Slashdot Mirror


New Satellite Experiment Helps Confirm Einstein's Equivalence Principle (presse.cnes.fr)

Part of Einstein's theory of general relativity posits that gravity equals inertial mass -- and for the first time in 10 years, there's new evidence that he's right. Slashdot reader orsayman reports: Most stories around space today seem to revolve around SpaceX, but let's not forget that space is also a place for cool physics experiments. One such experiment currently running into low orbit is the MICROSCOPE satellite launched in 2016 to test the (weak) Equivalence Principle (also knows as the universality of free fall) a central hypothesis in General Relativity.

The first results confirm the principle with a precision ten times better than previous experiments. And it's just the beginning since they hope to increase the precision by another factor of 10. If the Equivalence Principle is still verified at this precision, this could constrain or invalidate some quantum gravity theories. For those of you who are more satellite-science oriented, the satellite also features an innovative "self destruct" mechanism (meant to limit orbit pollution) based on inflatable structures described in this paper.

"The science phase of the mission began in December 2016," reports France's space agency, "and has already collected data from 1,900 orbits, the equivalent of a free fall of 85 million kilometres or half the Earth-Sun distance."

71 comments

  1. Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Hey, why is this not another "RUSSIAN COLLUSION" story?
     
    Every other story was Russian-bashing.
     
    Come on! We want to hear the paid-off Slashdot "editors" shove more conspiracy theory in our faces that "THE RUSSIANS" made us vote for Donald Trump.

    1. Re:Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Shut up , nobody cares about your pro-Russia shilling. NASA and the Russian space agency have worked together for decades and science is international. Working together on one level doesn't mean that you should endorse other things the Russian government has done, such as influencing elections, destabilizing nations, human rights abuses, etc. Also note: Russia != the current Russian government with its oligarchs and fascists. I'm sure the Russian space agency would be happy if Putin went the way of the Dodo, so to say.

    2. Re:Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      So what are they paying you to do that? 50c/post? Or are you out of your parents' basement so they have to pay you $1/post just so you can afford that low rent Baltimore ghetto apartment?

    3. Re:Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      >shove more conspiracy theory in our faces that "THE RUSSIANS" made us vote for Donald Trump.

      They didn't make you vote for Donald Trump. Willful ignorance taken advantage of by greedy rich people under the color of faith requested some help from the Russians, and enough people lacking critical thinking capacity and feeling disenfranchised enough bought into the idea that a greedy rich misogynistic narcissist who has never dealt fairly with anyone would suddenly deal fairly with them instead of lining his own pockets that he got elected.

      And now you're so deep in that no amount of proof will get you to admit you've made a massive mistake - you believe every lie Trump utters, you dismiss every fact that contradicts his lies, and every one of you who continues to permit him to hold the office of President is responsible for your society going down the shitter as you divide people by race, religion, and nationality and set them against one another in a futile hope that you can carve up the world into smaller pieces and be more important in the part you live in. You even pervert the principles of your own faith to maintain your support for the orange buffoon.

      Here's a hint: You CAN carve the world up into smaller pieces. You CAN be more important in your part. Overall, things will get worse, and you'll have a worse standard of living than you would otherwise, and you're going to be really disappointed when you find out that 'can' doesn't mean 'will'.

      I'd wish you good luck with that, but I can't as you're dragging down a lot of innocent people with you.

    4. Re: Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You explained her highness, Hillary, and the votes she got. She laughed about screwing the working class. The real impact is not that trump was elected, but that the working class has rejected the DNC.

    5. Re: Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Continue the deflection. It doesn't matter how shitty Trump is, or what damage he causes... because 'Hillary'.

      Awesome. It's like you've got Trump's playbook shoved so far up your ass it's replaced your brain.

    6. Re:Russian Collusion! by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      It'd be nice if there could be some public discourse with this R vs D shit intruding constantly. I miss the good old days when once the election was over a few months later everyone had moved on. I blame 24 hour news that constantly strives to create division so they can sell more and more advertising.

