Slashdot Mirror


People Keep Finding Hidden Cameras in Their Airbnbs (buzzfeed.com)

"Airbnb has a scary problem on their hands: People keep finding hidden cameras in their rental homes," reports the New York Post. "Another host was busted last month trying to film guests without their knowledge -- marking the second time since October that the company has had to publicly deal with this sort of incident." BuzzFeed reports: In October, an Indiana couple visiting Florida discovered a hidden camera disguised as a smoke detector in their Airbnb's master bedroom. Earlier that same year Airbnb was forced to investigate and suspend a Montreal listing after one of the renters discovered a camera in the bedroom of the property... Hidden cameras aren't just an issue for Airbnb -- it's been a hot-button topic in hospitality for years. There are hundreds of stories about hotels using unlawful surveillance. [For example, this one.]

Airbnb recommends its customers read the reviews of the host of any rental property they might be interested in, and also offers an on-platform messaging tool that allows communication between host and guests... "Cameras are never allowed in bathrooms or bedrooms; any other cameras must be properly disclosed to guests ahead of time," Airbnb spokesperson Jeff Henry told BuzzFeed News.

This time the couple discovered hidden cameras that were disguised as a motion detectors. Airbnb says they've permanently banned the offending host -- and offered his guests a refund -- adding that this type of incident was "incredibly rare."

91 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cause I could SWEAR videotaping someone nude without their consent in an area that has a CLEAR expectation of Privacy, is a FELONY. Arrest The SOB "Host" and CHARGE THEM WITH THEIR CRIME! This WILL NOT stop until you do!

    1. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am so OUTRAGED that I am going to SELECTIVELY capitalize WORDS to make my POINT.

    2. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. Banning the host and refunding some money isn't even close to good enough here. In almost any civilised country, this should be a police matter, and someone should probably be going to jail and getting added to the sex offenders register or local equivalent.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Banning the host and refunding some money isn't even close to good enough here

      It's good enough for AirBNB. The guests can go to the police themselves.

    4. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

      Translation: "Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

    5. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Airbnb has no interest in making this a big deal, and everything has to be normal, as far as possible. Of course this is a crime, and the voyeur should be severely punished in a court of law.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    6. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      translation: you're a Trump voter.

    7. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If you're going through life believing that writing properly is only for english class, I pity you.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      This is Web 2.0! Uber doesn't have to abide by the law, why should AirBnB? This is Web 2.0!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    9. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Next time I am in an AirBnb and the host seems like an ass, I can plant a hidden camera and turn them in. They will be arrested and jailed, because no one will believe that it wasnâ(TM)t their camera.

    10. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      And their hidden camera would catch you planting yours. Stalemate.

    11. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This WILL NOT stop until you do!

      Are you implying that it will stop if you do? If you think that I have a bridge to sell you.

    12. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      It's not a felony to have a camera, so before you vigilante yourself right into the hoosegow you might want to check for evidence that it was in use.

    13. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Of course this is a crime

      Really? Can you cite the law?

      In America, surreptitious audio recordings are generally illegal, but video recordings and photography usually are not. It would be illegal to use the photos for extortion or blackmail. It might be illegal to distribute them without the consent of the subject, and would almost certainly be illegal to do so for commercial gain.

    14. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

      Putting emphasis on something you WISH to emphasize... DOES! LMMFAO! FYI, I get to use my keyboard HOWEVER I want TO! Fuktard... Troll elsewhere.

    15. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I'm more *fond* of asterisk emphasis than of CAPITALIZATION.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    16. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      > > keep finding hidden cameras

      >Airwithout their consent

      Precisely. That's why the cameras have to be OVERT. Post signs that cameras are present.

      Cameras are security mechanisms and justified.

      >videotaping someone nude

      Set up a special room for that (but there also has to be other rooms that guarantee privacy). Bring it on.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    17. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are naive.

    18. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      If I was talking to someone who emphasized words like you, I'd back away slowly. Just picture yourself in a conversation with someone speaking that way. Are you thinking about what they are saying, or what is wrong with that person? I'm thinking about what is wrong with that person. It's like talking to apk.

    19. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      So are you saying that in America it's not a crime to put a hidden camera inside, for example, a women's public shower room as long as it's only you who masturbate with the recording? Cool!

    20. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by quenda · · Score: 1

      someone should probably be going to jail and getting added to the sex offenders register or local equivalent.

