simple bomb together properly. I've got no good theory on who's doing it, but I'd bet a paycheck that the US intelligence agencies already know.

    1. Re:hypothesis by PPH · · Score: 1

      Aiming phased arrays is somewhat non-trivial, so the spot of focus isn't perfect ....
      .... Some consular personnel were hit with maxima in the ears, some on the eyes, some on the brain, etc. etc.

      You haven't seen me sleep. Try aiming something at my head and you might end up warming my feet.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:hypothesis by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, regarding capturing: you can simply keave your emabassy and capture one outside.
      Regarding microwaves, you can aim and focus them probably over a mile or more. Think about masers, microwave lasers, they can be focused probably for dozens of miles.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:hypothesis by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      It'll be interesting to eventually find out who is doing this.

      Maybe they already know. In any case, the answer will almost certainly be classified so as to not give others any ideas.

  11. Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You seriously think that in less than a year Trump has utter control over an array of army doctors such that they would outright lie to this extent? Come on man. He doesn't even have full control of the state department or pretty much any other department for that matter.

    Or what about the notion that Trump could coerce this many doctors to lie about this, and even if that WERE true why would the embassy staff all be sick? Do you claim that the entire staff of the Cuban embassy is making THAT up? I refer you again to my first point re: Trump and the state department - not to mention the actual timeframe in which they got sick was back in 2016 before the election. Was Trump masterfully convincing the entire Cuban embassy staff to claim they were sick at that point? To what end? I mean Scott Adams claims Trump is a master persuader but even so I'm not going to buy into Tump being that clever...

    Now I'm not willing to agree it was may not even have been an attack, maybe just some natural cause of the building. But to claim there is nothing going on at all is seriously out of whack even for the paranoid among us (which I count myself in that group). There is obviously something more to the story that is not understood at this point.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it was a Trump scheme, we'd be hearing all the details directly from Kellyanne Conway.

    2. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by meglon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not so sure Trump is the most corrupt candidate in history, but if you say so. Unless you meant Hillary... in which case i'll remind you: 14+ years of republican driven investigations into the Clintons = 0 indictments.... meanwhile, less than a year of investigations into Trump and we already have 2 indictments, and 2 guilty pleas.. and that's with republicans controlling the house, senate, and the presidency, and we have a Trump tweet just a few days ago admitting to obstructing justice.

      I'd suggest you pull your head out of your ass and take a look at reality, but you've shown in the past you're not capable of that.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    3. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, turns out Hillary wasn't indicted because the FBI is corrupt as hell. I thought the investigation was supposed to be about collusion between Trump and Putin. And what they have done is they have taken a campaign manager who was with Trump for three months and apparently gone back all the way to 2012 and indicted him for income tax evasion and things like that.

      If the FBI knew that Manafort was a Ukranian money launderer in 2014, why wouldn't they tell Trump unless they were going to blackmail him with that information?

      Robert Mueller found such strong evidence of Trump colluding with Russia that he decided to chase down a couple of tax evaders instead. Muellerâ(TM)s charges against Manafort were known to Obamaâ(TM)s Justice Department in 2013, investigated, and completely ignored. The FBI actually allowed a presidency candidate (Trump) to hire someone they were investigating since 2014 or earlier (Manafort) without sounding the alarm. Manafort wasn't arrested till now after uranium one scandal broke. This smells like a dirty intentional sabotage to me.

      I had an employee once that ended up in prison, twice. Am I responsible for his actions?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by meglon · · Score: 1, Troll

      You know, you shouldn't buy into all the conspiracy theories and bullshit lies the deranged talk radio circuit want's to sell you.... it makes you look like a stark raving mad lunatic completely out of touch with reality.

      The FBI has no say over who Trump hired for his campaign, and unless you're admitting that Trump is a complete fucking idiot that can't do a damn thing right without his hands being held, you probably shouldn't suggest they should have any say. Trump fucked that up. He was an idiot that didn't vet his personnel, and now a bunch of whiny little hyper-partisan bitches want to blame someone other than him. Get up off your knees; Trumps wife should be the one sucking his cock.... unless you really, really want to.

      Right now Mueller appears to be working right up the chain... and each lower level person he flips into talking is just more evidence against the higher ups. I shouldn't have to say that.. that SHOULD be a pretty common knowledge tactic for anyone that has any brain cells functioning. I'm not sure what your problem is, maybe head-up-ass syndrome or head-up-partisan-political-dogma ass syndrome.

