Slashdot Mirror


Why Meteoroids Explode Before Hitting the Earth (qz.com)

According to a new study from Purdue University, scientists have figured out why meteoroids explode before hitting the Earth. "The research, published in the December issue of the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science, shows that as meteoroids plunge, the high-pressure air they push against find its way into the objects' pores and cracks, forcing their bodies apart from the inside," reports Quartz. "The result is a kind of detonation that looks like an explosion." From the report: To explain the astrophysics, researchers focused their work on a widely viewed February 2013 meteoroid explosion place over Chelyabinsk, Russia, a city of 1.1 million north of the Kazakhstan border. Researchers ran a computer program that allowed for them to simulate what happened to the meteoroid in the atmosphere. "Our simulations reveal a previously unrecognized process in which the penetration of high-pressure air into the body of the meteoroid greatly enhances the deformation and facilitates the breakup of meteoroids similar to the size of Chelyabinsk," the study states. The researchers added that while the air pressure is effective at breaking apart small meteoroids, larger ones would likely withstand the force as they come to Earth.

58 comments

  1. Missile Command by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    >> Why Meteoroids Explode Before Hitting the Earth

    I'm not saying it's Missile Command, but it's Missile Command.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokIGklnBGY

    1. Re:Missile Command by antdude · · Score: 1

      Played by Chuck too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Missile Command by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      Alien intervention.

    3. Re:Missile Command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it's not Space Invaders?

    4. Re:Missile Command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Why Meteoroids Explode Before Hitting the Earth

      I'm not saying it's Missile Command, but it's Missile Command.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nokIGklnBGY

      If the meteoroids didn't explode, we certainly wouldn't be around to ask that question.

  2. Re:duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is more to the study then meets the eye. This will lead to knowing how to build kinetic weapons for kt/mt range drops with out the fuss and muss of fallout.

  3. Interstellar "Pull my finger Meteoroids" by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    So, aliens are basically bombarding us with meteoroids armed with the old "pull my finger" gag. The gall of them! Can't we build a space wall to keep these stinking meteoroids out?

    "Memo to the engineering team on the dark side of the moon, building the blimps that will be used to conquer the Earth:"

    "Avoid pores and cracks in the outer skin of the weapon. These could lead to premature explosion, which would be a major bummer for the Führer,"

    "-- Donald Zuckerberg, Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Interstellar "Pull my finger Meteoroids" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      So, aliens are basically bombarding us with meteoroids armed with the old "pull my finger" gag. The gall of them! Can't we build a space wall to keep these stinking meteoroids out?

      Dyson Corp. has sent Trump a proposal for building a space wall, but the cost would be in the quintillions of dollars. Just to fund a project of that size, we would have to cancel the F-35 program.

    2. Re:Interstellar "Pull my finger Meteoroids" by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      Don't worry. Trump has assured everyone that he'll make the Martians pay for it.

    3. Re:Interstellar "Pull my finger Meteoroids" by thomst · · Score: 1

      GrumpySteen observed:

      Don't worry. Trump has assured everyone that he'll make the Martians pay for it.

      A mod point! A mod point! My kingdom for a mod point ... !

      --
      Check out my novel.
    4. Re:Interstellar "Pull my finger Meteoroids" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If we put the sphere outside Martian orbit, they will help pay for it.

  4. They called it explode by n329619 · · Score: 0

    I called it firework.

    I mean, look at the number of cars stop to stare at it when it comes!

  5. Not the true reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meteroids explode because they activate self destruction, as a way to prevent earthlings to discover top alien tech.
    This study is probably funded by aliens.

  6. FFS... They need to get out more... by Kelxin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Obviously none of these people doing "research" have ever gone camping .... just throw a couple moist rocks into a camp fire and see what happens....

    1. Re:FFS... They need to get out more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously none of these people doing "research" have ever gone camping .... just throw a couple moist rocks into a camp fire and see what happens....

      Obviously you've never considered the possibility that porous rocks in space might not have any gas in them.

    2. Re:FFS... They need to get out more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Campfire rocks explode because of water that has made its way inside the rock, not because of forced gas penetration. Couple the forced gas penetration with the friction heating and you get something much more powerful.

    3. Re:FFS... They need to get out more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he meant if you throw the rocks very very fast?

    4. Re:FFS... They need to get out more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they were inspired by a camping trip and wanted to precisely model the mechanism?

    5. Re:FFS... They need to get out more... by caseih · · Score: 1

      Except that if you'd read the article you'd know that internal fracturing caused by steam is not the phenomenon they are talking about at all here. Even very dry meteors can explode for the reasons they describe.