      It was in the US. Neither police nor government want to set a precedent of jailing someone for illegal surveillance.

    21. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So are you saying that in America it's not a crime to put a hidden camera inside, for example, a women's public shower room as long as it's only you who masturbate with the recording? Cool!

      It is illegal in some jurisdictions. But I am not aware of any federal law.

    22. Re:Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right, legally speaking, but I'd like to hear a judge say that before I assume it. Given the way Airbnb works, it wouldn't surprise me if an argument based on having an implied duty of care could be made either. In any case, presumably the guest can report the matter to the police, and the police could/should then take action against the host.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    23. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Wootery · · Score: 1

      One shouldn't blame the AC for contributing precisely nothing to the conversation. It is their natural manner.

      (I realise the irony in my own empty snark, here. Ah well.)

    24. Re: Isn't Voyeurism a CRIME? by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

      Says the Troll. Doing nothing but Trolling.... Weak.

  2. Regular hotels have this issue too. by Isca · · Score: 1
  3. Bathrooms and bedrooms only? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cameras should be banned in all private spaces, not only bathrooms and bedrooms -- if you're renting the entire apartment on AirBNB, they should be banned in the living room, dining room, kitchen too. If it's not a shared space, people could be intimate or naked anywhere in it.

    Also, if there's audio recording, there's a risk of picking up conversations intended to be private, which almost certainly violates the law even in states that have one-party consent laws.

    The "hosts" installing the cameras shouldn't only be banned from AirBNB. They should be jailed and fined. Or just have their asses whupped by someone who rented from them. Violating people's privacy is a serious crime, and should be treated as such.

    1. Re:Bathrooms and bedrooms only? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No. Banned in private living spaces. Period.

      If you allow people to rent places with disclosed cameras or microphones, every host will install them for safety. "Don't like it: sleep on the street." Also, the disclosures could take a form (buried in a bunch of legalese) that's usually ignored.

    2. Re:Bathrooms and bedrooms only? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If you allow people to rent places with disclosed cameras or microphones, every host will install them for safety. "Don't like it: sleep on the street."

      Has AirBNB become the only way to book a room? If you don't like AirBNB's policies, book through someone else -- if enough people do that, then AirBNB will change their policies. If many people don't leave because of that policy, then I guess it wasn't so unpopular after all.

    3. Re:Bathrooms and bedrooms only? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The issue is to preserve choice and privacy even for the minority. Thus, laws protecting privacy should exist. The rules shouldn't be only made by and for the low-information majority.

    4. Re:Bathrooms and bedrooms only? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That is objectively not true.

      Not every listing has cameras disclosed, so your premise is false.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:Bathrooms and bedrooms only? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who rents out apartments. In one case, he put a fairly new computer into it's purchase container, and put the item in the cupboard for later retrieval.
      One month later, and 4 groups of guests, he went to fetch the box with the computer, to find the box was there, but the computer was missing. That was a simple $400 loss. C'est la vie.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  4. Re:DUH!! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    (1) If you're a coward, don't rent the house out.
    (2) Don't rent it to people whom you don't trust. Use Craigslist, talk on the phone, meet them in person, get references. AirBNB is too impersonal to weed out the bad actors.
    (3) If you follow rules (1) and (2), you shouldn't need to invade your tenants' privacy.

  5. Incredibly Rare? by careysub · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or merely rarely caught?

    Or - more to the point, sufficiently rarely caught and publicized that a company flack thinks he can get away with calling it "incredibly rare"?

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    1. Re:Incredibly Rare? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Despite people's assertions, people who actively commit perverted crimes are actually incredibly rare given the general population.

    2. Re:Incredibly Rare? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Whether that's true or not depends on what "perverted crimes" are in you locale. It's claimed, on what grounds I don't know, that the average US resident commits more than one felony per day. Do *you* know what all the laws say is a "crime"? What's the difference between a crime and a "perverted crime"?

      If you had asserted that most people don't hurt other people against their will I would have agreed with you, but "perverted crimes" is basically an undefined term.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Incredibly Rare? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      It seems that the hosts are committing a crime, but are they doing it for a perverted reason or just to protect their property? It's not acceptable either way and they will likely end up in jail if prosecuted. But I'd still want to know if there is a sexual motivation or if it's just that they realize that renting their house out to strangers is a really bad idea and then get desperate to minimize their risk.

