Slashdot Mirror


Russia-Linked Twitter Accounts 'Tried To Divide UK' After Terrorist Attacks (theguardian.com)

AmiMoJo shares a report from The Guardian: Fake social media accounts linked to Russia were used to influence and interfere with public debate in the aftermath of four terrorist attacks in the UK this year, researchers have found. At least 47 Russian Twitter accounts posted material after attacks at Westminster Bridge, Manchester Arena, London Bridge and Finsbury Park, according to researchers at the Cardiff University Crime and Security Research Institute (CSRI). Of the 47 accounts, eight were especially active, posting at least 475 tweets about the four attacks, which were reposted more than 153,000 times. The accounts intervened on both sides of polarized debates to ramp up the level of discord online, the research found.

133 comments

  1. Only 47? by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously 47? I call bullshit, there have to be more Russian trolls on twitter at any given second. And Americans, and Germans, and Australians, and Indians. Trolling is a world wide passtime.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Only 47? by thuylien · · Score: 0

      Visit my site you will have more useful information. hotmail photo storage

    2. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love how you dropped the "at least", brilliant, now the article is FAKE NEWS, oh wait, no that's just you. #MAGA

    3. Re:Only 47? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think of the debate within NATO on that number.

      Contractors wanting more over time prove 4700000 accounts are spreading news about what the Religion of War is doing.
      The NSA and GCHQ are sure its 47000000 accounts and want more funding to examine 5 hops from every account.
      MI5 and the FBI don't have 42300000 trusted contractors to watch 4700000 accounts in 24h shifts of 3 contractors.
      Some NATO nations are sure they cannot fund the over time for 3 investigators on weekends.

      After much internal debate the number 47 is selected from a list of bigger numbers.
      Its not a scary big number and can be presented like the Western security services have total control of the Religion of War issue.
      500 contractors watch over 47 accounts in shifts. A number NATO spending can cover.

      Trusted US and European news and social media dutifully push out the 47 number.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re: Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that... But imagine thinking that Twitter is a forum of meaningful debate... LMAO

    5. Re:Only 47? by blackomegax · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nice try, Russian divisive bullshit bot

    6. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah fuck off Ivan. We know what you're up to.

    7. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine they filtered out the simplistic dickheads and went for the state sponsored stuff. Besides, thousands of Russian accounts may somehow be easier to notice.

    8. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like SCO$699FeeTroll ?

    9. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *pastime*, you dullard.

    10. Re:Only 47? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Paid trolls confirmed to be working for the Russian government on Moscow time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who actually gives a fuck, what some random trolls tweet? Are there even more than 47 actual readers of twitter in UK? To many of us, whole twitter seems to be a channel where spam-bots send billions of advertisement messages to billions of fake-accounts.

    12. Re: Only 47? by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      500 contractors watching 47 accounts?

      You do realize that we have these fancy doohickeys called "computers" these days, right?

    13. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 47 are government backed accounts run by Russia's IRA. This isn't about random people trolling on the internet, this is about state sanctioned propaganda designed to divide Western society.

      Congratulations on falling for it, I think the term is "useful idiot".

    14. Re:Only 47? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Seriously 47? I call bullshit, there have to be more Russian trolls on twitter at any given second.

      I suspect that just stopped creating more once they realized that they could not possibly do a better job in dividing Britain than the Conservative party was doing all by itself. They are so divided that recently they even threatened to sue their own MPs.

    15. Re:Only 47? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 0

      2 problems here:

      1) the original link to the Guardian article
      2) your link to the Guardian article.

      The Guardian is the worst kind of "lets tell the truth, but just leave out this bit and that bit, those facts are never relevant to the story"... Read a few other newspapers takes on the same story and you'll see the misrepresentation the Guardian loves to peddle.

      Anyway, only the other day they were saying Russia spent 73p on adverts designed to mess with British politics, its laughable how much they were blamed and how little they did.

      Guido has a piece on it where the FT (A very pro-EU paper) admits:

      This is the latest evidence-based story countering the meme being pushed by Remainers that somehow Russia caused Brexit. Over the last few weeks:

              Twitter said only one Russian account spent any money promoting tweets during the referendum, and they only bought six adverts.
              It emerged that most Russian Twitter activity about Brexit actually took place after the referendum.
              And a number of the Russia-linked Twitter accounts were actually pro-Remain.
              Google told the Electoral Commission it had found no evidence of any paid Russian activity during the referendum.
              Facebook said Russia spent a total of 73p on adverts during the referendum, and they reached 200 people.
              An account accused by one pro-Remain outlet of being a Russian troll turned out to be a run by a security guard in Glasgow.