    7. Re:Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn how to read, dumbass.

    8. Re:Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's more than the 24-hour news cycle. Twitter, Facebook, and other social media also help perpetuate the adrenaline of electoral strife and factionalism. Unsurprisingly, they are also advertising-supported media. The owners of the media, both the news cycle and the social chatter continuum, also seem personally invested in factionalism and demand "change" and "disruption" and regardless of the topic and entirely despite the disruptive change of ruling faction from one party's near supermajority eight years ago to the other party's majority now - it's not even "change back to the old change" but simply "change for the sake of change." Plato warned of this in the Republic: there is an inherent tendency in generations to change, not always for the better, that a good polity's sustainability and stability temporarily, but not permanently, resists. We have reached the end of our polity's ability to resist destructive change, so we begin the slide from oligarchy through democracy and mob rule into tyranny.

    9. Re:Russian Collusion! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 0

      It'd be lovely, but the problem is in that lovely Gobbels quote, "If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth."

      When the Trumpers start spewing their lies (and they're almost always lies, something like 5x per day minimum from Trump himself, with frequent repeats of previous falsified statements... that's not a partisan bias speaking), you simply have to challenge them. Every time.

      Because when you don't, they win; people believe the unchallenged lie. You worry about being polite, but they see their brash rudeness as a positive thing. So yeah, until they're expunged from polite society, there's no polite society possible when they're around. You have to sink to their level because your level simply doesn't work with them.

    10. Re:Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ah, yes, the unfounded "RUSSIANS!" lie. Keep repeating "RUSSIANS" and it sticks. Let's see here.
       
        Would someone PLEASE reveal the ORIGIN of this "RUSSIANS" witchhunt? What evidence was there to begin with to base any investigation? When was the first occurrence of blaming "THE RUSSIANS" for mind controlling Americans?
       
      It's been a year. The Soros plant Hillary LOST. The Democrats could have put ANYONE ELSE up, and Trump would have lost in a landslide. Your sour grapes GRIPING for a year after the election is unprecedented.

    11. Re:Russian Collusion! by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Nothing about Trump is made OK by anything about Clinton.

      Attempt to distract from the Orange Buffon: failed.

      But you'll try again and again, right?

    12. Re:Russian Collusion! by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I can see it in a political discussion. You'd just think nerds could talk about Nerd stuff without bring up political bullshit. Maybe when it gets to GW I could see it but here it's got nothing to do with any of that.

    13. Re: Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many anti Trump news stories were retracted as fake news this week? How many new jobs were created last month? Are you using your critical thinking skills?

    14. Re: Russian Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You are part of a mass hallucination created by propaganda in the media. You wonder how the German people were taken in by Nazi propaganda that millions of their fellow citizens were evil? You and millions of your fellow leftists are living proof of how easy it is.

      I'm a sidenote which political Party in the US has divided people against each other in every possible way encouraging them to think of themselves as victims and encouraging their anger all for political power? Just look at your anger. It feels good to hate doesn't it? Those chemicals in your brain that hate and anger produce give you a high that becomes addictive doesn't it? That's the whole point of the leftist propaganda in the US and it's working very well on you and millions like you. It's why so many of you put on masks and beat up people you see as evil. It feels good to hurt people doesn't it? I just wonder if you'll ever have a moment where you wake up from your hate-induxed hallucination and realize you are the Nazi.

  2. Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    If our planet stopped rotating and revolving around the sun, we actually would fly off the planet if we jumped?

    1. Re: Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, rotation and orbits don't affect the fact that the Earth has mass.

    2. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Earth were to slow its rotation, the portion of your weight that is offset by centripital acceleration would be less and you would immediately notice your weight increasing. If it were to stop rotating, the immense increase in gravity would collapse your body to a volume smaller than a grape and of course you would not survive this unique experience (along with everyone else). The energy of the collapse would of course have to go somewhere, and it would be mostly heat along with some sonic energy if the collapse happened quickly enough.

    3. Re: Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So do cows, which you all are. MOOOOO! MOOOOO! Mooooo cows MOOOOO! Moo say the cows! YOU ORBITAL COWS!!

    4. Re:Does this mean by glenebob · · Score: 4, Funny

      And this explains why humans have never, and can never, go anywhere near the north and south poles.