    4. Re:Incredibly Rare? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you had asserted that most people don't hurt other people against their will I would have agreed with you, but "perverted crimes" is basically an undefined term.

      So you completely agree with my post and the fundamental discussion I was replying to but you typed all that because you're hung up on a definition? Are you in Human Resources by any chance?

    5. Re:Incredibly Rare? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No. I can't tell what your asserting because your words aren't meaningful. IOW: Sorry, but when I get a syntax error I can't compile.

      I don't know whether I agree with you or not.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  6. Better Idea by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you come across one of these, steal the camera.

    The host won't dare ask where their illegal spy camera overlooking the bed is.

    We had some illegal cameras we found in one of our buildings that we simply took down. No one ever asked about them ( and they were pricey cameras ) because doing so would be admitting putting them up illegally in the first place.

    1. Re:Better Idea by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you come across one of these, steal the camera.

      The host won't dare ask where their illegal spy camera overlooking the bed is.

      We had some illegal cameras we found in one of our buildings that we simply took down. No one ever asked about them ( and they were pricey cameras ) because doing so would be admitting putting them up illegally in the first place.

      I know where I am but you should read TFA

      The individual was one of two people who spoke to the website about their experience with finding hidden cameras inside their rental homes.
      The other renter — a woman named Erin — said her host chose to report her for damages after she unplugged a device she found inside a Houston Airbnb.
      “They just treated it like I was trying to get out of paying,” she said in reference to the company’s handling of the situation. “I was like, ‘Hello, he is saying he did what I was saying he did,’ and the customer service rep told me that I should ‘respond professionally.'”

      If AirBnB's initial response is to blame the renter without investigating things then AirBnB has more than a voyeurism problem.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Better Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you come across one of these, steal the camera.

      The host won't dare ask where their illegal spy camera overlooking the bed is.

      We had some illegal cameras we found in one of our buildings that we simply took down. No one ever asked about them ( and they were pricey cameras ) because doing so would be admitting putting them up illegally in the first place.

      How can cameras that you installed in your own house be illegal? Can you cite any statutory law to back up how such a camera could be illegal?

    3. Re:Better Idea by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for elsewhere, but in Canada cameras are illegal where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy, common examples are bathrooms or change rooms in public places.

    4. Re:Better Idea by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, they would not have -- the guest would have to do so, as the party being harmed. AirBNB has no interest in reporting something like that and creating bad publicity around their service.

    5. Re:Better Idea by MeNeXT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In my experience Airbnb couldn't care about the renter. When a renter has a terrible experience they do not display the comments they post. If you travel using Airbnb you are rolling the dice. I found myself stranded thousands of kilometers away from home and Aitbnb's response was that is was my though luck.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    6. Re:Better Idea by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Unless they saw the camera in person and determined it was on, they had no real evidence that a crime occurred. Up to the victim to make a report.

    7. Re:Better Idea by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with stealing. This Slashdot coverage from the past decade may remind you think twice about it, anyway :D

      * College Student Finds GPS On Car, FBI Retrieves It
      * Student Sues FBI For Planting GPS Tracker

    8. Re:Better Idea by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      What if they turn the cameras off during the rental period?

    9. Re:Better Idea by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Blackmail is also illegal. If they can show that you were blackmailing them, now you're on the hook for criminal offense. Either accept it or report it. Vigilanteism discouraged.

    10. Re:Better Idea by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Then they're also admitting to a crime. Quite the dilemma.

    11. Re:Better Idea by markana · · Score: 1

      >The other renter — a woman named Erin — said her host chose to report her for damages after she unplugged a device she found inside a Houston Airbnb.

      Was it acutally a camera? There have been stories of paranoid guests tearing down smoke detectors thinking they were cameras. Not every electronic gadget in a home is spying on you (Alexa/Home/etc. excepted, of course).

  7. Rare? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    or just not yet discovered?

  8. Surveillance of us here at Slashdot...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find it hypocritical that Slashdot would publish a submission about surveillance in the hospitality industry being wrong, when this is a web site that uses all sorts of online trackers and "analytics" providers to surreptitiously monitor us!