      But hey, these days somebody has to be Eurasia, and its been decided that Russia fits the "bogeyman" profile.

    16. Re:Only 47? by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      More likely simply English speaking Russian who like to take the piss out of the US and UK governments. I reckon both are up tight murderous freakazoids and I do seriously enjoy taking the piss out of the US government as a result and I am Australian mate, simply fuck em, murderous cunts. I am quite simply shocked there are not tens of thousands of Russian revelling in taking the piss out of the US and UK governments, just 47, I doubt that. Population of Russia, smart and well educated, I would have thought something more in the order of at least 10,000 Russians getting the jollies trolling the fuck out of both the US and UK government, damned those fuckers are more well behaved than Australians. You kill our people in your fucking bullshit wars, expect real long term enduring repercussions until justice is served. When the US choose to start killing Don Cossacks in the Ukraine, I was expecting worse, the Russian government managed a fine balance between generating hostility against themselves from Don Cossacks and giving them some space to express their opinions, aggressively when it comes to western powers.

      Expect a lot more trolls out of Russia, a whole bunch more, now that they can see how easy it is to poke the egos of the psychopaths that run the US and UK governments, you haven't seen anything yet. Now that they have seen how much fun westerners can have taking the piss, especially out of the US government, they are bound to join in and in big numbers. Oh wow, the pompous git running the CIA, oh noes, demons are attacking us, now that's fucking funny.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:Only 47? by ilguido · · Score: 1

      What? Are you serious? The shockingly diminutive numbers of the alleged Russian campaign on Twitter & Facebook (they spent tens of thousands of dollars over a year! tens of thousands, I tell you!!11!!) were the artificially inflated result of a computer-assisted, paranoid review. I mean, they included among the suspected Russian trolls even those that have a cyrillic character in their username or that logged even once from Russia. Well that last one makes sense: I'm sure that Hillary Clinton logged from Russia more than once.
      Jokes aside, to hijack the Brexit referendum, Russia allegedly spent up to 1$. Maybe Russians have loads of internet trolls, but Brexit, the Donald, racists, social warriors, divisions, the internet craziness are not their fault: they were all home-produced.

    18. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horn Wumpus is a dumb bitch acting extra stupid to try to pretend only 47 people were involved.

    19. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's twitard. Users are almost entirely mouth-breathing dullards with all the critical assessment faculties of an overripe banana.

    20. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Twit" is certainly an apt name for anyone who uses that garbage.

    21. Re: Only 47? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "You do realize that we have these fancy doohickeys called "computers" these days, right?"
      That would take away from 3 contractors sitting around watching the one account owner.
      8 to 12 hours later the next shift of 3 take over.
      Given average working hours and the number of shifts over a day with weekends, thats a lot of new surveillance work to cover 47 people who are working 47 real accounts..
      3 people per shift allows for the new NSA enforced buddy system. Nobody can be alone doing NATO contract work.
      Why use a computer to just track 47 accounts when a few hundred new jobs just got created.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    22. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously 47? I call bullshit, there have to be more Russian trolls on twitter at any given second. And Americans, and Germans, and Australians, and Indians. Trolling is a world wide passtime.

      Lets see, stats show UK is responsible for about 10% of all tweets, which equates to about 20 Billion UK tweets per year. . So this russion activity represents about 0.00008 % of tweets/retweets....I'm sure its having a huge effect.

    23. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many trolls in Russia. These are the white power, racists neo-pagan, "we love nazis and drink vodka out of their helmets while drawing funny symbols at the ground" kind of trolls.

    24. Re:Only 47? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      The handlers of the GCHQ bots complained that there were posts opposing their bots so they concluded it must have been russians.

    25. Re:Only 47? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      In fact it's always hard to say because of all the idiots around and because of the effectiveness of the propaganda , but it's plausible that a lot of the 'fuck off ivan' posts are from shills from the so-called good side. The budget is a lot larger , it's cheap, and it adds to the general feeling.

    26. Re: Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like most of the comments trashing or minimizing the idea of organized Russian trolling, that's just what a Krembot would say. Stating "I am an Australian" doesn't count as proof and is an odd thing to assert in this context.