      As for the "uranium one" scandal... you mean the scandal where a bunch of republican want-a-be propagandists took a break from lying about pedo shops in pizza joints, and aides being killed for whatever reason (both outright lies... why do conservatives lie so much, by the way?) and decided to try lie yet again? Here's fauxnews, of all places, explaining it to you... try to keep up: http://video.foxnews.com/v/564...

      But... if you're looking for an actual quid pro quo assault on the citizens of this country: https://nypost.com/2017/11/06/...

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    5. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't listen to talk radio and never have. You know, dripping with hate and condescension is no way to treat your fellow Americans, but we've long past that point, haven't we? You're just going further and further left, and leaving the rest of us in the dust.

      Donna Brazile said after Seth Rich was killed, she kept the blinds down to protect from snipers, possibly Russian. LOL. The Russians break every rule of engagement to start a possible WWIII with us to kill a man who...according to the DNC, didn't leak any emails.

      Obama knew Russia was engaged in bribery ($500,000 to Bill Clinton), kickbacks ($145 million to the Clinton Foundation) and extortion in order to gain control of North American atomic resources â" yet still approved the 2010 deal to give Moscow control of 20% of America's uranium. FBI Director at the time: Mueller.

      The DNC/Clinton machine paid for fake Piss Dossier which was used as justification for FISA warrant to spy on Trump/campaign. Also, Manafort worked for the Podestas in helping seal up the Uranium One deal, and the Podestas worked directly with the Russian government to do it. The smoking gun.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by meglon · · Score: 2

      Obama knew Russia was engaged in bribery ($500,000 to Bill Clinton), kickbacks ($145 million to the Clinton Foundation) and extortion in order to gain control of North American atomic resources â" yet still approved the 2010 deal to give Moscow control of 20% of America's uranium.

      So what you're saying is... you can't sit and watch FOXNEWS for 6 minutes as they tell you what you are peddling is an outright lie? You are fucking delusional. http://video.foxnews.com/v/564... Try watching it, and then seek mental health help.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    7. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      You think warning Trump about Manafort would have made any difference? Didn't Obama specifically warn him about Flynn and Trump still hired him anyways?

    8. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I don't listen to talk radio and never have. You know, dripping with hate and condescension is no way to treat your fellow Americans, but we've long past that point, haven't we? You're just going further and further left, and leaving the rest of us in the dust.

      What's funny is I was a solid conservative, and then the Republicans moved so far to the right.... (Hint: my core positions on a lot of things haven't changed, others have, naturally, no one is a rock unless they have challenges of various sorts)

      Donna Brazile said after Seth Rich was killed, she kept the blinds down to protect from snipers, possibly Russian.

      I'm sure you have that quoted from a reputable source?

      Obama knew Russia was engaged in bribery ($500,000 to Bill Clinton), kickbacks ($145 million to the Clinton Foundation) and extortion in order to gain control of North American atomic resources â" yet still approved the 2010 deal to give Moscow control of 20% of America's uranium. FBI Director at the time: Mueller.

      They don't have control of 20% of America's uranium, but 20% of the then active refinement capacity. A slightly different thing. Want to tie the rest of your assertions to facts and some reasonable facsimile of a coherent thought process. Just throwing a bunch of unsubstantiated statements against the wall to see what sticks is a pedestrian Trump tactic and in past was automatically a sign of desperation.

      The DNC/Clinton machine paid for fake Piss Dossier which was used as justification for FISA warrant to spy on Trump/campaign. Also, Manafort worked for the Podestas in helping seal up the Uranium One deal, and the Podestas worked directly with the Russian government to do it. The smoking gun.

      A) Apparently the DNC (haven't seen proof of Clinton yet) paid for additional work on a dossier started by Republicans. Have to hand it to the sellers, they sold the same work twice. It should be noted that the Dems didn't use it though, so did they really pay for it or was it some conspiracy to tar and feather them? As several DNC personnel questioned about the dossier stated that if they knew about this dossier, they would have used it.

      B) Ooo, you have a link to potential proof that the Podesta Group worked with Uranium One. Great. What's it prove since as much was already admitted?

      C) You provided no proof of Manafort working for the Podestas, the Podestas working for the Russian gov, nor that said dossier was used for anything FISA related. In fact, FISA warrants were already out for tracking various foreign nationals, and Trump's campaign was captured in that net because they communicated with those under surveillance. The Trump campaign itself was never the subject of any FISA warrants.