    My blockers show something called "RPX Now", and something called "Stack Sonar", and something called "Cross Pixel Media", and something called "Janrain", and something called "AlmondNet", and something called "Taboola", and something called "Pro Market", and something called "Bombora", and something called "LinkedIn Analytics", and something called "Google Analytics", and something called "ML314", and something called "SlashdotMedia Analytics".

    Frankly, the situation here would be like walking into a hotel bathroom and seeing a camera hanging from the ceiling, a microphone suspended in the shower, three cameras looking up from inside the toilet, a camera under the counter at crotch level, a one-way mirror with a team of marketing analysts watching your every move, and DNA sample collectors build into each towel.

    1. Re:Surveillance of us here at Slashdot...... by Megol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is /. using your webcam to spy on you? No? Then what have your rant to do with this? Nothing? Exactly.

  9. Wow by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    A treasure hunt to get free hardware! That's nice!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  10. Ewwwwwww by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    Makes you wonder how many places you stayed at (Airbnb's, motels, hostels, etc) over the years might have been pulling this kind of shit without your knowledge. I think I see a consumer market for a device that can detect these kinds of 'bugs'.

    1. Re:Ewwwwwww by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how many places you stayed at (Airbnb's, motels,
      hostels, etc) over the years might have been pulling this kind of shit
      without your knowledge.

        I think I see a consumer market for a device that can detect these kinds of 'bugs'.

      1. Sucks to be them when I am in such a place and parading around naked!

      2. Unless it's a stand alone camera, then what you are looking for is basically a Network Scanner. Just connect to the Host's network and scan for any devices that look like cameras.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re: Ewwwwwww by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're really worried, get a decent RF detector (around $100 or so). They work like those bug detectors in the movies, you sweep the room with them to find sources of RF in certain bands. Also, some cameras (pocket photo cams or smart phone cameras) are sensitive to IR, you can test that with a TV remote. If you have such a camera, turn off the lights and use it to find IR sources.

      Lastly, most consumer grade hidden cameras are in the form of motion detectors or smoke detectors. Or nanny cams in pluche toys. A closer look at one of these will quickly reveal the fact that it's a camera.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re: Ewwwwwww by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=n...

      Looks like there are plenty of RF detectors under $25 bucks these days.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re: Ewwwwwww by quenda · · Score: 1

      If you have such a camera, turn off the lights and use it to find IR sources.

      Any phone-camera will do that, but no need.
      If you turn the lights off, you can see IR lights with the naked eye. The LEDs all leak enough red light to be easily seen in the dark.

  11. Voyeur by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  12. A prior guest or service worker by spinitch · · Score: 1

    A more challenging situation might involve a third party such as prior guest, cleaner, maintenance installing surveillance devices . The owner may not know. Recall in Japan sweeping services finding mainly mics often as electrical outlet adapters like USB chargers. First find them but next find out who is eavesdropping. Hall & Oates 80â(TM)s song turns out more insightful then I imagined except left out the public eyes too part and now need to get that darn tune out of my head.

    1. Re: A prior guest or service worker by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      That's was my first thought too. I'm surprised by how many rental properties seem to never change their wifi password. Seems like it'd far easier for a past guest to set up something like that and far safer than doing it in a place you own

  13. Re:The Absurdity of Claiming to be an Atheist by Megol · · Score: 1

    I don't think foxes are religious...

  14. Re:So why is it okay for web browsers to spy on us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Google employee spotted.

  15. Re:Privacy? What's that? by Megol · · Score: 1

    Mouse in your pocket?

  16. Sharing economy attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hm, if you plant a hidden camera, you can get a host banned for life (what are they going to say, it isn't theirs? Who will believe them?)

    How much will a host will be willing to pay to avoid such banishment?

    How much will Airbnb be willing to pay (as a bug bounty?) to avoid the bad press if it becomes widely known that they have had to ban thousands for hidden cameras?

    How long until the pain and emotional suffering of their constituents causes politicians to decide that the Airbnb's need be responsible for the actions of their hosts?

  17. Well, no more airbnb rental... by burtosis · · Score: 1

    On the up side it sounds like they were more senate candidate material.

  18. Installation != Use by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People can (and do) deploy hidden cameras in conjunction with home security systems, for the purpose of identifying burglars or home invaders. A homeowner could reasonably claim that the cameras are only activated when the property is vacant. Considering that the value proposition of Air BnB is to facilitate absentee landlords, such property owners have a reasonable use case for cameras: to inspect the property via remote control after tenants leave, to see if the housekeeping service is doing their job. If the cameras are not actually running while tenants are present, there is no need to disclose their presence.