    5. Re:Does this mean by PPH · · Score: 1

      north and south poles

      Pure inventions on the part of the round-earthers to hide the locations of the edges.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe that and you will believe anything.

      What a load of crap.

      Newton came up with his laws of motion and gravity stuff three hundred years ago. It's still valid. There was a time when anyone leaving school knew such simple things.

      What on Earth happened?

    7. Re:Does this mean by ChatHuant · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pure inventions on the part of the round-earthers to hide the locations of the edges.

      But the truth of the flat Earth will still win in the end; the Flat Earth Society has now members from all around the globe!

    8. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's use actual numbers, eh?

      g = 9.81 m/s^2
      \Omega = 7.3e-5 /s
      R = 6380 km

      R \Omega^2 is much less than g

      Looks like you'll be fine.

    9. Re: Does this mean by careysub · · Score: 2

      I was missing these AC cow posts. Much more amusing than our recent flat earther coward.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    10. Re:Does this mean by careysub · · Score: 1

      Please mod this up "funny"!

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    11. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded funny? It should be insightful. Plus some extra points for creative sarcasm.

    12. Re:Does this mean by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Let's use actual numbers, eh?

      g = 9.81 m/s^2
      \Omega = 7.3e-5 /s
      R = 6380 km

      R \Omega^2 is much less than g

      Looks like you'll be fine.

      To be more precise, R * omega^2 = 0.0337 m/s^2, or about 0.34% of gravitational acceleration.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    13. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that read, "...every corner of the world?"

    14. Re:Does this mean by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, it means your brain would pop out of your ass when you jumped.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re: Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider a spherical cow in a vacuum

  3. In soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...inertial mass equals GRAVITY! Oh, wait...

  4. Experiment? by AlanObject · · Score: 2

    Is there any lay text around that explains how the experiment works? The article doesn't have and talks more about space pollution than relativity & gravity.

    1. Re:Experiment? by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Informative

      General Relativety states that the acceleration due to gravity on two bodies that start at same position and with same velocity will be the same regardless of composition. The sattelite has a reference accelerometer with an electrostatically suspended mass of one material, and a test accelerometer with two test masses of two other materials.

    2. Re: Experiment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank u, finally.

    3. Re:Experiment? by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
      I was wondering this myself. I hate it when all you get is the PR campaign BS.

      https://journals.aps.org/prl/a...
      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.027...
      http://sci2.esa.int/Microscope...

  5. The Kessler Syndrome... by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 2

    For those of you who don't pay attention to space matters, de-orbiting satellites is important because of something called the Kessler Syndrome. In effect, too much traffic up there would make it very difficult to get into space for thousands of years. This is also part of why the Chinese anti-satellite weapon test a while back was a big deal.

    We try to track everything, especially everything above a certain size, so we can prevent collissions.

    There's slightly more than a stub on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re:The Kessler Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Said it before and I say it again. North Korea didn't need to go to the expense of building nukes. They just need to pack a few tonnes of sand around some high explosives, launch it on a rocket into retrograde orbit, and blow it up a few hundred miles high if threatened. Ain't asymmetric escalation a bitch when you're fighting the little guy with a big sting!

    2. Re:The Kessler Syndrome... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ain't asymmetric escalation a bitch when you're fighting the little guy with a big sting!

      On the other hand, if you do have an ICBM with a nuke on it, you can do something even better than denying access to space, or even nuking a city: you can make one hell of an EMP, and charge the living shit out of the ionosphere making radio communications somewhere between difficult and impossible for days.

      We can probably clean up space debris by vaporizing it and/or slowing it down with lasers. But we have no great way to deal with an EMP, and no way to protect against one unless we can shoot down the missile.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The Kessler Syndrome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You both show misunderstanding of the way they are thinking, probably because of both sides' propaganda.
      North Korea is not bent on bringing grief to just anyone, and (perhaps foolishly) doesn't rely on a doomsday scenario for their protection, like Soviet Union did.
      They obviously seek capability of selective attacks (pre-emptive or retributive), because these types are possible to de-escalate or to scale up or down.
      It shows that they wish to come out of it alive, if possible, so they should be let to know that it is obvious they are bluffing with their "madman" rhetoric.