      You're obviously eyeballs deep in misinformation. Before you respond, you should definitely get some citations from reputable sources to back your claims, because right now your assertions are almost wholly unsubstantiated falsehoods.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    9. Re: Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      The fact that the Trump administration is susceptible to indictments shows that they aren't truly corrupt.

      Ok, I've seen sophistries in my life, but this one takes the cake.

    10. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Well you've been listening to fake news. You really didn't hear the Donna Brazile sniper story? Source: Donna Brazile. In her book. It was a big deal when it came out, did you hear of it? When she exposed the DNC as utterly corrupt and rigged against Bernie?

      The Free Beacon said its research ended before Fusion GPS hired a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, to produce a series of reports alleging links between Russia and those close to Trump. That occurred after the firm was retained by a lawyer for Hillary Clintonâ(TM)s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

      âoeNone of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier,â(TM)â(TM) said the statement from Free Beacon editor in chief Matthew Continetti and chairman Michael Goldfarb.

      After the Free Beacon stopped paying Fusion GPS, the research firm offered in April 2016 to continue researching Trump for the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The Free Beacon said it did not know at the time that the Clinton campaign and the DNC hired Fusion GPS later to continue the work.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/conservative-website-first-paid-fusion-gps-for-trump-research/2017/10/27/ee05c1d6-bb6f-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Well you've been listening to fake news. You really didn't hear the Donna Brazile sniper story? Source: Donna Brazile. In her book. It was a big deal when it came out, did you hear of it? When she exposed the DNC as utterly corrupt and rigged against Bernie?

      I heard she came out with something, but no, I don't follow her, her activities, nor those of the DNC much, really. So apparently it wasn't that big a deal. What I did catch is that the DNC and Hillary's campaign were slightly too close due to financing issues, with the DNC being the one short of money.

      The Free Beacon said its research ended before Fusion GPS hired a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, to produce a series of reports alleging links between Russia and those close to Trump. That occurred after the firm was retained by a lawyer for Hillary Clintonâ(TM)s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

      âoeNone of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier,â(TM)â(TM) said the statement from Free Beacon editor in chief Matthew Continetti and chairman Michael Goldfarb.

      After the Free Beacon stopped paying Fusion GPS, the research firm offered in April 2016 to continue researching Trump for the Clinton campaign and the DNC. The Free Beacon said it did not know at the time that the Clinton campaign and the DNC hired Fusion GPS later to continue the work.

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/conservative-website-first-paid-fusion-gps-for-trump-research/2017/10/27/ee05c1d6-bb6f-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html

      For some reason Free Beacon is making statements that it paid for the work, yet FusionGPS has taken the fifth and refuses to corroborate or dispute any of that information. Most interesting. And Free Beacon didn't make it's report public. I'm not sure I'd base anything other than a raised eyebrow on that story. I need more facts.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    12. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Well you're doing yourself a disservice by listening to biased news that doesn't tell you the whole story. Start listening to the alternative media. We know now without a shadow of a doubt that the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, paid Fusion GPS and Steele to acquire this dossier, which required colluding with Russian operatives and Russian nationals. They used the information from this dossier to justify surveillance on Trump and his associates. This happened.

      Fusion GPS was contacted by a GOP member for Opp research. The Steele Dossier was separate. The media / DNC are pushing that narrative, but itâ(TM)s flat out wrong. The GOP didnâ(TM)t ask for the Steele Dossier, they asked for separate Opposition Research. The DNC / HRC campaign started the Steele Dossier.

      Here's a video you should watch, by a fellow leftist who used to be on The Young Turks. It's safe, he agrees with you. When you're done, start clicking on the related videos it will suggest to you. You really need to widen the information sources you expose yourself to. Good luck!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Well you're doing yourself a disservice by listening to biased news that doesn't tell you the whole story. We know now without a shadow of a doubt that the Democratic Party paid Fusion GPS ... This happened.

      And we don't know that even that happened. We don't know *who* specifically paid Fusion GPS, what Fusion GPS were paid for, nor what Steele's directives were after he was hired. Most disturbing is that no matter the source of funding or directives that some of what became known as the Steele dossier has been verified by independent sources.