      Really any comment here doing down the West or claiming there's a moral equivalence between Russia and the West or they're all as bad as each other (or mentioning NATO at all) is a good indication of a paid Russian troll.

    27. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brit Trotsky-Lords deserve a good azz-fucking for letting in the slant/bantu and muzzi-wog race pollution. Aren't Anglo/Saxons enough? Best bust-up some Oxbridge gaffot pussy , hang the PM and scab cocksuckers and drive-the-kfir into cold/muddy Temes.

      Could be worse, could be a cowardly russian waste-of-space cunt who let his country turn back into a dictatorship in record time. Shameful, pathetic, dickheads you are.

    28. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same Russians who let Putin take the whole place over and annihilate all dissent? tbh I'm laughing at them mate. They might be fucking up other democracies but what have they got? A KGB emperor.

      You can badmouth Trump in the US, you can call Maybot a cunt in the UK. Be careful what you say about Putin in Russia.

      And that's why the Russian population are a bunch of cowardly fucks. They watch the TV and think Putin's sticking it to the world because they can't face what a bunch of pathetic cunts they really are.

      Funny that you seem to think the Australian government are somehow moral. Easter Island would like a fucking word. How about the 'abbos' that you treat like fucking shit.

    29. Re:Only 47? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There is still debate: Twit or twat?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    30. Re:Only 47? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The best trolls don't work for government. They do it because the love it, same as all great artists.

      Don't neglect the positive effect of trolls in breaking up circle jerks. There are groups that _deserve_ trolling and any other mockery they get. Laughter is a weapon.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    31. Re: Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But.. but.. YOU'RE WRONG! Because REASONS, plus IT'S THE CURRENT YEAR!!

    32. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do Australians like being peed on? Seems kind of weird to me.

      -An American

    33. Re:Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Misanthropes are deranged idiot fucktards, and you just admitted you are one.

    34. Re: Only 47? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the unholy offspring of an Essex boot boy, a blood from an indeterminate 'hood and a St Petersburg troll whose personality has begun to disintegrate under the strain of too many false identities.

    35. Re: Only 47? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Really any comment here doing down the West or claiming there's a moral equivalence between Russia and the West or they're all as bad as each other (or mentioning NATO at all) is a good indication of a paid Russian troll.

      Yes, anyone who criticises any aspect of US/Western life is definitely a paid Russian troll, because we are perfect and they are 100% evil, simple as that.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. So did Russia also sponsor those attacks? by Balial · · Score: 2

    Or is that just too much conspiracy?

    1. Re: So did Russia also sponsor those attacks? by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course they did. They also faked the moon landing and gave the footage to NASA.

    2. Re: So did Russia also sponsor those attacks? by Balial · · Score: 2

      That also explains the chemtrails that cause climate change!

    3. Re: So did Russia also sponsor those attacks? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      It's true. And the goddamn Russians are already trying to cover up the truth by modding my last comment "flamebait". Just wait, they'll come after you, too!

    4. Re:So did Russia also sponsor those attacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a step too far, and the magnitude x probability of blowback far too high. But look the other way and let it happen? *Maybe*.

      It's like 9/11... BushCo didn't "do" it and anyone who thinks they did is an idiot. But did they perhaps... suspect it was coming? And decide to let it happen so they could play Middle East Adventure with other people's lives? Impossible to prove either way... But Cheney is that kind of soulless evil though (what kind of person in his place in 2006 would be stumped when asked what their biggest mistake was? A sociopathic narcissist who literally cannot understand the idea that they were wrong).

    5. Re: So did Russia also sponsor those attacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was one of their most deviant ploys. NASA did not realize how easy it is to debunk the Russian fakes (wrong shadows, flag waving in vacuum) and went along with it. Big mistake. Sad!

  3. JFK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Russia built a time machine and killed JFK today.

    1. Re:JFK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But, he was already dead yesterday -- making it unnecessary for them to go back and kill him today.

    2. Re:JFK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they weren't aware they had been the ones to kill him, and went back in time to do it first...ending up having been the ones to do it in the first place.

    3. Re: JFK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'You're not thinking fourth-dimensionally, Marty!'

  4. i.e. Unite against a common enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sort of, they divide into factions, then align the gullible faction to a pro-Russian stance. i.e. its supposed to create factions so afraid of muslims, then we all unite with Putin against the muslim threat. 5 eyes would become 5+1 eyes, giving Putin access to surveillance data on other 5 eyes nations, and expanding his ability to attack other democracies, all under cover of protecting USA from this threat.