      Best course of action would be to show that the world is not impressed, and that although for the time being they can rest assured they will not be invaded, they won't blackmail out anything else by threatening other nations with their new expensive toys. If they soon don't commercialise their newly acquired technical expertise for some peace-time purposes and start playing nice with their potential customers, they certainly won't be able to eat their nukes and ICBMs. There is only one way out and that is North Korea gaining more pragmatism and returning into the global community. It may take some time. The bigger problem is what will happen once the peninsula is reunited and we get a little (well, relatively little, compared to PRC) regional industrial and technological superpower there, which might unexpectedly hurt neighbouring economies of Japan and lesser Asian "Tigers" and maybe even China. I predict the tensions might escalate instead of cooling down. So, perhaps it is a good thing that we still have North Korea to moderate the unrolling of events?

  6. Re:A false question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    First, the Earth would have to be spinning and moving. Can you get a gyroscope to move? Have you ever seen a hard drive move just from spinning?

    If Earth really spun, and we just don't feel it, we'd be completely dizzy everytime we took an airplane flight to another latitude, particularly if it was from the equator to the poles.

    Space is fake. The Earth is flat. The eclipses prove it.

  7. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    If you really want to experiment with gravity, look up the Allais Effect, and then design an experiment for the next solar eclipse. In the meantime, you can try to get a gyroscope to show rotation of the Earth.

    Space is fake. Earth is flat. The eclipses prove it.

    Solar Eclipse: https://vimeo.com/230976895
    Corona not shaped in a spherical configuration; orients toward Earth. Corona lines can be observed to move faster than the speed of light. Light of the corona can be observed on the back of the moon. Light of the chromosphere can be observed on the back of the moon. Light of protuberences can be observed on the back of the moon. Sun and Moon same size and near.

    Lunar Eclipse: https://vimeo.com/92378881
    Irregular shadow shape, progression. Shadow is black, then changes color to reddish: Shadows don't change color. Moon glow of uneclipsed portion increases as shadow becomes reddish, detail lost. Moon has no rotation(see Nikola Tesla): we always see the same face. Moon emits own light. Craters not from impacts: Too round.
    Next lunar eclipse: January 30/31, 2018 North America

  8. Here's a riddle about equivalence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's heavier? 375 pounds of shit, or creimer?

    1. Re: Here's a riddle about equivalence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer because you have to account for his weight PLUS the 375 pounds of shit he carries around with him in his gut.

  9. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to experiment with gravity, look up the Allais Effect, and then design an experiment for the next solar eclipse. In the meantime, you can try to get a gyroscope to show rotation of the Earth.

    Space is fake. Earth is flat. The eclipses prove it.

    This Flat Earth stuff is getting totally ridiculous. What does it mean space is fake? Let's not even dwell on the Earth is flat part. Let's just focus on the "space is fake" one. Are we living in a bi-dimensional world? Are Mars and the other planets fake? Even the Flat Earth Society recently replied to Elon Musk saying "Mars has been observed to be round." So where is Mars, if not in space?

    I know you're just a troll, but come on, troll properly. The rest of your comment is equally dumb. "Sun and Moon same size and near"? "Moon has no rotation"? Can you even grasp basic concepts at all? Are you using speech to text because you never learned how to type?

  10. Flat Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Wake up folks the earth is not a globe!

  11. By implication by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    That they may be identical suggests they are the exact same phenomenon, which is cooler than everything else put together.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:By implication by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't exactly say it's cooler, but it's something that any good theory of gravity is going to need to explain, and we need a new theory of gravity, because General Relativity doesn't play nice with quantum physics...but they both seem correct everywhere we can test either of them (usually, though, we can't test them in the same places).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:By implication by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly say it's cooler, but it's something that any good theory of gravity is going to need to explain, and we need a new theory of gravity, because General Relativity doesn't play nice with quantum physics...but they both seem correct everywhere we can test either of them (usually, though, we can't test them in the same places).

