Slashdot Mirror


Facial Scans at US Airports Violate Americans' Privacy, Report Says (nytimes.com)

Ron Nixon, writing for The New York Times: A new report concludes that a Department of Homeland Security pilot program improperly gathers data on Americans when it requires passengers embarking on foreign flights to undergo facial recognition scans to ensure they haven't overstayed visas. The report, released on Thursday by researchers at the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown University's law school, called the system an invasive surveillance tool that the department has installed at nearly a dozen airports without going through a required federal rule-making process. The report's authors examined dozens of Department of Homeland Security documents and raised questions about the accuracy of facial recognition scans. They said the technology had high error rates and are subject to bias, because the scans often fail to properly identify women and African-Americans. "It's telling that D.H.S. cannot identify a single benefit actually resulting from airport face scans at the departure gate," said Harrison Rudolph, an associate at the center and one of the report's co-authors. "D.H.S. doesn't need a face-scanning system to catch travelers without a photo on file. It's alarming that D.H.S. still hasn't supplied evidence for the necessity of this $1 billion program," he added.

8 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Security theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has NEVER required evidence for the necessity. Why should this be any different?

  2. Remember who this treatment is reserved for by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Airport security only applies to those of us who fly commercial. When is the last time the top critters in our government flew commercial? Some of them might never have. When you can charter your own aircraft you don't have to go through security, you go straight to the airplane cabin door. Same deal with government aircraft. These people get treatment that is better than the best we can buy, and they have no reason to care about what the rest of us go through.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  3. Goat Rope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They can build a $1 billion program to catch people leaving late, but cannot do a single thing to keep people out. Besides, what's the penalty if they're on a flight home one day past their visa? Throw them in jail and then send them home?

  4. Overstaying visas? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it requires passengers embarking on foreign flights to undergo facial recognition scans to ensure they haven't overstayed visas.

    Okay, maybe I’m missing something...

    So if I’m visiting the US and I overstay my visa. Now I’m getting on an airplane to leave the country and they want to make sure that I didn’t overstay?

    Hello? I’m leaving...

    What, you’re going to arrest me for overstaying my visa while I’m leaving? And you’re going to spend a billion dollars to catch me as I do just what you want me to do—leave!

    Really? My tax dollars at work...

    1. Re:Overstaying visas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PROTIP: It's an excuse to spy on American citizens

    2. Re:Overstaying visas? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just so that they can spend more money to detain you, give you a trial, make you serve a prison sentence for overstaying your visa, and then send you home at taxpayer expense. All instead of just letting you leave on your own.

  5. We Hold Neccesity of Revenue to be Self-Evident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "D.H.S. doesn't need a face-scanning system to catch travelers without a photo on file. It's alarming that D.H.S. still hasn't supplied evidence for the necessity of this $1 billion program," he added.

    Private companies got $1 billion in revenue.

    This is America. What greater necessity could there be than a company making money?

  6. Catching the wrong people by XXongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when do Americans need a visa to visit America? By definition anyone carrying a US passport should be exempt, if you believe their excuse for doing the scans.

    What part of scanning everybody are you having problems with? They are scanning everybody, Americans and non-Americans alike, in order to catch the ones with expired visas.

    What I don't get: these are people leaving the country. If somebody has an expired visa, what they are supposed to do is to leave the country. I don't see the point of a billion-dollar program (!) to catch the people leaving; what they're supposed to be doing is catching the people on expired visas who are not leaving the country.