      Fusion GPS was contacted by a GOP member for Opp research. The Steele Dossier was separate. The media / DNC are pushing that narrative, but itâ(TM)s flat out wrong. The GOP didnâ(TM)t ask for the Steele Dossier, they asked for separate Opposition Research.

      And yet we still don't know what was in the report the GOP associate(s) received. We don't know much of anything other than what's been disseminated, which truly sounds like a major case of CYA going on. Information warfare is dirty that way. Given that that's what this is, the only thing we know for certain is that the GOP associated entities have admitted to paying for research by FusionGPS.

      The DNC / HRC campaign started the Steele Dossier.

      We know this is false, even from what few facts are out there. Apparently Steele was hired by FusionGPS some period after being retained/hired by Perkins Coie via Marc Elias, a lawyer who represented the DNC. Hillary and the DNC leadership deny knowledge of this dossier. We know nothing else with certainty, although it is most telling that neither Hillary nor the DNC leadership appear to have used any information in the dossier prior to the election.

      Here's a video you should watch, by a fellow leftist who used to be on The Young Turks. It's safe, he agrees with you. When you're done, start clicking on the related videos it will suggest to you. You really need to widen the information sources you expose yourself to. Good luck!

      I don't youtube, and it is most definitely not a news source, although it may accidentally source some news in spite of itself. You'll also have to explain your definition of leftist, because I'm 99% certain I won't fit it. Similarly, I doubt I'll fit any definition of the right you wish to come up with, at least as they're defined in American politics. I do believe in facts, and partisanship has absolutely no place in determining whether something is a fact. It is true, or it is an "alternative fact", i.e., a falsehood, lie, wishful thinking, however you want to cast it in the context being used.

      With that said, so far you've gotten exactly 2 facts - that a GOP member paid Fusion GPS for opposition research, and that subsequently Fusion GPS hired Steele and created what became known as the Steele Dossier. Other than those 2 things, everything you've stated is either provably wrong, mere speculation, or even wishful thinking. Exercise some critical thinking and you'll have to agree with that analysis, grudgingly or not. As an exercise, reverse all the associated names, ie, Hillary with Trump, DNC with GOP, and Russians with "email server" and see what you think. If your view changes, then all parts of your position that changed should be thrown out.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    14. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      We don't know *who* specifically paid Fusion GPS, what Fusion GPS were paid for, nor what Steele's directives were after he was hired.

      Absolutely we did. An attorney for Clinton hired them.

      I know, you desperately want there to be proof of Russian interference. You simply can't fathom that your preferred candidate didn't win. I understand this. But the more I hear about Russia the more I'm sure it's a nothingburger. It's gone from Russia hacking our elections all the way down to "somebody related to the campaign talked to a Russian citizen." This is levels of "election interference" way below Obama's constant meddling in other nation's elections. Remember when he tried to alter the result of Brexit?

      Reminder: It's wrong for Republicans to even talk to foreigners but it's ok for democrats to hold campaign fundraisers in foreign countries.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:Crazy to bring Trump into this at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      We don't know *who* specifically paid Fusion GPS, what Fusion GPS were paid for, nor what Steele's directives were after he was hired.

      Absolutely we did. An attorney for Clinton hired them.

      You are wrong again, on multiple counts.

      • An attorney made a statement indicating he did, but there is no confirmation as to the truth of that statement, unless you happen to have a copy of the check or bank transaction, or Fusion GPS confirms this transaction.
      • Said attorney works for an agency hired by the DNC, not Clinton

      I know, you desperately want there to be proof of Russian interference. You simply can't fathom that your preferred candidate didn't win.

      I'm pretty sure there is proof of Russian collusion, since there are already 2 folks charged and have pled guilty. More will follow. That's not in question. You are correct that my preferred candidate didn't win. To continue to show how wrong you are on the whole, however, my preferred candidate wasn't on the ballot I voted on. Here's an absolutely shocking fact for you - the world isn't black and white, Trump or Hillary, I despise both of them, except one is a Hitler wannabe and the other merely objectionable. I'd vote against compromising my morals and ethics any day. That you could swallow that pill shows a lot about your lack of character.

      I understand this. But the more I hear about Russia the more I'm sure it's a nothingburger. It's gone from Russia hacking our elections all the way down to "somebody related to the campaign talked to a Russian citizen."