    So you see this in Syria, where Trump identified Isis as the USA's biggest threat (it isn't, it's Russia), and Putin did the same, and the trolls bigged up the threat as a general threat from muslims. Putin then bombs all of Assads enemies (muslims and US allies), and Trump gives him political cover.

    See the uniting bit? That's really the payoff. Mueller is arrested Putin's money launderers and Hannity is laying down smoke to cover for these Russians, Hannity's so aligned to the message and united to their cause, he forgets he's selling out America.

    You see the same thing here, where they organized a "Stop Islamation of Texas' protest to stop Texas turning muslim (!) and to give them something to push against, a counter protest against the racist one:
    http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-trolls-senate-intelligence-committee-hearing-2017-11

    Once people buy into this nonsense, their self worth becomes attached to it. They can't admit to being wrong, so they keep up the pretense and can be led further and further astray.

  5. Oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I totally believe this guys! You should too.
    The Russians stole my sandwich today also.

    1. Re: Oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Funny? You Russians sure do have a strange sense of humor and obviously like hearing the same "joke" over and over.

  6. I refuse to believe this MSM bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    there is no more Russian trolls/hackers than anywhere else. This leftist conspiracy nonsense has to stop

    1. Re:I refuse to believe this MSM bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your neckbeard retard head in the sand then

  7. Let's be honest here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying this IS RUSSIA doing this can only ever be based on stuff that is so easily forge-able as to be proof of nothing, other than someone wants us to THINK RUSSIA IS DOING THIS.

    If anything, what is more interesting is how the media pretends the accusations are not farcical. Except.. Media Ownership.

  8. Re: Capture: Forsty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Slashdot is going to delete offtopic spam like they did in the Coinbase article, be consistent and delete this post as well. Deleting posts is a slippery slope, but if you're deleting spammy posts, an ASCII art depiction of the n-word should be removed.

  9. OH SHUT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    russia and north korea have better things to do than dick around on the internet to screw with 5eyes

  10. Reposted about 300 times each by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And created some sort of ill-defined "discord" -- maybe.

    Meanwhile, U.S. "journalist" Brian Ross's fake news about Michael Flynn was retweeted over 25,000 times in less than half a day and caused the stock market to tank.

    So yes, let's definitely keep the focus where it belongs -- on a handful of posts from Rooshun nobodies. Because that's clearly what's dividing everyone.

    1. Re:Reposted about 300 times each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      typical what-about-ism.

      let's focus on the topic at hand - that twitter accounts, controlled in all likely hood by Russian intelligence services, are attempting to sow discord in the UK.

    2. Re:Reposted about 300 times each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "in all likely hood"

      What, so there's no evidence, YET AGAIN??

      Those of us with a brain are getting pretty tired of the constant DNC/establishment propaganda designed to distract from their criminal activities by screaming "RUSSIA!" multiple times per day. FOAD, losers.

    3. Re: Reposted about 300 times each by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The newspapers in the UK are far more effective at sowing discord than a few trolls on a platform that the majority of the country doesn't use.

    4. Re:Reposted about 300 times each by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What-about-ism. This kind of crap is what lead to the murder of a British Member of Parliament. It's not trivial or unimportant.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Reposted about 300 times each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DNC? This is a British academic institution, you self-centred pillock.

    6. Re:Reposted about 300 times each by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2

      What-about-ism.

      Well, no. It's exactly this kind of tripe that IS the what-about-ism. Show me the first article on this site about the Brian Ross debacle. There isn't a single one (and that holds true for the vast majority of attempts by the official media channels to foment the masses), yet we're treated to several poorly written, poorly sourced, handwaving articles a week about supposed Reds under our beds. It's nothing but a distraction from the misinformation campaign we're treated to on a daily basis from the supposed good guys.

      This kind of crap is what lead to the murder of a British Member of Parliament.

      Rank speculation. Your article didn't even come close to connecting those dots.

    7. Re: Reposted about 300 times each by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      More people use social media than read newspapers in the UK.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Reposted about 300 times each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who read newspapers explicitly do so to, y'know, read the news. Most people don't explicitly go on social media for news.

      You're being disengenious, and you know it.

    9. Re: Reposted about 300 times each by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Since when is Twitter the entirety of social media and how many of the over 60s who voted for Brexit spend their time on there? Facebook is vastly more popular here and the Russian influence on there was ruled negligible by the Electoral Commission. If you have some compelling evidence that Putin did it then you'd better let them know, otherwise give it a fucking rest already.