      I'm sure people intuitively understood for many years this idea that high speed, high pressure air can cause objects to break up catastrophically when it enters a hole in the object's surface (that's what destroyed the Columbia after all), but I think a lot of the emphasis was placed on temperature (just like your exploding rocks int the fire). Only now they've determined that just the air pressure effect itself can be powerful enough to cause a large ball of rock to explode. I'm sure hot plasma just adds to the effect.

    6. Re:FFS... They need to get out more... by crunchygranola · · Score: 2

      Are you always a cunt or is it just when you have anonymity?

      The un-self-aware irony in this is priceless.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  7. It's raining Metroids by malkien · · Score: 1

    I swear I read "Why Metroids Explode Before Hitting the Earth"

  8. Target practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How soon until small meteorites become target practice for new weapon systems I wonder.

    1. Re:Target practice? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      How soon until small meteorites become target practice for new weapon systems I wonder.

      Not soon at all; in fact, never. A meteorite is a meteor that has hit the earth, rendering it unsuitable for target practice.

    2. Re:Target practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a meteorite is a meteoroid that has hit the earth. A meteor is the bright streak it made in the sky.

  9. Hang On... by ytene · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something about the OP doesn't make sense.

    And no, not the fact that there isn't much in the way of "high-pressure air" at the outermost fringes of our atmosphere...

    The part which seems a little odd is to suggest that altering the apparent pressure [i.e. by the velocity of entry] can in some way "force" air into the cracks within a meteorite/meteorid to induce some form of break-up.

    Isn't it much more likely to be induced by the coefficient of expansion of the material concerned? If you take a meteorite and then flash-heat the outer surface very, very, very quickly - like for example by slamming it into an atmosphere at several thousand kph - then the outer layer will become very, very hot very quickly - and start to expand. The interior, meanwhile, simply won't have had time to warm up and thus will remain space-cold... As the outer layer warms, it expands. This would easily be enough to cause cracks in the material [think of the way that you can split a rock by pouring water into a crack and then waiting for the water to freeze...].

    It's been a while since I studied CFD [computational fluid dynamics - which is the science that would show how atmospheric gases would "flow" around an meteorite as it entered the atmosphere - but I think it's fair to say that a "boundary layer" would form that might in fact make it ridiculously difficult for "high pressure air" to be "forced" into tiny cracks in the surface.

    So... very interesting theory, but I think we might find that things like the irregular shape and density of the material [which causes non-uniform stress on the material] coupled with very high speed heating, might be significant factors too...

    1. Re:Hang On... by DrTJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're on to something.

      As far as I know, there are two ways for something to explode (not merely "break up", or "burn"). Either the object is made out of a high explosive, in which the chemical reaction occurs faster than the disintegration, or there is a hard shell surrounding a "low explosive" which reacts "slowly" and builds up a pressure within the shell and explodes when the shell bursts.

      Clearly, the meteoroids are not made out of high explosives (I think and hope), but I have a hard time to view them as the other model either. It is not the internal that is heated - it is the outside. The pores and cracks in the "shell" would work to equalize the pressure difference, not create it. The heated gas in the cracks would would be of insignificant volume, and therefore contain negligible energy, and if even there were a process in which this gas would be trapped and cause cracks, it would be just that - cracks. It would not be an explosion disintegrating the meteoroid.

      Something is fishy. May be it is the model that they put into the computer... SISO.

    2. Re:Hang On... by burtosis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you ever used a pressure washer? I own a mid grade entry level one with 3500 psi. You have to be very careful not to spray too hard into a crack or it will rip whatever it is apart. 3500 might not sound like a lot, but square area is deceptive. Say 300 psi gets into the crack, but the crack is 6 inches deep and 12 inches wide that's 21,600 lbs pushing on each side. But it gets worse, the stress has to flow from one side to the other of the crack, around the propagating crack tip. The sides of the crack act as a lever to concentrate the force many times higher if the crack tip is sharp and enough force is used to slightly bend the material. It's similar to fracking, the pressure may be moderate to high but the surface area is very large and it creates a super large force through several different effects that is capable of breaking rock.

    3. Re:Hang On... by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add that this fracturing would cause an explosion. Take a steel brick and hold a lighter under it, nothing happens. Create a dust and properly disperse it in the air and you can get a sizable explosion, this was a real problem for storing things like flour. So if it were to suddenly break up into small enough pieces it would react orders of magnitude faster with the atmosphere.