      You need to expand your horizons beyond Fox's fake news although, admittedly, their fake news broadcasting has dwindled in recent months in favor of all out propaganda masquerading as indignant opinions instead. Interesting in itself and worthy of a separate discussion on why Fox feels the need to amp up the vitriol considering *their* party controls both houses and the presidency. Maybe all is not well as the bandaids covering the hypocrisy comes peeling off?

      This is levels of "election interference" way below Obama's constant meddling in other nation's elections. Remember when he tried to alter the result of Brexit?

      Did he? I'm sure you can provide some real facts to back that up. Him stating his opinion that leaving the EU would be a bad idea or something similar isn't meddling, any more than Trump saying he admires manly man Putin's bare chest.

      Reminder: It's wrong for Republicans to even talk to foreigners but it's ok for democrats to hold campaign fundraisers in foreign countries.

      It's wrong for private citizens to attempt to engage in diplomacy and international government relations. This is what Flynn got rightly indicted for. Papadopolous was indicted for lying under oath to the FBI IIRC. Those appear to be altogether different activities, much like Trump's claim that middle class taxes will go down while rewriting the tax code to have the middle class pay for a 1T tax cut for the rich.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  12. Plausible explanation: microwave guns by pikine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a plausible explanation for this mysterious attack. Currently, Microwave guns that are being used for riot-control have their frequencies tuned to be absorbed by the skin, but you can lower the frequency (longer wavelength) to make the microwave penetrate deeper, literally frying the victim's brain. When the microwave cooks the auditory region, the victim hears a phantom sound.

    There is no actual recording of the sound. What the AP released is just a synthesized simulation of what it might sound like to a victim under attack.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:Plausible explanation: microwave guns by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is no actual recording of the sound. What the AP released is just a synthesized simulation of what it might sound like to a victim under attack.

      That's not at how the AP described it.

      The Associated Press has obtained a recording of what some U.S. Embassy workers heard in Havana in a series of unnerving incidents later deemed to be deliberate attacks.

      The recordings from Havana have been sent for analysis to the U.S. Navy, which has advanced capabilities for analyzing acoustic signals, and to the intelligence services, the AP has learned.

      Yet the AP has reviewed several recordings from Havana taken under different circumstances, and all have variations of the same high-pitched sound. Individuals who have heard the noise in Havana confirm the recordings are generally consistent with what they heard.

      “That’s the sound,” one of them said.

      The recording being released by the AP has been digitally enhanced to increase volume and reduce background noise, but has not been otherwise altered.

      Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised at all if the US figures out exactly how the attack works, but don't disclose the fact. If the US says "We've confirmed it and have reproduced a weapon which causes these symptoms", then every government on Earth will attempt to do the same.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
    2. Re:Plausible explanation: microwave guns by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No idea abiut the recording, but there are two ways to produce perception of sound: fake signals in your nerves, that is what you suggest, or side effects in your head from the damage, which would be real sound you hear.
      Just touch your head with a microfone, and it will record that same sound your, if it is real sound.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Plausible explanation: microwave guns by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Not just that, but if they confirm that Cuban agents attacked US diplomats at a US embassy, that is an act of war on US soil, and demands a response. I don't think we really want to go down to Cuba and wipe them out, but that is what the evidence would demand, even if it was only a rogue wing of Cuban intelligence that actually committed the attack.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  13. Re:how about just pollution. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    AC Re: The motive is strange.
    Human spies need out of Cuba and into US to spy on groups that are trying to bring freedom to Cuba.
    Getting out of Cuba with that real US embassy paperwork is great for a later deep cover story.
    The US embassy trusted that person enough to give the needed real paper work.
    The spy agency printed paperwork spies tried to use gets detected.
    The embassy is one way out. Walk in, tell a good story, get real trusted papers to escape out of Cuba with.
    Once in the West find other people who want to bring freedom to Cuba.
    Report all findings back to Cuba.

    A more long term plan used by Communists is to escape to the West and get the second and third generations to enter the US mil, gov.
    Grow up in the USA, pass the few background checks now, rise up the ranks of the US mil, gov reporting back to Cuba only when really needed.
    The one part Cuba needs working for decades of spying is a US embassy thats relaxed and able to give a lot of papers out so as many spies can get into the USA.
    The more spies Cuba graduates as ready for missions in the USA the longer lines outside the US embassy.
    The more happy and productive the US embassy staff are the more Cuban spies might get a chance to enter the USA.
    More paperwork for spies is cleared per hour to enter the USA with relaxed embassy staff.
    Cuba would not risk the best, fastest and most legitimate way to get lots of its trusted spies out of Cuba.
    Everyday embassy work slows is another days worth of spies not been allowed into the USA.