    10. Re:Reposted about 300 times each by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not speculation. The murderer tried to cite Russian posts as evidence in his trial. Some of them were retweeted by Britain First, whose name he murdered in.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolling is practically free, successful physical attacks are hard and expensive. Worse getting away uncaught is harder, and unlike trolling (which is nebulous and plays on internal division) getting caught doing physical violence makes you a target and worse undoes your previous work as a *clear* and *external* common enemy, tends to bring societies together.

  12. The Cleverest Social Media in the World by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Funny

    47 accounts that have a hall full of the best anthropologists, psychologists, psychiatrists and propagandists to support them.
    Halls of select staff in isolated, sealed military cities.
    Hand crafting every word on typewriters to ensure total security from the NSA and GCHQ.
    The final approved message is transmitted by number station https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... deep into the UK.
    After the one time pad is used once a message is released on to waiting social media in a NATO nation.
    The account has a real ip and looks like an average ISP. Using a desktop computer and consumer OS.
    The ill equipped minds of the average European cant handle the flow of such quality statements.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The Cleverest Social Media in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on - look at Russia and you tell me that they can on one hand topple western governments via twitter and on the other hand their own country is going to hell? I think your paranoia is affecting your judgement somewhat.

    2. Re:The Cleverest Social Media in the World by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The sad part is that even when they forget to turn location tracking off and it says "Moscow" right there on their Facebook page most people don't notice. They don't check the source, they just re-post it on their own feed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:The Cleverest Social Media in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Masterfully done.

  13. Has the world gone mad? by William+Baric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Between the alt-right who thinks the Jews are controlling the world and the left who thinks it's Putin who is controlling the world, I'm beginning to think that flat-Earthers are not that bad after all.

    Am I the only person on this planet who is still sane?

    1. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      noone, everybodies still here, looks like the journalist rabble finally figured out how those bot things works and is now flooding the web with their lists and spam in hopes of getting in on the danegeld the google hath amassed from the various factions of the western lands, and in what seems to be an algorithmic circle jerk all the nubmers are getting boosted all around and its a race to see what you can post with the least effort and still remain monetized.

    2. Re:Has the world gone mad? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Follow the over time and funding.
      With every account discovered thats 3 unionized security service jobs created to watch the one account for 12 hours. 3 shifts of 3 people in 24h for years.
      Thats budget growth for the clandestine services, a bureaucratic success, more work for private sector contractors and a good news political story.
      More mil work if the special forces have enter a home.
      A good cyber news story can be the pathway to entire gov and mil careers.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What made you think there are distinct partitions?

    4. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Between the alt-right who thinks the Jews are controlling the world and the left who thinks it's Putin who is controlling the world

      If I think that Putin is Jewish, does that make me a centrist?

    5. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the Flat Earth guy plans to test his theory scientifically. He's completely nuts, but he's still less crazy than either of these.

      The last story about the $1 in Russian ads or whatever was hilarious though.

      I can't wait until we get the classified intercepts of Putin's orders to Trump to piss on the bed in the room where Hillary hid JFK's body in the basement of Comet Ping Pong Pizza next to Jimmy Hoffa's grave.

    6. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hhgttg: Wonko the Sane

    7. Re:Has the world gone mad? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Well, the Flat Earth guy plans to test his theory scientifically. He's completely nuts, but he's still less crazy than either of these.

      He plans to make money off donations and then accomplish nothing but spending it on himself. He's a scammer who is not nuts at all.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Has the world gone mad? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The rational thing to do is look at the evidence. There is evidence that Russia is influencing people in the West.

      Is it really surprising that Russia continues to use propaganda, especially now that we build these effective tools to disseminate it?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Has the world gone mad? by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      You arrogant Americans deserve what is comming to you. The foreign trolls have scented the death about you, the kids on 4chan think that it would be fun to take down your society with a frog. Even if only the Russians have been definitively detected as trying to sow discord in your society your arrogance makes you a big fat complacent target for anyone who wishes you ill. Serves you right I say, eaten from the inside out by Facebook the pinnacle of democratic capitalism.