    4. Re:Hang On... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously it cause Bruce Willis blew them up, I've seen the documentary

    5. Re:Hang On... by careysub · · Score: 2

      It's been a while since I studied CFD [computational fluid dynamics - which is the science that would show how atmospheric gases would "flow" around an meteorite as it entered the atmosphere - but I think it's fair to say that a "boundary layer" would form that might in fact make it ridiculously difficult for "high pressure air" to be "forced" into tiny cracks in the surface.

      Try thinking of it this way.

      The meteor is stationary and it is being hit by a 20 km/s stream of gas (far into the hypersonic range, so this gas cannot "flow" around it). When the gas hits the surface of the meteor it comes to a dead halt. All that kinetic energy is converted into internal energy of the gas - extremely high pressure as well as extremely high temperature. This pressure at the very least exerts intense force on the meteor accelerating it (in this frame of reference) and subjecting it to powerful one-sided compressive force which deforms the body at the macro level, creating lateral tensile stresses. At the same time this high pressure gas is operating at the micro level, exerting pressure in every single pore and crack. Why do you imagine this is "ridiculously difficult" instead of the real case, which is "completely unavoidable"?

      What do you think this "boundary layer" is? A wall that keeps pressure from reaching the surface of the meteor? That is physically impossible simply due to conservation of momentum. Boundary layers on reentry bodies are simply cooler zones next to the surface of the body caused by ablation off of the surface. The pressure is exactly the same in the boundary layer as in front of it.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    6. Re:Hang On... by crunchygranola · · Score: 3, Funny

      Something about the OP doesn't make sense. And no, not the fact that there isn't much in the way of "high-pressure air" at the outermost fringes of our atmosphere... The part which seems a little odd is to suggest that altering the apparent pressure [i.e. by the velocity of entry] can in some way "force" air into the cracks within a meteorite/meteorid to induce some form of break-up. Isn't it much more likely to be induced by the coefficient of expansion of the material concerned? If you take a meteorite and then flash-heat the outer surface very, very, very quickly - like for example by slamming it into an atmosphere at several thousand kph - then the outer layer will become very, very hot very quickly - and start to expand. The interior, meanwhile, simply won't have had time to warm up and thus will remain space-cold... As the outer layer warms, it expands. This would easily be enough to cause cracks in the material [think of the way that you can split a rock by pouring water into a crack and then waiting for the water to freeze...]. It's been a while since I studied CFD [computational fluid dynamics - which is the science that would show how atmospheric gases would "flow" around an meteorite as it entered the atmosphere - but I think it's fair to say that a "boundary layer" would form that might in fact make it ridiculously difficult for "high pressure air" to be "forced" into tiny cracks in the surface.

      Interesting how you imagine tossing around some dimly remembered terms like "boundary layer" invalidates the detailed physics of these researcher's model.

      If they had access to your brilliance they would have know the answer without even examining the problem!

      This should a Slashdot "law":

      "If, with just a few minutes of thought about a scientific topic you have only slight familiarity with, you believe you have identified a fatal error that a team of highly trained professional researchers have failed to detect, you can be certain that you are wrong."

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    7. Re:Hang On... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classification system for meteors is complex; there are over a dozen major types and each has many sub-types. The typing is based on composition, and ultimately ties into the type system for asteroids and comets, where all the meteors come from. Most types are amalgams: silica-based rocks, with some small % of minerals, bonded with water and other ices. Upon heat-up in the atmosphere, the ices melt and the amalgam starts to disintegrate. This produces an exponential increase in surface area, which them immediately become available for heating; lather, rinse, repeat.

      This is NOT new information! I read this in a book from the 1980s (Meteorites: Their Record of Early Solar-System History, by John T. Wasson). The other major type of meteors are iron based, and can contain almost no or a significant percentage of ice. The study only mentions "silicates", so they did not consider iron or other metallic meteors.

    8. Re:Hang On... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should a Slashdot "law":

      "If, with just a few minutes of thought about a scientific topic you have only slight familiarity with, you believe you have identified a fatal error that a team of highly trained professional researchers have failed to detect, you can be certain that you are wrong."

      Appeal to authority? That's the opposite of the scientific process.

  10. Re:duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, it really won't.

    We already have a good understanding of how to drop something from orbit and have it hit the ground intact. At most, this study just confirms that cracked rocks aren't the best choice for that task, which we already knew.

  11. How big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joke Alert

    "facilitates the breakup of meteoroids similar to the size of Chelyabinsk"
    Never realised it was that big :-)

    1. Re:How big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meteorites (and thus, the meteoroids that form them) are named after the place where they fall. In this case, Chelyabinsk refers to the meteorid parent of the Chelyabinsk meteorites (of which I happen to own one), not the city on which they fell.