    Having US investigations start also disrupts the work of Cuban spies working inside the US embassy.
    Cuba would lose it legal path to the USA for many of its spies and risk its spies in the US embassy with a spy hunt.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  14. off-the-record quote from affected U.S. diplomats by FranklinWebber · · Score: 1

    "Thanks Obama"

  15. Probably not acoustic by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Considering there is zero precedent for any kind acoustic phenomenon to cause symptoms like this

    Considering they have brain abnormalities it seems like whatever happened may not have been acoustic. It could be what was "heard" was a side effect of trauma to the brain, which would also explain why some people heard nothing if the brain was affected in differing locations.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Probably not acoustic by Rei · · Score: 1

      I've considered that possibility, and it's always struck me as realistic. But it would also require that this be wrong.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
  16. Re:Paranoia by alvinrod · · Score: 2

    If Cuban communist agents really wanted to infiltrate America they could have just landed on US soil and claimed asylum which would have been granted, just as it had been for decades up until earlier this year when Obama ended that policy. If this were a real goal of Cuba, the U.S. would be rife with Cuban spies unless they only decided they should get in on this whole espionage thing within the last 10 months. There were so many Cubans actually trying to escape that even thousands of spies would have been able to blend in quite easily.

  17. Tinfoil Hat by pikine · · Score: 1

    Also, I'm not sure if the tinfoil hat has ever been accurately prescribed as a remedy, but in this case the US could ask the embassy workers to wear it as a precaution. It would actually be effective against microwave guns if it were the true cause.

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:Tinfoil Hat by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And even if it didn't work, it would look totally awesome.

  18. So you think two administrations colluded by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Secretary of State Rex Tillerson

    Actual attacks happened back in 2016. You know, before the election? So TWO administrations (that absolutely despise each other) both claim something happened and you say no?

    HMM.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So you think two administrations colluded by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have that refutes the evidence presented by medical professionals?

      What evidence are you talking about? Which medical professionals?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  19. smoke and mirrors ? by swell · · Score: 2

    Motivation: Who would be motivated to cause this? Does anyone benefit from it?

    Dispersion: Have no Cubans suffered from similar symptoms? Has anyone bothered to check?

    Location: Were all affected families living in the embassy? What other areas were 'attacked'?

    The 'white matter' test evidence seems weak, just as the entire story is vague. Until our own government is honest about what they've found, it just seems like another conspiracy theory. The kind of vague rumor they create when they are contemplating an offensive action against a country.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  20. Re:Paranoia by sheramil · · Score: 2

    Think of the stress of working in an embassy like that.

    Think of the literally hundreds of jobs that are far more stressful than being stationed in an embassy, and yet which don't show the same symptoms.

  21. Re: Paranoia by superdave80 · · Score: 2

    Anyone banging their head in the wall has psychologically induced brain trauma.

    No, that is physically induced brain trauma. Regardless of WHY your head hit the wall, it is the physical impact that did the damage.

  22. Same attack performed on Americans in Uzbekistan? by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello,

    CBS News reports that the same type of attack may have occurred on USAID workers in Uzbekistan; https://www.cbsnews.com/news/u...

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
  23. Re: Sock Puppet by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Well, reading some of his leaked emails on the dark web, SOMEONE is definitely paying him.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  24. Re:Reversing symptom and effect by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would be a bizarre pathogen indeed that can make you hear a sound - which can be and has been recorded - in a specific part of the room, disappearing whenever you move just slightly but reappearing when you pass back through that spot. And which only affects workers of the US embassy in Cuba, having never been recorded to infect anyone else, anywhere else, ever.

    There's no question that it's a baffling case, but pathogens don't pass muster. I waver between "another type of EM radiation, for which the sound is just an incidental side effect" and "a multispectral ultrasonic audio signal, for which what is heard (and what does the damage) is harmonics between the channels rather than the carriers". But at this point, who bloody knows.

    --
    Pinkypants -- my favorite!
  25. The lesson of Olympic Games in Rio by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Some US athletes were claiming that they were robbed at gun point in Rio during the Olympic Games. It was a big story in the media.

    Until it was proven irrevocably by the organizing side that they were just lying brazenly.