      You seriously underestimate the power of propaganda now that social media can amplify it a millionfold. Have you never wondered why totalitarian societies have a tight grip on what information is transmitted through the internet? Let me give you a clue, they know that they can control their populations and you guys are about to find out what happens when your enemies control your population. Soon we will be buying buckets of popcorn and watching you turn your cities into piles of rubble like Syria. I am rather looking forward to Alex Jones'es armed inssurection when Trump finally gets called to acount for tax fraud or whatever Mueller manages to dig up on him.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    10. Re:Has the world gone mad? by William+Baric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, the rational thing to do is look at the evidence. So can we look at it? Because up to now, the only "evidence" is that there are people who say there is evidence, but we don't see any actual evidence. For example, can we look at those ads that RT America bought on Facebook to judge if the conspiracy theory can possibly be true? I'm asking this because I did see a few ads from RT in the past (not on Facebook since I don't use it), and they looked to me like all ads from any news media. It looked to me the goal of those ads were to attract viewers, nothing more.

      Anyway, do you realize the alt-right is also saying the evidence shows the Jews are controlling the world and trying to destroy white people? For example, they use the "Frankfurt School" and the "Kalergi plan" as evidence. They use the fact that owners of American media are disproportionately Jewish as evidence. They use an awful lot of facts to "prove" their conspiracy theory. Of course, none of the facts presented by the alt-right are logically valid arguments to support their conspiracy theory, but don't you see the people who claim that Russia was behind a propaganda effort to make sure Trump got elected are doing the exact same thing as the alt-right? Don't you see their conspiracy theory is as crazy as the conspiracy theory of the alt-right?

    11. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between the alt-right who thinks the Jews are controlling the world and the left who thinks it's Putin who is controlling the world, I'm beginning to think that flat-Earthers are not that bad after all.

      Am I the only person on this planet who is still sane?

      Join us, the radical centrists.

    12. Re:Has the world gone mad? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What about the social media accounts claiming to be ordinary British people, with hundreds of thousands of reposts, that only post during Moscow office hours and occasionally forget to delete their Moscow location data?

      Both the Frankfurt School and Kalergi plan are real too, but they are also very old news (like a century old) and the claims made about them don't stand up to scrutiny. The main difference is that those theories are all circumstantial, while Russian inference is specific and impossible to explain any other way.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Has the world gone mad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily you can spot them by their shit English. It's gotten so bad that there is an academic study that shows that online political debate's English has dropped to the level of a six year old. Well duh. Russian trolls don't speak perfect English and they are fucking everywhere.

    14. Re:Has the world gone mad? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Between the alt-right who thinks the Jews are controlling the world and the left who thinks it's Putin who is controlling the world, I'm beginning to think that flat-Earthers are not that bad after all.

      Am I the only person on this planet who is still sane?

      I thought the left was pro-Putin because he's not Donald Trump? Or something.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Has the world gone mad? by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes! I've seen that claim of the Moscow office hours that goes from 9 am to 9 pm (those Russians certainly do some serious shifts), as well as the professionals who "occasionally forget" to delete their location data (I guess Putin should not force his government employees to work 12 hours a day).

      Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure among those supposed fake "pro-Russian" social media accounts there were also teenagers in Russia who troll the shit out of people, trolls are not something that exists only in the West, but considering that as evidence of an organized campaign by Dr. Evil, err... I mean Putin, to "interfere" with Western democracies is as crazy as believing the Frankfurt School is evidence of the Jews being behind a conspiracy to destroy the "white race".

  14. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fork Newts!

  15. Re:Religion has no need to debate by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    We need -1 Annoying I spent 10 seconds reading it.

  16. Re:Look, guys, it is obvious what we need to do. by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    This is a perfect example of the type of divisive bullshit they'd be posting too. Almost too perfect of an example, actually...

  17. Color me purple and pink! by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Russians were trying to divide the country? That's awful! It could be worse, imagine if our own politicians were trying to divide the country! Oh, wait.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Color me purple and pink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason this is happening is that while most people agree that politics are divisive, they tend to believe that it is the other sides politics that are more divisive. The only way this ends is with the realisation that both sides are as bad as the other and that we all have more in common than we do with those outside our culture, or with bloody civil war where one side decimates the other.

    2. Re:Color me purple and pink! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The only way this ends is with the realisation that both sides are as bad as the other and that we all have more in common than we do with

      You can say that again. The different parties are much more alike than they are different. Each party thinks the other is led by Hitler. We are so similar that politicians need to use very small things to try to divide us (like abortion).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Color me purple and pink! by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      How exactly, do you know this divide isn't escalated largely by these actions, and how do we know it's ONLY 47 accounts?