  12. Side question on comet/asteroid "tails" by swb · · Score: 1

    Do asteroids or comets have "tails' outside of the atmosphere in the vacuum of space -- ie, plumes of particulates given off? Are they "burning"?

    Or is this just what happens when they cross into an atmosphere and experience friction?

    I guess maybe I could see solar heating causing them to erode, but at the same time is there enough solar heating much outside Earth's orbital distance?

    1. Re:Side question on comet/asteroid "tails" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do asteroids or comets have "tails' outside of the atmosphere in the vacuum of space -- ie, plumes of particulates given off?

      If they are headed into the sun, comets do have tails

      Are they "burning"?

      It's vaporization, not "burning" as you may perceive it.

      Or is this just what happens when they cross into an atmosphere and experience friction?

      It's solar radiation, not heating.

      I guess maybe I could see solar heating causing them to erode, but at the same time is there enough solar heating much outside Earth's orbital distance?

      Comet Tails have actually been detectable (to telescopes, not the naked eye, and not specialized instruments like space probes)), beyond the orbit of Jupiter, and in terms of size, they can be longer than 3 astronomical units in themselves.

  13. Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what happened to these columbia space shuttle astronauts !

    Sad and horrible !

    Feel sorry for those poor fokkers !

    May they rest in pieces ! Chear up ! ;) =D

  14. Thermal Strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have thought that differential thermal strain and poor internal structure of the rock was the culprit. The inside is at the temperature of deep space. The outside gets hot. The expansion on the outer parts places the inner parts under tension. Rocks are not so good at withstanding tensile stress. A crack is propagated and the rock fails. Did the simulation also examine thermal strain? Thermal strain generates enormous forces. The lack of ductility in rock makes the problem even worse.

    The air pressure would have to be in the 10,000 psi region to break a rock that had any internal structural consistency. I don't buy it. All of the air pressure posited to be acting on the inside of the rock would also be acting on the outside of the rock compressing it. The internal air pressure and the external air pressure would cancel each other out.

    The range of mechanical strengths given in the summary of the article 1 MPa - to 330 MPa implies that 329 MPa of air pressure makes up the difference to cause the rock to fail. That's 47,000 psi. Is there an aerodynamicist here who can tell us how fast you have to be going to generate 47,000 psi of air pressure at the stagnation point?

    1. Re:Thermal Strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick scan of the paper shows that they discount thermal effects. I'm a lazy reader so double check for yourself.

    2. Re:Thermal Strain by mysticgoat · · Score: 2

      A meteor arriving with several times the Earth's escape velocity is not interacting with the atmosphere that you know; it it interacting with the plasma that is formed by compression in front of it. The streaks left by the sub-milimeter particles of a Leonid meteor shower are plasmas with a measured temperature of 4,000+ deg C; the plasma at the head of the meteor would be much hotter than that.

      So it is not cold air that is forced into the crevices of a meteor; it is very hot plasma. The pressure this exerts on the internal structure of the meteor is not countered by similar pressures on the back and sides of the object. Most meteors and bollides will burst apart.

    3. Re:Thermal Strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temperature != pressure. Fusion plasmas are a case in point running millions of degrees at the pressure of deep space. Just because the plasma is hot doesn't mean it exerts a lot of force vis a vis pressure. Hot certainly causes ablation or spalling, but ablation is not an explosion as far I know. But a 4,000C thermal strain absolutely exerts a lot of force on the order of many thousands of pounds. I suppose I could do a calculation. Maybe if I am bored this weekend.

  15. Looks Cool by Luthair · · Score: 1

    duh.

  16. Re:Noticed the yellow winter Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've found another round object infiltrated with air- this guys head!

  17. Re:duh. by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    when I read the headline I thought, because of friction from the atmosphere.

  18. They hate our way of life. by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    And are willing to die to destroy us.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  19. Re:duh. by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    You should get in an argument with other posters here who declare that this conclusion is obviously impossible.

    The arrogance of the lazy boy 'scientist'.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  20. Re:duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also use the wrong term. A meteoroid that has entered the atmosphere is called a meteor and if it reaches the ground, it's a meteorite.

  21. Not the conclusion I would have drawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trees explode when lightning hits them because the water in their sap is instantaneously converted to superheated steam and the immense pressure created blows the trunk apart. Same as river rocks thrown into camp fires.

    Guess what happens to the ice in meteoroids when they get superheated by atmospheric entry?