      Before a quantum gravity theory, first we need a more complete Quantum Mechanics theory

      It has been demonstrated that it is impossible to renormalize gravity in Quantum field theory (part of QM) without the use of extra dimensions. At least not without the addition of Supersymetry to QM, a theory which has been taking a bruising lately from LHC data (the simplest SUSY model has already been ruled out.)

      QFT was widely believed to be truly fundamental but largely due to the continued failures of quantization of general relativity, the consensus is that it is only a very good low-energy approximation and there has to be something more fundamental (like Newton's laws are an approximation of GR which work for non-relativistic speeds and low gravitational fields)

  12. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    You can lookup Nikola Tesla's analysis of the moons rotation and argue with him. (It has none)

    Sun and moon are same size and near, because that is the only way the sun can be behind the moon, and still manage to project the light of it's corona and protuberances onto the back side that we see here on Earth during a solar eclipse.

    The "Flat Earth Society" is not a flat Earth group. They are run by the round Earthers. This is obvious from their ridiculous statement that gravity is the Earth accelerating upwards. The Earth does not move. Michelson-Morley showed this.

    Space is fake. The heavens are real. The concept of space that exists in your head, and shapes every thought about the nature of the universe, is not real. The heavens are up there above us and they are real. If 'space' was real, they wouldn't have needed to invent dark matter and dark energy to explain why their equations for gravity don't model the way it is.

    It is a lot to swallow. Start with the eclipses or get a gyroscope to show you rotation of the Earth.

  13. SOLID SCIENCE by Templer421 · · Score: 2

    This is what we pay taxes for.

  14. Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Gravity is just a theory, therefore another liberal lie.

    Things don't fall down! How does an airplane stay in the sky you fools?!

    Use common sense instead of science.

    1. Re:Fake by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Well you are partly coreect, ot is a theory, which means it makes predictions, those predictions can be tested, and so far those predictions have been proved right every tine. So I would have to dissagree with the second part of your statement. But if you cane produce a repetable experement that dissproves it thrtr is a rather famous comitie in Sweden that would like to hear from you.

    2. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Only on Earth, where the gravity theory was formulated. It does not model the 'universe,' which is why they invented dark matter and dark energy. No famous committee in Sweden is ever going to want to hear any of this. If they did, they could have started with the Allais Effect.

    3. Re:Fake by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      so far those predictions have been proved right every tine.

      May I fork your version of the theory? I'd just like to take a stab at it, if I may. Pretty sure I can handle it.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  15. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could just go flush a toilet on the opposite side of the planet...

  16. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    One other thing may help. Very smart men like Tycho Brahe looked up and saw the Earth at the center. This is because of the mathematical reality that whether the curve is on the surface of the Earth, or in the heavens, the view of the observer on Earth is the same. Just like Eratosthenes experiment can be applied in a flat model or a round model. Kepler worked on the very same observations in the same observatory, but used them to calculate elliptical orbits to make Copernicus' round Earth model better fit the observations.

    If the Earth was a spinning sphere, the evidence would be everywhere you look. For some strange reason, it isn't there. They give you 'ships over the curve', which is false. And they give you the lunar eclipse, which if you watch it, can't be explained by their model. For the solar eclipse, they simply pretend not to see the light, which until recent times, were very difficult for a man to record, and impossible for him to share.

  17. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure if you are serious, but Coriolis Effect is no longer claimed to cause swirl in draining water. Because whatever it is caused by (or isn't), it isn't the rotation of the Earth.

    If the Earth makes my toilet spin, it could certainly make my gyroscope move. Or my hard drive.

  18. Re:A false question by careysub · · Score: 1

    As our recent flat earth coward knows that all gyroscopes are rigidly fixed in space (he says so!). This is why no one with a laptop with a harddrive (or an iPod) has ever been able to tilt it in operation! Mystery solved!

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  19. Re:A false question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A gyroscope is rigidly fixed in space unless forced to change orientation. The purpose of the gymbals is to provide it the ability to rotate the gymbals instead of the rotor. The effect is that a gyroscope should appear to 'move' relative to the floor, desk, or the Earth, if the Earth is moving.