      I for one, remember quite vividly how all of a sudden, even here on /., after the Ukrainian invasion by Russia, there was a sudden influx of almost trollish proposals of idiotic theories, how it was really the CIA (f.e.).

      Troll factories are real. Russia is at info-war with us. And they are really really good at it.

    4. Re:Color me purple and pink! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How exactly, do you know this divide isn't escalated largely by these actions, and how do we know it's ONLY 47 accounts?

      That's a very trollish question there. Show the evidence or you yourself have become the troll.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Color me purple and pink! by temcat · · Score: 1

      All these stories about Russian "attempts to divide" coupled with minuscule resources allegedly devoted to the task now smell like bullshit to me. Looks more like someone has found a bunch of accounts of people who may indeed be linked to Russian government but hasn't found any evidence of them taking a definite side on political issues as a group (because they've been likely expressing their own views as individuals). That, however, would not make a story, so it was decided to portray the situation as an "attempt to divide" because in any case, it's not possible to prove otherwise.

      Meanwhile, the so called trolls (actually, sockpuppets) are really active in the Russian part of the Internet, and have two kinds of tactics which are more or less effective: defend the government's POV on the issue at hand or simply flood the forum with all kinds of trash, usually of toxic nature, to suppress normal discussion. The latter only works in limited circumstances. I will therefore really believe stories about Russian meddling when there will be evidence of Russian agents take a certain side reasonably beneficial to the Russian government.

    6. Re:Color me purple and pink! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, the so called trolls (actually, sockpuppets) are really active in the Russian part of the Internet, and have two kinds of tactics which are more or less effective: defend the government's POV on the issue at hand

      I don't know if that's the government though (it might be, I don't know), but there are plenty of average Russian citizens who will willingly do that without getting paid. Just like there are plenty of people in America who willingly defend Trump when he says stupid things.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  18. We doing that lock step US/UK thing like Iraqi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We doing that lock step US/UK thing like Iraqi?

    Fucking great.

    We didn't learn anything.

  19. Please stop posting Guardian propaganda here. by AbRASiON · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm sick of this ridiculous, endless "THE RUSSIANS DID IT" stuff. The evidence is normally lacking or asinine. The Guardian and particular outlets have an ongoing boogeyman with this Russian stuff, which has reached a point to have become absurd.

    "WHITE MALE RUSSIANS DID IT"
    Etc

    We're over it. You've cried wolf, stupidly, one too many times and now, even if you're right, we're probably not going to listen anymore.

    1. Re:Please stop posting Guardian propaganda here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU Yuri.

    2. Re:Please stop posting Guardian propaganda here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that using racism as your only rebuttal undermines your own position, right?

    3. Re:Please stop posting Guardian propaganda here. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      That's an amazingly low bar for racism if you think that's racist.

  20. How about using that intelligence and by shm · · Score: 1

    figuring out where the real terrorists are coming from?

    Instead of making countries safer, they're going after internet trolls?

    Good grief. Way to distract from their own incompetence. Or is it collusion?

  21. Re: Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because xenophobia is ok as long as it's against white people

  22. Re: Russia by shilly · · Score: 1

    What makes you think others think that it's OK for Western nations to be doing this either?

    It's not OK when the US does it, and it's not OK when Russia does it.

  23. They're certainly quick... by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 2

    I was going to remark that we could expect Russian apologists to swarm to this story in three, two...but I was too late. They're already on it like flies on a fresh turd.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  24. but, why? by sad_ · · Score: 0

    i can understand they try to influence elections, but why influence the terrorist attacks debate? how does that benefit them?

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  25. Will the UK government provide approved opinions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to be mistaken for a troll! I want my opinion to matter to other Twitter users.

  26. Re:Look, guys, it is obvious what we need to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a perfect example of the type of divisive bullshit they'd be posting too. Almost too perfect of an example, actually...

    Great one Sergei, playing the irony card. You deserve a medal from Putin himself for this one.

  27. USA = lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putin dropped few hundred thou into social media and scored Brexit and Trump while shit like Clinton wasted billions and still lost. I know who my overlords are.

  28. The Division by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

    The division, which only exists because people are now hyper-aware of terrorism and related issues, goes something like:

    Right: Terrorism is bad; open borders contribute to insecure nations. We shouldn't have open borders.

    Left: This is our new way of life; you are a racist if you can't deal with it.