    Hypothetically, if I owned a home in some far away place and wanted to rent it out via Air BnB, I would (at a minimum) have some sort of home security system to protect the property during weeks when it might be vacant. If someone wants to rent it and they ask me if the property is ready for visitors, I might want a camera system to help determine the status of the house. If I pay a service provider for maintenance or cleanup, I'm going to want some verification that they showed up and did the work. Cameras can do all of that, using nothing more than hardware already present for the security system.

    Is there room for abuse? Absolutely. Bad landlords could hide under the skirt of reasonable use cases, and run the cameras 24x7. Even worse, the government really wants you to begrudgingly accept THEIR 24x7 cameras, so they are unlikely to provide meaningful protection from private cameras. Although Air BnB says disparaging things about hidden cameras, they don't want to lose their base of absentee landlords either. You can't have it both ways. The cameras are winning this battle, using expedience as a shield against privacy rights.

    1. Re:Installation != Use by Kjella · · Score: 2

      If the cameras are not actually running while tenants are present, there is no need to disclose their presence.

      Considering AirBnB's terms says otherwise, it's at minimum a breach of contract. And none of what you said describes a reasonable need for hidden cameras, even if that was so for aesthetic reasons there should at minimum be a notice. I wouldn't call you or the company if I found a hidden camera in my AirBnB, I'd call the cops and let them work out if you have been conducting illegal surveillance or not.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Installation != Use by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      People can (and do) deploy hidden cameras in conjunction with home security systems, for the purpose of identifying burglars or home invaders.

      That should be easy to prove, show me all the other hidden cameras in all the other rooms. Or are you only worried about someone stealing the bed and the shower curtain?

    3. Re:Installation != Use by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Right, but a breach of contract is a minor civil matter. Intentionally recording somebody when they have an expectation of privacy is a criminal one.

    4. Re:Installation != Use by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      The only recourse AirBnB offers for finding an undisclosed surveillance device is a refund, as described at https://www.airbnb.com/help/ar...

      The presence of an undisclosed camera is at most, a breach of contract. And since AirBnB anticipates this and prescribes a specific remedy, it won't be easy for a tenant to get any more compensation than a free rental. After all, the tenants agreed to the terms (and the specific remedy for undisclosed cameras) as part of the contract.

      The USE of such a camera might be grounds for all sorts of civil & criminal trouble, but the proof of use is ultimately on you. If you call the cops, they would need a search warrant (in the landlord's home state) to do any meaningful followup. That's a lot of effort with a low probability of success. Without a solid reason to believe the camera was in use, I wouldn't bet much on the search warrant, much less the search. At best, you end up with a 5% chance of catching a landlord illegally using a camera vs. a 100% chance of getting blacklisted as a tenant.

      What I think you'll see in the future is a boilerplate disclosure of surveillance devices, whether they are present or not, just as you can't open a food wrapper these days without some form of peanut disclosure. Otherwise, the only camera-free properties to rent will be those where the landlord manages the property in person. That would pretty much eliminate the entire category of vacation home rentals.

    5. Re: Installation != Use by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      Assume whatever you want, but without actual proof that the camera was used, your assumptions fall short of probable cause. No proof means no search warrant, which means no arrest, which means game over.

    6. Re: Installation != Use by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      Everyone has privacy rights, but everyone has a right to due process as well. A landlord's lack of camera disclosure falls far short of any level of proof necessary to establish violation of a tenant's privacy rights. Without such proof, it's not easy to find any jurisdiction on the planet (least of all Europe) that will act on the mere possibility that privacy rights might have been violated.

      The solution is ridiculously simple. All rental contracts to include boilerplate text that acknowledges the presence of cameras and the circumstances under which the landlord intends to use them. Such text won't change much, but it eliminates potential complaints. Happy now?

      To a certain extent, the Air BnB business model depends on tenants accepting the presence of cameras that operate when the property is unoccupied. The only viable alternative is to stay at a hotel, where housekeepers visit daily and a property manager is on site.

  19. regulation by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Does everyone understand the point of regulation now?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  20. Re:Scary, really? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    You realize this has the potential to destroy lives right?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  21. Of course by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    If I was dumb enough to rent my house out to strangers, I would certainly want some sort of monitoring to keep them from, or at least be able to charge them for, trashing it. I don't think you should have an expectation of privacy when you are guest in someone else's home.