    I guess that at least some part of the American people believe that they are kind of exclusive, much cleverer than others. And that they can get away with about any lie. My point is that one has to look for irrevocable evidences as soon as one hears such unusual claims.

    1. Re:The lesson of Olympic Games in Rio by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      irrevocable evidences

      I can't help but read this in an exaggerated Russian accent, a bit like the one Pavel Chekov used when he talked about 'nuclear vessels' in Star Trek IV : The Voyage Home.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:The lesson of Olympic Games in Rio by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It's Occam's Razor really. If the alternatives are (a) an elaborate conspiracy involving alien technology, unknown scientific principles and probably time travel or (b) a few people are lying to cover up an in house experiment gone wrong, sanity would suggest choosing the latter. (At the risk of being labelled a Russian Sock Puppet/Troll).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re: The lesson of Olympic Games in Rio by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I would like to correct the wording of my previous post above. It should be definitely - a part of people. Probably, a small part.

      Because, the only general thing which could be said about American people is that they are all different. Undoubtedly there honest individuals among them.

    4. Re:The lesson of Olympic Games in Rio by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      > (At the risk of being labelled a Russian Sock Puppet/Troll)

      The American government has been caught doing abhorrent things surreptitiously often enough that you're more or less a fool if you accept what they say without independent corroboration.

      Iraq/WMDs are the first thing that comes to mind (along with the babies and incubators propaganda), but there are plenty of other things that at one time would have people thinking you were late for your tinfoil hat fitting that we now know actually happened.

      IF there's brain damage, I'd go looking for an infection. We know, for instance, that toxoplasma gondii causes brain damage in humans. I wouldn't rule out the affected people coming into contact with something that likes the auditory processing region of the brain for some reason.

      Then again, maybe long term exposure to high levels of ultrasound can cause the brain to change - if your ear can pick up the sound in some way and your brain's trying to process it. Human brains are adaptive given time. Or maybe the doctors are experiencing apophenia and seeing patterns that aren't there because they're looking too hard.

  26. Re: Paranoia by meglon · · Score: 1

    No, they were taken out of a B-17. See, video proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  27. Clearly a case of by meglon · · Score: 1

    too much country music.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    1. Re:Clearly a case of by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, you made my day!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  28. Re:obvious answer from Coast to Coast radio by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Four centuries of official denial have not satisfied independent investigators of the Bermuda Triangle. From the time of Shakespeare (The Tempest) to the space age, no official body will admit that the anomalies that occur in that area are of extraterrestrial origin. Even NASA will not acknowledge their measurements and probes showing the shifting and expanding of the Triangle with the ozone layer and global warming.

    Is it any surprise that innocent, non-spying diplomats are suffering due to official refusal to admit the influence of alien powers over this area? Expect the zombification to continue.

    Finally some common sense.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  29. I wouldn't rule out mass hysteria ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    ... entirely. Mass hysteria has effects that can be bizarr and creepy to the utmost extent. And as far as we know, nobody is fully immune to it. For one, mass hysteria does spread similar to a disease. Because you need to meet people who have fallen prone to the hysteria for it to spread. Or you need to be primed by some detailed description of it in an environment that emphasises the fact that the effects have a "real" cause.

    That scientist find "alterations in brain tissue" could be simply because they were looking for them.

    Note: I'm not ruling out some sort of weapon, but right now mass hysteria seems more plausible to me. The story has all the ingredients.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I wouldn't rule out mass hysteria ... by slshdtisctrldbysjws · · Score: 1

      Okay why don't you apply your lens of mass hysteria to everything else new. Why don't you apply it to the sentiment around Trump, global warming, the North Korea crisis, Bitcoin, diversity....

      How much sense does that make to you?
      Can you see how hysteria could be the cause of either or both sides of the divide of any of those issues? "All the ingredients" are there in any case.

      What does "more plausible" even mean to you? You're just trying to put a cap on the unknown so you can consider quantitatively. In reality you just don't have enough grasp to make a statement. Your reasoning is incoherent.

      What ever happened to people only judging matters they are fit to judge? People have become so incredibly disingenuous and self righteous. That is the cause of the hysteria in all of the things I mentioned above.
      There is no hysteria about any one issue. People themselves are hysterical by default. That doesn't mean new things aren't actually happening.