    A hard drive will resist rotation as well, if you have ever held one while it is spinning. Like a gyroscope, a hard drive that isn't fixed in place by surface friction or bolts should tend to 'crawl' or move about as it resists the rotation of the Earth. This would be separate from the potential movements caused by head seeking.

    A Leibert flywheel UPS would do the same thing, but should be especially forceful, considering the spinning rotor is storing enough electricity to power data center equipment until generators start up.

    And as I said below, if the spinning Earth used to be powerful enough to spin my toilet water, why not anything else. (They no longer claim Coriolis effect turns toilet water)

  20. Ludicrous lede by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    ”Most stories around space today seem to revolve around SpaceX, but let's not forget that space is also a place for cool physics experiments.”

    Well, if the sum total of your science reading amounts to scanning Slashdot headlines, perhaps this is true. But then you probably also believe that the vast majority of financial news stories involve Bitcoin.

    Otherwise... no. There’s a lot of very cool real space science going on right now! Meanwhile Musk is essentially running an innovative delivery service.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Ludicrous lede by orsayman · · Score: 1

      You're right, I meant "most Slashdot stories around space today seem to revolve around SpaceX". While it's of course interesting to talk about SpaceX sometimes it feels like any SpaceX launch deserves its dedicated story... That was a tentative catch-phrase because like you I believe that we have good reasons to do science in space.

  21. but isn't the earth flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    The flat earth truthers are very confident the earth is flat and gravity doesn't exist, how can this be true??

    Serious question - does anyone reading believe the earth is flat?

    1. Re:but isn't the earth flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      The part of gravity that 'doesn't exist' would be the part that says all matter attracts all other matter. This follows because if the Earth were hypothetically a flat disc, traditional gravity would pull everything into the center of the disc. If the Earth is a plane, then we don't know the thickness or how that is distributed.

      Some flat Earthers think density and buoyancy explain everything. Myself, I think there is a downward force, which we call gravity. However, there is something more to that force, which is reflected in the Allais Effect.

      I will again point out that if gravity was everything they say, they wouldn't have needed to invent dark matter and dark energy to explain why the rest of the 'universe' doesn't seem to obey.

  22. What does this have to do with global warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    This story is too complicated for me. Can't we get back to stories about global warming? Those stories are the ones I like because they make everything so simple. Science stories are too complicated.

    Einstein? Ouch!

  23. How exactly is this being tested? by kevin805 · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to find anything explaining how the test works. Is it just measuring forces on balls with different densities or something?

    1. Re: How exactly is this being tested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, try asking on a tech oriented site, rather than a kegster of retards like Slashdot. From my simple reading of summaries like this, it appears as if there are two different reference masses on the satellite, in carefully controlled conditions, their position on board measured to within atoms through what looks like capacitive feedback. The masses are electrostatically adjusted to keep their position. If there is a difference in the adjustment required (the satellite is in freefall, but presumably needs to keep its own position adjusted, in turn requiring the masses to be), this would indicate a difference between gravitational and intertial mass.

    2. Re:How exactly is this being tested? by orsayman · · Score: 1

      Basically yes. There is a brief description of the main instrument here. There was a mode detailed description with references to many papers but I can't find it anymore.

  24. Not a globe by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Wake up folks the earth is not a globe!

    Exactly right. It's an oblate spheroid.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  25. Re:DIY gravity experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you're just a troll, but come on, troll properly.

    This has been the MO of various trolls on Slashdot science topics for ages. They just copy past the exact same post over and over again, with maybe one sentence that gets tweaked each time. Doesn't matter that every other time they get a bunch of replies showing how wrong stuff is. They just keep saying, "But no one has ever answered this question," or, "No one ever talks about foo or bar," regardless of how many people have answered those questions or talked about such things.

    It amounts to very lazy trolling, but it works almost every time. Some trolls do it for pride and sense of power over others, others just do it for a quick fix like some disheveled drug addict. At least APK put more effort into things by rewriting. Even most pseudoscientists have better things to do than copy paste the same thing over and over again on a message board without reading replies.

  26. mommy whats nadrasys and nanosat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well?