          Of course, I would never even imagine doing something as foolish as renting my house out to strangers that I haven't checked out and trust.

    1. Re:Of course by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Well, I do that to make ends meet. The traditional way is to have a list of all the things in the house, signed by the renter upon arrival. Then upon departure you go again with him through the list: 10 forks, 6 chairs, etc... If something's missing and/or broken you keep part of the deposit. No need for cameras.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  22. You can't trust people anyway... by MindPrison · · Score: 3

    ...I lived in a 3 room rental area in a house with no keys to my rooms for 3 years, I had this weird feeling that the guy who rented it to me kinda stole my stuff.

    I got so paranoid on the 3rd year, that I decided to purchase an ip camera (a camera that can send mpg. files to my mail address without a computer connected to the camera, in other words...totally independent of my computer). I set it up, and no longer than half a day during a sunday, it actually captured the guy in action. When I was out of my "rented rooms", he was there prowling my private premises. he was doing something funky to my clothes, I couldn't quite figure out what it was, but he kept running for the window to see if I was on my way home, and back to my closets just to continue his business over and over again. I got these mails at work (with mpg4 files 10 seconds worth each), unfortunately a lot of them was sent to me due to light changes in the room ...like the clouds passing by etc, but I quickly found a way to search the image files for file-size changes as the files would pretty much stay the same size if nothing changed but colors, but when there was detail change in the images - the files would get considerably bigger.

    Lo and behold...he was there - rummaging trough my stuff.

    So yes, you can't trust people - you really can't! this isn't just one off, I've had 3 cases like this, all with their own weird fetishes. :/

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  23. Re:Why is anyone surprised? by careysub · · Score: 1

    Some people do it because they are perverts but most people do it to protect their property. Do remember that hotels also have hidden cameras.

    Only in Russia do you expect those to be inside the hotel rooms!

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  24. Re:The Absurdity of Claiming to be an Atheist by HiThere · · Score: 1

    I agree. Being an atheist is as silly as believing in God...any god.

    The only two rational positions are gnostic and agnostic. I happen to be both.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  25. "how stupid and flawed that argument is." by MarkeJohnston · · Score: 1

    It is stupid.. turn off the lights? Too many people fool around in the dark, so the cameras I boght work via IR too....

  26. Re: DUH!! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    What for? You inspect the place after each visit and since you know who rented it you know who to go after if things are missing or broken. If Hotels doesn't need this then AirBnB doesn't either.

  27. Most folks I know don't hide security cameras by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they want them visible so a would be thief sees them and moves on to less risky targets. This is much, much more likely to be regular, run of the mill perverts.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re: The Absurdity of Claiming to be an Atheist by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    Just come up with one version of "God" so we can all finally agree it's all bullshit then we can all be atheist. Changing the definition of "God" is the ultimate moving of goal posts.

  30. Re: Scary, really? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    He's the guy taking the videos. "I didn't hurt you".

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  31. Feature by spinitch · · Score: 1

    We have cameras . You can turn off while you are occupying the premises. You are responsible. You can help protect your stuff by turning back on when you leave. These are not Fort Know fool proof. There are none in bathroom or bedroom. An electronics sniffer would be nice. Here you go check the place out for yourselves. We will do the same. Why we require a deposit.

  32. What's the problem? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    I have security cameras being installed in the near future. (I bought the Lorex system and am waiting for the installation to complete.)

    I'm putting up several cameras around the perimeter of the house but also putting up a few internal cameras. Ones to catch the entrances to the house, one for the basement window near the power mains, one to cover my bar, and one for the entrance to my master bedroom.

    I figure that if someone breaks in when we're away those are the areas that would be targets. The bar one is for when the kids are older and have friends over. I want there to be no question if someone started drinking when they are not supervised.

    As for recording when someone is (hypothetically) renting the house, I would certainly keep them all on. What if someone breaks in while the renters are away for dinner?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  33. Re:So why is it okay for web browsers to spy on us by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

    I'd say it's closer to what air bnb explicitly would allow. Say per the rules, they can have a camera in the living room, so long as it is disclosed to the guests. You are quite literally aknowledging it's disclosure to prove it's existence.