      --
      My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
  30. Re:how about just pollution. by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    Sick building syndrome. A 1950s brutalist bunker, probably filled with asbestos and other toxic building materials, that sat mostly unused and undermaintained for decades and was only fully reoccupied a few years ago. You don't need to resort to alien mind-control-rays or similar to come up with things that would affect people working in that environment.

  31. Why use the term 'attack' by paai · · Score: 1

    I do not understand why almost everybody keeps referring to these phenomena as 'atacks'. An 'attack' implies a malevolent agent and purpose.

    So if you don't know what happened, what exactly is the damage or even whether anything happened at all, why keep using the word 'attack', implying that the Cubans had anything to do with it and did it on purpose? Unless of course somebody wants a reason to put pressure on Cuba. But the american gouvernement would not do that,would they?

    Paai

    1. Re:Why use the term 'attack' by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Thats the problem with the story.
      Cuba has a lot of spies in the US gov and mil.
      The US embassy in Cuba is full of spies.
      Spies in place and their cover is holding.
      Why do the one thing that would cause the USA to start a spy hunt?
      To make the US look at the groups who want freedom for Cuba and find all the well placed Cuban spies in them?
      To look at everyone in the US embassy?
      To go over all the information that passed in and out of the US embassy and look for the results of spies working from that information in the USA?
      Spies like to spy and they places they work at to be safe for decades of productive spying. Why induce US investigations that puts years of work at risk?

      If the US wanted a good news spy story, find a Cuban spy deep in the CIA, FBI, US mil, gov. No need for phenomena and thats a real result. A win.
      Start the investigations with something that media and public can understand and build up real investigations.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  32. Otto Warmbier by heson · · Score: 1

    Ate there any correlation to the Otto Warmbier injuries?

  33. Re:Sure if you don't mind.... by pikine · · Score: 1

    The charge won't build up more than electrostatic does and tends to dissipate quickly in a humid climate like Havana, so sure it's uncomfortable but it sure gets your attention that you may be under attack.

    I think the more scary thought is that the weapon is low-tech enough that any random hobo could make one by tearing apart an off-the-shelf microwave oven. It doesn't take state sponsorship to do that.

    --
    I once had a signature.
  34. Re:Fibromyalgia by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Hell, one time I spent a week in New Orleans in the 80s for Mardi Gras, and I ended up on intravenous antibiotics and bed rest for a month.

    You shouldn't have barebacked that tranny.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  35. Not really the question by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Let's see...you're asking me if Hillary Clinton and Rex Tillerson are both capable of lying?

    No, I'm asking if you believe they are capable of liking each other enough to coordinate the SAME EASILY DISPROVED LIE.

    Also You brought up the entirely wrong person, Hillary was not president last year - Obama was. Same point though, are Rex Tillerson and Obama going to be willing to work together on the same lie about embassy workers in Cuba???? Really? Why.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. Re:Fibromyalgia by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    You shouldn't have barebacked that tranny.

    Now you tell me.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  37. What is the motive? Cui bono? For whose benefit? by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Why would Cuba want to irradiate the American diplomats? It wants the good trading relations with the US as far as I know.

    It is rather seldom that a crime is being committed without a motive.

  38. Who says it's an attack? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Do you think that, since they don't know what's causing these symptoms, perhaps they could lay off calling it an attack? You know, until they have some evidence. Or is it now US foreign policy to characterise everything that they don't understand that affects US personnel as an attack?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  39. CIA's job to sour up budding relations by Mrakodrap · · Score: 1

    Nobody knows no nothing, just like through Kennedy's assassination. Truth is, I'd rather see less of NGO's trying to infiltrate Cuban way of life and more of diplomatic relations rendezvouses. But that wishful thinkking doesn't fall in line to pre-charted lines of certain powerful figures in espionage apparatus of the USA.

  40. Re: Paranoia by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Again, that is the claim but no names about these "doctors" are being given. Also, I do work in neuroscience.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  41. Re:Paranoia by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot - http://healthland.time.com/201... and https://www.researchgate.net/p.... In fact simply do the search yourself https://duckduckgo.com/?q=stre.... Stupid is as stupid does and they have been quite stupid.

    I would post studies showing Aliens causing the same damage but it's classified and they would find me.

  42. Re:Reversing symptom and effect by jafac · · Score: 1

    What if they were exposed to a pathogen; and they (Russians?) also blasted their target with audio, in order to confuse them and dissuade investigators from taking blood samples, doing dna tests, and looking for some kind of weaponized bacteria or virus or something like that?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.