    1. Re:The Division by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The division, which only exists because people are now hyper-aware of terrorism and related issues, goes something like:

      Right: Terrorism is bad; open borders contribute to insecure nations. We shouldn't have open borders.

      Left: This is our new way of life; you are a racist if you can't deal with it.

      Gosh, I wonder whether you are on the right or Left? So hard to tell from your finely balanced strawman.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  29. Miller Lite by tsqr · · Score: 1

    This whole thing reminds me of the old Miller Lite commercial where Conrad Dobler stirs up trouble between "tastes great" guy and the "less filling" guy.

  30. Re: Capture: Forsty by Maritz · · Score: 1

    The edgy neckbeard manchildren like it, so it'll stay.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  31. Re: Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same AC posting. I've posted all the AC comments in this thread so far except the OP. I agree with you that the US and other Western nations shouldn't be meddling b in elections and in the affairs of other countries. I don't think it's okay for the US to be engaging in such activities. However, many in the West are complaining about Russian meddling while tolerating their own government doing it. The US has done a lot of meddling in foreign affairs, often covertly. We like to pretend that we're spreading democracy, but we've propped up some pretty nefarious regimes that were anything but democratic. I really don't understand why more people aren't troubled by the hypocrisy, which is what I was trying to point out. Again, I totally agree with what you're saying.

  32. Re: Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm... I didn't post the one about xenophobia against white people, either. I'm not sure what they're going on about, but it doesn't make a lot of sense. I don't think meddling in the affairs of other countries works out well for those countries (or for us, in many cases) and I'd like us to stop doing so covertly and severely limit our activities. I'm okay with us trying to encourage the people of North Korea to overthrow the Kim regime, but that's about as far as I'm willing to go.

  33. Re: Russia by shilly · · Score: 1

    Well, some people do think it's OK, but many people don't. Why focus on the ones who do? Focusing on that hypocrisy risks ignoring or minimising or whatabouting the very real problem of Russian meddling. It also doesn't solve the problem of Western meddling. The hypocrisy is not as bad as the meddling.

  34. You sure about decimation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you positive it would be a rout?

  35. Re: Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook and Twitter aren't capable of stopping nations from using their services for the purpose of meddling in the affairs of other nations. Many of the attempts by Facebook to cracking down on meddling in foreign affairs also have side effect of seriously eroding privacy. It's also a form of censorship and Facebook doesn't have a good record of being judicious in its use of censorship.

    The solution to the foreign meddling is an individual one in countries that have the freedom. People need to be skeptical of what they're told, and not believe something just because it's shared on social media or published on the internet. There's no substitute for questioning whether reports are plausible, examining the credibility of sources, and searching for multiple sources. Unfortunately, few people will actually do that, because it's easier to be lazy and more comfortable to remain within an echo chamber.

    Alternatively, we can stop the meddling, but this is no easy task. We meddle in the affairs of other countries because it appears to benefit us at the time. In many cases, this occurs at the expense of the country we're meddling on, and other countries. We do it to expand our circle of influence. It's no secret that Russia has felt threatened by former Soviet and Eastern Bloc countries joining NATO and otherwise aligning with the West. As a result, they've ramped up their meddling even more. As long as neither side makes a gesture of trust, the meddling will continue from both sides.

    Most Americans probably never even make the connection in their minds that our government is meddling in the affairs of foreign countries. We also portray it as being good and noble, using the term spreading democracy. If the meddling is to stop, our citizens will need to insist that we change our foreign policy. As long as we look the other way or pretend it's good and noble, the government will continue its meddling.

    This doesn't mean protectionism or isolationism as some would like. It means not being manipulative and exploitative. And it means being forward thinking and interacting globally where our interests align with the best interests of others.

    To put it in terms that nerds should appreciate, our diplomacy should be more like that of Jean-Luc Picardy and less like the foreign policy of the Romulan Star Empire.

  36. Hello paid troll by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    The trolls here are easily identifiable. Often, they're the ones lamenting Russian trolling, which isn't present here--you'd have to be delusional to think the russian government knows or cares about slashdot. On the other hand, corporate and government trolls from the US have been here for years, calling Assange a rapist, snowden a double agent, glenn greenwald a liar and bradley manning a coward. We see trolls lying about how the ISPs secretly desire network neutrality, and about how global warming is a hoax. Now compared to all that, find me one post here extolling Putin. Go ahead.